Influence of acid etching on shear strength of different glass ionomer cements

Bortoletto, Carolina Carvalho; Miranda Junior, Walter Gomes; Motta, Lara Jansiski; Bussadori, Sandra Kalil

Abstract

AIM: To assess the influence of dental etching on the shear strength of different glass ionomer cements. METHODS: The crown of 60 bovine incisors was prepared to obtain a flat, smooth surface, were attached to a PVC tube and randomly divided into six groups: Group 1 - Riva Self Cure without etching; Group II - Riva Self Cure with pre-etching; Group III - Maxxion R without etching; Group IV - Maxxion R with pre-etching; Group V - KetacTM Molar Easymix without etching; and Group VI - KetacTM Molar Easymix with pre-etching. Etching was performed with 10% polyacrylic acid for 30 s. A standardizing device was used for preparation of the test specimens (SBS Test Method). Following preparation, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37° C for 24 h. The shear test was performed on a Kratos universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The specimens were then viewed under a stereomicroscope at a magnification of x90 for analysis of fractures. RESULTS: The results revealed that pre-etching increased the shear strength of Riva glass ionomer cement (SDI) alone, whereas no statistically significant differences were found with regard to the other materials tested. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-etching with 10% polyacrylic acid for 30 s increased the shear strength of Riva glass ionomer cement.

glass ionomer cement; shear strength; dentin

¹
Blatt JA, Goes FM. Microleakage in cavities prepared on primary and sclerotic dentin restored with resin modified glass ionomer. Rev Fac Odontol São Jose Campos. 2001; 4: 61-6.
²
Gateau P, Sabek M, Dayley B. in vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 149-55.
³
França TRT, Sedycias M, Silva RJ, Beatrice LCS, Silva CHV. Use of glass ionomer cement : a systematic review. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin integr. 2010; 10: 301-7.
⁴
Ngo H. Glass-ionomer cements as restorative and preventive materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54: 551-63.
⁵
Costa CAS, Ribeiro APD, Giro EMA, Randall RC, Hebling J. Pulp response after application of two resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) in deep cavities of prepared human teeth. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: e158-e170.
⁶
Choi K, Oshida Y, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Yi K. Microtensile bond strenght of glass ionomer cements to artificially created carious dentin. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 590-7.
⁷
Fagundes TC. influence of ultrasound on the bond strength of glass ionomer cements to dentin. Bauru: Universidade de São Paulo; 2005. 104p.
⁸
Çehrli CZ, Akca T, Altay N. Bond strengths of polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to primary dentin. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 47A-50A.
⁹
Mussolino ZM, Borsatto MC, Turbino ML. Shear bond strength of a sealant using components of na adhesive system. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo. 1998; 12: 389-94.
¹⁰
Cardoso PEC, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 1998; 14: 394-8.
¹¹
Tao L, Pashley DH, McGuckin R. in vivo bond strength : effect of depth and tooth type. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 285 [abstract 1411]
¹²
Gray SE, Burgess JO. An in vivo an in vitro comparison of two dentin bonding agents. Dent Mater. 1991; 7: 161-5.
¹³
Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 1993; 9: 19-22.
¹⁴
Chain MC, Chain JB, Leinfelder KF. Hybrid glass-ionomer cements. Dentin bond strength and bondin mechanism. Using electron microscopy. RGO. 2000; 48: 42-9.
¹⁵
Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson SA, Wilson AD. improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res. 1982; 61: 1416-22.
¹⁶
Raggio DP, Sonego FG, Camargo LB, Marquezan M, imparato JC. Efficiency of different polyacrilic acid concentrations on the smear layer, after ART technique, by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11: 232-5.
¹⁷
Castro MFS, Costa JF, Costa EL, Padilha LN, Lopes FF. Effect of chlorhexidine on the adhesion of glass ionomer cement used in atraumatic restorations, using microleakage test. RGO. 2010; 58: 167-71.
¹⁸
Van Meerbeek B, AL E. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin : current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 215-35.
¹⁹
De Munck J, AL E. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue : method and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118-32.
²⁰
Cunnigham MP, Meires JC. The effect of dentin desinfectants on shear bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence int. 1997; 28: 545-51.
²¹
inoue S, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Sano H, Suzuki k, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent. 2004; 29: 685-92.
²²
Hibino Y, Kuramochi K, Harashima A, Honda M, Yamazaki A, Nagasawa Y, et al. Correlation between the strength of glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to bovine teeth. Dent Mater J. 2004; 23: 656-60.
²³
Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentin using four conditioners. J Dent. 2000; 28: 361-6.
²⁴
Rekha CV, Varma B, Jayanthi. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer and comomer: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012; 3: 282-7.
²⁵
Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Cimmino A, Tyas MJ. The evaluation of four conditioners for glass ionomer cements using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. J Dent. 2001; 29: 131-8.
²⁶
Hinoura KO, Moore BK, Phillips RW. Influence of dentin surface treatments on the bond strength of dentin lining cements. Oper Dent. 1986; 11: 14754.
²⁷
Banomyong D, Palamara JEA, Burrow MF, Messer HH. Effect of dentin conditioning on dentin permeability and micro-shear bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007; 115: 502-9.
²⁸
El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin : effect of smear layer tickness and different dentin conditioners. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 10: 471-9.
²⁹
Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 454-62.

Publication Dates

Publication in this collection
04 June 2013
Date of issue
Mar 2013

History

Received
09 Nov 2012
Accepted
04 Feb 2013

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

[1] ¹
Blatt JA, Goes FM. Microleakage in cavities prepared on primary and sclerotic dentin restored with resin modified glass ionomer. Rev Fac Odontol São Jose Campos. 2001; 4: 61-6.

[2] ²
Gateau P, Sabek M, Dayley B. in vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 149-55.

[3] ³
França TRT, Sedycias M, Silva RJ, Beatrice LCS, Silva CHV. Use of glass ionomer cement : a systematic review. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin integr. 2010; 10: 301-7.

[4] ⁴
Ngo H. Glass-ionomer cements as restorative and preventive materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54: 551-63.

[5] ⁵
Costa CAS, Ribeiro APD, Giro EMA, Randall RC, Hebling J. Pulp response after application of two resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) in deep cavities of prepared human teeth. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: e158-e170.

[6] ⁶
Choi K, Oshida Y, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Yi K. Microtensile bond strenght of glass ionomer cements to artificially created carious dentin. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 590-7.

[7] ⁷
Fagundes TC. influence of ultrasound on the bond strength of glass ionomer cements to dentin. Bauru: Universidade de São Paulo; 2005. 104p.

[8] ⁸
Çehrli CZ, Akca T, Altay N. Bond strengths of polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to primary dentin. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 47A-50A.

[9] ⁹
Mussolino ZM, Borsatto MC, Turbino ML. Shear bond strength of a sealant using components of na adhesive system. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo. 1998; 12: 389-94.

[10] ¹⁰
Cardoso PEC, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 1998; 14: 394-8.

[11] ¹¹
Tao L, Pashley DH, McGuckin R. in vivo bond strength : effect of depth and tooth type. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 285 [abstract 1411]

[12] ¹²
Gray SE, Burgess JO. An in vivo an in vitro comparison of two dentin bonding agents. Dent Mater. 1991; 7: 161-5.

[13] ¹³
Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 1993; 9: 19-22.

[14] ¹⁴
Chain MC, Chain JB, Leinfelder KF. Hybrid glass-ionomer cements. Dentin bond strength and bondin mechanism. Using electron microscopy. RGO. 2000; 48: 42-9.

[15] ¹⁵
Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson SA, Wilson AD. improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res. 1982; 61: 1416-22.

[16] ¹⁶
Raggio DP, Sonego FG, Camargo LB, Marquezan M, imparato JC. Efficiency of different polyacrilic acid concentrations on the smear layer, after ART technique, by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11: 232-5.

[17] ¹⁷
Castro MFS, Costa JF, Costa EL, Padilha LN, Lopes FF. Effect of chlorhexidine on the adhesion of glass ionomer cement used in atraumatic restorations, using microleakage test. RGO. 2010; 58: 167-71.

[18] ¹⁸
Van Meerbeek B, AL E. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin : current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 215-35.

[19] ¹⁹
De Munck J, AL E. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue : method and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118-32.

[20] ²⁰
Cunnigham MP, Meires JC. The effect of dentin desinfectants on shear bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence int. 1997; 28: 545-51.

[21] ²¹
inoue S, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Sano H, Suzuki k, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent. 2004; 29: 685-92.

[22] ²²
Hibino Y, Kuramochi K, Harashima A, Honda M, Yamazaki A, Nagasawa Y, et al. Correlation between the strength of glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to bovine teeth. Dent Mater J. 2004; 23: 656-60.

[23] ²³
Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentin using four conditioners. J Dent. 2000; 28: 361-6.

[24] ²⁴
Rekha CV, Varma B, Jayanthi. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer and comomer: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012; 3: 282-7.

[25] ²⁵
Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Cimmino A, Tyas MJ. The evaluation of four conditioners for glass ionomer cements using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. J Dent. 2001; 29: 131-8.

[26] ²⁶
Hinoura KO, Moore BK, Phillips RW. Influence of dentin surface treatments on the bond strength of dentin lining cements. Oper Dent. 1986; 11: 14754.

[27] ²⁷
Banomyong D, Palamara JEA, Burrow MF, Messer HH. Effect of dentin conditioning on dentin permeability and micro-shear bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007; 115: 502-9.

[28] ²⁸
El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin : effect of smear layer tickness and different dentin conditioners. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 10: 471-9.

[29] ²⁹
Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 454-62.

Brasil

Brasil

Influence of acid etching on shear strength of different glass ionomer cements

Abstract

Publication Dates

History