brag
Bragantia
Bragantia
0006-8705
1678-4499
Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
Campinas, SP, Brazil
The purpose of this work was the study of the efficiency of a 3³ factorial design, confounded in blocks of 9 units, in comparison with the completely randomized design. Approximately 300 cotton experiments were conducted during the years of 57/58, 58/59, 59/60 on different kinds of soils of the State of São Paulo. From the results of the experiments in which confounding was employed, we estimated what the experimental error would have been if this technique had not been used; a comparison was mode between the two experimental errors and the efficiency was calculated. Confounding in blocks of 9 units has presented a gain in precision of about 20% when compared with the completely randomized design.
Eficiência do delineamento fatorial 3³, em blocos de 9, em uma série de experimentos de adubação do algodoeiro1
Efficiency of a 3³ factorial design for cotton fertilizer experiments
Wanderley Rinaldo VenturiniI; Joassy de Paula Neves JorgeII
IEngenheiro-agrônomo
IILicenciada em Matemática, Seção de Técnica Experimental, Instituto Agronômico
RESUMO
Êste trabalho estuda a eficiência do delineamento fatorial 3³, em blocos de 9, em relação ao delineamento completamente casualizodo. Utilizaram-se cêrca de 260 experiências de adubação de olgodoeiro, realizadas nos anos de 1957/58, 1958/59 e 1959/60, em diferentes locais escolhidos, os quais abrangeram os principais tipos de solo cultivado com algodão no Estado de São Paulo. O confundimento em blocos de 9 foi, em média, 20% mais eficiente que o delineamento sem restrição.
SUMMARY
The purpose of this work was the study of the efficiency of a 3³ factorial design, confounded in blocks of 9 units, in comparison with the completely randomized design.
Approximately 300 cotton experiments were conducted during the years of 57/58, 58/59, 59/60 on different kinds of soils of the State of São Paulo. From the results of the experiments in which confounding was employed, we estimated what the experimental error would have been if this technique had not been used; a comparison was mode between the two experimental errors and the efficiency was calculated.
Confounding in blocks of 9 units has presented a gain in precision of about 20% when compared with the completely randomized design.
Texto completo disponivél apenas em PDF.
Full text available only in PDF format.
LITERATURA CITADA
Recebido para publicação em 28 de maio de 1962.
1
Os autores agradecem à Seção de Algodão do Instituto Agronômico, que gentilmente cedeu os dados originais para o presente trabalho.
1. COCHRAN, W. G. &. COX, G. M. Experimental Design. 2.Ş edição. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1957. 611p.
Experimental Design
1957
COCHRAN
W. G.
COX
G. M.
2. FISHER, R. A. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd, 1937. 260p.
The Design of Experiments
1937
FISHER
R. A.
3. NEVES, O. SILVEIRA, FRAGA JR., C. G. [e outros] Ensaios de adubação do algodoeiro. Campinas, Instituto Agronômico, 1960. 33p. (Boletim n.° 1 14).
Ensaios de adubação do algodoeiro
1960
NEVES
O. SILVEIRA
FRAGA JR.
C. G.
Authorship
Wanderley Rinaldo Venturini
Joassy de Paula Neves Jorge
Instituto Agronômico, Seção de Técnica Experimental , , BrazilInstituto AgronômicoBrazil, BrazilInstituto Agronômico, Seção de Técnica Experimental , , Brazil
SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS
Instituto Agronômico, Seção de Técnica Experimental , , BrazilInstituto AgronômicoBrazil, BrazilInstituto Agronômico, Seção de Técnica Experimental , , Brazil
How to cite
Venturini, Wanderley Rinaldo and Jorge, Joassy de Paula Neves. Efficiency of a 3³ factorial design for cotton fertilizer experiments. Bragantia [online]. 1962, v. 21, n. unico [Accessed 16 April 2025], pp. 631-637. Available from: <https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051962000100035>. Epub 02 Mar 2010. ISSN 1678-4499. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051962000100035.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.