menu menu_open
Brasil
home Sumário navigate_before Anterior Atual Seguinte navigate_next
home Sumário
Review Article • Cad. Bras. Ter. Ocup. 32 • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoAR291837922 linkcopy

Open-access Interventions to improve independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily living in individuals with myelomeningocele: an integrative literature review

Intervenções para melhorar a independência nas atividades básicas e instrumentais de vida diária em indivíduos com mielomeningocele: uma revisão integrativa da literatura

AuthorshipSCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

    Resumo

    Objetivo  Esta pesquisa buscou revisar as evidências atuais sobre intervenções de terapia ocupacional para promover independência nas atividades de vida diária e atividades instrumentais de vida diária em indivíduos com Mielomeningocele.

    Método  Foram seguidos os critérios do PRISMA e pesquisadas as bases de dados PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PEDro e OTseeker, utilizando-se os descritores disrafismo espinhal, espinha bífida, mielomeningocele associados à reabilitação, independência, atividades de vida diária e terapia ocupacional.

    Resultados  Dos 523 artigos encontrados, 19 preencheram os critérios de inclusão/exclusão. Destes, 18 foram intervenções e um de revisão, resultando na seleção de 18 estudos. A análise quantitativa e descritiva revelou que o maior número de estudos publicados foi de intervenção baseada em acampamento, orientação cognitiva CO-OP para o desempenho ocupacional diário, programa de educação integrativa em dois passos e sistema móvel de saúde e reabilitação. As intervenções baseadas em acampamento, CO-OP e terapia baseada em ocupação mostraram maior independência dos participantes.

    Conclusão  Esta revisão apresentou uma síntese das intervenções que visam melhorar a independência nas AVDs e AIVDs em pessoas com MMC, seus referenciais teóricos e elementos comuns que favorecem a efetividade.

    Palavras-chave:  Espinha Bífida; Atividade de Vida Diária; Área de Dependência-Independência; Terapia Ocupacional; Reabilitação

    Abstract:

    Objective  This research reviews current evidence on occupational therapy interventions for promoting independence in activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living in individuals with Myelomeningocele.

    Method  The PRISMA criteria were adopted and, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PEDro and OTseeker were searched, using the descriptors spinal dysraphism, spina bifida and myelomeningocele associated with rehabilitation, independence, activities of daily living and occupational therapy.

    Results  Of the 523 articles found, 19 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of these, 18 were interventions and one a review, resulting in the selection of 18 studies. A quantitative and descriptive analysis revealed that the highest number of published studies were camp-based intervention, Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance and Two-Step Integrative Education Program and Mobile Health and Rehabilitation system. The camp-based interventions, CO-OP and occupation-based therapy showed increased independence of the participants.

    Conclusion  This review presented a synthesis of interventions aimed at improving independence in ADLs and IADLs in people with MMC, their theoretical frameworks and common elements that favor effectiveness.

    Keywords:  Spina Dysraphism; Activity of Daily Living; Field Dependence-Independence; Occupational Therapy; Rehabilitation

    Introduction

    Myelomeningocele (MMC), the most common form of spina bifida (SB), is a congenital neural tube defect in which the bones of the spine do not completely form during the fourth week of pregnancy, leading to herniation of the meninges and spinal cord (Sahni et al., 2021). Between 2017 and 2019, the prevalence of spina bifida in Brazil was 2.67 for every 10,000 births (Orioli et al., 2020). People with MMC have different degrees of neurological impairment depending on the level of the injury, generally exhibiting complete paralysis and loss of sensitivity below the injury, as well as altered bladder and intestinal function (Ulsenheimer et al., 2004). The condition is typically associated with hydrocephaly and Chiari-II malformation (Sahni et al., 2021).

    Advances in medical care and rehabilitation in recent years have resulted in increased life expectancy in people with MMC, with most reaching adulthood (Davis et al., 2005). However, these individuals have difficulty achieving independence and autonomy in activities of daily living (ADLs), such as bathing, dressing, independence from toileting, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), such as cooking and managing finances, particularly in individuals with hydrocephaly and spinal cord injury above L2 (Davis et al., 2006; Luz et al., 2017; Steinhart et al., 2021).

    In the literature, authors use different terms to refer to daily activities. The present study uses the definitions proposed by the American Occupational Therapy Association in the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (American Occupational Therapy Association, 2020), which defines ADLs as “activities involving self-care”, including bathing, toileting and personal hygiene, dressing, eating/swallowing, functional mobility, personal care and sexual activity, and IADLs as “activities that support daily life at home and in the community”, such as caring for others, caring for pets, educating children, managing communication, driving and mobility in the community, managing finances and the home, preparing meals, religious and spiritual expression, safety procedures, emergency responses and shopping (American Occupational Therapy Association, 2020).

    Different interventions have been proposed to increase independence in ADLs for people with MMC, including camp-based experiences (Bodzioch et al., 1986; Bolding & Llorens, 1991; Driscoll et al., 2019; Holbein et al., 2013; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Zimmerman et al., 2019), increasing participation opportunities (Harr et al., 2011), Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) (Öhrvall et al., 2020; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009; Steinhart et al., 2021)⁠, assistive technology (Dicianno et al., 2016a; Jennings et al., 2020)⁠, targeted interventions to improve self-catheterization independence (Clarkson, 1982; Donlau et al., 2013; Hannigan, 1979; Neef et al., 1989), and wheelchair skills training (Liptak et al., 1992; Sawatzky et al., 2012)⁠. However, there are still no review studies that summarize this knowledge. For this reason, the present study aimed to identify and analyze scientific evidence on interventions used to increase independence in ADLs and IADLs in this population.

    Materials and Methods

    This is a literature review, which involves synthesizing knowledge and incorporating the practical applicability of the results of significant studies (Souza et al., 2010). This method was selected because of its broader approach, allowing the inclusion of experimental and nonexperimental studies to fully understand the phenomenon studied (Souza et al., 2010).

    According to Souza et al. (2010), an integrative review consists of the following stages: defining the clinical problem, identifying the necessary information, data collection and a critical appraisal of evidence, establishing the applicability of the data obtained from the publications, and determining their usefulness to the patient. The research aimed to identify which interdisciplinary or occupational therapy interventions for individuals with MMC include independence in ADLs and IADLs as one of the evaluated outcomes.

    Rigour

    The researcher followed the criteria adopted by PRISMA devised and a data collection process aimed at synthesizing the information gathered in the review. Bibliographic and methodological data were extracted for each study, including names of the authors, year of publication, sample size, participants’ ages and diagnosis, description of the intervention, measurement tools and intervention results. The level of evidence of each study was classified in accordance with Stillwell et al. (2010), based on the study design: Level I (systematic reviews and meta-analyses), Level II (randomized clinical trials), Level III (nonrandomized clinical trials), Level IV (cohort and case-control studies), Level V (descriptive studies and systematic reviews of qualitative research), Level VI (qualitative or descriptive studies), Level VII (expert opinion).

    Databases and search strategy

    The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PEDro and OTseeker databases were searched for studies published between January 1, 2010 and March 1, 2021. The search strategy used the descriptors spinal dysraphism, spina bifida and myelomeningocele associated with the descriptors rehabilitation, independence, activities of daily living and occupational therapy, in English or Portuguese. The following combinations were used: (“Spinal Dysraphism” OR Meningomyelocele OR myelomeningocele OR “spina bifida”) AND (Rehabilitation OR Independence OR “Activities of Daily Living” OR “Occupational Therapy”).

    Inclusion criteria were: (a) studies involving interdisciplinary rehabilitation or occupational therapy interventions for people diagnosed with spina bifida or myelomeningocele (b) with independence in ADLs or IADLs as one of the outcomes assessed.

    The exclusion criteria were: (a) those involving surgical interventions, medication-based therapy or specific or restrictive procedures from other rehabilitation professions (b) investigations with mixed populations that did not describe the specific results of individuals with MMC, (c) clinical opinion articles, commentaries, or conference proceedings, and d) articles that did not have open access.

    Data analysis

    A quantitative analysis of the data was performed, where the authors grouped the number of articles according to the following categories: description, theoretical framework of the intervention and level of evidence, type of interventions, assessments used, and results obtained. Subsequently, a descriptive analysis was performed, highlighting the following categories: description of the interventions, assessments used, and results obtained and the intervention elements that favor effectiveness in improving independence in ADLs and IADLs among individuals with MMC.

    The search identified a total of 926 articles (Pubmed – 229, Cochrane – 46, Web Science – 288, Embase – 351, Lilacs – 5, Scielo – 2, OTseeker – 3, PEDro – 2), 403 of which were excluded as duplicates. The titles and abstracts of 523 articles were read and a total of 62 were selected for full-text screening, independently performed by the two authors.

    Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria of this review. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the literature review process.

    Figure 1
    Flowchart of the literature review process. *Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). **If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools. From:Page et al. (2021).

    Results

    Table 1 presents the characterization of the articles by lead author, year of publication, study objective, sample description, theoretical framework of the intervention and level of evidence.

    Thumbnail
    Table 1
    List of the articles by lead author, year of publication, study objective, sample description, theoretical framework of the intervention and level of evidence.

    Of the studies analyzed, 3 were randomized controlled trials (Dicianno et al., 2016a; Khan et al., 2015; Rice et al., 2017), 13 quasi-experimental with only an intervention group and pre- and post-treatment assessment (Choi et al., 2019, 2020; Dicianno et al., 2016b, 2017; Donlau et al., 2013; Driscoll et al., 2019; Holbein et al., 2013; Jennings et al., 2020; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009; Sawatzky et al., 2012; Steinhart et al., 2021; Zimmerman et al., 2019) and 2 case reports (Harr et al., 2011; Kokkoni et al., 2018). Nine studies analyzed adult participants (older than 18 years) (Dicianno et al., 2016a, 2016b, 2017; Driscoll et al., 2019; Harr et al., 2011; Holbein et al., 2013; Khan et al., 2015; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009).

    Only 5 articles cited the theories that provided the theoretical foundation that underpins the approach to intervention, with 4 models identified: self-determination theory (Dicianno et al., 2017; Harr et al., 2011); patient-centered care and occupation-based interventions (Harr et al., 2011), individual and family self-management theory (Choi et al., 2019; 2020) and multidisciplinary care (Dicianno et al., 2016b).

    The table below presents a description of the interventions, the assessments used and results obtained.

    As shown in Table 2, the interventions identified varied considerably in terms of duration (1 day to 2 years). The assessments most used were the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), applied in 5 studies, and the Goal Attainment Scale, Sharing of Spina Bifida Management Responsibilities (SOSBMR) and Spina Bifida Independence Survey (SBIS), in 3 studies.

    Thumbnail
    Table 2
    Description of the interventions, assessments used and results obtained.

    The interventions with the most available evidence were the camp-based, the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP), the Two-Step Integrative Education Program and Mobile Health and Rehabilitation system (iMHere).

    Our review selected studies with interventions that had ADL or IADL as one of the assessed outcomes. Among the studies found, 8 had the gain of independence in ADL and/or IADL as the primary objective of the intervention and all presented positive outcomes in their results (Driscoll et al., 2019; Holbein et al., 2013; Jennings et al., 2020; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009; Steinhart et al., 2021; Harr et al., 2011, Zimmerman et al., 2019). Four studies had as their primary objective the increase of independence in specific activities of daily living, such as general mobility (Kokkoni et al., 2018), wheelchair mobility (Sawatzky et al., 2012), transfers (Rice et al., 2017) and toileting (Donlau et al., 2013). The other articles presented interventions whose primary objective is associated with occupations classified by the American Occupational Therapy Association (2020) as health management, namely activities related to developing, managing and maintaining health and wellness routines, including self-management with the goal of improving or maintaining health to support participation in other occupations (Choi et al., 2019, 2020; Dicianno et al., 2016a, 2016b, 2017; Khan et al., 2015).

    Table 3 lists the elements of the interventions that favor their effectiveness in people with MMC.

    Thumbnail
    Table 3
    Description of the studies by lead author and intervention elements that favor effectiveness.

    As shown in Table 3, there are several common elements in the different interventions that seem to contribute to their effectiveness in improving independence in ADLs and IADLs among individuals with MMC.

    Setting individual goals for the intervention program was a common element in 10 studies (Dicianno et al., 2016a, 2017; Donlau et al., 2013; Driscoll et al., 2019; Harr et al., 2011; Holbein et al., 2013; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009; Steinhart et al., 2021) and⁠ participation by parents and family members took place while defining the goals and objectives of interventions and during the proposed programs in 9 investigations (Donlau et al., 2013; Driscoll et al., 2019; Harr et al., 2011; Holbein et al., 2013; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009; Zimmerman et al., 2019; Steinhart et al., 2021; Sawatzky et al., 2012)⁠, Cognitive learning strategies were used in camp-based and CO-OP interventions (Driscoll et al., 2019; Holbein et al., 2013; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009; Steinhart et al., 2021) and training the stages of an activity in natural settings was described in a study to improve toileting independence (Donlau et al., 2013) and camp-based interventions (Driscoll et al., 2019; Holbein et al., 2013; O’Mahar et al., 2010). Telerehabilitation in the form of synchronous care was used in the CO-OP approach and in 3 studies that evaluated mobile interactive systems for smartphones to facilitate self-management of specific SB-related tasks, such as medication, bladder and intestinal management, skin care and depressive symptoms (Choi et al., 2019, 2020; Dicianno et al., 2016a). Educational groups that addressed topics such as bladder and intestinal management, skin care and lesion prevention, nutrition and mental health were intervention elements in 9 studies (Choi et al., 2019, 2020; Dicianno et al., 2016b, 2017; Driscoll et al., 2019; Holbein et al., 2013; Khan et al., 2015; O’Mahar et al., 2010; Zimmerman et al., 2019).

    Discussion

    This integrative review identified and analyzed 18 articles about the interventions considered effective at promoting independence in ADLs and IADLs for individuals with MMC. Few randomized controlled trials were found, which are considered the most suitable methodological design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. In addition, the participant age and intervention duration and design varied, and few studies reported the theoretical framework of the intervention.

    Nevertheless, critical analysis of the studies demonstrated that the occupation-based and patient-centred approaches were present in a range of interventions. These approaches involve active patient participation when negotiating objectives, with their needs and goals considered a priority and crucial to assessment, intervention, and the expected outcomes. The approach targets the patients’ goals, needs, and desires, considering their abilities and the context of their environment (Pontes & Polatajko, 2016)⁠. Moreover, while there is no citation of the theoretical model utilized, some interventions such as CO-OP have their theoretical foundations described in the literature (Missiuna et al., 2001). These foundations encompass conceptual bases in learning and problem-solving theories, as well as the principles of motor learning and motor control, strategy use theories and child -centered interventions.

    The results of the camp-based interventions, CO-OP and occupation-based therapy, whose primary objective was the improvement of performance in ADL, showed increased independence of the participants in relation to the individual goals established, as evaluated by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The camp-based intervention and CO-OP were the ones with the highest number of studies.

    The camp-based intervention format was used in the largest number of studies. In research by Holbein et al. (2013) and O’Mahar et al. (2010), the authors observed significant changes in individual self-care goals and overall independence in SB-related tasks; and Driscoll et al. (2019) demonstrated that these results are enhanced with repeated participation in these camps. In a study by Zimmerman et al. (2019), 86% of caregivers reported that their child’s independence improved after participating in the camp. The factors that contributed the most were camp activities (44%), bonding with the volunteer (20%) and acquiring new skills (20%).

    The CO-OP approach was assessed in two studies, one using a virtual application format (Steinhart et al., 2021). The results of these studies indicate significant improvements in performance and satisfaction, with performance for individual goals measured by the COPM after intervention and at follow-up (Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009; Steinhart et al., 2021). Better overall independence was also observed, as evaluated by the Wee-Functional Independence Measure (Wee-FIM) (Steinhart et al., 2021), but there were no changes in participation in daily life contexts (Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009).

    When studying occupation-based therapy, Harr et al. (2011) observed an increase in the participant's performance in the Arc's Self-Determination Scale (SDS) and in the COPM, but a decrease in the score for in-home context activities, presented in the follow-up evaluations of the Children Helping Out: Responsibilities, Expectations and Supports (CHORES).

    Among the studies that evaluated specific training, such as the wheelchair skills training program (WSTP), Sawatzky et al. (2012) observed an improvement in independence in wheelchair travel, but a decrease in community participation. When evaluating the training self-care in toilet activities, Donlau et al. (2013) observed improvement in the performance of the individual goals in the evaluation by the GAS but decreased the score in the COPM.

    A large variability of evaluative methods was also found. However, it is worth noting that the COPM and GA emerged as the most prominent measures for defining individual goals, being utilized in a total of 8 studies. The results show that the scales that evaluated the individual goals were more sensitive to changes in outcome than general ADL independence measures (Driscoll et al., 2019; Harr et al., 2011; Holbein et al., 2013; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009), which may be due to the difficulty of transferring and generalizing the learning of individuals with MMC, as learning a specific task does not represent a ability to generalize this learning to other tasks or other contexts (Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009).

    Common elements of the interventions that favor their effectiveness were identified. Setting personal goals enables the inclusion of a heterogeneous population in terms of objectives, diagnoses, and disability severity as well as different contextual factors in a positive, dynamic and iterative process that takes into account what is important to each individual, identifying and creating significant objectives (O’Mahar et al., 2010; Peny-Dahlstrand et al., 2009). This increases the patients’ motivation, perseverance and sense of self-efficacy during the intervention. According to Bovend'Eerdt et al. (2009), goals must have certain characteristics in order to effectively change behavior: they should be relevant to the individual in question, challenging but realistic and achievable, as well as specific and measurable, grouping these features under the acronym SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic/relevant and timed).

    Participation by parents and/or family members contributed to intervention success, since both patients and their families have difficulty adjusting to new roles and responsibilities and parents need to provide safe spaces for these changes to take place within the family’s daily routine. Stern et al. (2020) investigated how parental behavior moderates the association between attention/executive function and independence in activities related to responsibility for SB management. The authors found that mothers and fathers can help their children take responsibility for self-management by providing a structured environment that supports autonomy and allows them to develop their executive function skills.

    The use of cognitive learning strategies was another common element found in the interventions identified. Several studies demonstrated that individuals with MMC may present executive dysfunctions such as planning and problem-solving difficulties, which also compromises their ability to create and apply strategies effectively (Dennis & Barnes, 2010). Toglia et al. (2012) define cognitive strategies as a mental action plan and emphasize that their use can improve learning, problem solving and task performance in terms of efficiency, speed, precision and consistency.

    Another important element was training the stages of activities in natural settings. According to Beckers et al. (2020), home-based programs offer a unique opportunity to continuously train specific tasks in a relevant setting, allowing parents to incorporate training into their daily routine and promoting generalized learning. This can also be achieved via telerehabilitation, which refers to the use of information and communications technology to deliver rehabilitation services remotely. In 2014, the World Federation of Occupational Therapists recognized telerehabilitation as a suitable model for providing occupational therapy services, whereby telehealth is used to help patients develop skills; incorporate assistive technology and adaptive techniques; modify work, home or school setting; and create health-promoting habits and routines (Hung & Fong, 2019). In Brazil, this treatment format was authorized by the Federal Council of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy (COFITO) via resolution 516, of March 20, 2020, due to the coronavirus pandemic (Brasil, 2020). The present review identified 1 article that used synchronous care, with appointments via Skype, and 3 with an asynchronous format, via smartphone applications.

    Nine studies featured educational groups as part of the intervention strategy. This is an important element because people with MMC are at risk of developing secondary conditions, such as intestinal and bladder problems, pain, fatigue, depression, obesity and pressure sores due to motor and sensory disorders. Dicianno & Wilson (2010) reported that one-third of hospitalizations of adults with SB were attributed to potentially avoidable secondary conditions.

    Finally, although some studies have already shown that several specific conditions of the condition (injury level, motor and cognitive functions and presence of hydrocephalus) have an impact on the independence of individuals with MMC (Davis et al., 2006; Luz et al., 2017; Steinhart et al., 2021)⁠, the studies of this review did not find an effect of these characteristics on ADL independence.

    A notable limitation of the study was the exclusion of articles that required purchase or subscription access to journals. This restricted access to potentially valuable sources of information, which could have contributed to a more comprehensive analysis. The reliance on freely available articles may have introduced a bias in the selection process, leading to the omission of relevant studies that were inaccessible due to financial or subscription barriers. It is important to acknowledge this limitation as it may have influenced the overall findings and conclusions of the study.

    Conclusion

    The present study achieved its objectives in identifying and analyzing evidence on interdisciplinary or occupational therapy interventions considered effective at promoting independence in ADLs and IADLs in individuals with MMC, their theoretical frameworks and components, such as: setting individual goals, participation by parents/family members, use of cognitive learning strategies, training stages of activities in natural settings, telerehabilitation and educational groups.

    Further research with greater methodological rigor is needed to define the effectiveness of interventions to increase independence in ADL for individuals with MMC, in addition to evaluating the moderating effect of the level of injury, cognitive function and presence of hydrocephalus on the outcome of these interventions.

    • How to cite: Ferreira, R. F. A., & Alves, A. C. J. (2024). Interventions to improve independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily living in individuals with myelomeningocele: an integrative literature review. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 32, e3792. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoAR291837922

    References

    • American Occupational Therapy Association – AOTA. (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process (4th ed.). The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Suppl. 2), 7412410010p1.
    • Beckers, L., Geijen, M., Kleijnen, J., & Rameckers, A. A. (2020). Feasibility and effectiveness of home-based therapy programmes for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 10(10), e035454.
    • Bodzioch, J., Roach, J. W., & Schkade, J. (1986). Promoting independence in adolescent paraplegics: a 2-week “camping” experience. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 6(2), 198-201. http://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198603000-00015
      » http://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198603000-00015
    • Bolding, D. J., & Llorens, L. A. (1991). The effects of habilitative hospital admission on self-care, self-esteem, and frequency of physical care. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(9), 796-800.
    • Bovend’Eerdt, T. J., Botell, R. E., & Wade, D. T. (2009). Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(4), 352-361. PMid:19237435. http://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101741
      » http://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101741
    • Brasil. Conselho Federal de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional – COFITO. (2020, 23 de março). Resolução nº 516, de 20 de março de 2020. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília. Retrieved in 2024, May 20, from https://www.coffito.gov.br/nsite/?p=15825#:~:text=%C2%A7%201%C2%BA%20A%20Teleconsulta%20consiste,por%20meio%20de%20aparelhos%20tecnol%C3%B3gicos
      » https://www.coffito.gov.br/nsite/?p=15825#:~:text=%C2%A7%201%C2%BA%20A%20Teleconsulta%20consiste,por%20meio%20de%20aparelhos%20tecnol%C3%B3gicos
    • Choi, E. K., Jung, E., Bae, E., Ji, Y., & Lee, A. (2020). Two-step integrative education program and mHealth for Korean children with spina bifida: a quasi-experimental pre-post study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 51, e92-e99. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.12.006
      » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.12.006
    • Choi, E. K., Jung, E., Ji, Y., & Bae, E. (2019). A 2-step integrative education program and mHealth for self-management in Korean children with spina bifida: feasibility study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 49, e54-e62.
    • Clarkson, J. D. (1982). Self-catheterization training of a child with myelomeningocele. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36(2), 95-98.
    • Davis, B. E., Daley, C. M., Shurtleff, D. B., Duguay, S., Seidel, K., Loeser, J. D., & Ellenbogan, R. G. (2005). Long-term survival of individuals with myelomeningocele. Pediatric Neurosurgery, 41(4), 186-191.
    • Davis, B. E., Shurtleff, D. B., Walker, W. O., Seidel, K. D., & Duguay, S. (2006). Acquisition of autonomy skills in adolescents with myelomeningocele. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(4), 253-258.
    • Dennis, M., & Barnes, M. A. (2010). The cognitive phenotype of spina bifida meningomyelocele. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 16(1), 31-39.
    • Dicianno, B. E., & Wilson, R. (2010). Hospitalizations of adults with spina bifida and congenital spinal cord anomalies. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(4), 529-535.
    • Dicianno, B. E., Fairman, A. D., McCue, M., Parmanto, B., Yih, E., Mccoy, A., Pramana, G., Yu, D. X., McClelland, J., Collins, D. M., & Brienza, D. M. (2016a). Feasibility of using mobile health to promote self-management in Spina Bifida. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 95(6), 425-437.
    • Dicianno, B. E., Lovelace, J., Peele, P., Fassinger, C., Houck, P., Bursic, A., & Boninger, M. L. (2016b). Effectiveness of a wellness program for individuals with spina bifida and spinal cord injury within an integrated delivery system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(11), 1969-1978.
    • Dicianno, B. E., Henderson, G., & Parmanto, B. (2017). Design of mobile health tools to promote goal achievement in self-management tasks. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(7), e103.
    • Donlau, M., Mattsson, S., & Glad-Mattsson, G. (2013). Children with myelomeningocele and independence in the toilet activity: a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(1), 64-70.
    • Driscoll, C. F. B., Murray, C. B., Holbein, C. E., Stiles-Shields, C., Cuevas, G., & Holmbeck, G. N. (2019). Camp-based psychosocial intervention dosage and changes in independence in young people with spina bifida. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 61(12), 1392-1399.
    • Hannigan, K. F. (1979). Teaching intermittent self‐catheterization to young children with myelodysplasia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 21(3), 365-368.
    • Harr, N., Dunn, L., & Price, P. (2011). Case study on effect of household task participation on home, community, and work opportunities for a youth with multiple disabilities. Work, 39(4), 445-453.
    • Holbein, C. E., Murray, C. B., Psihogios, A. M., Wasserman, R. M., Essner, B. S., O’hara, L. K., & Holmbeck, G. N. (2013). A camp-based psychosocial intervention to promote independence and social function in individuals with spina bifida: moderators of treatment effectiveness. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(4), 412-424.
    • Hung, K. G. & Fong, K. N. (2019). Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 32(1), 3-21. PMid:31217758. http://doi.org/10.1177/1569186119849119
      » http://doi.org/10.1177/1569186119849119
    • Jennings, M., Guilfoyle, A., Green, J., Cleary, Y., & Gowran, R. J. (2020). Octopus watch fosters family resilience by enhancing occupational engagement for children with spina bifida and/or hydrocephalus: pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8316.
    • Khan, F., Amatya, B., Ng, L., & Galea, M. (2015). Rehabilitation outcomes in persons with spina bifida: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(8), 734-740.
    • Kokkoni, E., Logan, S. W., Stoner, T., Peffley, T., & Galloway, J. C. (2018). Use of an in-home body weight support system by a child with spina bifida. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 30(3), E1-E6.
    • Liptak, G. S., Shurtleff, D. B., Bloss, J. W., Baltus‐Hebert, E., & Manitta, P. (1992). Mobility aids for children with high‐level myelomeningocele: parapodium versus wheelchair. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 34(9), 787-796.
    • Luz, C. L., Moura, M. C. D. S., Becker, K. K., Teixeira, R. A. A., Voos, M. C., & Hasue, R. H. (2017). Relação entre função motora, cognição, independência funcional e qualidade de vida em pacientes com mielomeningocele. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 75(8), 509-514.
    • Missiuna, C., Mandich, A. D., Polatajko, H. J., & Malloy-Miller, T. (2001). Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): part I--theoretical foundations. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20(2-3), 69-81. PMid:11345513. http://doi.org/10.1300/J006v20n02_05
      » http://doi.org/10.1300/J006v20n02_05
    • Neef, N. A., Parrish, J. M., Hannigan, K. F., Page, T. J., & Iwata, B. A. (1989). Teaching self-catheterization skills to children with neurogenic bladder complications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22(3), 237-243.
    • O’Mahar, K., Holmbeck, G. N., Jandasek, B., & Zukerman, J. (2010). A camp-based intervention targeting independence among individuals with spina bifida. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35(8), 848-856.
    • Öhrvall, A. M., Bergqvist, L., Hofgren, C., & Peny-Dahlstrand, M. (2020). “With CO-OP I’m the boss”: experiences of the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach as reported by young adults with cerebral palsy or spina bifida. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(25), 3645-3652.
    • Orioli, I. M., Dolk, H., Lopez-Camelo, J., Groisman, B., Benavides-Lara, A., Gimenez, L. G., Correa, D. M., Ascurra, M., de Aquino Bonilha, E., Canessa-Tapia, M. A., de França, G. V. A., Hurtado-Villa, P., Ibarra-Ramírez, M., Pardo, R., Pastora, D. M., Zarante, I., Soares, F. S., de Carvalho, F. M., & Piola, M. (2020). The Latin American network for congenital malformation surveillance: ReLAMC. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 184(4), 1078-1091. PMid:33319501. http://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31872
      » http://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31872
    • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), n71.
    • Peny-Dahlstrand, M., Ahlander, A. C., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., & Gosman-Hedström, G. (2009). Quality of performance of everyday activities in children with spina bifida: a population-based study. Acta paediatrica, 98(10), 1674-1679. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01410.x
      » http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01410.x
    • Pontes, T., & Polatajko, H. (2016). Enabling occupation: occupation-based and client centred practice in Occupational Therapy. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 24(2), 403-412. http://doi.org/10.4322/0104-4931.ctoARF0709
      » http://doi.org/10.4322/0104-4931.ctoARF0709
    • Rice, L. A., Dysterheft, J. L., Sanders, E., & Rice, I. M. (2017). Short-term influence of transfer training among full time pediatric wheelchair users: A randomized trial. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 40(4), 396-404. PMid:26914856. http://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2016.1149292
      » http://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2016.1149292
    • Sahni, M., Alsaleem, M., & Ohri, A. (2021). Meningomyelocele StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved in 2023, August 15, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536959
      » https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536959
    • Sawatzky, B., Rushton, P. W., Denison, I., & McDonald, R. (2012). Wheelchair skills training programme for children: A pilot study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(1), 2-9. PMid:22272877. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00964.x
      » http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00964.x
    • Steinhart, S., Raz-Silbiger, S., Beeri, M., & Gilboa, Y. (2021). Occupation Based Telerehabilitation Intervention for Adolescents with Myelomeningocele: A Pilot Study. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 41(2), 176-191. PMid:32856511. http://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2020.1807448
      » http://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2020.1807448
    • Stern, A., Winning, A., Ohanian, D., Driscoll, C. F. B., Starnes, M., Glownia, K., & Holmback, G. N. (2020). Longitudinal associations between neuropsychological functioning and medical responsibility in youth with spina bifida: The moderational role of parenting behaviors. Child Neuropsychology : a Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 26(8), 1026-1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2020.1751098
      » https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2020.1751098
    • Souza, M. T., Silva, M. D., & Carvalho, R. (2010). Integrative re-view: what is it? How to do it? Einstein, 8(1), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134
      » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134
    • Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: searching for the evidence. The American Journal of Nursing, 110(5), 41-47. PMid:20520115. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000372071.24134.7e
      » http://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000372071.24134.7e
    • Toglia, J. P., Rodger, S. A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2012). Anatomy of cognitive strategies: a therapist's primer for enabling occupational performance. Canadian journal of Occupational Therapy. Revue Canadienne D'ergotherapie, 79(4), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2012.79.4.4
      » https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2012.79.4.4
    • Ulsenheimer, M. M., Antoniuk, S. A., Santos, L. H. C., Ceccatto, M. P., Silveira, A. E., Ruiz, A. P., Egger, P., & Bruck, I. (2004). Myelomeningocele: a Brazilian University Hospital experience. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 62(4), 963-968. PMid:15608952. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2004000600006
      » http://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2004000600006
    • Zimmerman, K., Williams, M. K., Arynchyna, A., Rocque, B. G., Blount, J. P., Graham, A., & Hopson, B. (2019). Program evaluation of camp V.I.P: promoting self-confidence and independence for patients with spina bifida. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 47, 30-35. PMid:31026678. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.04.014
      » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.04.014

    Edited by

    • Section editor
      Prof. Dr. Daniel Marinho Cezar da Cruz

    Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      05 Aug 2024
    • Date of issue
      2024

    History

    • Received
      07 Mar 2024
    • Reviewed
      15 Mar 2024
    • Accepted
      24 May 2024
    Creative Common - by 4.0
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    vertical_align_top file_download show_chart
    location_on
    Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Terapia Ocupacional Rodovia Washington Luis, Km 235, Caixa Postal 676, CEP: , 13565-905, São Carlos, SP - Brasil, Tel.: 55-16-3361-8749 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: cadto@ufscar.br
    rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
    Acessibilidade / Reportar erro