Tallal et al. (55. Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, et al. Language
comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech.
Science. 1996;271(5245):81-4.) |
II |
11 Lang D (FFW) |
11 Lang. D (software with natural speech) |
______ |
5 to 10 |
Yes, higher for SG |
Yes, higher for SG |
Cohen et al. (66. Cohen W, Hodson A, O'Hare A, Boyle J, Durrani T, McCartney E, et al. Effects
of computer-based intervention through acoustically modified speech (Fast ForWord) in severe mixed
receptive-expres-sive language impairment: outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(3):715-29.) |
Ib |
23 Lang.D (FFW) |
1 group of 27 Lang. D (another software) |
1 group of 27 Lang. D |
6 to 10 |
Not tested |
Yes, for all 3 trained groups |
Gillam et al. (77. Gillam RB, Loeb DF, Hoffman LM, Bohman T, Champlin CA, Thibodeau L, et al. The
efficacy of Fast ForWord Language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: a
randomized controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(1):97-119.) |
Ib |
54 Lang. D (FFW) |
3 groups of 54 Lang. D each (another software) |
_______ |
6 to 8 |
Yes, for all trained groups |
Yes, for all 4 trained groups |
Given et al. (88. Given BK, Wasserman JD, Chari SA, Beattie K, Eden GF. A randomized, controlled
study of computer-based intervention in middle school struggling readers. Brain Lang.
2008;106(2):83-97.) |
Ib |
12 Lang. D (FFW) |
3 groups of 14, 15 e 11 Lang. D each (another software) |
1 group of 13 Lang. D |
12 |
Not tested |
Yes, for all 4 trained groups |
Pinheiro & Capellini (99. Pinheiro FH, Capellini SA. Auditory training in students with learning
disabilities. Pro Fono. 2010;22(1):49-54.) |
II |
10 Learn. D (AudioTraining) e 10 TD (AudioTraining) |
_____ |
10 Learn. D e 10 TD |
8 to 14 |
Not tested |
Yes, only for SG |
Murphy & Schochat (1010. Murphy CFB, Schochat E. Effect of non-linguistic auditory training on
phonological and reading skills. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(3):147-53.) |
II |
Study 1-12 D (Software ATP) |
Study 2-18D (language training) |
Study 1-28 D |
7 to 14 |
Study 1 - Yes, only for SG |
Study 1 - Yes, only for SG |
|
|
Study 2-18 D (Software ATP) |
|
|
|
Study 2 - Yes, only for SG |
Estudo 2 - Yes, only for SG |
Halliday et al. (1111. Halliday LF, Taylor JL, Millward KE, Moore DR Lack of generalization of auditory
learning in typically developing children. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
2012;55(1):168-81.) |
II |
22 TD (non-verbal discrimination/Software STAR) |
2 groups of 22 TD (verbal discrimination) and 20 TD (visual discrimination) |
1 group of 22 TD |
8 to 10 |
Yes, only for SG and one of the AG |
No improvement |
Heim et al. (1212. Heim S, Keil A, Choudhury N, Thomas Friedman J, Benasich AA. Early gamma
oscillations during rapid auditory processing in children with a language-learning impairment:
Changes in neural mass activity after training. Neuropsychol.
2013;24;51(5):990-1001.) |
II |
21 Lang D (FFW) |
______ |
1 group of 12 TD |
8 (mean age) |
Yes, only for SG |
Yes, only for SG |
Fisher et al. (1313. Fisher M, Holland C, Merzenich MM, Vinogradov S. Using neuroplasticity-based
auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry.
2009;166(7):805-11.) |
II |
29 schizophrenia (based on the FFW) |
1 group of 26 schizophrenia (visualspacial game, pinball-style game) |
________ |
45 (SG) and 48 (AG) |
Yes, only for SG |
Yes, only for SG |
Gaab et al. (1414. Gaab N, Gabrieli JD, Deutsch GK, Tallal P, Temple E. Neural correlates of rapid
auditory processing are disrupted in children with developmental dyslexia and ameliorated with
training: an fMRI study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):295-310.) |
II |
22 D (FFW) |
______ |
1 group of 23 TD |
10 (mean age) |
No |
Yes, only for SG |
Russo et al. (1515. Russo NM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Hayes EA, Kraus N. Auditory training improves
neural timing in the human brainstem. Behav Brain Res. 2005; 156(1):95-103.) |
II |
9 Lear. D. (Earobics) |
_______ |
1 group of 10 TD and Lear. D. |
8 to 12 |
Yes, only for SG |
Yes, only for SG |
Strehlow et al. (1616. Strehlow U, Haffner J, Bischof J, Gratzka V, Parzer P, Resch F. Does successful
training of temporal processing of sound and phoneme stimuli improve reading and spelling? Eur Child
Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;15(1):19-29.) |
II |
15 D (sound processing training and reading) |
14 D (phoneme processing and reading) and 15 D (reading) |
____ |
7 to 8 |
Yes, for all but higher for sound processing group after 6 or 12 months later |
Yes, for all groups after 12 months later |
Hayes et al. (1717. Hayes EA, Warrier CM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N. Neural plasticity following
auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol.
2003;114(4):673-84.) |
II |
27 Learn. D (Earobics) |
______ |
15 learn. D. and 7 TD |
8 to 12 |
Yes, higher for SD |
Yes, for some measures in SG |