Steinberg et al. (1997) (88. Steinberg DM, Sauvageot J, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI. Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(5):566-76.)
|
499 |
58% |
36% |
6% |
Djavan et al. (1998) (99. Djavan B, Kadesky K, Klopukh B, Marberger M, Roehrborn CG. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 1998;33(3):261-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000019578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000019578...
)
|
415 |
37% |
50% |
13% |
D'Amico et al. (1999) (1010. D'Amico AV, Renshaw AA, Arsenault L, Schultz D, Richie JP. Clinical predictors of upgrading to Gleason grade 4 or 5 disease at radical prostatectomy: potential implications for patient selection for radiation and androgen suppression therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(4):841-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00260-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)...
)
|
653 |
35% |
51% |
14% |
King CR (2000) (1111. King CR. Patterns of prostate cancer biopsy grading: trends and clinical implications. Int J Cancer. 2000;90(6):305-11.)
|
428 |
41% |
42% |
17% |
Noguchi et al. (2001) (1212. Noguchi M, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Yemoto CM. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10.)
|
222 |
36% |
46% |
18% |
San Francisco et al. (2003) (1313. San Francisco IF, DeWolf WC, Rosen S, Upton M, Olumi AF. Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;169(1):136-40.)
|
126 |
76% |
14% |
10% |
Chun et al. (2006) (1414. Chun FK, Briganti A, Shariat SF, Graefen M, Montorsi F, Erbersdobler A, et al. Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation. BJU Int. 2006;98(2):329-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06262.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.20...
)
|
4,789 |
54% |
33% |
13% |
Mian et al. (2006) (1515. Mian BM, Lehr DJ, Moore CK, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Ross JS et al. Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores. Urology. 2006;67(2):379-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005...
)
|
225 |
68% |
17% |
15% |
Divrik et al. (2007) (1616. Divrik RT, Eroglu A, Sahin A, Zorlu F, Ozen H. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Urol Oncol. 2007;25(5):376-82.)
|
392 |
56% |
37% |
10% |
Kato et al. (2008) (1717. Kato T, Nakano M, Uno H, Seike K, Kojima K, Kubota Y, et al. Discrepancy between Gleason score of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens--current situation of general pathologists. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2008;54(10):641-5.)
|
153 |
50% |
37% |
13% |
Fine et al. (2008) (1818. Fine SW, Epstein JI. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score. J Urol 2008;179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9.)
|
1,455 |
76% |
18% |
6% |
Kvale et al. (2009) (1919. Kvåle R, Møller B, Wahlqvist R, Fosså SD, Berner A, Busch C et al. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study. BJU Int. 2009;103(12):1647-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08255.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.20...
)
|
1,116 |
53% |
38% |
9% |
Moreira Leite et al. (2009) (2020. Moreira Leite KR, Camara-Lopes LH, Dall'Oglio MF, Cury J, Antunes AA, Sañudo A, et al. Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(2):353-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008....
)
|
464 |
57% |
29% |
14% |
Tapia et al. (2011) (2121. Tapia O, Bellolio E, Roa JC, Guzmán P, Villaseca M, Araya JC. Concordance between Gleason scores of trans rectal biopsies and the surgical piece of radical prostatectomy. Rev Med Chil. 2011; 39(2):171-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872011000200005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872011...
)
|
168 |
63% |
27% |
10% |
Current study
|
235 |
52% |
35% |
13% |