1
|
Cameron et al.(3636 Cameron S, Glyde H, Dillon H. Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LiSN-S): normative and retest reliability data for adolescents and adults up to 60 years of age. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22(10):697-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.22.10.7. PMid:22212768. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.22.10.7...
) |
Healthy |
LISN-S |
● Worse performance of speech comprehension in noise for the group of older adults (30-60 years old) than the younger ones (18-30 years old); |
N=132 |
● Ability to use spatial cues does not diminish in individuals with normal hearing until age 60. |
Young: 36 (12-17 years) |
|
Adults: 96 (18-60 years) |
|
2
|
O’Beirne et al.(3737 O’Beirne GA, McGaffin AJ, Rickard NA. Development of an adaptive low-pass filtered speech test for the identification of auditory processing disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(6):777-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.039. PMid:22402015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012....
) |
Healthy |
LPFST |
● There was no difference between the scores obtained in the RE and LE in both groups; |
N=63 |
● Improvement in performance with increasing age between 17 and 34 years, decline in speech understanding from 35 years of age. |
Adults= 15 (28.5 years) |
|
Children= 15 (10.1 years) |
|
3
|
Liberalesso et al.(5757 Liberalesso PB, D’Andrea KF, Cordeiro ML, Zeigelboim BS, Marques JM, Jurkiewicz AL. Effects of sleep deprivation on central auditory processing. BMC Neurosci. 2012;13(1):83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-83. PMid:22823997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-8...
) |
Sleep Deprivation |
SSW, RGDT |
● Worse performance on RGDT and SSW after 24 hours of deprivation |
N=90 (18-40 years) |
of sleep; |
|
● No sex effect on SSW and RGDT. |
4
|
Sininger et al.(3535 Sininger YS, Bhatara A. Laterality of basic auditory perception. Laterality. 2012;17(2):129-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2010.541464. PMid:22385138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2010....
) |
Hearing lateralization |
Discrimination of intensity, frequency and temporal resolution |
● Lower threshold for detection of silent interval in LE; |
N=34 (18-32 years) |
● LE advantage for tonal stimulus, no advantage for noise; |
Education: Average - 15.69 years |
● Difference between RE and LE for intensity discrimination decreased with age. |
Musical training: Average - 2.7 years |
|
5
|
Iliadou et al.(2828 Iliadou VV, Bamiou DE, Chermak GD, Nimatoudis I. Comparison of two tests of auditory temporal resolution in children with central auditory processing disorder, adults with psychosis, and adult professional musicians. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(8):507-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.900576. PMid:24801531. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014....
) |
Psychosis |
GIN, RGDT |
● No difference between the Psychosis and Musicians group in the GIN test; |
N=90 |
●Psychosis Group with better performance in the GIN in relation to the RGDT; |
Psychosis= 17 (18-48 years) |
● Best performance for the Musicians group in the RGDT. |
Musicians= 11 (28-61 years) |
|
6
|
Saunders et al.(5858 Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):343-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275. PMid:26237266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0...
) |
War veterans exposed to blast |
HINT, LISN-S, ATTR, TCST, SSW |
● 75% reported having difficulty understanding speech in noise; |
N=99 (25-53 years) |
● 56.6% found it difficult to follow conversations; |
Complaint: 80% migraine; 73% Dizziness |
● 60% showed alterations in the HINT and 33.7% in the SSW. |
Health condition: 19% PTSD |
|
Education: High School - Undergraduate |
|
7
|
Prestes et al.(2929 Prestes R, Andrade AN, Santos RB, Marangoni AT, Schiefer AM, Gil D. Temporal processing and long-latency auditory evoked potential in stutterers. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(2):142-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.02.015. PMid:27233690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.0...
) |
Stutter |
DPS, RGDT |
● Stuttering group with better performance in DPS and RGDT in relation to non-stutterers, with values below normality. |
N=41 |
Control= 21 (18-46 years) |
Study= 20 (18-46 years) |
8
|
Kumar et al.(3939 Kumar P, Pradhan B, Handa D, Sanju HK. Effect of age on time-compressed speech perception and speech perception in noise in normal-hearing individuals. J Hear Sci. 2016;6(1):33-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.17430/896978. http://dx.doi.org/10.17430/896978...
) |
Healthy |
TFC, SPIN |
● Younger adults performed better on both tests; |
N=29 |
● Worse performance of young and older adults with increasing comprehension rate and/or signal-to-noise ratio. |
Control= 15 (18-25 years) |
|
Study= 14 (30-50 years) |
|
9
|
Przewoźny et al.(5959 Przewoźny T, Gójska-Grymajło A, Kwarciany M, Graff B, Szmuda T, Gąsecki D, et al. Hypertension is associated with dysfunction of both peripheral and central auditory system. J Hypertens. 2016;34(4):736-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000803. PMid:26682779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000...
) |
Arterial hypertension |
MAA, RGDT |
● Arterial hypertension group with higher silent interval detection thresholds, but with no significant difference between the groups; |
N=64 |
● Arterial hypertension group with worse sound localization performance. |
Control= 32 (52.8 years) |
|
Study= 32 (53.1 years) |
|
Health condition: Pharmacological treatment; Incidence of hyperlipidemia; smoking. |
|
10
|
Santiago et al.(6060 Santiago JM, Luiz CBL, Garcia M, Gil D. Masking level difference and electrophysiological evaluation in adults with normal hearing. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;24(4):e399-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701266. PMid:33101502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701266...
) |
Healthy |
MLD |
● Positive correlation between MLD and waves V, A and F of the FFR; |
N=20 (18-30 years) |
● The higher the latency of waves V, A and F, the higher the MLD. |
11
|
Roup et al.(6161 Roup CM, Post E, Lewis J. Mild-gain hearing aids as a treatment for adults with self-reported hearing difficulties. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018;29(6):477-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16111. PMid:29863462. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16111...
) |
Hearing difficulty |
SCAN-3:A, MLD |
● All individuals with complaints showed altered performance in at least one of the behavioral tests; |
N=37 |
GIN, DDT, SPIN |
● 12% showed alterations in MLD and SCAN-A:3, 41% in DDT, 53% in GIN, 71% to 88%. |
Study= 20 (19-27 years) |
|
|
Control= 17 (18-58 years) |
|
|
12
|
Gallun et al.(6262 Gallun F, Lewis MS, Folmer RL, Hutter M, Papesh MA, Belding H, et al. Chronic effects of exposure to high-intensity blasts: results on tests of central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(6):705-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.12.0313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.12.0...
) |
War veterans exposed to blast |
GIN, DDT, PPS, SSW, MLD |
● War veterans and control group with the worst RE performance in the GIN; |
N=59 |
● War veterans with the worst performance in DDT, SSW, PPS and MLD. |
Control= 29 (39.2 years) |
|
Study= 30 (37.3 years) |
|
Health condition: 56.7% PTSD |
|
13
|
Mishra et al.(2424 Mishra R, Sanju HK, Kumar P. Auditory temporal resolution in individuals with diabetes mellitus type 2. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;20(4):327-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1571207. PMid:27746835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1571207...
) |
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 |
GDT |
● Diabetes group with the highest silent interval detection threshold; |
N=30 |
● Mean threshold in GDT: GE= 6.49 ms (0.81); GC=3.33 ms (0.79). |
Control= 15 (30-40 years) |
|
Study= 15 (30-40 years) |
|
14
|
Ibraheem et al.(2323 Ibraheem OA, Hassaan MR. Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus versus temporal resolution in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;21(2):144-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583526. PMid:28382121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583526...
) |
Tinnitus |
GIN |
● Tinnitus group with worse performance in the GIN test; |
N=30 |
● No correlation between GIN and tinnitus duration, subjective scale, audiological profile and psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus; |
Control= 15 (20-45 years) |
● Positive correlation between OAE amplitude and GIN scores. |
Study= 15 (20-45 years) |
|
15
|
Silva et al.(3333 Silva BCS, Mantello EB, Freitas MCF, Foss MC, Isaac ML, Anastasio ART. Speech perception performance of subjects with type I diabetes mellitus in noise. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(5):574-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.07.003. PMid:27546348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.0...
) |
Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 |
List of Sentences in Portuguese |
● Significant differences between the groups with and without diabetes for the recognition threshold in silence, in noise and in the signal-to-noise ratio. |
N=40 |
Control=20 (18-30 years) |
Study=20 (18-30 years) |
16
|
Hoover et al.(3434 Hoover EC, Souza PE, Gallun FJ. Auditory and cognitive factors associated with speech-in-noise complaints following mild traumatic brain injury. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017;28(4):325-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16051. PMid:28418327. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16051...
) |
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury |
QuickSIN, SRM |
●Presence of auditory handicap increases the probability of worse speech performance in noise; |
N=33 |
●No difference in speech comprehension performance in subjects with and without mild traumatic brain injury. |
Control= 9 (18-24 years) |
|
Study= 13 (25-71 years) |
|
Paired= 11 (20-70 years) |
|
17
|
Arcuri et al.(2727 Arcuri CF, Schiefer AM, Azevedo MF. Research about suppression effect and auditory processing in individuals who stutter. CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20160230. PMid:28538833.) |
Stutter |
TFR, TDNV, SSW, DPS, PPS, SSI, RGDT |
●Stuttering group with the worst performance in the TDNV and PPS tests; |
N=30 |
●14 participants of the Stuttering Group presented alterations in the CAPD. |
Control= 15 (18-40 years) |
|
Study= 15 (18-40 years) |
|
18
|
Yeend et al.(3131 Yeend I, Beach EF, Sharma M, Dillon H. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise. Hear Res. 2017;353:224-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.006. PMid:28780178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017....
) |
Noise exposure |
LISN-S, NALDCT, TFS, AM |
●No correlation between lifetime noise exposure and performance of auditory processing tasks; |
N=122 (30-60 years) |
●Positive correlation between speech comprehension in noise and working memory, attention, high-frequency tonal thresholds and suppression strength of the medial olivocochlear system. |
Complaint: Tinnitus; difficulty understanding speech in noise; discomfort for loud sounds |
|
Education: 68% Graduates; 25% Technical qualification; 6% High School |
|
Health conditions: Smoking; use of ototoxic; otitis history |
|
Musical training: 18% ≤ 8 years; 40% ≥ 8 years; 17% professionals; 25% no experience |
|
Noise exposure: 70% occupational |
|
19
|
Fostick et al.(3232 Fostick L, Eshcoly R, Shtibelman H, Nehemia R, Levi H. Efficacy of temporal processing training to improve phonological awareness among dyslexic and normal reading students. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014;40(5):1799-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037527. PMid:25089573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037527...
) |
Dyslexia |
Judgment of temporal order |
●Dyslexia group with worse performance in temporal processing; |
N=101 |
●Positive correlation between working memory performance and temporal processing with reading and phonological processing. |
Control= 23 (20-33 years) |
|
Study= 78 (20-33 years) |
|
Education: 13 to 15 years |
|
20
|
Habibi et al.(2525 Habibi M, Farahani S, Rouhbakhsh N, Abdollahi FZ, Jalaie S. Dichotic listening processing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Aud Vestib Res. 2019;28(4):221-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/avr.v28i4.1457. http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/avr.v28i4.145...
) |
Multiple Sclerosis |
SSW persian version, DDT |
●46% of the multiple sclerosis group showed alterations in the SSW; |
N=90 |
●Multiple Sclerosis group with higher percentage of qualitative and quantitative errors in SSW and worse performance in DDT. |
Control= 45 (25-45 years) |
|
Study= 45 (25-45 years) |
|
Multiple Sclerosis= 04 to 10 years |
|
21
|
Trott et al.(2020 Trott S, Cline T, Weihing J, Beshear D, Bush M, Shinn J. Hormones and hearing: central auditory processing in women. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019;30(6):493-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17123. PMid:30461407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17123...
) |
Post-menopause |
DDT, DPS, LINS-S, SPIN-R |
●No difference between pre- and post-menopausal women for DDT, DPS and SPIN-R; |
N=28 (18-70 years) |
●Worse performance of the postmenopausal group on LISN-S. |
Control= 14 |
|
Study= 14 |
|
22
|
Sanguebuche et al.(6363 Sanguebuche TR, Peixe BP, Garcia MV. Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder. Rev CEFAC. 2020;22(1):e13718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/202022113718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/2020...
) |
CAPD |
DSI, MLD, PPS, DPS, RGDT, TFCA |
●18 to 29 years: Better scores for the CG, except in the RE of the DSI and in both ears of the TFCA; |
N=94 |
●30 to 58 years: Best scores for the CG in the DSI (LE), RGDT and TFCA (RE). |
Control= 64 (18-59 years) |
|
Study= 30 (18-59 years) |
|
Education: Minimum of 11 years |
|
23
|
Turcatto et al.(3030 Turcatto LG, Scharlach RC, Braga J Jr, Pinheiro MMC. Time-compressed speech test in adults with and without central auditory processing disorders. Rev CEFAC. 2020;22(4):e2520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20202242520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/2020...
) |
CAPD |
DDT, PPS, TFC |
●Better performance of the group without CAPD in the PPS; |
N=40 |
●Similar performance between individuals with and without CAPD in DDT; |
Control= 20 (18-35 years) |
●Association between scores on the self-perception scale and the |
Study = 20 (18-35 years) |
list of monosyllables in the TFC. |
Education: 95% incomplete higher education |
|
24
|
Pham et al.(6464 Pham CQ, Kapolowicz MR, Metherate R, Zeng FG. Nicotine enhances auditory processing in healthy and normal-hearing young adult nonsmokers. Psychopharmacology. 2020;237(3):833-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05421-x. PMid:31832719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-054...
) |
Nicotine |
GDT |
●Lower silent interval detection threshold with nicotine use; |
N=14 (18-27 years) |
●Better performance of selective attention with nicotine use. |
Health conditions: Oxygenation monitoring |
|