ABSTRACT
Introduction
A high agreement in the perceptual assessment of hypernasality among different listeners is difficult to achieve. Prior listener training and the standardization of analysis criteria may be effective strategies to decrease the effect of perceptual assessment subjectivity and increase the agreement among listeners.
Objective
To investigate the influence of prior training on agreement among different listeners in the perceptual assessment of hypernasality.
Methods
Three experienced speech–language pathologists analyzed 77 audio-recorded speech samples of individuals with repaired cleft palate. During the first phase, the listeners classified hypernasality according to their own criteria, using a 4-point scale. Seventy days later, they were required to complete the training to define the stimuli to be used as anchors for the assessment in the following phase. During the second phase, the listeners analyzed the same samples and rated hypernasality in a 4-point scale, using the anchors defined during training as the criteria. Intra- and interrater agreement in both the phases were calculated by the kappa coefficient. These values were statistically compared using the Z-test.
Results
The intrarater agreement obtained between the two phases of the study ranged from 0.38 to 0.92, with a statistically significant difference for one of the listeners (p=0.004). The agreement for the hypernasality degree obtained among the three listeners after training (0.54) was significantly higher than that obtained before training (0.37; p=0.044).
Conclusion
Listener training and the definition of criteria to rate hypernasality lead to the increase of intra- and interrater agreement.
Keywords:
Cleft Palate; Velopharyngeal Insufficiency; Speech; Speech Disorders; Speech Perception