Contribución de enfermedades crónicas a la prevalencia de incapacidad en actividades básicas e instrumentales de la vida diaria entre ancianos brasileños: Encuesta Nacional de Salud (2013)
Cad Saude Publica
csp
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Cad. Saúde Pública
0102-311X
1678-4464
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
Resumen:
El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la contribución de algunas enfermedades crónicas seleccionadas en la prevalencia de incapacidad de ancianos brasileños, basándose en los datos de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud (2013). La incapacidad fue definida como algún grado de dificultad para la ejecución de diez actividades, considerando tres niveles: (i) sin incapacidad; (ii) incapaz sólo para alguna actividad instrumental de la vida diaria (AIVD); e (iii) incapaz para la actividad básica de vida diaria (ABVD). El modelo aditivo de riesgos multinomial fue el método de atribución utilizado para evaluar la contribución de cada condición crónica autorreferida (hipertensión, diabetes, artritis, accidente cerebrovascular -ACV, depresión, enfermedades del corazón y del pulmón) en la prevalencia de la incapacidad de esa población, estratificada por sexo y franja etaria (60 a 74 y 75 años o más). Participaron en este estudio 10.537 ancianos brasileños, con una edad media de 70,0 años (DP = 7,9 años) y predominio de mujeres (57,4%). La prevalencia de incapacidad para al menos una AIVD y al menos una ABVD fue de un 14% (IC95%: 12,9; 15,1) y un 14,9% (IC95%: 13,8; 16,1), respectivamente. De manera general, la contribución de estas enfermedades en la prevalencia de incapacidad fue mayor entre los ancianos más jóvenes (60 a 74 años) y para el grupo con mayor gravedad (incapaz para ABVD), destacándose la relevancia del ACV y artritis entre los hombres, y de la artritis, hipertensión y diabetes entre las mujeres. Estos resultados pueden orientar la actuación de los servicios de salud hacia grupos específicos, considerando edad, sexo y enfermedades presentes, con el fin de prevenir la incapacidad entre ancianos.
Introduction
Chronic non-communicable diseases have become an increasingly serious public health problem due to rapid population aging. Such diseases are associated with increased risk of mortality and impaired quality of life, particularly due to the increase in the risk of functional limitation 1. Disability is a multidimensional condition resulting from the interaction between individuals and their physical and social environment and can be defined in terms of the individual’s inability or difficulty in performing basic or more complex daily tasks within a socially accepted standard 1,2. A person’s ability to perform basic activities of daily living (BADL) and/or instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) is widely used in epidemiological and clinical studies to assess physical functioning. The former scale includes the more basic activities involved in independent daily functioning (bathing, getting dressed, eating, etc.). IADL are activities needed to adapt to the environment, emphasizing social activities (shopping, managing money, etc.) 3,4.
Various studies have shown an association between functional decline and presence of one or more chronic diseases in the elderly 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. The diseases most commonly associated with functional decline are cardiovascular disease, lung disease, hypertension, diabetes, and joint disease, which have a greater effect on functionality. However, some authors propose other analytical approaches in addition to the verification of statistical association, for example estimation of the contribution of chronic diseases to disability 14,15,16,17,18,19. In the Netherlands 17, from 2001 to 2007, musculoskeletal diseases (arthritis and back pain) and cardiovascular diseases (stroke, heart disease, and peripheral vascular diseases) were the conditions that most contributed to disability in the population 55 years or older. Likewise, in individuals 55 years or older 14, the estimated contribution of chronic diseases to disability in Belgium (from 1997 to 2008) showed that musculoskeletal diseases, cardiovascular disease, and lung disease made the largest contribution. In Brazil, a recent study 15 of 10,290 elderly individuals representing the elderly Brazilian population participating in the National Health Survey (PNS) investigated these contributions, exploring differences by sex, and showed that stroke, back pain, and arthritis were the diseases that most contributed to disability in men and diabetes, heart disease, and arthritis in women. In these studies, disability was considered present when the individual presented some degree of difficulty in at least one selected BADL or IADL, without differentiating between these two levels of activities. However, additional comparisons such as the contribution of chronic diseases between age brackets or different measures of disability have not been previously addressed by studies.
It is thus necessary to expand the analysis of the relationship between diseases and disabilities beyond studies of association; it may be useful to estimate the contribution of chronic diseases to disability in different scenarios in order to pursue better public policy strategies aimed at prevention and health promotion, especially among the elderly, considering that they are the population with the highest prevalence of chronic diseases and greatest vulnerability to functional decline. The current study drew on data from the PNS to examine the contribution of selected chronic diseases to prevalence of disability among elderly Brazilians, considering possible differences in relation to age bracket, sex, and type of impaired activities (basic or instrumental activities of daily living).
Methodology
Study population
The data source for the study was the PNS, conducted in a representative national sample of the adult Brazilian population in 2013 by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) in collaboration with the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The PNS was approved by the Brazilian National Commission on Research Ethics (CONEP), under the Brazilian National Health Council (CNS), case review 328.159 of June 26, 2013. All the individuals were consulted, had the survey explained to them, and agreed to participate 20.
Data collection used structured questionnaires that were applied in the selected households. The questionnaire consisted of 16 thematic modules that included: performance quality of the national health system (including access to and use of health services and health plan coverage); the population’s health conditions and lifestyle; and surveillance of diseases and health conditions and associated risk factors 21,22. The PNS sampling plan was defined by clusters in three stages: (i) census tracts or sets of census tracts by simple random sampling; (ii) households, also selected by the same criteria used in the first stage; and (iii) adult residents, randomly selected with equiprobability among all eligible individuals over 18 years of age 22.
More than 205,000 Brazilians were interviewed from more than 64,000 households, including 23,815 elderly. The PNS included a specific questionnaire for the population over 60 years, including questions on the degree of difficulty in performing BADL and IADL. The current analysis included 11,177 questionnaires that were answered by the elders themselves when they were included as the randomly selected residents. Of these, 640 elderly were excluded due to missing information, resulting in a sample of 10,537 elderly included in the current study. These elderly, who were also randomly selected, answered a questionnaire on chronic diseases, the object of this analysis.
Variables
Composition of the target outcome considered 10 questions from the PNS assessing the elder’s degree of difficulty in performing the following activities: eating, taking a bath, using the toilet, getting dressed, walking at home, getting in and out of bed, shopping, managing money, taking medication, and going out. These questions were divided into two groups, with the first six classified as BADL 23 and the others as IADL 24. All the questions had four possible answers: (i) not able; (ii) great difficulty; (iii) slight difficulty; and (iv) no difficulty. The response variable was then categorized in three groups: (i) “without disability” if the individual had answered “ no difficulty” to all the questions; (ii) “disabled in IADL” if the individual reported some degree of difficulty in at least one of the questions in the IADL group and “no difficulty” to the questions comprising the BADL group; and (iii) “disabled in BADL” when the individual reported some degree of difficulty in at least one of the questions in the BADL group, regardless of whether they had reported disability in IADL.
The selected chronic diseases in this study were hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, heart disease, lung disease, stroke, and depression. Presence of these diseases was defined as any lifetime history of a medical diagnosis or psychiatric diagnosis (in the case of depression) of the respective condition.
For characterization of the sample and adjustment, socio-demographic data (sex, age, and schooling) were also analyzed. Age was categorized in two age brackets (60 to 74 years and 75 or older) and schooling was divided into four categories (none, incomplete/complete primary, incomplete/complete secondary, and university).
Data analysis
A descriptive analysis of the study variables was performed, aimed at general characterization of the sample’s prevalence rates for disability and chronic diseases, stratified by sex and age bracket. A description was also performed of the prevalence rates for disability between the groups of elderly that reported each chronic condition, by age bracket and sex. The descriptive analysis of all the variables used the Stata software, version 13.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, USA), with the survey module, which considers weights and design effect, attributed due to the sampling plan adopted in the study. Confidence intervals were set at 95%.
The contribution of chronic diseases to disability was analyzed separately for men and women, considering the sampling weight. In each of the models, age bracket (60 to 74 years and 75 years or older) was used as the stratification variable. The R software, version 3.3.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.r-project.org) was used for the analysis of the attribution method, using the “addhaz” package for the model’s adjustment (available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=addhaz). The results were then presented as the model’s coefficients and respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), along with the relative contribution (as a percentage) of each disease to each level of disability according to age bracket and sex.
The model
Attribution method is used to quantify the contribution of a set of explanatory variables to the prevalence of a target outcome in cross-sectional studies 25. The current study used the method to quantify each chronic condition’s contribution to the prevalence of disability among elderly participants in the PNS, taking into account that individuals can have more than one disease and that disability may be present in individuals without any of selected diseases 25.
In attribution method, the prevalence of disability not explained by the model’s selected diseases is called “background”. Disability in individuals that did not report any disease is attributed entirely to background, while in individuals that reported one or more chronic diseases, the attribution is shared between the reported chronic diseases and the background.
Attribution method assumes that: (i) the distribution of disability according to causes (chronic conditions) is totally explained by the conditions present at the time of the survey and by background; (ii) distribution of the disability due to chronic diseases is proportional to the distribution of risk of becoming disabled in the period prior to the survey; (iii) the starting time of the risk for disability from each cause is the same; (iv) causes of the disability (chronic diseases and background) act as independent concurrent causes; and (v) risk of disability from each selected condition (or from background) is similar for all individuals in the sample 26.
This study used the attribution method based on the multinomial additive hazards model, since the target outcome (disability) was assessed on a multinomial scale with three categories: “without disability”, “disabled in IADL”, and “disabled in BADL”. Further details on the method and its application can be found in other studies 16,19,25,26.
Results
Among the 10,537 elderly participants in this study, age varied from 60 to 101 years, with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD = 7.9 years), and majority of women (57.4%; 95%CI: 55.7; 59.0) and younger elderly (60 to 74 years) (74.6%; 95%CI: 73.1; 76.0). As for schooling, 30.6% of the elderly had no education and 46.1% had gone to primary school or the equivalent. Considering the total sample included in the analysis, the most frequent chronic condition was hypertension (52.3%; 95%CI: 50.5; 54.1), followed by diabetes (19%; 95%CI: 17.8; 20.4), arthritis (17%; 95%CI: 15.7; 18.3), and heart disease (11.9%; 95%CI: 10.7; 13.2). Depression was the fifth most prevalent disease, with 9.9% (95%CI: 8.9; 11.0), followed by stroke and lung disease, with prevalence rates of 5.1% (95%CI: 4.4; 5.9) and 3.8% (95%CI: 3.1; 4.6), respectively. Disability was present in 28.9% of the elderly: 14% (95%CI: 12.9; 15.1) were only disabled in IADL and 14.9% (95%CI: 13.8; 16.1) were disabled in BADL.
Table 1 shows the prevalence rates for disability and chronic diseases according to sex and age bracket. In general, this descriptive analysis shows that prevalence of disability in both IADL and BADL is more frequent in women and in the population 75 years or older. Concerning distribution of the selected chronic diseases, hypertension was the most common condition in all the strata, followed by diabetes and heart disease in men and arthritis and diabetes in women, independently of age bracket.
Table 1
Prevalence of disability and chronic diseases in elderly Brazilians according to sex and age bracket. National Health Survey, 2013.
Variables
Total (%)
95%CI
60-74 years
75+ years
%
95%CI
%
95%CI
Men
Disability
With disability
74.9
72.4; 77.2
81.3
78.6; 83.8
55.5
49.7; 60.1
Disabled in IADL
11.4
9.8; 13.3
8.3
6.7; 10.1
21.0
16.9; 25.7
Disabled in BADL
13.6
11.9; 15.6
10.4
8.5; 12.6
23.5
19.4; 28.3
Chronic diseases
Arthritis
10.1
8.3; 12.2
9.7
7.7; 12.1
11.2
8.0; 15.4
Hypertension
47.6
44.7; 50.5
46.3
42.9; 49.6
51.4
46.0; 56.8
Diabetes
17.3
15.1; 19.7
17.0
14.4; 19.9
18.2
14.3; 22.8
Stroke
6.3
5.0; 7.8
5.1
3.8; 6.9
9.8
7.0; 13.5
Depression
4.9
3.7; 6.6
5.4
3.8; 7.6
3.5
2.0; 5.9
Lung disease
4.2
3.1; 5.6
3.9
2.7; 5.7
4.8
3.0; 7.7
Heart disease
13.1
11.0; 15.6
12.2
9.9; 15.0
16.0
12.0; 20.1
Women
Disability
With disability
68.1
66.2; 70.1
77.5
75.4; 79.5
41.2
37.3; 45.3
Disabled in IADL
15.9
14.4; 17.5
11.2
9.7; 12.9
29.5
25.7; 33.4
Disabled in BADL
15.9
14.5; 17.5
11.2
9.8; 12.8
29.3
25.9; 33.0
Chronic diseases
Arthritis
22.1
20.4; 24.0
20.9
19.0; 23.0
25.6
22.1; 29.4
Hypertension
55.8
53.5; 58.1
54.1
51.5; 56.8
60.6
56.3; 64.7
Diabetes
20.4
18.7; 22.2
19.7
17.8; 21.7
22.3
19.0; 26.0
Stroke
4.2
3.5; 5.1
3.7
2.9; 4.7
5.9
4.5; 7.8
Depression
13.6
12.0; 15.3
14.9
13.0; 16.9
9.9
7.6; 12.7
Lung disease
3.6
2.8; 4.5
3.4
2.5; 4.7
3.9
2.7; 5.6
Heart disease
10.9
9.7; 12.4
10.3
8.8; 12.1
12.8
10.5; 15.4
95%CI: 95% confidence interval; BADL: basic activities of daily living; IADL: instrumental activities of daily living.
Table 2 shows the prevalence of disability in IADL and BADL among elderly that reported each of the selected chronic diseases according to sex and age bracket. Despite important variations, the prevalence of disability in IADL is only apparently lower when compared to BADL for all the selected diseases in both sexes and in both age brackets. Importantly, the highest prevalence rates for disability in BADL were seen in elderly with a history of stroke, in both sexes and in both age brackets.
Table 2
Prevalence of disability in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (BADL) in elderly Brazilians with diagnosis of chronic diseases, according to sex and age bracket. National Health Survey, 2013.
Variables
Prevalence of disability (%)
60-74 years
75+ years
IADL
95%CI
BADL
95%CI
IADL
95%CI
BADL
95%CI
Men
Arthritis
11.9
6.6; 20.4
27.0
17.0; 40.0
21.8
12.0; 36.3
35.6
22.4; 51.6
Hypertension
9.2
7.0; 12.0
13.1
10.1; 16.9
22.1
16.6; 28.7
23.9
18.2; 30.8
Diabetes
10.2
6.6; 15.4
12.3
8.5; 17.5
16.1
9.6; 25.7
31.6
21.7; 43.5
Stroke
16.8
8.1; 31.7
46.6
32.6; 61.1
19.5
10.5; 33.3
70.2
55.6; 81.5
Depression
8.4
4.0; 16.5
26.3
12.9; 46.3
25.1
10.2; 49.7
21.8
8.1; 46.7
Lung disease
11.5
3.5; 32.2
30.6
14.4; 53.6
16.5
7.3; 33.2
40.4
21.3; 63.0
Heart disease
13.1
7.9; 21.1
15.9
10.0; 24.2
25.2
15.9; 37.4
29.6
18.5; 43.8
Women
Arthritis
10.8
8.4; 13.8
18.9
15.2; 23.3
27.2
21.2; 34.0
40.7
33.0; 49.0
Hypertension
12.5
10.6; 14.8
14.7
12.4; 17.2
29.6
25.2; 34.4
30.4
26.0; 35.1
Diabetes
12.2
9.5; 15.5
18.1
14.2; 22.9
29.8
22.4; 38.5
37.9
29.1; 47.4
Stroke
15.3
8.9; 25.1
34.6
23.5; 47.8
24.8
15.0; 38.3
59.2
45.6; 71.5
Depression
17.2
12.2; 23.7
14.3
10.2; 19.6
37.0
24.8; 51.0
35.8
25.2; 48.0
Lung disease
17.2
8.9; 30.7
12.9
6.2; 25.1
26.1
13.8; 43.8
44.2
27.0; 62.9
Heart disease
20.8
15.0; 28.0
19.3
14.1; 25.9
31.8
23.3; 41.6
43.3
33.7; 53.4
95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Table 3 shows the coefficients (and 95%CI) estimated by the model, as well as the relative contribution from each disease to disability in IADL and BADL, according to sex and age bracket. Considering the report of difficulties in performing IADLs, the results show fewer diseases and smaller relative contribution to this outcome in both sexes when compared to the more severe level of disability (BADL), emphasizing the role of arthritis and stroke in men and hypertension, depression, and heart disease in women. Meanwhile, there was a larger contribution of the selected chronic diseases to prevalence of disability in performing basic activities (BADL) in men and women, emphasizing arthritis and stroke in men and arthritis, hypertension, and diabetes in women. In the comparison of age brackets, the contribution of diseases was consistently higher in younger elderly, except for contribution of stroke to disability in BADL among men.
Table 3
Coefficient (95%CI) and relative contribution of selected chronic diseases to disability in elderly Brazilians, according to sex, age bracket, and type of disability. National Health Survey, 2013.
Chronic diseases
Disability in IADL
Disability in BADL
Coefficient
95%CI
Relative contribution (%)
Coefficient
95%CI
Relative contribution (%)
60-74 years
75+ years
60-74 years
75+ years
Men
Background
-
-
75.77
87.14
-
-
46.51
57.87
Arthritis
0.04 *
0.01; 0.07
3.81
1.96
0.20 *
0.18; 0.23
14.38
8.50
Hypertension
0.01
-0.01; 0.01
6.09
3.02
0.01
-0.04; 0.03
4.78
2.59
Diabetes
-0.002
-0.01; 0.02
-0.52
-0.22
0.03 *
0.01; 0.04
5.03
2.90
Stroke
0.18 *
0.15; 0.22
5.59
3.07
0.81 *
0.79; 1.05
20.49
22.62
Depression
0.01
-0.04; 0.04
0.95
0.33
0.01 *
0.00; 0.08
0.71
0.23
Lung disease
-0.03
-0.06; 0.07
-1.20
-0.64
0.15*
0.01; 0.21
4.46
3.05
Heart disease
0.07
-0.01; 0.10
9.5
5.31
0.04
-0.01; 0.08
3.60
2.22
Women
Background
-
-
73.17
90.79
-
-
27.26
69.86
Arthritis
-0.01
-0.03; 0.02
-2.35
-0.95
0.11 *
0.09; 0.14
17.51
7.31
Hypertension
0.01 *
0.01; 0.02
6.56
2.72
0.05 *
0.05; 0.06
20.10
7.58
Diabetes
0.01
-0.01; 0.00
1.45
0.57
0.09 *
0.07; 0.15
13.77
5.15
Stroke
0.07 *
0.01; 0.17
1.47
0.67
0.42 *
0.35; 0.51
8.73
5.43
Depression
0.08 *
0.01; 0.12
8.92
2.01
0.04
-0.00; 0.04
4.33
0.90
Lung disease
0.05
-0.01; 0.06
1.42
0.45
0.01
-0.11; 0.17
0.30
0.12
Heart disease
0.13 *
0.06; 0.16
9.34
3.71
0.13 *
0.08; 0.14
7.96
3.60
95%CI: 95% confidence interval; BADL: basic activities of daily living; IADL: instrumental activities of daily living.
* p < 0.05.
Discussion
The study estimated the contribution of the leading chronic diseases to prevalence of disability in elderly Brazilians, considering differences by sex, age bracket, and level of disability. The results generally showed that: (i) the selected diseases showed a greater impact in more severe disability (BADL) when compared to elderly that only reported difficulties in IADL; (ii) the relative contributions of these diseases were greater in the younger elderly, except for the effect of stroke in more severe disability in men; (iii) arthritis and stroke were the diseases that contributed most consistently to disability in this population, independently of sex and age bracket; and (iv) hypertension and heart disease only contributed the most to disability in women, and diabetes only showed a significant contribution to disability in BADL.
Some hypotheses can be proposed to explain the pattern of disability in these different scenarios. The first is that the diseases show a greater contribution to the prevalence of more severe disability, that is, with impairment of basic activities of daily living. This may be explained in part by the higher prevalence of disability in BADL among individuals that reported the chronic diseases analyzed here, with few exceptions (Table 2). These diseases thus appear to have greater impact on the performance of basic activities, raising the hypothesis that biological or psychosocially primary mechanisms associated with these diseases may explain the relationship with this level of disability 27, suggesting the importance of further studies on the subject. This result thus emphasizes the importance of elucidating the impact of chronic diseases on different levels of disability, an issue not addressed by previous studies 14,15,17,18, which did not differentiate between the impacts of diseases on BADL versus IADL. These findings should be considered in the follow-up of patients with diagnosis of chronic diseases, given the relevance of these conditions as factors contributing to disability in basic activities, which lead to a growing burden for family and society 28.
Among the younger elderly (60 to 74 years), the relative contribution of chronic diseases to the prevalence of disability was greater than in older seniors. Although the prevalence rates of disability and chronic diseases showed an upward trend with age (except for depression), corroborating other studies 16,17,18, the size of this increase does not follow the same trend in these events. Even without considering statistical differences, while prevalence rates for the two levels of disability more than doubled between the two age brackets, the prevalence rates of the diseases increased less (Table 1). This may be attributed to higher mortality from these diseases among the oldest old 29, consequently leading to the lower increase in the prevalence of these diseases and smaller contribution to disability in this age bracket. In the attribution method, the contribution of chronic diseases to disability depends on both the prevalence of the disease in the target population and the condition’s disabling impact (related to disability’s prevalence among individuals with the illness) 16. Thus, the disabling impact from the diseases among younger elders appears to carry more weight, while other factors besides the reported diseases contribute to the prevalence of disability during aging, leading to the observation of higher background values among the oldest old. Although chronic diseases are consistently associated with disability 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,30,31,32, other factors are also determinant in this event, such as socio-demographic conditions and health behaviors 33,34, which were not examined in detail in this study, but which are present in the background. One can thus suggest that the other factors show an uneven distribution between the age brackets, being more common among older seniors and exerting greater influence on prevalence of disability in this age group, contrary to the chronic diseases analyzed in the study. For example, among the elderly participating in the PNS, disability in some activity was greater in older smokers (43.4%), as opposed to smokers under 75 years of age (22%) (data not shown), which may partially explain the disability reported in this age group.
These results show the importance of early intervention, aimed at adequate control of the reported diseases, considering that in this life phase (under 75 years) the diseases play a greater role in the determination of disability, which may favor the drop in this prevalence at more advanced ages. The only exception is the relative contribution of stroke to disability in BADL in men, the effect of which increases with age, potentially attributable to the high percentage of disabled elderly in BADL in the older age bracket (70.2%) among those with a history of stroke, contrary to this prevalence in the younger group (46.6%). This pattern of greater contribution of disease to disability among older seniors has been seen in other populations 17,18 for the majority of the selected diseases, besides stroke, but these studies did not differentiate between levels of disability, used different ways of measuring this outcome, included greater age variation (considering non-elderly as well), and were conducted in European populations, which may have influenced the results.
Stroke and arthritis were the diseases that contributed most consistently to disability in this population, independently of sex and age bracket. Both have a direct impact on the body systems related to movement 35,36,37,38, and the measures of disability used in the current study feature those related to performing physical tasks (mobility and manual skills), more sensitive to the perception of neurological and musculoskeletal dysfunctions and their sequelae, more than other domains related to cognition. These measures of physical performance still predominate in studies focused on aspects of functionality and disability 6,7,9,10,17,31, which may explain the consistently important role of these diseases in the disability observed in this and other studies.
Hypertension and heart disease only showed a significant contribution to the prevalence of both levels of disability in women. A similar pattern has been reported in other populations, showing that both hypertension 39 and myocardial infarction 40 were the most important determinants of disability in women. This difference may be explained by the higher prevalence of diseases in the female population, including their greater ability to report the chronic condition or even the greater occurrence of non-fatal disease, when compared to the male population 39,40,41. Meanwhile, diabetes only showed a significant contribution to limitations in BADL, in both sexes. Like arthritis and stroke, diabetes may involve impairment of neuromuscular functions, in addition to sensory (visual) and circulatory functions 13, especially at more advanced ages, in which it is assumed that time with the disease is longer and consequently entails more (and more serious) sequelae 13,42. Such sequelae can thus lead to greater impact on the performance of basic activities of daily living, as observed in an Italian study 43, reinforcing the importance of this disease in more severe disability.
Another feature in the current study is the relative contribution of depression to the prevalence of disability in IADL in younger elderly women, second only to the contribution of heart disease. Other studies have already identified the association of disability with depression, predominantly in women 44,45,46, and the current study corroborates these findings, besides measuring the contribution’s proportion. Although the results point to a reduction in the prevalence of depression with age, the prevalence of disability in women with a diagnosis of depression appears to show the opposite association (increasing with age). For purposes of calculation, since attribution method considers these two estimates, the effect of the disease appears to be more important in younger elderly women and for limitations in tasks requiring a higher degree of cognition (IADL).
According to the PNS, 45% of the Brazilian adult population reports some chronic non-communicable disease, and among these the highest prevalence of disability was due to stroke, followed by arthritis, back pain, and musculoskeletal conditions, highlighting the relevance of these conditions for disability 47. In general, the relationship between chronic diseases and disability has been investigated in cross-sectional studies using regression models that only estimate associations 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,30,31,32, while few studies have used the attribution method to calculate the specific contribution of each disease to disability as the outcome 14,15,16,17,18,19. Of these, only one study 15 assessed the contribution of chronic diseases to the prevalence of disability in elderly Brazilians from the perspective of disparities between the sexes, using data from the PNS (2013). However, in the study, the outcome of disability was investigated from a binomial approach (with versus without disability), and the analysis failed to include a comparison of these contributions between different age groups, as had been explored in other populations 14,17,18. The current study was thus the first to assess possible differences in the contribution of chronic diseases to the prevalence of disability, considering sex, age bracket, and different levels of disability in elderly Brazilians.
The study’s potential limitations include its cross-sectional design, which does not allow establishing a temporal relationship between the variables, which may have led to biased interpretations, especially in cases where the disability may have preceded the disease. The exclusive use of self-reported information may also have introduced an information bias, since the ability to report the conditions included in the analysis is dependent on gender, age bracket, and use of health services, for example. In addition, comparisons with other studies should be done with caution, due to the different ways of measuring disability. In this study, disability was measured according to World Health Organization criteria 2, considering any degree of the elder’s difficulty in performing a given task, but not including information on the need for assistance from others, which could lead to differences in the estimates of prevalence 48. Finally, the study did not aim to establish the determinants of the relative contribution of the diseases to the disability, i.e., the discussion only raised possible hypotheses for the observed differences in relation to age bracket, sex, and type of impaired activity. As mentioned previously, the contribution estimated in this study is the result of a complex combination of the prevalence of the disease in the elderly Brazilian population and the chronic condition’s disabling impact, besides potentially being determined by other factors not measured in the analysis (background). On the other hand, the study was conducted in a representative sample of the elderly Brazilian population that used standardized data collection procedures, as the first study to present important differences in the contribution of selected diseases in relation to the stratification variables.
Conclusion
The results showed that the selected chronic diseases generally made a larger contribution to more severe disability (BADL) and that this contribution was greater in women and among the younger elderly. In addition, elderly with a diagnosis of arthritis, stroke, or diabetes should be monitored more effectively, considering the important contribution of these conditions to disability. This knowledge can orient action by health services to specific groups, considering age, sex, and concurrent diseases, aimed at the prevention of disability in the elderly.
Acknowledgments
A. M. Costa Filho received a scholarship from the Brazilian Graduate Studies Coordinating Board (Capes), and D. C. Malta, M. F. Lima-Costa, and S. V. Peixoto hold research scholarships from the Brazilian National Research (CNPq).
References
1
1. Alves LC, Leite IC, Machado CJ. Conceituando e mensurando a incapacidade funcional da população idosa: uma revisão de literatura. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2008; 13:1199-207.
Alves
LC
Leite
IC
Machado
CJ
Conceituando e mensurando a incapacidade funcional da população idosa uma revisão de literatura
Ciênc Saúde Coletiva
2008
13
1199
1207
2
2. Organização Mundial da Saúde. CIF: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. São Paulo: Edusp; 2015.
Organização Mundial da Saúde
CIF: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde
2015
São Paulo
Edusp
3
3. Solé-Auró A, Crimmins EM. Who cares? A comparison of informal and formal care provision in Spain, England and the USA. Ageing Soc 2014; 34:495-517.
Solé-Auró
A
Crimmins
EM
Who cares A comparison of informal and formal care provision in Spain, England and the USA
Ageing Soc
2014
34
495
517
4
4. Jang S-N, Avendano M, Kawachi I. Informal caregiving patterns in Korea and European countries: a cross-national comparison. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2012; 6:19-26.
Jang
S-N
Avendano
M
Kawachi
I
Informal caregiving patterns in Korea and European countries: a cross-national comparison
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci)
2012
6
19
26
5
5. Spiers NA, Matthews RJ, Jagger C, Matthews FE, Boult C, Robinson TG, et al. Diseases and impairments as risk factors for onset of disability in the older population in England and Wales: findings from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60:248-54.
Spiers
NA
Matthews
RJ
Jagger
C
Matthews
FE
Boult
C
Robinson
TG
Diseases and impairments as risk factors for onset of disability in the older population in England and Wales findings from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
2005
60
248
254
6
6. Parahyba MI, Veras R, Melzer D. Incapacidade funcional entre as mulheres idosas no Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública 2005; 39:383-91.
Parahyba
MI
Veras
R
Melzer
D
Incapacidade funcional entre as mulheres idosas no Brasil
Rev Saúde Pública
2005
39
383
391
7
7. Parahyba MI, Simões CCS. Disability prevalence among the elderly in Brazil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2006; 11:967-74.
Parahyba
MI
Simões
CCS
Disability prevalence among the elderly in Brazil
Ciênc Saúde Coletiva
2006
11
967
974
8
8. Puts MTE, Deeg DJH, Hoeymans N, Nusselder WJ, Schellevis FG. Changes in the prevalence of chronic disease and the association with disability in the older Dutch population between 1987 and 2001. Age Ageing 2008; 37:187-93.
Puts
MTE
Deeg
DJH
Hoeymans
N
Nusselder
WJ
Schellevis
FG
Changes in the prevalence of chronic disease and the association with disability in the older Dutch population between 1987 and 2001
Age Ageing
2008
37
187
193
9
9. Del Duca GF, Silva MC, Hallal PC. Incapacidade funcional para atividades básicas e instrumentais da vida diária em idosos. Rev Saúde Pública 2009; 43:796-805.
Del Duca
GF
Silva
MC
Hallal
PC
Incapacidade funcional para atividades básicas e instrumentais da vida diária em idosos
Rev Saúde Pública
2009
43
796
805
10
10. Alves LC, Leite IC, Machado CJ. Fatores associados à incapacidade funcional dos idosos no Brasil: análise multinível. Rev Saúde Pública 2010; 44:468-78.
Alves
LC
Leite
IC
Machado
CJ
Fatores associados à incapacidade funcional dos idosos no Brasil análise multinível
Rev Saúde Pública
2010
44
468
478
11
11. Hung WW, Ross JS, Boockvar KS, Siu AL. Association of chronic diseases and impairments with disability in older adults: a decade of change? Med Care 2012; 50:501-7.
Hung
WW
Ross
JS
Boockvar
KS
Siu
AL
Association of chronic diseases and impairments with disability in older adults a decade of change?
Med Care
2012
50
501
507
12
12. Garin N, Olaya B, Moneta MV, Miret M, Lobo A, Ayuso-Mateos JL, et al. Impact of multimorbidity on disability and quality of life in the spanish older population. PLoS One 2014; 9:e111498.
Garin
N
Olaya
B
Moneta
MV
Miret
M
Lobo
A
Ayuso-Mateos
JL
Impact of multimorbidity on disability and quality of life in the spanish older population
PLoS One
2014
9
e111498
13
13. de Rekeneire N, Volpato S. Physical function and disability in older adults with diabetes. Clin Geriatr Med 2015; 31:51-65.
de Rekeneire
N
Volpato
S
Physical function and disability in older adults with diabetes
Clin Geriatr Med
2015
31
51
65
14
14. Yokota RTC, van der Heyden J, Nusselder WJ, Robine J-M, Tafforeau J, Deboosere P, et al. Impact of chronic conditions and multimorbidity on the disability burden in the older population in Belgium. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2016; 71:903-9.
Yokota
RTC
van der Heyden
J
Nusselder
WJ
Robine
J-M
Tafforeau
J
Deboosere
P
Impact of chronic conditions and multimorbidity on the disability burden in the older population in Belgium
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
2016
71
903
909
15
15. Yokota RTC, de Moura L, Andrade SSC, de Sá NNB, Nusselder WJ, van Oyen H. Contribution of chronic conditions to gender disparities in disability in the older population in Brazil, 2013. Int J Public Health 2016; 61:1003-12.
Yokota
RTC
de Moura
L
Andrade
SSC
de Sá
NNB
Nusselder
WJ
van Oyen
H
Contribution of chronic conditions to gender disparities in disability in the older population in Brazil, 2013
Int J Public Health
2016
61
1003
1012
16
16. Nusselder WJ, Looman CW, Mackenbach JP, Huisman M, van Oyen H, Deboosere P, et al. The contribution of specific diseases to educational disparities in disability-free life expectancy. Am J Public Health 2005; 95:2035-41.
Nusselder
WJ
Looman
CW
Mackenbach
JP
Huisman
M
van Oyen
H
Deboosere
P
The contribution of specific diseases to educational disparities in disability-free life expectancy
Am J Public Health
2005
95
2035
2041
17
17. Klijs B, Nusselder WJ, Looman CW, Mackenbach JP. Contribution of chronic disease to the burden of disability. PLoS One 2011; 6:e25325.
Klijs
B
Nusselder
WJ
Looman
CW
Mackenbach
JP
Contribution of chronic disease to the burden of disability
PLoS One
2011
6
e25325
18
18. Yokota R, Berger N, Nusselder WJ, Robine J-M, Tafforeau J, Deboosere P, et al. Contribution of chronic diseases to the disability burden in a population 15 years and older, Belgium, 1997-2008. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:229.
Yokota
R
Berger
N
Nusselder
WJ
Robine
J-M
Tafforeau
J
Deboosere
P
Contribution of chronic diseases to the disability burden in a population 15 years and older, Belgium, 1997-2008
BMC Public Health
2015
15
229
229
19
19. Yokota RTC. Use of a multinomial additive hazards model to assess the disability burden using cross-sectional data. https://uhdspace.uhasselt.be/dspace/handle/1942/19407 (accessed on 09/Jul/2016).
Yokota
RTC
Use of a multinomial additive hazards model to assess the disability burden using cross-sectional data
https://uhdspace.uhasselt.be/dspace/handle/1942/19407
09/Jul/2016
20
20. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas: Brasil, grandes regiões e unidades da Federação. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2014.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas: Brasil, grandes regiões e unidades da Federação
Rio de Janeiro
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
2014
21
21. Malta DC, Leal MC, Costa MFL, Morais Neto OL. Inquéritos nacionais de saúde: experiência acumulada e proposta para o inquérito de saúde brasileiro. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2008; 11:159-67.
Malta
DC
Leal
MC
Costa
MFL
Morais
OL
Neto
Inquéritos nacionais de saúde experiência acumulada e proposta para o inquérito de saúde brasileiro
Rev Bras Epidemiol
2008
11
159
167
22
22. Szwarcwald CL, Malta DC, Pereira CA, Vieira MLFP, Conde WL, Souza Junior PRB, et al. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde no Brasil: concepção e metodologia de aplicação. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2014; 19:333-42.
Szwarcwald
CL
Malta
DC
Pereira
CA
Vieira
MLFP
Conde
WL
Souza
PRB
Junior
Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde no Brasil concepção e metodologia de aplicação
Ciênc Saúde Coletiva
2014
19
333
342
23
23. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185:914-9.
Katz
S
Ford
AB
Moskowitz
RW
Jackson
BA
Jaffe
MW
Studies of illness in the aged the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function
JAMA
1963
185
914
919
24
24. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9:179-86.
Lawton
MP
Brody
EM
Assessment of older people self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living
Gerontologist
1969
9
179
186
25
25. Nusselder WJ, Looman CW. Decomposition of differences in health expectancy by cause. Demography 2004; 4:315-34.
Nusselder
WJ
Looman
CW
Decomposition of differences in health expectancy by cause
Demography
2004
4
315
334
26
26. Nusselder WJ, Looman CW. WP7: decomposition tools. Technical report on attribution tool. http://www.eurohex.eu/pdf/Reports_2010/2010TR7.2_TR%20on%20attribution%20tool.pdf (accessed on 23/Oct/2016).
Nusselder
WJ
Looman
CW
WP7: decomposition tools. Technical report on attribution tool
http://www.eurohex.eu/pdf/Reports_2010/2010TR7.2_TR%20on%20attribution%20tool.pdf
23/Oct/2016
27
27. Duarte YAO, Andrade CL, Lebrão ML. O Índex de Katz na avaliação da funcionalidade dos idosos. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2007; 41:317-25.
Duarte
YAO
Andrade
CL
Lebrão
ML
O Índex de Katz na avaliação da funcionalidade dos idosos
Rev Esc Enferm USP
2007
41
317
325
28
28. Griffith LE, Raina P, Levasseur M, Sohel N, Payette H, Tuokko H, et al. Functional disability and social participation restriction associated with chronic conditions in middle-aged and older adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017; 71:381-9.
Griffith
LE
Raina
P
Levasseur
M
Sohel
N
Payette
H
Tuokko
H
Functional disability and social participation restriction associated with chronic conditions in middle-aged and older adults
J Epidemiol Community Health
2017
71
381
389
29
29. Solé-Auró A, Michaud P-C, Hurd M, Crimmins E. Disease incidence and mortality among older Americans and Europeans. Demography 2015; 52:593-611.
Solé-Auró
A
Michaud
P-C
Hurd
M
Crimmins
E
Disease incidence and mortality among older Americans and Europeans
Demography
2015
52
593
611
30
30. Ades PA, Savage PD, Tischler MD, Poehlman ET, Dee J, Niggel J. Determinants of disability in older coronary patients. Am Heart J 2002; 143:151-6.
Ades
PA
Savage
PD
Tischler
MD
Poehlman
ET
Dee
J
Niggel
J
Determinants of disability in older coronary patients
Am Heart J
2002
143
151
156
31
31. Santos KA, Koszuoski R, Dias-da-Costa JS, Pattussi MP. Fatores associados com a incapacidade funcional em idosos do Município de Guatambu, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2007; 23:2781-8.
Santos
KA
Koszuoski
R
Dias-da-Costa
JS
Pattussi
MP
Fatores associados com a incapacidade funcional em idosos do Município de Guatambu, Santa Catarina, Brasil
Cad Saúde Pública
2007
23
2781
2788
32
32. Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Salive ME. Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population. Annu Rev Public Health 1996; 17:25-46.
Guralnik
JM
Fried
LP
Salive
ME
Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population
Annu Rev Public Health
1996
17
25
46
33
33. Alves LC, Leimann BCQ, Vasconcelos MEL, Carvalho MS, Vasconcelos AGG, Fonseca TCO, et al. A influência das doenças crônicas na capacidade funcional dos idosos do Município de São Paulo, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2007; 23:1924-30.
Alves
LC
Leimann
BCQ
Vasconcelos
MEL
Carvalho
MS
Vasconcelos
AGG
Fonseca
TCO
A influência das doenças crônicas na capacidade funcional dos idosos do Município de São Paulo, Brasil
Cad Saúde Pública
2007
23
1924
1930
34
34. d'Orsi E, Xavier AJ, Steptoe A, de Oliveira C, Ramos LR, Orrell M, et al. Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors related to instrumental activity of daily living dynamics: results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62:1630-9.
d'Orsi
E
Xavier
AJ
Steptoe
A
de Oliveira
C
Ramos
LR
Orrell
M
Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors related to instrumental activity of daily living dynamics: results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
J Am Geriatr Soc
2014
62
1630
1639
35
35. Adamson J, Beswick A, Ebrahim S. Is stroke the most common cause of disability? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 13:171-7.
Adamson
J
Beswick
A
Ebrahim
S
Is stroke the most common cause of disability
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
2004
13
171
177
36
36. Gabriel SE, Michaud K. Epidemiological studies in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and comorbidity of the rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11:229.
Gabriel
SE
Michaud
K
Epidemiological studies in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and comorbidity of the rheumatic diseases
Arthritis Res Ther
2009
11
229
229
37
37. Arthritis Foundation. About arthritis: understanding arthritis. http://www.arthritis.org/about-arthritis/understanding-arthritis/ (accessed on 08/Dec/2015).
Arthritis Foundation
About arthritis: understanding arthritis
http://www.arthritis.org/about-arthritis/understanding-arthritis/
08/Dec/2015
38
38. Welmer AK, Angleman S, Rydwik E, Fratiglioni L, Qiu C. Association of cardiovascular burden with mobility limitation among elderly people: a population-based study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65815.
Welmer
AK
Angleman
S
Rydwik
E
Fratiglioni
L
Qiu
C
Association of cardiovascular burden with mobility limitation among elderly people a population-based study
PLoS One
2013
8
e65815
39
39. Hajjar I, Lackland DT, Cupples LA, Lipsitz LA. Association between concurrent and remote blood pressure and disability in older adults. Hypertension 2007; 50:1026-32.
Hajjar
I
Lackland
DT
Cupples
LA
Lipsitz
LA
Association between concurrent and remote blood pressure and disability in older adults
Hypertension
2007
50
1026
1032
40
40. Kattainen A, Koskinen S, Reunanen A, Martelin T, Knekt P, Aromaa A. Impact of cardiovascular diseases on activity limitations and need for help among older persons. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57:82-8.
Kattainen
A
Koskinen
S
Reunanen
A
Martelin
T
Knekt
P
Aromaa
A
Impact of cardiovascular diseases on activity limitations and need for help among older persons
J Clin Epidemiol
2004
57
82
88
41
41. Murtagh KN, Hubert HB. Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort. Am J Public Health 2004; 94:1406-11.
Murtagh
KN
Hubert
HB
Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort
Am J Public Health
2004
94
1406
1411
42
42. Wong E, Backholer K, Gearon E, Harding J, Freak-Poli R, Stevenson C, et al. Diabetes and risk of physical disability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013; 1:106-14.
Wong
E
Backholer
K
Gearon
E
Harding
J
Freak-Poli
R
Stevenson
C
Diabetes and risk of physical disability in adults a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2013
1
106
114
43
43. Maggi S, Noale M, Gallina P, Marzari C, Bianchi D, Limongi F, et al. Physical disability among older Italians with diabetes. The ILSA Study. Diabetologia 2004; 47:1957-62.
Maggi
S
Noale
M
Gallina
P
Marzari
C
Bianchi
D
Limongi
F
Physical disability among older Italians with diabetes The ILSA Study
Diabetologia
2004
47
1957
1962
44
44. Steffens DC, Hays JC, Krishnan KRR. Disability in geriatric depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 7:34-40.
Steffens
DC
Hays
JC
Krishnan
KRR
Disability in geriatric depression
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
2000
7
34
40
45
45. Beekman AT, Penninx BW, Deeg DJ, Beurs ED, Geerlings SW, Tilburg WV. The impact of depression on the well-being, disability and use of services in older adults: a longitudinal perspective. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002; 105:20-7.
Beekman
AT
Penninx
BW
Deeg
DJ
Beurs
ED
Geerlings
SW
Tilburg
WV
The impact of depression on the well-being, disability and use of services in older adults a longitudinal perspective
Acta Psychiatr Scand
2002
105
20
27
46
46. Parker G, Brotchie H. Gender differences in depression. Int Rev Psychiatry 2010; 22:429-36.
Parker
G
Brotchie
H
Gender differences in depression
Int Rev Psychiatry
2010
22
429
436
47
47. Malta DC, Bernal RT, de Souza MF, Szwarcwald CL, Lima MG, Barros MB. Social inequalities in the prevalence of self-reported chronic non-communicable diseases in Brazil: national health survey 2013. Int J Equity Health 2016; 15:153.
Malta
DC
Bernal
RT
de Souza
MF
Szwarcwald
CL
Lima
MG
Barros
MB
Social inequalities in the prevalence of self-reported chronic non-communicable diseases in Brazil national health survey 2013
Int J Equity Health
2016
15
153
153
48
48. Ramos LR, Andreoni S, Coelho-Filho JM, Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL, Rebouças M, et al. Perguntas mínimas para rastrear dependência em atividades da vida diária em idosos. Rev Saúde Pública 2013; 47:506-13.
Ramos
LR
Andreoni
S
Coelho-Filho
JM
Lima-Costa
MF
Matos
DL
Rebouças
M
Perguntas mínimas para rastrear dependência em atividades da vida diária em idosos
Rev Saúde Pública
2013
47
506
513
Autoría
Antônio Macêdo Costa Filho
Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo CruzBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Juliana Vaz de Melo Mambrini
Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo CruzBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Deborah Carvalho Malta
Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa
Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo CruzBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Sérgio Viana Peixoto ** Correspondence S. V. Peixoto Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002, Brasil. sergio@cpqrr.fiocruz.br
Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo CruzBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
* Correspondence S. V. Peixoto Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002, Brasil. sergio@cpqrr.fiocruz.br
All authors participated in all stages of the article’s production.
SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS
Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo CruzBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrazilBelo Horizonte, Brazil Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Table 2
Prevalence of disability in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (BADL) in elderly Brazilians with diagnosis of chronic diseases, according to sex and age bracket. National Health Survey, 2013.
Table 3
Coefficient (95%CI) and relative contribution of selected chronic diseases to disability in elderly Brazilians, according to sex, age bracket, and type of disability. National Health Survey, 2013.
table_chartTable 1
Prevalence of disability and chronic diseases in elderly Brazilians according to sex and age bracket. National Health Survey, 2013.
Variables
Total (%)
95%CI
60-74 years
75+ years
%
95%CI
%
95%CI
Men
Disability
With disability
74.9
72.4; 77.2
81.3
78.6; 83.8
55.5
49.7; 60.1
Disabled in IADL
11.4
9.8; 13.3
8.3
6.7; 10.1
21.0
16.9; 25.7
Disabled in BADL
13.6
11.9; 15.6
10.4
8.5; 12.6
23.5
19.4; 28.3
Chronic diseases
Arthritis
10.1
8.3; 12.2
9.7
7.7; 12.1
11.2
8.0; 15.4
Hypertension
47.6
44.7; 50.5
46.3
42.9; 49.6
51.4
46.0; 56.8
Diabetes
17.3
15.1; 19.7
17.0
14.4; 19.9
18.2
14.3; 22.8
Stroke
6.3
5.0; 7.8
5.1
3.8; 6.9
9.8
7.0; 13.5
Depression
4.9
3.7; 6.6
5.4
3.8; 7.6
3.5
2.0; 5.9
Lung disease
4.2
3.1; 5.6
3.9
2.7; 5.7
4.8
3.0; 7.7
Heart disease
13.1
11.0; 15.6
12.2
9.9; 15.0
16.0
12.0; 20.1
Women
Disability
With disability
68.1
66.2; 70.1
77.5
75.4; 79.5
41.2
37.3; 45.3
Disabled in IADL
15.9
14.4; 17.5
11.2
9.7; 12.9
29.5
25.7; 33.4
Disabled in BADL
15.9
14.5; 17.5
11.2
9.8; 12.8
29.3
25.9; 33.0
Chronic diseases
Arthritis
22.1
20.4; 24.0
20.9
19.0; 23.0
25.6
22.1; 29.4
Hypertension
55.8
53.5; 58.1
54.1
51.5; 56.8
60.6
56.3; 64.7
Diabetes
20.4
18.7; 22.2
19.7
17.8; 21.7
22.3
19.0; 26.0
Stroke
4.2
3.5; 5.1
3.7
2.9; 4.7
5.9
4.5; 7.8
Depression
13.6
12.0; 15.3
14.9
13.0; 16.9
9.9
7.6; 12.7
Lung disease
3.6
2.8; 4.5
3.4
2.5; 4.7
3.9
2.7; 5.6
Heart disease
10.9
9.7; 12.4
10.3
8.8; 12.1
12.8
10.5; 15.4
table_chartTable 2
Prevalence of disability in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (BADL) in elderly Brazilians with diagnosis of chronic diseases, according to sex and age bracket. National Health Survey, 2013.
Variables
Prevalence of disability (%)
60-74 years
75+ years
IADL
95%CI
BADL
95%CI
IADL
95%CI
BADL
95%CI
Men
Arthritis
11.9
6.6; 20.4
27.0
17.0; 40.0
21.8
12.0; 36.3
35.6
22.4; 51.6
Hypertension
9.2
7.0; 12.0
13.1
10.1; 16.9
22.1
16.6; 28.7
23.9
18.2; 30.8
Diabetes
10.2
6.6; 15.4
12.3
8.5; 17.5
16.1
9.6; 25.7
31.6
21.7; 43.5
Stroke
16.8
8.1; 31.7
46.6
32.6; 61.1
19.5
10.5; 33.3
70.2
55.6; 81.5
Depression
8.4
4.0; 16.5
26.3
12.9; 46.3
25.1
10.2; 49.7
21.8
8.1; 46.7
Lung disease
11.5
3.5; 32.2
30.6
14.4; 53.6
16.5
7.3; 33.2
40.4
21.3; 63.0
Heart disease
13.1
7.9; 21.1
15.9
10.0; 24.2
25.2
15.9; 37.4
29.6
18.5; 43.8
Women
Arthritis
10.8
8.4; 13.8
18.9
15.2; 23.3
27.2
21.2; 34.0
40.7
33.0; 49.0
Hypertension
12.5
10.6; 14.8
14.7
12.4; 17.2
29.6
25.2; 34.4
30.4
26.0; 35.1
Diabetes
12.2
9.5; 15.5
18.1
14.2; 22.9
29.8
22.4; 38.5
37.9
29.1; 47.4
Stroke
15.3
8.9; 25.1
34.6
23.5; 47.8
24.8
15.0; 38.3
59.2
45.6; 71.5
Depression
17.2
12.2; 23.7
14.3
10.2; 19.6
37.0
24.8; 51.0
35.8
25.2; 48.0
Lung disease
17.2
8.9; 30.7
12.9
6.2; 25.1
26.1
13.8; 43.8
44.2
27.0; 62.9
Heart disease
20.8
15.0; 28.0
19.3
14.1; 25.9
31.8
23.3; 41.6
43.3
33.7; 53.4
table_chartTable 3
Coefficient (95%CI) and relative contribution of selected chronic diseases to disability in elderly Brazilians, according to sex, age bracket, and type of disability. National Health Survey, 2013.
Chronic diseases
Disability in IADL
Disability in BADL
Coefficient
95%CI
Relative contribution (%)
Coefficient
95%CI
Relative contribution (%)
60-74 years
75+ years
60-74 years
75+ years
Men
Background
-
-
75.77
87.14
-
-
46.51
57.87
Arthritis
0.04 *
0.01; 0.07
3.81
1.96
0.20 *
0.18; 0.23
14.38
8.50
Hypertension
0.01
-0.01; 0.01
6.09
3.02
0.01
-0.04; 0.03
4.78
2.59
Diabetes
-0.002
-0.01; 0.02
-0.52
-0.22
0.03 *
0.01; 0.04
5.03
2.90
Stroke
0.18 *
0.15; 0.22
5.59
3.07
0.81 *
0.79; 1.05
20.49
22.62
Depression
0.01
-0.04; 0.04
0.95
0.33
0.01 *
0.00; 0.08
0.71
0.23
Lung disease
-0.03
-0.06; 0.07
-1.20
-0.64
0.15*
0.01; 0.21
4.46
3.05
Heart disease
0.07
-0.01; 0.10
9.5
5.31
0.04
-0.01; 0.08
3.60
2.22
Women
Background
-
-
73.17
90.79
-
-
27.26
69.86
Arthritis
-0.01
-0.03; 0.02
-2.35
-0.95
0.11 *
0.09; 0.14
17.51
7.31
Hypertension
0.01 *
0.01; 0.02
6.56
2.72
0.05 *
0.05; 0.06
20.10
7.58
Diabetes
0.01
-0.01; 0.00
1.45
0.57
0.09 *
0.07; 0.15
13.77
5.15
Stroke
0.07 *
0.01; 0.17
1.47
0.67
0.42 *
0.35; 0.51
8.73
5.43
Depression
0.08 *
0.01; 0.12
8.92
2.01
0.04
-0.00; 0.04
4.33
0.90
Lung disease
0.05
-0.01; 0.06
1.42
0.45
0.01
-0.11; 0.17
0.30
0.12
Heart disease
0.13 *
0.06; 0.16
9.34
3.71
0.13 *
0.08; 0.14
7.96
3.60
Como citar
Costa, Antônio Macêdo et al. Contribución de enfermedades crónicas a la prevalencia de incapacidad en actividades básicas e instrumentales de la vida diaria entre ancianos brasileños: Encuesta Nacional de Salud (2013). Cadernos de Saúde Pública [online]. 2018, v. 34, n. 1 [Accedido 18 Abril 2025], e00204016. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00204016>. Epub 05 Feb 2018. ISSN 1678-4464. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00204016.
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo CruzRua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480 , 21041-210 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel.:+55 21 2598-2511, Fax: +55 21 2598-2737 / +55 21 2598-2514 -
Rio de Janeiro -
RJ -
Brazil E-mail: cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
rss_feed
Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.