Police and policing |
Connection with military police (conflict-consensus-coalition-collusion). São Paulo. |
Imposition of rules by illicit organizations (robbery, other offences). São Paulo. |
Control over weapons. São Paulo. |
Military presence, militarization of public security. São Paulo. |
Regulatory practices |
Homicide (prohibition). São Paulo. |
Gang behavior. São Paulo. |
Control of territories (entry, movements). São Paulo (partial). |
Control of arms by illicit organizations. São Paulo. |
Control of other public behavior. São Paulo. |
Control of sexual behavior and other forms of violence. |
Law of silence imposed by criminal organization. São Paulo. |
Imposition of social rules (clothing, sexual relationships, etc.). |
- |
Justice |
Dispute resolution. São Paulo. |
“Informal justice” (executions, lynchings, persecution). Partly São Paulo. |
Debt collection. São Paulo. |
Judgments (and decisions, punishments, executions). São Paulo. |
Other judgment or dispute resolution functions. |
Tax collection. |
Other regulatory practices. |
Fulfillment of contracts-agreements. São Paulo. |
Public services (provision, capture, use) |
Other practices in Mexico City. São Paulo, in critical moments (2006, 2012). |
Other regulatory economic practices |
With national or international capital. |
Economic-commercial: regulation of trade on public roads (use of space, control of goods, employees, security guards). |
Intimidation of the formal-legal market through extortion in Mexico City. |
Loans (forced), to aid businesses, to improve housing, basic food baskets. Partly São Paulo. |
Corruption-extortion. São Paulo. |
Social regulatory practices |
Transgressive conduct, associations. São Paulo. |
Attachment to the law |
Legal cynicism (ambiguity) of politicians, citizens and criminal actors. São Paulo. |
Type and size of illicit market (market power) |
Large markets; monopoly of cocaine trafficking in SP; diversity in Mexico City and São Paulo. |
Prisons |
Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC) has control over prisons, prisoners, guards, internal practices. In Mexico City there is nothing. |
|
Articulation with neighborhoods in São Paulo. Disarticulation and predatory practices in Mexico City |
Policies |
Community relations: clientelism and vote buying; electoral political clans in Mexico; voter control through informal trade organizations. |
Participation in security with collective action dilemmas; tolerance is the dominant strategy, along with criticism of police work. |
Other forms of citizen involvement: participatory budgeting in Mexico City. |
Commitment to elections (candidacies, sponsorship, voters, campaigns, pressure on the media and on electoral institutions) in Mexico. |
Other forms of political involvement. |
Capture of political positions, control of employees, control of budgets in territorial demarcations in Mexico City. |
Promotion or inhibition of political competition: in Mexico, candidacies are not controlled and participation in various organizations is promoted. |
Territorial control practices Socio-spatial conditions |
Urban socio-spatial and temporal regimes associated with socio-spatial segregation. |
Behavior and presence-co-presence practices of other criminal organizations |
Control in SP; conflicting and unstable co-presence in Mexico. |
Control-articulation (centralization, decentralization, franchising). |
Leadership. In every organization in Mexico City there is an ongoing struggle for command. In São Paulo, this problem and leadership succession are resolved by the “rules” and the so-called sintonias. |
Relationship with the government elite |
Interaction with heads of merchant associations, elected representatives, mayors and other members of the government of Mexico City. Weak evidence in São Paulo. |
Connection with the local, national, transnational elite |
In Mexico City, through party alliances and hidden sponsorship. |
City government regime and citizen participation |
Clientelism |