Lopes17
|
2011 |
Noncontrolled clinical trial |
Drawing, painting, and image cutting |
Rey's Complex Figure Test Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) |
n=6 Rey's Complex Figure Test: 16.8% increase in overall post-intervention score MMSE: 30 and 33.3% increase in the score in the Attention and Calculation items |
Toscano et al.18
|
2017 |
Controlled clinical trial |
Drawing, painting, and image cutting |
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) MMSE Dartmouth COOP/WONCA Functional Health Rating Scale (El COOP/WONCA) |
n=32 Control group (CG): n=16 Intervention group (IG): n=16 Significant improvement in the Student's t-test in: BDI-II: −3.47 MMSE: −3.25 Feelings (t=-3.22) and Social Activities (-5.05) |
Hattori et al.19
|
2011 |
Controlled clinical trial |
CG: drawing, painting, and image cutting GI: math calculation involving multiplication and addition |
MMSE Wechsler Memory Scale – Revised (WMS-R) Geriatric Depression Scale (GDR) Apathy Scale (Japanese version) SF-8 |
n=39 CG: n=19 IG: n=20 GI: MMSE: (significant difference compared to the CG, p=0.0015) Apathy Scale: (significant improvement compared to the CG, p=0.0014) MCS-8: (p=0.38, OR=5.54) |
Zhao et al.20
|
2018 |
Controlled clinical trial |
IG: warm-up by interaction game, drawing, and painting CG: occupational rehabilitation (exercises by lens, cognitive, and speech training strategy) |
Changsha-Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Chinese version of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (CVAVLT) Chinese version of the Category Verbal Fluency Test (CVCVFT) Digital Span Test (DST) Chinese version of Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) Chinese version of the Activities of Daily Living (CVADL) scale |
n=93 CG: n=45 IG: n=48 Both groups showed good post-intervention results IG: greater benefits than CG on all instruments MOCA: F=21.24, p<0.001 CVAVLT memory domain – memory: immediate: F=4.81, p=0.023 and daily F=3.98, p=0.012 CVCVFT language function domain: F=3.91, p=0.017 Cognitive function: F=23; 35. p<0.001 Attention domain: F=3.29, p=0.030 Memory satisfaction (MSQ: F=18.39, p<00001) |
Masika et al.21
|
2020 |
Controlled clinical trial |
IG: drawing, painting, and artistic expression. CG: educational guidelines in health |
Montreal Cognitive Assessment – 5-minute protocol (MOCA-5min) Geriatric Depression Scale – Short Form (GDS-SF) |
n=39 IG: n=21 CG: n=18 MOCA: IG and CG had significant improvements in cognitive scores over time GDS-SF: IG shows more intense improvement in scores than CG (β=-3.0, SE=0.822, p<0.001) |
Seifert et al.22
|
2017 |
Controlled clinical trial |
IG: sculpture assembly activities CG: painting, singing, and playing |
MMSE Neuro-Psychiatric Inventory (NPI) |
n=12 CG: n=6 IG: n=6 MMSE: There were no significant differences between CG and IG NPI: There were no significant differences between CG and IG |
Mahendran et al.23
|
2018 |
Randomized controlled trial |
IG I: (art therapy) IG II (Musical reminiscence activities) CG: did not receive therapeutic intervention |
Rey's Verbal Auditory Learning Test (RAVLT) Third edition of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Visuospatial Skill Tests Procedural and Attention Tests Color Test GDS Geriatric Anxiety Inventory Analog visual scale Telomere Size Analysis |
n=68 IG I: n=22 IG II: n=24 CG: n=22 Wechsler Scale: Higher mean scores in the CG for the items List Learning (CI=90%, (d)=0.542) and Digit Span Forward (d=0.0991; CI=90%; p=0.028) IG (art therapy): good results in the items Delayed Recall, Recognition Trials, Black Design, and Coolor Trials 2, but not statistically significant and higher than the CG. GDS: IG (art therapy) and IG II (musical reminiscence activities) had a decrease in the scale, but not statistically significant (p≥0.005) Telomere size: increase in telomere size (p=0.03) in the IG (art therapy) and IG II (musical reminiscence activities, p=0.076) |
Tietyen and Richards24
|
2017 |
No controlled clinical trial |
Decoration, collage, painting, ceramics, photography, printing, and photo mounting |
Alzheimer's Disease Quality of Life Scale (QoL-AD) Rosenberg High Estimate Scale Smiley Face Mood Assessment Systematic Observation |
n=8 QoL-AD: Improved index of all scale scores Rosenberg High Estimate Scale – Improvement in the index of all scale scores Smiley Face Mood Assessment – Improved index of all scale scores |
Costa et al.25
|
2020 |
Clinical controlled trial |
Collage, painting on canvas, watercolors, dry pastel, and drawing. IG: received guidance from researchers CG: did not receive guidance from researchers |
MOCA Verbal Phonemic Fluency Clock-Drawing Test TMT-A and TMT-B Stroop Test Wechsler Memory Scale III Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS) World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref) |
n=12 CG: n=3 IG: n=9 MOCA: negative medians in both groups TMT-A and TMT-B: negative medians in both groups Stroop Test: negative medians in the Unguided Group WHOQOL-Bref: negative medians in the Guided Group |
Savazzi et al.26
|
2020 |
Randomized controlled trial |
IG: Painting, drawings, and creative stimulation through audiovisual means CG: Did not receive treatment |
QoL-AD Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) The Cognitive Subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (ADAS-cog) |
n=20 CG: n=10 IG: n=10 QoL-AD: improvement in IG's quality of life NPI: improvement in IG scores (frequency, p=0.014; nuisance, p=0.006). ADAS-cog: statistically significant improvement in quality of life in IG compared to CG, p<0.001) |
Johnson et al.27
|
2020 |
Randomized controlled trial |
IG: drawing and collage GC: waiting list |
MOCA Backward Digit Span Test |
n=53 CG: n=26 IG: n=27 MOCA (General Cognition): IG had no significant differences from the CG (GI: M=0.37; SD=2.7) MOCA (Delayed Recall): authors claim that it is impossible to declare whether or not there were statistically significant differences IG: M=-0.093; SD=0.68; CG: M=0.15; SD=0.61 Backward Digit Span Test: there were no significant differences between IG: M=-0.037; SD=1.3 and CG: (M=0.040; SD=1.8) |
Richards and Tietyen28
|
2019 |
Randomized controlled trial |
Decoration, collage, painting, ceramics, photography, printing marks, and photo mounting |
Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale QoL-AD Functional Assessment Questionnaire |
n=27 CG: n= 12 IG: n=15 Rosenberg High Estimate Scale: significant post-intervention differences in IG compared to CG (p=0.028) QoL-AD: better results were found in the scores, but statistically nonsignificant results after the intervention compared to CG (p=0.082); FAQ: statistically nonsignificant post-intervention results (p=0.17); |
Choi and Jeon29
|
2013 |
Quasi-experimental study |
Drawing, painting, and decorating |
MMSE-Korean version (MMSE-KC) GDS-SF Quality of Life Questionnaire derived from the Ministry of Health of South Korea |
n=64 CG: n=30 IG: n=34 MMSE-KC: IG had statistically significant improvements compared with CG (t=6.72, p<0.001) GDS-SF: IG had statistically significant improvements compared with CG (z=-4.55, p<0.001) Quality of Life: IG patients improved more significantly than CG patients (t=-2.39, p<0.05) |
Windle et al.30
|
2017 |
Longitudinal study |
Elaboration of sculptures, paintings, and drawings |
The Greater Cincinnati Chapter Well Being Observation Tool (GCCWBOT) Quality of Life and Dementia Scale (DEMQOL) Holden Communication Scale |
n=125 GCCWBOT: Significant improvements were found in the “negative affections” (p=0.001) and “interest” (p≤0.001) domains. No changes to normality and disengagement items. DEMQOL: no significant changes were found Holden Communication Scale: results indicate worsening of social behavior and communication with the person with neurocognitive disorder |