First author (year) |
Bracket |
n |
Transversal variables increase (mm) |
Sagittal variables increase (degrees/mm) |
This study |
SL (passive 1) |
51 |
3+3 (1.82±1.99***); 4+4 (3.68±2.27***); 5+5(3.27±2.23***); 6+6 (2.47±1.74***); 7+7 (2.39±1.75***); 3-3 (0.55±2.32NS); 4-4 (3.01±2.17***); 5-5 (2.49±2.13***); 6-6 (1.79±1.61***) ; 7-7 (2.68±1.66***) |
IMPA (3.15±6.78***); ArchD (0.25±1.41 NS); MAng (7.00±4.41***) |
CL |
55 |
3+3 (1.03±2.28**); 4+4 (2.63±1.94***); 5+5(2.73±1.92***); 6+6 (1.79±1.51***); 7+7 (0.83±1.03***); 3-3 (0.91±1.79***); 4-4 (1.9±1.85***); 5-5 (2.01±2.15***); 6-6 (1.08±1.97***) ; 7-7 (0.5±1.3*) |
IMPA (7.13±5.53***); ArchD (0.91±3.66 NS); MAng (0.66±5.28 NS) |
Pandis1616 Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: A prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):208-15.
(2007) |
SL (passive 1) |
27 |
3-3 (1.08**); 6-6 (2.04**) |
IMPA (7.41***) |
CL |
27 |
3-3 (1.58**); 6-6 (0.43**) |
IMPA (6.22***) |
Scott1919 Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):470.e1-8.
(2008) |
SL (passive 1) |
32 |
3-3 (2.55±2.27*); 6-6 (-0.09±2.40*) |
IMPA (1.73±4.06*); ArchD (-2.27±2.63*) |
CL |
28 |
3-3 (2.66±2.33*); 6-6 (0.63±2.12*) |
IMPA (2.34±3.72*); ArchD (-1.33±3.39*) |
Jiang1717 Jiang R, Fu M. [Non-extraction treatment with self-ligating and conventional brackets]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;43(8):459-63.
(2008) |
SL (passive 1) |
13 |
6-6 (1.42 NS) |
L1-Apo (2.66 mm NS) |
CL |
13 |
6-6 (0.65 NS) |
L1-APo (1.57 mm NS) |
Fleming99 Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, Johal A. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):185-93.
(2013) |
SL (passive 2) |
29 |
3-3 (0.85±1.52); 4-4 (0.73±2.06); 5-5 (1.43±2.23); 6-6 (1.41±1.7 NS) |
IMPA (4.41±3.19) |
CL |
31 |
3-3 (1.17±1.77); 4-4 (1.16±1.55); 5-5 (1.72±1.80); 6-6 (0.5±1.44 NS) |
IMPA (4.32±4.16) |
Tecco2323 Tecco S, Tetè S, Perillo L, Chimenti C, Festa F. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances. World J Orthod. 2009;10(4):290-4.
(2009) |
SL (passive 1) |
20 |
3+3 (3.3±2.6*); 4+4 (4.4±2.5*); 5+5 (4.2±1.8*); 6+6 (2.3±1.5*) |
-- |
CL |
20 |
3+3 (2.6±2.4*); 4+4 (4.3±2.1*); 5+5 (4.1±2.1*); 6+6 (2.4±2.0*) |
-- |
Pandis1818 Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, Eliades T. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2010 June 1;32(3):248-53.
(2010) |
SL (passive 1) |
27 |
3-3 (1.6**); 6-6 (2.4**) |
IMPA (3.1) |
CL |
27 |
3-3 (1.8**); 6-6 (1.0**) |
IMPA (5.1) |
Vajaria1414 Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, Galang MT, Obrez A. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system. Angle Orthod. 2011 July;81(4):647-52.
(2011) |
SL (passive 1) |
27 |
3+3 (1.74±3.44*); 4+4 (2.87±3.03***); 5+5 (2.77±3.19***); 6+6 (2.79±1.60***); 3-3 (2.24±1.66***); 4-4 (4.21±2.19***); 5-5 (4.35±2.53***); 6-6 (2.24±166***) |
IMPA (6.09±6.94***); ArchD (1.37±1.98 NS) |
CL |
16 |
3+3 (1.72±2.72*); 4+4 (3.44±1.80***); 5+5 (2.87±2.41***); 6+6 (0.60±2.42 NS); 3-3 (1.85±2.47*); 4-4 (3.22±2.77***); 5-5 (2.60±3.36***); 6-6 (1.85±2.47*) |
IMPA (5.33±5.59***); ArchD (0.90±1.72 NS) |
Pandis2424 Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: A single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sept;140(3):e99-105.
(2011) |
SL (passive 2) |
25 |
3-3 (1.40±0.8); 6-6 (1.9±1.3) |
-- |
CL |
25 |
3-3 (2.1±1.2); 6-6 (1.5±0.9) |
-- |
Fleming99 Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, Johal A. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):185-93.
(2013) |
SL (passive 1) |
28 |
3+3 (1.97±2.16); 4+4 (4.51±2.68); 5+5 (3.96±2.51); 6+6 (1.22±2.26) |
-- |
SL (active 1) |
31 |
3+3 (1.78±2.21); 4+4 (3.75±2.31); 5+5 (3.78±1.91); 6+6 (1.82±1.59) |
-- |
CL |
28 |
3+3 (0.88±2.18); 4+4 (3.7±3.19); 5+5 (3.59±2.8); 6+6 (1.41±2.08) |
-- |
Almeida77 Almeida MR de, Futagami C, Conti AC de CF, Oltramari-Navarro PVP, Navarro R de L. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 June;20(3):50-7.
(2015) |
SL (passive 3) |
13 |
4-4 (1.27±1.95*); 5-5 (2.10±1.00*); 6-6 (0.92±088*) |
-- |
CL |
12 |
4-4 (1.87±2.30*); 5-5 (1.75±1.33*); 6-6 (0.46±0.77*) |
-- |
Yu2020 Yu Z, Jiaqiang L, Weiting C, Wang Y, Zhen M, Ni Z. Stability of treatment with self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in adolescents: a long-term follow-up retrospective study. Head Face Med. 2014 Dec 20;10(1):41.
(2014) |
SL (passive 2-3) |
15 |
3+3 (1.89±1.23); 6+6 (2.36±1.20); 3-3 (0.68±1.46); 6-6 (2.14±1.56) |
ArchD (2.31±1.56) |
CL |
14 |
3+3 (1.86±1.36); 6+6 (1.12±0.87); 3-3 (0.56±1.56); 6-6 (2.06±1.68) |
ArchD (1.98±1.76) |
Celikoglu1313 Celikoglu M, Bayram M, Nur M, Kilkis D. Mandibular changes during initial alignment with SmartClip self-ligating and conventional brackets: a single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Korean J Orthod. 2015 Mar;45(2):89.
(2015) |
SL(passive 2) |
22 |
3-3 (0.88±1.47*); 6-6 (0.51±0.92) |
IMPA (5.25±4.77***) |
CL |
24 |
3-3 (068±1.48*); 6-6 (0.61±1.15) |
IMPA (5.38±3.37***) |
Anand1111 Anand M, Turpin DL, Jumani KS, Spiekerman CF, Huang GJ. Retrospective investigation of the effects and efficiency of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 July;148(1):67-75.
(2015) |
SL (passive 1) |
37 |
3+3 (0.7±3.0); 6+6 (0.6±2.1); 3-3 (1.1±1.9); 6-6 (0.8±2.3) |
IMPA (5.6±6.3); ArchD (2.3±3.2) |
CL |
37 |
3+3 (-0.3±1.9); 6+6 (0.3±1.9); 3-3 (1.0±1.5); 6-6 (1.6±1.7) |
IMPA (4.9±5.2); ArchD (0.5±2.3) |
SL (passive 1) |
17 |
3+3 (1.5±3.4); 6+6 (0.3±3.2); 3-3 (1.4±1.4); 6-6 (2.2±1.4) |
IMPA (1.5±4.3); ArchD (-0.2±2.5) |
CL |
17 |
3+3 (-0.8±1.5); 6+6 (0.7±1.8); 3-3 (0.2±1.7); 6-6 (0.5±1.6) |
IMPA (6.0±7.4); ArchD (0.9±3.8) |