HEI Infrastructure |
1 |
Resources made available by UFSM libraries. |
1 = Inadequate 2 = Not suitable 3 = Adequate 4 = Very suitable 5 = Totally adequate |
2 |
Infrastructure available at the Teaching Centres (or campuses outside the headquarters) for holding conferences and events. |
3 |
Safety measures practised at the university. |
4 |
The campus infrastructure. |
5 |
The infrastructure used by the program. |
6 |
The adequacy of the infrastructure used by the program for PNE (Persons with Special Needs). |
7 |
The equipment available. |
8 |
The labs available. |
9 |
Internet access in the classrooms used by the program. |
10 |
Internet access in common areas at the university. |
11 |
Internet access in my workroom. |
Course Professors |
12 |
The professors are responsive. |
1 = I totally disagree 2 = I partially disagree 3 = I neither disagree nor agree 4 = I partially agree 5 = I totally agree |
13 |
The professors are accessible. |
14 |
The professors adopt good teaching practices. |
15 |
The professors have specific knowledge that they add to my training. |
16 |
The professors have general knowledge that adds to my training. |
17 |
The professors have international academic contacts. |
18 |
The professors publish in international journals. |
Course Subjects |
19 |
I can understand the concepts discussed in the subjects. |
|
20 |
I can apply the concepts discussed in the subjects. |
21 |
I believe the classes are of good quality. |
22 |
The subject’s activities are adequate. |
23 |
The bibliography is predominantly based on international literature. |
24 |
The bibliography is updated. |
25 |
The use of writing articles as an assessing criterion is appropriate. |
26 |
The assessment criteria are adequate. |
27 |
I receive feedback from the activities I perform in the course. |
28 |
Grading is consistent with my performance. |
29 |
The recommended readings are appropriate to what is discussed in the classroom. |
30 |
The amount of readings is adequate to what is discussed in the classroom. |
31 |
The course workload is fulfilled. |
32 |
The program content is fulfilled. |
Advisor Support |
33 |
My advisor has a good relationship with me. |
|
34 |
My advisor treats me respectfully. |
35 |
My advisor is a good researcher. |
36 |
My advisor is patient with me. |
37 |
My advisor always assists me when I need it. |
38 |
My advisor quickly returns the requests I submit. |
39 |
My advisor is easily accessible. |
40 |
My advisor encourages me to attend events. |
41 |
My advisor helps me publish articles in national journals. |
42 |
My advisor helps me publish articles in international journals. |
43 |
My advisor helps me get international academic contacts. |
44 |
My advisor places me in activities (meetings, presentations, projects, articles etc.). |
45 |
My advisor masters the knowledge related to the subject of my dissertation/thesis. |
46 |
My advisor masters the methodological procedures necessary for the development of my dissertation/thesis. |
47 |
My advisor discusses my research with me regularly. |
48 |
My advisor teaches me to find work that is relevant to the development of my work. |
49 |
My advisor provides constructive feedback and guidance for my work. |
50 |
My advisor is essential for the elaboration of my dissertation/thesis. |
Administrative Support |
51 |
The secretary is courteous. |
|
52 |
The secretary is always willing to help. |
53 |
The secretary provides correct information. |
54 |
The secretary is accessible during working hours. |
55 |
The secretary answers my questions. |
56 |
The secretary treats me respectfully. |
57 |
The secretary updates me with academic proceedings. |
Graduate Course Impacts |
58 |
The teaching quality of the course is high. |
|
59 |
The international performance of the course is relevant. |
60 |
The regional impact of the course is high. |
61 |
The national impact of the course is high. |
62 |
The course is properly coordinated. |
63 |
The course has an efficient information system (website, emails, media). |
Professional Development |
64 |
My national academic production evolved from the learning acquired in the course. |
|
65 |
My international academic production evolved from the learning acquired in the course. |
66 |
The course improved my specific knowledge in my field of expertise. |
67 |
The completion of the course has been important for my professional career. |
Selection Processes |
68 |
The requirements for joining the program are clear. |
|
69 |
The selection process is fair. |
70 |
The criteria for awarding scholarships are clear. |
71 |
The curriculum structure of the course (research lines, subjects, credits) is adequate to the course goals. |
Satisfaction with the Course |
72 |
Course curriculum structure. |
0 (completely unsatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) |
73 |
Course faculty competencies. |
74 |
Course internationalisation. |
75 |
Regional impacts of the course. |
76 |
Incentive to Academic Production. |
77 |
Course Selection Criteria. |
78 |
Career/labour market preparation. |
79 |
Overall satisfaction with the advisor. |
80 |
Overall satisfaction with the course. |