Abstract
This paper characterizes the third generation of privatization of São Paulo education, viewed as a result of articulated incidence of private business-based agents, organized in a systemic and institutional manner. The sense of privatization of education grounds itself on Belfield and Levin ( 2002 BELFIELD, Clive; LEVIN, Henry. Education privatization: causes, consequences and planning implications. [S. l.] Unesco, 2002 Disponível em: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/516407 . Acesso em: jul. 2021.
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/516...
) and implies the transfer of state of São Paulo government’s activities and responsibilities to private organizations concerning three dimensions of educational policies: curriculum, educational provision and educational management. (Adrião, 2018 ADRIÃO, Theresa. Dimensões e formas da privatização da educação no Brasil: caracterização a partir de mapeamento de produções nacionais e internacionais. Currículo sem Fronteiras, v. 18, p. 8-28, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.curriculosemfronteiras.org/vol18iss1articles/adriao.pdf . Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.
http://www.curriculosemfronteiras.org/vo...
). The period corresponds to the original format of “Programa de Compromisso São Paulo pela Educação (2011-2018)” and analyzes the consequences of “Programa Educação Integral (PEI)” in sixteen pilot schools. Data is sourced from documental research (web pages, official documents and data banks). Results indicate: the absence of publicly available data pertaining to the analyzed programs; that PEI has not altered offer conditions or drastically impacted schools, which, for the most part, were already above average; that corporate management of educations installation by private associations was lead by philanthrocapitalists who demanded returns and evidence on the results of their private investments, a condition opposite to democratic education management.
Keywords
Philanthrocapitalism
;
Privatization
;
Education
;
Third generation
;
São Paulo