fm
Fisioterapia em Movimento
Fisioter. mov.
1980-5918
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
Resumen
Introducción:
Niños con sobrepeso/obesidad pueden tener menores escores de coordinación motora, comparados a las eutróficas.
Objetivo:
Comparar la coordinación motora gruesa entre escolares con sobrepeso/obesidad y eutróficos, y analizar factores asociados a coordinación motora.
Método:
Este estudio transversal incluyó niños de 6-9 años, de ambos géneros. Se excluyeron: niños con malformaciones congénitas, deformidades osteomioarticulares, trastornos neurológicos o IMC < -2 escore-z. Se evaluó la coordinación motora gruesa por las pruebas Körperkoordinations test für Kinder (KTK). Factores asociados a los escores de coordinación motora fueron analizados por regresión lineal.
Resultado:
Las medias de los escores en la marcha hacia atrás (84,2 ± 13,2 vs. 91,0 ± 15,0), saltos monopedales (127,9 ± 10,1 vs. 132,3 ± 12,1, transferencia en plataformas (123,5 ± 23,4 vs. 129,8 ± 14,9) y escore global (112,5 ± 14,8 vs. 118,8 ± 11,6) fueron significativamente menores (p < 0,05) en niños con sobrepeso/obesidad, comparados a las eutróficas. El porcentaje de alumnos con escore motor deficiente (< 85) fue mayor en sobrepeso/obesidad en la marcha hacia atrás (60,4% vs. 36,4%, p = 0,004) y similares en los saltos laterales (18,8% vs. 9,9%, p = 0,116) y transferencia lateral (6,3% vs. 0,8%, p = 0,070). En el análisis de regresión lineal múltiple, las variables sobrepeso/obesidad y práctica de deporte < 2 veces/semana redujeron significantemente (p < 0,05) el puntaje motor global en 18,7 y 15,6 puntos, respectivamente.
Conclusiones:
Niños con sobrepeso/obesidad presentaron menores escores de coordinación motora que las eutróficas. Sobrepeso/obesidad y baja frecuencia de actividad física se asociaron a menores escores de coordinación motora gruesa.
Introduction
Global estimates show that the prevalence of overweight/obesity among children has increased from 4.2%, in 1990, to 6.7%, in 2010. Moreover, in 2010 there were approximately 43 million overweight/obese children worldwide, of whom 35 million resided in developing countries 1.
Obese children and adolescents frequently show a higher frequency of physical and psychological comorbidities 2, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes, insulin resistance, dyslipidemias, coronary diseases, and sleep disorders 3), (4.
Furthermore, Utesch et al. 5 pointed out that overweight/obese children had greater difficulty, both in motor skills and in the future, and were less prone to a physical activity routine. Another study conducted with 165 children showed worse scores for abdominal activities, balance, and 6-minute walk test among children with severe obesity when compared to their eutrophic pairs 6. According to Liang et al. 7, obese subjects have twice as many motor difficulties as their normal-weight counterparts.
In childhood and adolescence obesity may also affect the neurocognitive functions, such as cognitive processing speed, speech, learning, memory, attention, and visual and spatial performance 7), (8.
In this sense, the literature points out that poor motor coordination, not only negatively affects normal motor development, but may also influence the development of academic activities and peer interaction in social and physical activities 9), (10.
Although the knowledge that motor disorders may interfere with the academic or daily life activities, there are few studies in gross and fine motor coordination, specially using the KTK test in obese schoolchildren 11.
In this context, this study aimed to compare gross motor coordination between overweight/obese and normal-weight children, as well as to investigate associated factors with the gross motor coordination scores.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 6-9-year-old children, of both genders, enrolled at two public schools in Itabuna, BA, Brazil. Exclusion criteria were congenital malformations, bone, muscle, and joint deformities, neurological disorders that prevented test performance, and the body mass index (BMI) z-score for age below -2, classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) 12 as underweight or severe underweight.
The motor coordination was assessed by the “Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder” (KTK) [Body Coordination Test for Kids] 13), (14. This test is composed by the following subtests: 1) balancing backwards over three progressively narrow boards (6 cm, 4.5 cm, and 3 cm wide) and walking up to 8 steps. Three valid trials were recorded. Participants were not allowed to touch the floor with their feet during the test. 2) Hoppingon one foot over rectangular foam rubber mats (50 cm x 20 cm x 5 cm each), placedon top of each other. The maximum height was 60 cm. The right and left legs were tested separately, and subjects were allowed three trials. 3) Jumping sideways as fast as possible with both feet together over a lath on the floor in two sets of 15 seconds. 4) Shifting platforms sidewise. The child had to stand on one platform and move the other identical platform to the opposite side, using both hands, then move sideways to the other platform and repeat this procedure as often as possible for two sets of 20 seconds 13), (14 (Figure 1).
Figure 1
1A: balancing backwards; 1B: hopping over on one foot; 1C: jumping sideways; 1D/1E: shifting platforms.
The overall objective of the KTK is to measure the degree of motor deficit for the activities of balance, rhythm, laterality, speed, and agility. The balancing backwards measures the child’s degree of stability in backward movement; hopping over on one foot assesses lower limb coordination and dynamic energy / strength; jumping sideways measures the velocity; and the shifting platforms sidewise measures laterality and spatiotemporal structuration 10.
The KTS tests were applied for the participant children after the researcher had instructed and demonstrated the trial. The motor scores for each test, as well as that for the overall motor score, were calculated according to the test guidelines 14 and classified as normal if above 85 points, and as low motor performance when less than or equal to 85 14.
The KTS test is widely used in Germany, and in other countries, by many healthcare professionals, being specially applied by physical educators 9), (15. In Brazil, the KTS test was validated by Gorla et al. 14 and has been used to assess gross motor coordination in 5-14-year-old children 16), (17.
In this study, the children’s weight was measured wearing light clothes and no footwear, on a Welmy analog scale (model R-110, series 11953) with precise 100 g and variation of 2 to 150 Kg. Each child’s height was measured with a stadiometer (Nutri Vida, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), with intervals of 0.5 cm between the set values.
Overweight was defined as a BMI z-score greater or equal to 1 and less than 2, and obesity was stated when BMI z-score was equal or greater than 2 12.
At the baseline, the following information was collected: sociodemographic and anthropometric data, and frequency of physical activity outside of the school schedule per week.
The Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo (#238.369) approved this study. At the start of the study, all parents or legal guardians were asked to give a written informed consent, as well as all children.
Statistical Analysis
Numerical variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (range). Normally distributed variables were compared by the t test, otherwise the Mann-Whitney U test was used. Categorical variables were expressed as number (percentage) and compared by the chi-square test or by the Fisher’s exact test. Factors that could potentially be associated with lower motor coordination score were examined with the univariate and the multiple linear regression analyses. First the researchers of this study performed a univariate analysis of the clinical variables that could possibly be associated with the motor scores. Variables with statistical significance below 0.20 upon univariate and regression analysis (except for the collinear variables with the same clinical significance) were included in the multivariate analysis.
All analyses were conducted using the SPSS for Win/v.17.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Somers, NY). The level of significance was set at 5%.
Results
At the time of the study, 225 children aged 6-9 years were enrolled in the two biggest schools of Itabuna that agreed to participate in the study. Thirty-two (82.1%) of 45 enrolled students in school A and 137 (81.1%) of 180 enrolled students in school B were included in the sample. Of 225 children, 17 (7.6%) fulfilled the exclusion criteria, and 208 (92.4%) children met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 39 (18.8%) students did not agree to participate; thus, the final study sample was composed of 169 (81.3%) students.
The mean age of the sample was 8.1 ± 1.2 years old (range = 6.0 - 9.9) and 85 of the studied sample (50.3%) were male. One hundred and twenty-one children (71.6%; 95%CI: 64.4 - 77.9%) were normal-weight, 29 of them (17.2%; 95%CI: 12.2 - 23.6%) were overweight, and 19 of them (11.2%; 95%CI: 7.3 - 16.9%) were obese. For comparison purposes, the children were divided into two groups: normal-weight (n = 121) and overweight/obese (n = 48). Both groups had similar age (8.2 ± 1.3 vs. 8.0 ± 1.2, p = 0.770) and male gender participation (52.1 vs. 49.6%, p = 0.182). But the two groups had different weight (36.6 ± 8.4 vs. 25.8 ± 4.5kg, p < 0.001) and BMI z-score (1.9 ± 0.7 vs. -0.3 ± 0.8, p < 0.001).
Practice of physical activity for at least twice a week was similar for both the overweight/obese and the normal-weight groups (87.5% vs. 80.2%, p = 0.260).
The mean motor quotient for hopping over on one foot (127.9 ± 10.1 vs. 132.3 ± 121.1 ± 12.1, p = 0.027), balancing backwards (84.2 ± 13.2 vs. 91.0 ± 15.0, p = 0.027), and shifting platforms sidewise (123.5 ± 23.4 vs. 129.8 ± 14.9, p = 0.038) subtests, as well as for the overall test scores (112.5 ± 14.8 vs. 118.8 ± 11.6, p = 0.04) were significantly lower for the overweight/obese compared to the eutrophic group. There were no significant differences in the jumping sideways subtest or in the maximum height of obstacles in the hopping over on one foot subtest (Table 1).
Table 1
Means and standard deviations of the motor quotients of the performed tests according to the nutritional status
Overweight/obese (n = 48)
Eutrophic (n = 121)
p
MQ jumping sideways
103.5 ± 16.4
105.8 ± 16.1
0.399
MQ hopping over on one foot
127.9 ± 10.1
132.3 ± 12.1
0.027
MQ balancing backwards
84.2 ± 13.2
91.0 ± 15.0
0.007
MQ shifting platforms
123.5 ± 23.4
129.8 ± 14.9
0.038
MQ overall score
112.5 ± 14.8
118.8 ± 11.6
0.004
Note: MQ: motor quociente score; p value: t test.
The percentage of children with altered overall motor coordination (score < 85) was higher in the overweight/obese group than in the eutrophic group (4.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.005). When compared to their normal-weight counterparts, the overweight/obese students showed a higher frequency of altered gross motor coordination (MQ < 85) during the balancing backwards subtest (60.4% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.004), and greater likelihood of deficits on the shifting platforms sidewise subtest (6.3% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.070). Both groups had similar scores on the jumping sideways subtest (18.8% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.116). None of the students had altered motor function on the hopping over on one foot subtest.
Sports practice for less than two times per week, compared to more than two times per week, scored less in jumping sideways (140.0 ± 15.6 vs. 110.5 ± 17.7, p = 0.045), and in the overall score (116.0 ± 12.8 vs. 121.8 ± 12.6, p = 0.025), respectively (Table 2).
Table 2
Mean and standard deviations of the motor quotients of the performed tests according to the level of physical activities
Sports < 2 times/week (n = 139)
Sports > 2 times/week (n = 30)
p
QM jumping sideways
104.0 ± 15.6
110.5 ± 17.7
0.045
QM hopping over on one foot
130.5 ± 11.8
133.3 ± 1 2.0
0.226
QM balancing backwards
88.3 ± 14.6
92.8 ± 15.7
0.232
QM shifting platforms
127.4 ± 18.6
131.0 ± 14.0
0.307
QM overall score
116.0 ± 12.8
121.8 ± 12.6
0.025
Note: MQ: motor quociente score; p value: t-test
Male and female children showed similar mean motor quotient for hopping over on one foot (130.7 ± 11.5 vs. 131.3 ± 12.0, p = 0.743), balancing backwards (88.5 ± 13.1 ± 89.6 ± 16.5, p = 0.649), and shifting platforms sidewise (129.1 ± 18.4 vs. 126.9 ± 17.3, p = 0.427) subtests, as well as for the overall test scores (72.3 ± 22.1 vs. 83.4 ± 19.5, p = 0.112). However, for jumping sideways (110.5 ± 14.5 vs. 99.8 ± 16.0, p < 0.001), boys presented higher mean score than girls.
By linear univariate analysis, the associated factors with lower overall motor coordination scores were from the overweight/obese group, BMI, BMI-z-score, and practice of sports for less than two times a week (Table 3).
Table 3
Univariate linear regression analysis for associated factors with the overall motor scores
Beta
CI 95%
p
Female
−11.264
−23.338 to 0.810
0.067
Overweight/obesity
−19.843
−33.021 to -6.664
0.003
BMI (kg/cm2)
−3.510
−5.481 to -1.540
0.001
BMI z-score
−5.196
−9.869 to -0.524
0.030
Sports for < 2 times/week
−17.489
−33.223 to -1.756
0.030
After excluding collinear variables and adjusting them for gender, overweight/obesity, and sports for < 2 times/week, the associated factors with overall motor coordination scores were overweight/obesity and practice of sports for less than twice a week (Table 4).
Table 4
Multiple linear regression analysis for associated factors with the overall motor scores
Beta
95%CI
p
Overweight/obesity
−18.700
−31.813 to -5.587
0.005
Sports for < 2 times/week
−15.579
−31.055 to -0.103
0.049
Note: Adjusted for gender. Overweight/obesity and Sports for < 2 times/week.
Conclusion
This study showed a high frequency of overweight/obese children and also low level of physical activity outside the school, compared to the 6.7%worldwide prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity (95%CI: 5.6%, 7.7%) in 2010 1.
The overweight/obese children presented lower overall motor coordination scores and lower scores than the eutrophic scholars in the followings sub-tests: hopping over on one foot, balancing backwards, and shifting platform sidewise. The motor coordination lowest score was found in the overweight/obese children with physical activity for less than twice a week.
This study showed that except the jumping sideways subtest, the overweight/obese children presented lower motor coordination scores in all KTK subtests. In addition, there were higher percentage of overweight/obese children with altered scores of overall gross motor coordination and balancing backwards subtest compared to the normal-weight students. This performance of overweight/obese children on the KTS test may suggests that they have, compared to eutrophic children, lower motor coordination and dynamic energy, lower stability during movement, and lower degree of laterality and spatiotemporality. These results agree to other studies referring that overweight/obesity is associated with the delayed motor development in children 18), (19, and when compared to normal-weight children, obese children have significantly lower motor performance and tend to be less skilled in related tasks involving support, propulsion, and movement 20. Likewise, a study with 6-9-year-olds and 13-year-olds showed that overweight/obese children had, respectively, 5.2 and 5.4 greater chance to present lower motor development scores than normal-weight children 21. This reinforces the finding that the BMI increase affects normal motor patterns and flexibility 21. Furthermore, a study with 1,276 children showed significantly lower scores on all KTK subtests in the overweight/obese children compared to their normal-weight counterparts 22.
In this study, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the overall motor coordination score was negatively associated with overweight/obesity and practice of sports for less than twice a week. As well as Henrique et al. 23) showed, motor coordination in children assessed by the KTK test was negatively associated with subcutaneous fat, higher BMI, and lower scores in physical fitness tests. Also, Freitas et al. 24 found that the BMI increase had a negative impact on the acquisition of coordination and essential motor skills, assessed by the KTK tests.
Regarding physical activity, as in this study, Morrison et al. 25) reported that children with high body fat percentages and low levels of physical activity showed worse motor performance. Another study evaluated 794 children and concluded that low levels of physical activity were negatively associated with motor ability between the overweight/obese groups 26.
Despite the well-recognized benefits of physical activity on motor development, adherence to it was extremely low in this study. Over 80% of the children performed physical activity at least twice a week at school, but only 20% performed physical activity outside the school environment.
As for the influence of physical activity on motor development, it is widely known that overweight children may experience motor difficulties that limit their participation in physical activity 27. This may cause children to prefer a sedentary life to an active life and is directly associated with impaired development of motor skills 19. This suggests that an early intervention program to control weight would benefit these children. Pona et al. 28 reported that after a program to control weight a significant interaction between child age and time of intervention revealed that younger children exhibited greater decreases in z-score body mass index over the treatment compared to older children.
In this study, the linear regression analysis showed that females and males presented similar overall KTK performance, only with a higher mean score in jumping sideways for boys than for girls. The literature is controversial regarding children’s gender-related motor performance. A study with 2,470 children from 26 German schools showed that girls had better performance than boys on the balancing backwards and on the hopping over on one foot subtests, and no statistically significant differences on the jumping sideways and on the shifting platforms sidewise subtests 9. A previous study that used the KTK on 627 children aged from 5 to 6 years found no differences in motor skills between males and females 29. However, another study showed that boys had 1.72 more chance of motor discoordination than girls when walking in the cross bars 30. Lopes et al. 31 evaluated 7175 overweight/obese and eutrophic children aged from 6 to 14 years with the KTK and concluded that regardless of gender, overweight/obese children had lower motor development scores when compared to the eutrophic group. The motor development of the sample was positively associated with the children’s level of physical activity, while the opposite was associated with the concomitant BMI increase, especially observed in 11-year-old children, regardless of gender. It may suggest that the influence of overweight/obesity on motor coordination may overlap the influence of gender 32 as this study observed. The gender variable has lost its statistical significance in the final model of the linear regression, remaining only the nutritional status variables and the physical activity level.
One strong point of this study is the fact that the KTK tests were performed by the same examiner, which ensured the administration uniformity. In addition, the fact that more than 80% of the students of both schools were included may have contributed to its internal validity.
The limitations of this study are its cross-sectional design, which preclude the case-effect nature of associated factors with gross motor coordination; and the inclusion of only two schools that may have compromised the external validity of this study. In addition, the authors point out the likelihood selection bias, since the students were included by spontaneous demand and both groups may not represent the real population in terms of nutritional status and motor coordination, which could have interfered in the results.
In conclusion, overweight/obese children had lower gross motor coordination scores than their normal-weight counterparts when assessed by the KTK tests. The associated factors with the lower motor coordination scores were overweight/obesity and sports practice for < 2 times/week.
References
1
1. Onis M, Blössner M, Borghi E. Global prevalence and trends overweight and obesity among preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(5):1257-64.
Onis
M
Blössner
M
Borghi
E
Global prevalence and trends overweight and obesity among preschool children
Am J Clin Nutr
2010
92
5
1257
1264
2
2. O'Malley G, Clarke M, Burls A, Murphy S, Murphy N, Perry IJ. A smartphone intervention for adolescent obesity: study protocol for a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2014;15:15-43.
O'Malley
G
Clarke
M
Burls
A
Murphy
S
Murphy
N
Perry
IJ
A smartphone intervention for adolescent obesity study protocol for a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Trials
2014
15
15
43
3
3. Moore SM, Borawski EA, Cuttler L, Ievers-Landis CE, Love TE. IMPACT: a multi-level family and school intervention targeting obesity in urban youth. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;36(2):574-86.
Moore
SM
Borawski
EA
Cuttler
L
Ievers-Landis
CE
Love
TE
IMPACT a multi-level family and school intervention targeting obesity in urban youth
Contemp Clin Trials
2013
36
2
574
586
4
4. Händel MN, Larsen SC, Rohde JF, Stougaard M, Olsen NJ, Heitmann BL. Effects of the Healthy Start randomized intervention trial on physical activity among normal weight preschool children predisposed to overweight and obesity. PloS One. 2017;12(10):e0185266.
Händel
MN
Larsen
SC
Rohde
JF
Stougaard
M
Olsen
NJ
Heitmann
BL
Effects of the Healthy Start randomized intervention trial on physical activity among normal weight preschool children predisposed to overweight and obesity
PloS One
2017
12
10
e0185266
5
5. Utesch T, Dreiskämper D, Naul R, Geukes K. Understanding physical (in) activity, overweight and obesity childhood: effects of congruence between physical self-concept and motor competence. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5908.
Utesch
T
Dreiskämper
D
Naul
R
Geukes
K
Understanding physical (in) activity, overweight and obesity childhood effects of congruence between physical self-concept and motor competence
Sci Rep
2018
8
1
5908
5908
6
6. Häcker AL, Bigras JL, Henderson M, Barnett TA, Mathieu ME. Motor skills of obese and severely obese children and adolescents - a CIRCUIT study. J Strength Cond Res. 2017. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002213.
Häcker
AL
Bigras
JL
Henderson
M
Barnett
TA
Mathieu
ME
Motor skills of obese and severely obese children and adolescents - a CIRCUIT study
J Strength Cond Res
2017
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002213
7
7. Liang J, Matheson BE, Kaye WH, Boutelle KN. Neurocognitive correlates of obesity and obesity-related behaviors in children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2014;38(4):494-506.
Liang
J
Matheson
BE
Kaye
WH
Boutelle
KN
Neurocognitive correlates of obesity and obesity-related behaviors in children and adolescents
Int J Obes
2014
38
4
494
506
8
8. Sweat V, Yates KF, Migliaccio R, Convit A. Obese adolescents show reduced cognitive processing speed compared with healthy weight peers. Child Obes. 2017;13(3):190-6.
Sweat
V
Yates
KF
Migliaccio
R
Convit
A
Obese adolescents show reduced cognitive processing speed compared with healthy weight peers
Child Obes
2017
13
3
190
196
9
9. Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche J, Lefevre J, Pion J, Vaeyens R, Matthys S, et al. The Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder: reference values and suitability for 6-12-year-old children in Flanders. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(3):378-88.
Vandorpe
B
Vandendriessche
J
Lefevre
J
Pion
J
Vaeyens
R
Matthys
S
The Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder reference values and suitability for 6-12-year-old children in Flanders
Scand J Med Sci Sports
2011
21
3
378
388
10
10. Glazebrook C, Baty MJ, Mullan N, Macdonald I, Nathan D, Sayal K, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of a schools-based programme to promote exercise self-efficacy in children and young people with risk factors for obesity: step to active kids (STAK). BMC Public Health. 2011;11:830.
Glazebrook
C
Baty
MJ
Mullan
N
Macdonald
I
Nathan
D
Sayal
K
Evaluating the effectiveness of a schools-based programme to promote exercise self-efficacy in children and young people with risk factors for obesity step to active kids (STAK)
BMC Public Health
2011
11
830
830
11
11. Cairney J, Hay JA, Faught BE, Hawes R. Developmental coordination disorder and overweight and obesity in children aged 9-14y. Int J Obes. 2005;29(4):369-72.
Cairney
J
Hay
JA
Faught
BE
Hawes
R
Developmental coordination disorder and overweight and obesity in children aged 9-14y
Int J Obes
2005
29
4
369
372
12
12. WHO. World Health Organization. Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Supl. 2006;450:76-85.
WHO. World Health Organization
Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age
Acta Paediatr Supl
2006
450
76
85
13
13. Kiphard EJ, Schilling VF. Köoperkoordination test für kinder KTK: manual Von Fridhelm Schilling. Weinhein: Beltz Test GmBH; 1974.
Kiphard
EJ
Schilling
VF
Köoperkoordination test für kinder KTK: manual Von Fridhelm Schilling
1974
Weinhein
Beltz Test GmBH
14
14. Gorla JI, Araújo PF, Rodrigues JL. O teste de coordenação motora KTK. In: Avaliação motora em Educação Física Adaptada. 2a ed. São Paulo: Phorte; 2009, p. 104-15.
Gorla
JI
Araújo
PF
Rodrigues
JL
Avaliação motora em Educação Física Adaptada
O teste de coordenação motora KTK
2009
2
São Paulo
Phorte
104
115
15
15. Lopes VP, Maia JAR, Silva RG, Seabra A, Morais FP. Estudo do nível de desenvolvimento da coordenação motora da população escolar (6 a 10 anos de idade) da Região Autónoma dos Açores. Rev Port de Cienc Desp. 2003;3(1):47-60.
Lopes
VP
Maia
JAR
Silva
RG
Seabra
A
Morais
FP
Estudo do nível de desenvolvimento da coordenação motora da população escolar (6 a 10 anos de idade) da Região Autónoma dos Açores
Rev Port de Cienc Desp
2003
3
1
47
60
16
16. Ribeiro AS, Formiga CK, David AC. Healthy preterm infants: global motor coordination and early intervention. Fisioter Mov. 2015;28(1):85-95.
Ribeiro
AS
Formiga
CK
David
AC
Healthy preterm infants: global motor coordination and early intervention
Fisioter Mov
2015
28
1
85
95
17
17. Costa VS, Silva HM, Azevêdo M, Silva AR, Cabral LL, Barros JF. Efeito da equoterapia na coordenação motora global em sujeitos com Síndrome de Down. Fisioter Mov. 2017;30(Suppl 1):229-40.
Costa
VS
Silva
HM
Azevêdo
M
Silva
AR
Cabral
LL
Barros
JF
Efeito da equoterapia na coordenação motora global em sujeitos com Síndrome de Down
Fisioter Mov
2017
30
Suppl 1
229
240
18
18. Alievi PT, Carvalho PR, Trotta EA, Mombelli Filho R. The impact of admission to a pediatric intensive care unit assessed by means of global and cognitive performance scales. J Pediatr. 2007;83(6):505-11.
Alievi
PT
Carvalho
PR
Trotta
EA
Mombelli
R
Filho
The impact of admission to a pediatric intensive care unit assessed by means of global and cognitive performance scales
J Pediatr
2007
83
6
505
511
19
19. D'Hondt E, Deforche B, Gentier I, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vaeyens R, Philippaerts R, et al. A longitudinal analysis of gross motor coordination in overweight and obese children versus normal-weight peers. Int J Obes. 2013;37(1):61-7.
D'Hondt
E
Deforche
B
Gentier
I
De Bourdeaudhuij
I
Vaeyens
R
Philippaerts
R
A longitudinal analysis of gross motor coordination in overweight and obese children versus normal-weight peers
Int J Obes
2013
37
1
61
67
20
20. Lopes L, Santos R, Moreira C, Pereira B, Lopes VP. Sensitivity and specificity of different measures of adiposity to distinguish between low/high motor coordination. J Pediatr. 2015;91(1):44-51.
Lopes
L
Santos
R
Moreira
C
Pereira
B
Lopes
VP
Sensitivity and specificity of different measures of adiposity to distinguish between low/high motor coordination
J Pediatr
2015
91
1
44
51
21
21. Lopes L, Póvoas S, Mota J, Okely AD, Coelho-E-Silva MJ, Cliff DP, et al. Flexibility is associated with motor competence in schoolchildren. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(21):1806-13.
Lopes
L
Póvoas
S
Mota
J
Okely
AD
Coelho-E-Silva
MJ
Cliff
DP
Flexibility is associated with motor competence in schoolchildren
Scand J Med Sci Sports
2017
27
21
1806
1813
22
22. Lima RA, Bugge A, Pfeiffer KA, Andersen LB. Tracking of gross motor coordination from childhood into adolescence. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017;88(1):52-9.
Lima
RA
Bugge
A
Pfeiffer
KA
Andersen
LB
Tracking of gross motor coordination from childhood into adolescence
Res Q Exerc Sport
2017
88
1
52
59
23
23. Henrique RS, Bustamante AV, Freitas DL, Tani G, Katzmarzyk PT, Maia JA. Tracking of gross motor coordination in Portuguese children. J Sport Sci. 2018;36(2):220-8.
Henrique
RS
Bustamante
AV
Freitas
DL
Tani
G
Katzmarzyk
PT
Maia
JA
Tracking of gross motor coordination in Portuguese children
J Sport Sci
2018
36
2
220
228
24
24. Freitas DL, Lausen B, Maia JA, Lefevre J, Gouveia ÉR, Thomis M, et al. Skeletal maturation, fundamental motor skills and motor coordination in children 7-10 years. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(9):924-34.
Freitas
DL
Lausen
B
Maia
JA
Lefevre
J
Gouveia
ÉR
Thomis
M
Skeletal maturation, fundamental motor skills and motor coordination in children 7-10 years
J Sports Sci
2015
33
9
924
934
25
25. Morrison K, Bugge A, El-Naaman B, Eisenmann JC, Froberg K, Pfeiffer KA, et al. Inter-relationships among physical activity, body fat, and motor performance in 6- to 8-year-old Danish children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24(2):199-209.
Morrison
K
Bugge
A
El-Naaman
B
Eisenmann
JC
Froberg
K
Pfeiffer
KA
Inter-relationships among physical activity, body fat, and motor performance in 6- to 8-year-old Danish children
Pediatr Exerc Sci
2012
24
2
199
209
26
26. Melo MM, Lopes VP. Associação entre o índice de massa corporal e a coordenação motora em crianças. Rev Bras Educ Fis Esporte. 2013;27(1):7-13.
Melo
MM
Lopes
VP
Associação entre o índice de massa corporal e a coordenação motora em crianças
Rev Bras Educ Fis Esporte
2013
27
1
7
13
27
27. Lloyd J, Creanor C, Price L, Abraham C, Dean S, Green C, et al. Trial baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trail of a school-located obesity prevention programme; the Healthy Lifestyles Programme (HeLP) Trail. Pols One. 2017;17:91.
Lloyd
J
Creanor
C
Price
L
Abraham
C
Dean
S
Green
C
Trial baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trail of a school-located obesity prevention programme; the Healthy Lifestyles Programme (HeLP) Trail
Pols One
2017
17
91
91
28
28. Pona AA, Dreyer Gillette ML, Odar Stough C, Gerling JK, Sweeney BR. Long-Term outcomes of a multidisciplinary weight management intervention for youth with disabilities. Child Obes. 2017;13(6):455-61.
Pona
AA
Dreyer Gillette
ML
Odar Stough
C
Gerling
JK
Sweeney
BR
Long-Term outcomes of a multidisciplinary weight management intervention for youth with disabilities
Child Obes
2017
13
6
455
461
29
29. Olesen LG, Kristensen PL, Ried-Larsen M, Grøntved A, Froberg K. Physical activity and motor skills in children attending 43 preschools: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatrics. 2014;14:229.
Olesen
LG
Kristensen
PL
Ried-Larsen
M
Grøntved
A
Froberg
K
Physical activity and motor skills in children attending 43 preschools: a cross-sectional study
BMC Pediatrics
2014
14
229
229
30
30. Reis MS, Lisboa T, Alexandre JM, Capristano R, Santos JOL, Beltrame TS. Associação entre fatores antropométricos e desempenho de escolares em tarefas de equilíbrio. Fisioter Bras. 2017;18(5):580-8.
Reis
MS
Lisboa
T
Alexandre
JM
Capristano
R
Santos
JOL
Beltrame
TS
Associação entre fatores antropométricos e desempenho de escolares em tarefas de equilíbrio
Fisioter Bras
2017
18
5
580
588
31
31. Lopes LO, Lopes VP, Santos R, Pereira BO. Associações entre atividade física, habilidades e coordenação motora em crianças portuguesas. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2011;13(1):15-21.
Lopes
LO
Lopes
VP
Santos
R
Pereira
BO
Associações entre atividade física, habilidades e coordenação motora em crianças portuguesas
Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum
2011
13
1
15
21
32
32. Slining M, Adair LS, Goldman BD, Borja JB, Bentley M. Infant overweight is associated with delayed motor development. J Pediatr. 2010;157(1):20-5.
Slining
M
Adair
LS
Goldman
BD
Borja
JB
Bentley
M
Infant overweight is associated with delayed motor development
J Pediatr
2010
157
1
20
25
Autoría
Fabiana do S. da Silva Dias de Andrade
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Table 4
Multiple linear regression analysis for associated factors with the overall motor scores
imageFigure 1
1A: balancing backwards; 1B: hopping over on one foot; 1C: jumping sideways; 1D/1E: shifting platforms.
open_in_new
table_chartTable 1
Means and standard deviations of the motor quotients of the performed tests according to the nutritional status
Overweight/obese (n = 48)
Eutrophic (n = 121)
p
MQ jumping sideways
103.5 ± 16.4
105.8 ± 16.1
0.399
MQ hopping over on one foot
127.9 ± 10.1
132.3 ± 12.1
0.027
MQ balancing backwards
84.2 ± 13.2
91.0 ± 15.0
0.007
MQ shifting platforms
123.5 ± 23.4
129.8 ± 14.9
0.038
MQ overall score
112.5 ± 14.8
118.8 ± 11.6
0.004
table_chartTable 2
Mean and standard deviations of the motor quotients of the performed tests according to the level of physical activities
Sports < 2 times/week (n = 139)
Sports > 2 times/week (n = 30)
p
QM jumping sideways
104.0 ± 15.6
110.5 ± 17.7
0.045
QM hopping over on one foot
130.5 ± 11.8
133.3 ± 1 2.0
0.226
QM balancing backwards
88.3 ± 14.6
92.8 ± 15.7
0.232
QM shifting platforms
127.4 ± 18.6
131.0 ± 14.0
0.307
QM overall score
116.0 ± 12.8
121.8 ± 12.6
0.025
table_chartTable 3
Univariate linear regression analysis for associated factors with the overall motor scores
Beta
CI 95%
p
Female
−11.264
−23.338 to 0.810
0.067
Overweight/obesity
−19.843
−33.021 to -6.664
0.003
BMI (kg/cm2)
−3.510
−5.481 to -1.540
0.001
BMI z-score
−5.196
−9.869 to -0.524
0.030
Sports for < 2 times/week
−17.489
−33.223 to -1.756
0.030
table_chartTable 4
Multiple linear regression analysis for associated factors with the overall motor scores
Beta
95%CI
p
Overweight/obesity
−18.700
−31.813 to -5.587
0.005
Sports for < 2 times/week
−15.579
−31.055 to -0.103
0.049
Como citar
Andrade, Fabiana do S. da Silva Dias de, Davidson, Josy y Santos, Amélia Miyashiro Nunes dos. Análisis comparativo de la coordinación motora gruesa en niños con sobrepeso / obesidad y eutróficas. Fisioterapia em Movimento [online]. 2020, v. 33 [Accedido 4 Abril 2025], e003313. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.033.AO13>. Epub 24 Ene 2020. ISSN 1980-5918. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.033.AO13.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.