Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The indigenous critique and the divided brain hypothesis: Ideas to postpone the end of the World

A crítica indígena e a hipótese do cérebro dividido: Ideias para adiar o fim do mundo

ABSTRACT

The voice of Indigenous intellectuals on the conduct of the European conquerors, whenever and wherever in the Americas it has been recorded, consists of a thoroughgoing critique of the Europeans’ genocidal and ecocide al proclivities. In recent times, the voice has taken on apocalyptic tones, emphasizing that the West’s chronic disregard for nature imperils all of us, with Ayton Krenak’s eloquent appeal for ‘ideas to postpone the end of the world’. An astoundingly similar critique of the Western World based on neuroscience comes from the Scottish psychiatrist and philosopher Iain McGilchrist whose Divided Brain Hypothesis proposes an explanation for what the West has become: an existential threat to human survival. Others such as Mignolo, de Sousa Santos, Bateson, Harries-Jones, have put forward ideas which align with this hypothesis, but this essay brings these two currents together for the first time and proposes that it was the West’s conquest of the Americas - its people, its natural resources - that was a key factor in normalizing this mindset. To extend the metaphor, the conquest of the American hemisphere normalized the conquest of the right hemisphere by the left.

Keywords:
Indigenous; Divided Brain Hypothesis; Conquest of the Americas; Western mindset

Programas de Pós-Graduação em Letras da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) Rua Professor Marcos Waldemar de Freitas Reis, s/n, Bloco C - sala 518, CEP 24210-201 - Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil., Telefone +55 21 2629-2600 - Niterói - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: gragoata.egl@id.uff.br