Thompson et al. (2121 Thompson JE, Sridhar AN, Shaw G, Rajan P, Mohammed A, Briggs TP, et al. Peri-operative, functional and early oncologic outcomes of salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after high-intensity focused ultrasound partial ablation. BMC Urol. 2020;20:81.) |
2020 |
45 |
HIFU |
NA/ 140 |
0 |
200 |
17.8 Clv 1-3 |
44.4 |
65.5/ 0 |
5.3 |
17.7 |
Bonet et al. (3939 Bonet X, Moschovas MC, Onol FF, Bhat KR, Rogers T, Ogaya-Pinies G, et al. The surgical learning curve for salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon study. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73:600-9.) |
2020 |
120 |
RT ABL |
127/ 84 |
0 |
103 |
14.2 Clv1-4 |
22.5 |
55,8/ 19.2 |
32.5 |
44 |
De Groote et al. (3535 De Groote R, Nathan A, De Bleser E, Pavan N, Sridhar A, Kelly J, et al. Techniques and Outcomes of Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP). Eur Urol. 2020;78:885-92.) |
2020 |
106 |
HIFU-59 RT-27 BRC-10 Others -10 |
142/NA |
0 |
200 |
8 Clv 1-3 |
39 |
50/ 5 |
13 |
25 |
Madi et al. (2323 Madi R, Sayyid RK, Hiffa A, Thomas E, Terris MK, Klaassen Z. Early Experience with Salvage Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. Urology. 2021;149:117-21.) |
2021 |
RS (20) Usual (6) |
EBRT-18 BRC-4 Cryo-2 CYK-2 |
NA/ 141 NA/ 199 |
0 0 |
50 100 |
10 Clv 1-3 16,7 Clv 3 |
30 33 |
100/NA 44/NA |
20 33,3 |
18 |
Cathcart et al. (2424 Cathcart P, Ribeiro L, Moore C, Ahmed HU, Leslie T, Arya M, et al. Outcomes of the RAFT trial: robotic surgery after focal therapy. BJU Int. 2021;128:504-10.) |
2021 (RCT) |
23 |
Cryo (4) HIFU (17) Electro (1) |
NA |
0 |
NA |
4 (Clv 1) |
35 |
100/52 |
18 |
12 |
Martinez et al. (2525 Martinez PF, Romeo A, Tobia I, Isola M, Giudice CR, Villamil WA. Comparing open and robotic salvage radical prostatectomy after radiotherapy: predictors and outcomes. Prostate Int. 2021;9:42-7.) |
2021 |
26 |
BRC (3) EBRT (19) IMRT (3) |
NA |
3.8 rectal |
150 |
11.5(Clv 3-5) |
26,9 |
90.9/4.5 |
39.1 |
47 |
Nathan et al. (2626 Nathan A, Fricker M, De Groote R, Arora A, Phuah Y, Flora K, et al. Salvage Versus Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity-matched Comparative Effectiveness Study from a High-volume Tertiary Centre. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021;27:43-52.) |
2021 |
135 |
N/A |
165/NA |
0.8 rectal |
200 |
13.3 (Clv 1-5) |
37.8 |
78.8/5.2 |
22.2 |
43 |
Nunes-Silva (2727 Nunes-Silva I, Hidaka AK, Monti CR, Tobias-Machado M, Zampolli HC. Salvage Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: the first brazilian experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47:1279-80.) |
2021 |
RS (12) |
EBRT (10) BRC (2) |
NA/138 |
0 |
81 |
8.3(Clv 3) |
25 |
91.6/NA |
16.6 |
12 |
Kowalczyk et al. (2828 Kowalczyk KJ, Madi RH, Eden CG, Sooriakumaran P, Fransis K, Raskin Y, et al. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series. J Urol. 2021;206:1184-91.) |
2021 |
RS (40) |
EBRT (21) BRC (12) HIFU (7) |
NA/130 |
2.5 |
100 |
12.5 (Clv 1-5) |
57.5 |
54.1/10 |
23.1 |
23 |
Kowalczyk et al. (2828 Kowalczyk KJ, Madi RH, Eden CG, Sooriakumaran P, Fransis K, Raskin Y, et al. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series. J Urol. 2021;206:1184-91.) |
2021 |
32 |
EBRT (16) BRC (9) Cryo (5) RT (2) |
NA/175 |
0 |
150 |
28.1(Clv 1-3) |
65.6 |
6.3/12.5 |
37.5 |
36 |
Spitznagel et al. (2929 Spitznagel T, Hardenberg JV, Schmid FA, Rupp NJ, Westhoff N, Worst TS, et al. Salvage Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Following Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for ISUP 2/3 Cancer. Urology. 2021;156:147-53.) |
2021 |
13 |
HIFU |
260/NA |
0 |
230 |
46.2 (Clv 1-3) |
7.7 |
NA/NA |
0 |
12 |
Bozkurt et al. (3030 Bozkurt Y, Atar M, Pisters LL. Early Experience with Salvage Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Proton Beam Radiotherapy Failures. Balkan Med J. 2021;38:310-15.) |
2021 |
10 |
PTB |
230/NA |
0 |
745 |
90 (Clv 1-4) |
20 |
12.5/0 |
10 |
31.8 |
Bhat et al. (3131 Bhat KRS, Covas Moschovas M, Sandri M, Noel J, Reddy S, Perera R, et al. Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8:1192-7.) |
2021 |
53 |
FT |
NA/121 |
0 |
100 |
21 (Clv1-2) |
40 |
56/13 |
17 |
36.3 |
Schuetz et al. (3232 Schuetz V, Reimold P, Goertz M, Hofer L, Dieffenbacher S, Nyarangi-Dix J, et al. Evolution of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy from Open to Robotic and Further to Retzius Sparing Surgery. J Clin Med. 2021;11:202.) |
2021 |
RS (21) |
RT (8) HIFU (9) BRC (2) Cryo (1) FT (1) |
228/NA |
0 |
300 |
NA |
19 |
19/NA |
14.3 |
12 |
Schuetz et al. (3232 Schuetz V, Reimold P, Goertz M, Hofer L, Dieffenbacher S, Nyarangi-Dix J, et al. Evolution of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy from Open to Robotic and Further to Retzius Sparing Surgery. J Clin Med. 2021;11:202.) |
2021 |
7 |
RT (4) HIFU (1) BRC (2) |
252/NA |
0 |
500 |
NA |
57,1 |
0/NA |
57,1 |
36 |
Blazevski et al. (3333 Blazevski A, Gondoputro W, Scheltema MJ, Amin A, Geboers B, Barreto D, et al. Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following focal ablation with irreversible electroporation: feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes. BMC Urol. 2022;22:28.) |
2022 |
15 |
FT |
NA/NA |
0 |
200 |
NA |
7 |
100/60 |
0 |
22 |
Mortensen et al. (3434 Mortensen MA, Poulsen CA, Ahlgren G, Madsen K, Poulsen MH. Introduction of salvage prostatectomy in Denmark: the initial experience. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15:185.) |
2022 |
5 |
EBRT |
205/NA |
0 |
120 |
60 (Clv 1-3) |
60 |
0/NA |
20 |
13 |
Nathan et al. (3737 Nathan A, Fricker M, De Groote R, Arora A, Phuah Y, Flora K, et al. Salvage Versus Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity-matched Comparative Effectiveness Study from a High-volume Tertiary Centre. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021;27:43-52.) |
2022 |
100 |
HIFU (92) Cryo (5) IRE (2) |
170/NA |
0 |
200 |
9 (Clv 1-3) |
25 |
84,7/21 |
23 |
16,5 |
De Luca et al. (3636 De Luca S, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Alessio P, Russo F, Amparore D, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in post HIFU salvage setting: tertiary center experience and review of the current literature. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:13. [Internet]. Available at. https://misjournal.net/article/view/4636 https://misjournal.net/article/view/4636...
) |
2022 |
11 |
HIFU |
110/NA |
0 |
NA |
20 (Clv 1) |
27 |
81/18 |
0 |
12 |