Bakavicius et al. 2019 (66 Bakavicius A, Sanchez-Salas R, Muttin F, Sivaraman A, Dell’Oglio P, Barret E, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Focal Therapy Complications in Prostate Cancer: A Standardized Methodology. J Endourol. 2019; 33:509-15.) |
Retrospective cases series |
210 |
Low, intermediate |
Lesion-targeted ablation, hemiablation, subtotal ablation |
11 |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Yes |
– |
Hamdy et al., 2018 (99 Hamdy FC, Elliott D, le Conte S, Davies LC, Burns RM, Thomson C, et al. Partial ablation versus radical prostatectomy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the PART feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018; 22:1-96.) |
Randomized control trial |
41 |
Intermediate |
Lesion-targeted ablation, quadrant ablation, hemiablation |
– |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Ahmed et al., 2015 (1010 Ahmed HU, Dickinson L, Charman S, Weir S, McCartan N, Hindley RG, et al. Focal Ablation Targeted to the Index Lesion in Multifocal Localised Prostate Cancer: a Prospective Development Study. Eur Urol. 2015; 68:927-36.) |
Prospective development study |
56 |
Low, intermediate |
Lesion-targeted ablation |
12 |
|
92.9 |
34.6 |
15.4 |
7.7 |
3.8 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Dickinson et al., 2017 (1111 Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, McCartan N, Freeman A, Allen C, et al. Prostate-specific antigen vs. magnetic resonance imaging parameters for assessing oncological outcomes after high intensity-focused ultrasound focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2017; 35:30.e9-30.e15.) |
Prospective development study |
118 |
Low, intermediate |
Lesion-targeted ablation, hemiablation |
12 |
|
94.1 |
36.9 |
18.9 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Feijoo et al., 2016 (1212 Feijoo ER, Sivaraman A, Barret E, Sanchez-Salas R, Galiano M, Rozet F, et al. Focal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Targeted Hemiablation for Unilateral Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Evaluation of Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016; 69:214-20.) |
Prospective development study |
67 |
Low, intermediate |
Hemiablation |
12 |
|
100a |
16.4a |
– |
10.4a |
– |
Yes |
Yes |
– |
Guillaumier et al., 2018 (1313 Guillaumier S, Peters M, Arya M, Afzal N, Charman S, Dudderidge T, et al. Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes Following Focal Therapy in Treating Clinically Significant Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2018; 74:422-9.) |
Prospective development study |
625 |
Low, intermediate, high |
Quadrant ablation, hemiablation |
56 |
|
35.5 |
18.0 |
– |
12.2 |
– |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Rischmann et al., 2017 (1414 Rischmann P, Gelet A, Riche B, Villers A, Pasticier G, Bondil P, et al. Focal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound of Unilateral Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multicentric Hemiablation Study of 111 Patients. Eur Urol. 2017; 71:267-73.) |
Prospective development study |
111 |
Low, intermediate |
Hemiablation |
30 |
|
91.8 |
13.9 |
5.0 |
20.8 |
6.9 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
van Velthoven et al., 2016 (1515 van Velthoven R, Aoun F, Marcelis Q, Albisinni S, Zanaty M, Lemort M, et al. A prospective clinical trial of HIFU hemiablation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016; 19:79-83.) |
Prospective development study |
50 |
Low, intermediate |
Hemiablation |
35 |
|
16.0b |
6.0b |
– |
10.0b |
– |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Schmid et al., 2020 (1616 Schmid FA, Schindele D, Mortezavi A, Spitznagel T, Sulser T, Schostak M, et al. Prospective multicentre study using high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the focal treatment of prostate cancer: Safety outcomes and complications. Urol Oncol. 2020; 38:225-30.) |
Prospective development study |
98 |
Low, intermediate |
– |
3 |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Yes |
– |
Lovegrove et al., 2020 (1717 Lovegrove CE, Peters M, Guillaumier S, Arya M, Afzal N, Dudderidge T, et al. Evaluation of functional outcomes after a second focal high-intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU) procedure in men with primary localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer: results from the HIFU Evaluation and Assessment of Treatment (HEAT) registry. BJU Int. 2020; 125:853-60.) |
Prospective development study |
420 |
Low, intermediate, high |
Lesion-targeted ablation, quadrant ablation, hemiablation, hockey stick ablation, subtotal ablation |
65 and 73 |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Yes |
– |
– |
Ganzer et al., 2018 (1818 Ganzer R, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, Koch D, Baumunk D, Kuru T, et al. Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study on Focal Therapy (Hemiablation) of the Prostate with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. J Urol. 2018; 199:983-9.) |
Prospective development study |
51 |
Low, intermediate |
Hemiablation |
17 |
|
96.1 |
26.5 |
8.2 |
34.7 |
2.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Mortezavi et al., 2019 (1919 Mortezavi A, Krauter J, Gu A, Sonderer J, Bruhin J, Reeve KA, et al. Extensive Histological Sampling following Focal Therapy of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. J Urol. 2019; 202:717-24.) |
Prospective development study |
75 |
Low, intermediate |
– |
6 |
|
90.7 |
– |
20.6 |
– |
29.4 |
Yes |
– |
Yes |
Albisinni et al., 2017 (2020 Albisinni S, Aoun F, Bellucci S, Biaou I, Limani K, Hawaux E, et al. Comparing High-Intensity Focal Ultrasound Hemiablation to Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Unilateral Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis. J Endourol. 2017; 31:14-9.) |
Retrospective cases series |
55 |
Low, intermediate |
Hemiablation |
36 |
|
– |
12.7b |
9.1b |
21.8b |
– |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Tourinho-Barbosa et al., 2020 (2121 Tourinho-Barbosa RR, Sanchez-Salas R, Claros OR, Collura-Merlier S, Bakavicius A, Carneiro A, et al. Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with Either High Intensity Focused Ultrasound or Cryoablation: A Single Institution Experience. J Urol. 2020; 203:320-30.) |
Retrospective cases series |
190 |
Low, intermediate |
Lesion-targeted ablation, quadrant ablation, hemiablation, subtotal ablation |
37 |
|
91.6 |
30.0 |
– |
16.8 |
– |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Stabile et al., 2019 (2222 Stabile A, Orczyk C, Hosking-Jervis F, Giganti F, Arya M, Hindley RG, et al. Medium-term oncological outcomes in a large cohort of men treated with either focal or hemi-ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasonography for primary localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2019;1 24:431-440.) |
Retrospective cases series |
1032 |
Low, intermediate |
Lesion-targeted ablation, hemiablation |
36 |
|
41.1 |
31.5 |
– |
-– |
Yes |
Johnston et al., 2019 (2323 Johnston MJ, Emara A, Noureldin M, Bott S, Hindley RG. Focal High-intensity Focussed Ultrasound Partial Gland Ablation for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Report of Medium-term Outcomes From a Single-center in the United Kingdom. Urology. 2019; 133:175-81.) |
Retrospective cases series |
107 |
Low, intermediate |
Lesion-targeted ablation, quadrant ablation, hemiablation |
30 |
|
62.6 |
28.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Bass et al., 2019 (2424 Bass R, Fleshner N, Finelli A, Barkin J, Zhang L, Klotz L. Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Partial Gland Ablation with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019; 201:113-9.) |
Retrospective cases series |
150 |
Low, intermediate, high |
Lesion-targeted ablation, hemiablation, hockey stick ablation |
24 |
|
58.0 |
– |
12.7 |
– |
12.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Annoot et al., 2019 (2525 Annoot A, Olivier J, Valtille P, Deken V, Leroy X, Puech P, et al. Extra-target low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal high-intensity focused ultrasound of clinically significant prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2019; 37:261-8.) |
Retrospective cases series |
55 |
Low, intermediate |
Hemiablation |
33 |
|
– |
– |
21.8 |
– |
5.5 |
– |
– |
Yes |
Huber et al., 2020 (2626 Huber PM, Afzal N, Arya M, Boxler S, Dudderidge T, Emberton M, et al. Prostate Specific Antigen Criteria to Diagnose Failure of Cancer Control following Focal Therapy of Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. J Urol. 2020; 203:734-42.) |
Retrospective cases series |
598 |
Low, intermediate, high |
Lesion-targeted ablation, quadrant ablation, hemiablation |
– |
|
– |
35.1c |
– |
– |
– |
Abreu et al., 2020 (2727 Abreu AL, Peretsman S, Iwata A, Shakir A, Iwata T, Brooks J, et al. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Hemigland Ablation for Prostate Cancer: Initial Outcomes of a United States Series. J Urol. 2020; 204:741-7.) |
Retrospective cases series |
100 |
Low, intermediate, high |
Hemiablation |
18 |
|
58.0 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
23.0 |
10.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |