Erectile dysfunction among men with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis in a Brazilian Amazon urban setting: an epidemiological study

Abstract

Introduction:

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common sexual problem among men with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The severity of sexual dysfunction tends to worsen with kidney damage. This study aims to evaluate the erectile function and sexual quality of life of adult male CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in a hospital located in the Brazilian Amazon.

Methods:

A cross-sectional quantitative study was performed within the HD Sector of the Nephrology Unit including men with CKD aged ≥ 18 years, undergoing ≥ 3 weekly HD sessions for ≥ 3 months who had been sexually active for ≥ 6 months. We used the Male Sexual Quotient (MSQ) to measure sexual satisfaction and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5) to establish erectile function. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 21.0 using appropriate tests, such as Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis (P < 0.05).

Results:

Ninety-eight patients (51.68 ± 15.28 years) were evaluated. They were primarily married/or living with a partner (60.20%), with HD time between 1 to 5 years (55.10%), and an average KTV of 1.17. ED prevalence was 66.30%, and it was associated with a higher age group (p = 0.01), lower family income (p = 0.02), diabetes (p = 0.01), lower mean corpuscular hemoglobin (p = 0.04), higher total calcium (p = 0.04), and lower albumin (p = 0.03). Around 75% classified their sex life as regular to excellent.

Conclusion:

Despite the high ED prevalence, most men with CKD in HD reported experiencing regular to excellent sex life. The study underscores the importance of establishing effective screening and conducting routine evaluations regarding sexual issues in these men.

Keywords:
Renal Insufficiency; Chronic; Renal Dialysis; Quality of Life; Men’s Health; Sexual Health; Erectile Dysfunction

Resumo

Introdução:

Disfunção erétil (DE) é um problema sexual comum entre homens com doença renal crônica (DRC). A gravidade da disfunção sexual tende a piorar com a lesão renal. Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar função erétil e qualidade de vida sexual de pacientes homens adultos com DRC em hemodiálise (HD) em um hospital na Amazônia brasileira.

Métodos:

Realizou-se estudo quantitativo transversal no Setor de HD da Unidade de Nefrologia, incluindo homens com DRC ≥ 18 anos, submetidos a ≥ 3 sessões semanais de HD por ≥ 3 meses e sexualmente ativos por ≥ 6 meses. Utilizamos o Quociente Sexual Masculino (QSM) para medir satisfação sexual e o Índice Internacional de Função Erétil (IIEF5) para estabelecer função erétil. A análise estatística foi realizada com o SPSS 21.0 usando testes apropriados, como Mann-Whitney e Kruskal-Wallis (P < 0,05).

Resultados:

Avaliamos 98 pacientes (51,68 ± 15,28 anos). Eles eram predominantemente casados/ou vivendo com um(a) parceiro(a) (60,20%), com tempo de HD entre 1 e 5 anos (55,10%) e KTV médio de 1,17. A prevalência de DE foi 66,30% e foi associada a maior faixa etária (p = 0,01), menor renda familiar (p = 0,02), diabetes (p = 0,01), menor hemoglobina corpuscular média (p = 0,04), maior cálcio total (p = 0,04) e menor albumina (p = 0,03). Aproximadamente 75% classificaram sua vida sexual como regular a excelente.

Conclusão:

Apesar da elevada prevalência de DE, a maioria dos homens com DRC em HD relatou vida sexual regular a excelente. O estudo ressalta a importância de estabelecer triagem eficaz e realizar avaliações de rotina sobre questões sexuais nesses homens.

Descritores:
Insuficiência Renal Crônica; Diálise Renal; Qualidade de Vida; Saúde do Homem; Saúde Sexual; Disfunção Erétil

Introduction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common sexual problem among men with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD affects more than 10% of the global population and is a significant global health issue¹. The severity of sexual dysfunction tends to increase with the level of kidney damage². According to the Brazilian Chronic Dialysis Survey, active dialysis centers increased by 2.7% from 2021 to July 2022, and patients on dialysis increased by 182.1% between 2003 and 2022³. In Northern Brazil, there was an 80% increase in the number of patients on dialysis between 2020 and 2022, while in the rest of the country the increase was of 10%³.

According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus, ED is the inability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance⁴. The prevalence of ED can be as high as 80% in individuals with CKD; thus, it is considered a frequent yet potentially treatable complication⁵. ED can lead to a decreased quality of life, causing depression, anxiety, self-esteem issues, and relationship problems. When managing patients with end-stage renal disease, the focus should be on prolonging life expectancy and improving quality of life⁶.

This study aimed to evaluate the erectile function and sexual quality of life of adult male CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in a hospital unit in a city in the Brazilian Amazon.

Methods

We conducted this cross-sectional quantitative study in the Hemodialysis Sector of the Nephrology Unit of the Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Alberto Lima (HCAL) in Macapá, State of Amapá, Brazil. Macapá is a unique Brazilian Amazon city with a distinct blend of indigenous and African cultures and urban lifestyles. Being surrounded by the Amazon River, it is geographically isolated from other developed Amazonian cities and far from the industrialized Brazilian metropolises. Until the end of data collection, this hemodialysis unit provided care for all chronic renal patients on HD in the State of Amapá, so the total number of CKD men receiving HD in the clinic represents this entire specific population for this Brazilian state (N = 105).

We included male patients with CKD aged 18 years or older undergoing three or more weekly hemodialysis sessions for at least three months. Patients who presented clinical instability during the hemodialysis session were excluded from the study. We also excluded indigenous men due to the sensitive sexual issues in this population, which require a culturally appropriate approach under specific Brazilian legislation.

After conducting an epidemiological and clinical survey, two self-administered questionnaires were privately given to individuals who had been sexually active for at least six months: the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5) and the Male Sexual Quotient (MSQ). The prevalence of erectile dysfunction was derived from the IIEF5, a self-report questionnaire globally used to classify the quality of erectile function as normal (>21 points), mild (17–21 points), mild to moderate (12–16 points), moderate (8–11 points), and severe (<8 points)⁷. The MSQ is a validated questionnaire designed in Brazil⁸, currently used in various clinical scenarios for Brazilian surveys⁹–¹¹. It was created to measure sexual satisfaction and function across multiple aspects of male sexuality, including desire, confidence, foreplay quality, partner satisfaction, quality of erection, ejaculation control, ability to achieve orgasm, and overall satisfaction with sexual intercourse. It consists of ten self-report questions that use a Likert scale to measure frequency and level of satisfaction. The scores for all ten items were added together and multiplied by 2, resulting in a quotient score on a 100-point scale. We also used the MSQ to identify ejaculatory problems, such as premature ejaculation (PE), delayed ejaculation (DE), and hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). To estimate the prevalence of each of these sexual dysfunctions, we used the proportion of men with a response score no higher than 2 for each item: HSDD (question 1), “Is your desire strong enough to encourage you to initiate sexual intercourse?” PE (question 8), “Can you control ejaculation so that sexual activity lasts as long as you want?” DE (question 9), “Can you reach orgasm during sex?”. All patients had undergone a medical consultation with the same urologist for clinical confirmation of sexual dysfunctions⁸.

The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Amapá (CAAE 52275516.3.0000.0003), and all patients who participated signed the informed consent form.

We conducted a statistical analysis to determine the measures of central tendency and verify the significance of the differences among groups for quality of sexual life and erectile function. We used approximate 95% confidence intervals. The normality and comparison of samples were assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Non-parametric tests, such as the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, were used, depending on the data analyzed. The chi-square test was used to compare non-parametric variables and detect any divergences between observed and expected frequencies. Pearson’s test was employed to determine the degree of linear correlation between two datasets, and the T-test was used to evaluate the differences between group averages. We set the significance level at P < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

The population of adult men with CKD consisted of 133 individuals. After applying the exclusion criteria, 105 patients remained, seven of which did not agree to participate. The final sample thus comprised 98 men (average age 51.68 ± 15.28 years). Epidemiologic characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1
Baseline demographic parameters of male patients undergoing hemodialysis in Macapá, Brazil

Demographic Parameter		% Patients [N (%)]
Age (years)	<30	7 (7.10%)
	31-40	14 (14.30%)
	41-50	18 (18.40%)
	51-60	35 (35.70%)
	61-70	20 (20.40%)
	71-80	4 (4.10%)
Ethnicity	Brown	57 (58.16%)
	Black	27 (27.60%)
	White	11 (11.22%)
	Yellow	1 (1.02%)
	Others	2 (2.04%)
Marital Status	Married	59 (60.20%)
	Single	29 (29.60%)
	Widower	1 (1%)
	Others	9 (9.20%)
Monthly earned income (US$)	< 317	27 (27.60%)
	317 – 634	16 (16.30%)
	635 – 952	11 (11.20%)
	953 – 1,269	7 (7.10%)
	1,270 – 1,586	5 (5.10%)
	1,587 – 3,174	15 (15.30%)
	> 3,174	17 (17.30%)
Smoking	No smokers	36 (36.73%)
	Ex-smokers	58 (59.18%)
	Active smokers	4 (4.08%)
Tobacco Exposure Time	No smokers	36 (36.73%)
	≤ 20 years	41 (41.83%)
	> 20 years	21 (21.40%)
Alcoholism	No alcoholism	68 (69.38%)
	Ex-alcoholic	16 (16.32%)
	Active alcoholism	14 (14.28%)
Alcoholism Exposure Time	No alcoholism	68 (69.38%)
	≤ 15 years	5 (5.10%)
	> 15 years	25 (25.51%)
Comorbidities	Systemic Arterial Hypertension	87 (88.77%)
	Diabetes Mellitus	38 (38.77%)
	Overweight	37 (37.80%)
	Obesity	17 (17.34%)
Previous Medical History	Acute Myocardial Infarction	10 (10.20%)
	Cerebrovascular accident	3 (3.10%)
Time Undergoing Hemodialysis	3 months to 1 year	16 (16.32%)
	1 year to 5 years	54 (55.10%)
	> 5 years	28 (28.57%)

Out of the total sample, 57 individuals (58,16%) identified as brown. Fifty-nine individuals (60.20%) were either married or in a stable relationship. Thirty-three individuals (33.70%) had no formal education or had studied for up to 8 years. Forty-two individuals (42.90%) were receiving government assistance, 43.90% had a family income of up to US$ 634. Most of the sample (27.60%) had a family income of less than US$ 317.

In the sample group, only 4.08% (n = 4) were active smokers, but the total population with smoking exposure over 20 years was 21.40%. Alcoholics made up 14.28% (n = 14) of the group, while former alcoholics constituted 16.32% (n = 16) with an exposure time of over 15 years, accounting for 25.51% (n = 25) of the sample. The study found that 88.77% of the sample had systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), 38.77% had diabetes mellitus (DM), 17.34% were obese, and 37.80% were overweight. As for previous medical history, 10.20% had experienced a myocardial infarction (MI), and 3.10% had suffered a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Concerning dialysis treatment time, 55.10% (n = 54) had undergone treatment between 1 and 5 years, while 28.57% (n = 28) had received treatment for more than five years.

The baseline clinical laboratory results are described in Table 2.

Table 2
Baseline clinical parameters of male patients undergoing hemodialysis in Macapá, Brazil

Laboratory Parameter	Value (mean ± SD)	Reference Value
Hemoglobin	9.70 ± 2.30 g/dL	14 – 18 g/dL
Hematocrit	28.70 ± 5.81%	38–52%
Pre-dialysis urea	135.00 ± 32.16 mg/dL	16 – 40 mg/dL
Post-dialysis urea	51.51 ± 17.18 mg/dL	16 – 40 mg/dL
Creatinine	11.41 ± 3.17 mg/dL	0.6 – 1.2 mg/dL
Creatinine clearance	5.30 ± 3.30 mL/min/1.73 m2	75 – 115 mL/min/1.73 m2
Potassium	5.25 ± 0.69 mmol/L	3.5 – 5.5 mmol/L
Calcium	8.30 ± 0.73 mg/dL	8.5 – 10.2 mg/dL
Phosphor	6.43 ± 1.70 mg/dL	2.5 – 4.5 mg/dL
Fasting blood glucose	140.00 ± 81.53 mg/dL	<99 mg/dL
Albumin	3.70 ± 0.34 g/dL	3.5 – 4.7 g/dL
Parathyroid hormone	210.38 ± 241.08 pg/mL	12 – 65 pg/mL
Ferritin	472.48 ± 438.53 ng/mL	23 – 336 ng/mL
Serum iron	72.88 ± 35.42 µg/dL	65 – 175 µg/dL
Transferrin saturation index	29.90 ± 17.00 mg/dL	215 – 365 mg/dL
Alcaline phosphatase	162.38 ± 154.50 U/L	40 – 129 U/L
KTV	1.17 ± 0.22	–

• Legends: SD: standard deviation; KTV: dialyzer clearance of urea (K), dialysis time (T), and volume of distribution of urea (V).

International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5)

The average value of IIFE5 was 19.45 ± 2.58 (95% CI 18.74–20.17; median of 20), which can be classified as mild erectile dysfunction. ED was reported in 65 cases, 66.30% of the total population. The intensity of ED was distributed as follows: mild (47 cases, 48%), mild to moderate (15 cases, 15.30%), moderate (2 cases, 2%), and severe (1 case, 1%). The prevalence of ED increases with age and reaches a slight stabilization after age 30, only to increase again after age 60 (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Percentage of men with erectile dysfunction by age group assessed by IIFE5 in male patients undergoing hemodialysis in Macapá, Brazil.

Regarding family monthly income, the highest incidence of ED (52.90%) was observed in the group with the highest monthly income (P = 0.02). Among patients with diabetes, 81.60% had ED, while 57.60% of non-diabetic patients had ED (P = 0.01) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Prevalence of erectile dysfunction according to IIFE in diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis in Macapá, Brazil.

The mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) was lower in subjects with ED compared to subjects with normal function (29.24 vs. 30.18 pg) (P = 0.04), the calcium was higher (8.42 vs. 8.04 mg/dL) (P = 0.04) and the serum albumin was lower (3.69 vs. 3.84 g/dL) (P = 0.03).

Male Sex Quotient (MSQ)

In the sample, 1% (n = 1) had a null MSQ score, 5.10% (n = 5) had a poor to unfavorable score, 17.30% (n = 17) had an unfavorable to regular score, 37.80% (n = 37) had a fair to good score, and 38.80% (n = 38) had a good to excellent score. Black individuals scored higher on average (82.66) compared to white (78.36) and brown (67.92) individuals (P = 0.001) (Figure 3).

Figure 3
(A) Sexual function classification of male patients undergoing hemodialysis in Macapá according to MSQ. (B) Mean score of individuals according to ethnicity assessed by the MSQ of male patients undergoing hemodialysis in Macapá, Brazil.

The highest scores were observed in patients aged up to 40 (79.43 points for those under 30 and 81.86 for those aged 31–40) (Figure 4). HSDD occurred in 17.30% (n = 17), while PE occurred in 36.70% (n = 36). The DE prevalence was calculated at 14.30% (n = 14).

Figure 4
MSQ score according to age groups in patients undergoing hemodialysis in Macapá, Brazil.

In comparison to men with CKD and normal erectile function, men with erectile dysfunction had lower mean corpuscular hemoglobin (28.66 vs. 29.83 pg; P = 0.04), lower serum creatinine (9.53 vs. 11.98 mg/dL; P = 0.001), and lower serum albumin (3.59 vs. 3.79 g/dL; P = 0.001), as shown in Table 3.

Table 3
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and serum albumin of patients undergoing hemodialysis with and without erectile dysfunction in Macapá, Brazil

Laboratory test	With ED	Without ED
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin	28.66 g/dL	29.83 g/dL
Serum creatinine	9.53 mg/dL	11.98 mg/dL
Serum albumin	3.59 g/dL	3.79 g/dL
Total Serum Calcium	8.42 mg/dL	8.04 mg/dL

• Legend: ED: erectile dysfunction.

Discussion

This research investigated aspects of sexual well-being of men with CKD receiving HD in a specific environment of the world, the Amazon. It highlighted the prevalence of sexual dysfunctions, mainly ED, a clinical concern that is often overlooked in the routine treatment of this patient population.

We reported a higher ED prevalence in adult men with CKD undergoing HD (66.30%), most of which had mild dysfunction (48%). Also, sexual satisfaction was found to be regular to excellent in 76.60%, a value close to that of the local population (80.39%) and the national average (85%)⁹,¹⁰.

In men with chronic health conditions, ED is a significant predictor of unsatisfactory sex life⁶. Despite the high rate of unsatisfactory erectile function found in our study, 38.80% of men reported good to excellent sexual satisfaction. It is contradictory if we observe that in a survey by Fugl-Meyer et al.¹² men with ED complained about their low sexual satisfaction.

Furthermore, Perelman et al.¹³ reported that most men have little or no interest in alternative ways of sexual activity to achieve sexual satisfaction. So, we hypothesized that the local population values other forms of sexual satisfaction, such as a satisfying relationship with a partner and masturbation. Similarly, Corona et al.¹⁴ state that a normal erection is not essential to be sexually active, and adapting to a more sensory, less coitus-focused sexuality is essential to cope with changes in sexual responses.

As per the literature, this study has also confirmed that patients with CKD have a high incidence of ED⁵, which can be attributed to multiple factors such as reduced arterial blood flow, altered penile muscle function, hormonal imbalances, drug side effects, and neurogenic dysfunction¹⁵. Rosas et al.⁵ revealed that age, DM (diabetes mellitus), and causes of end-stage renal disease correlate with ED.

CKD can contribute to ED in two ways. Firstly, it can indirectly impact ED through correlated metabolic conditions and secondly, it can directly affect the function of endothelial cells. In patients with CKD, the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonad axis, which is responsible for regulating the reproductive system, can be disrupted, leading to hypogonadism. This condition reduces testosterone production, essential for producing nitric oxide (NO), by upregulating nitric oxide synthase (NOS). NOS is a group of enzymes that catalyze NO production, crucial for achieving and maintaining an erection. Additionally, CKD-induced autonomic neuropathy, which is common in diabetic patients, can also contribute to ED by affecting penile tumescence¹⁶,¹⁷.

As expected, age was directly correlated with ED and lower MSQ scores, and patients with DM had a higher prevalence of ED compared to the non-diabetic group (81.60 vs 57.60%; P = 0.01). Sexual dysfunction affects men of all ages, but studies have shown that it is more prevalent in older men. In our sample, most cases of ED were in the 51-60 age group (27.27%). Fifty percent of patients over 31 have ED, which aligns with the fact that individuals over 40 are more affected¹⁸.

A cross-sectional observational study found that individuals over 50 were more likely to experience ED¹⁹. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study found that patients aged 70 years were three times more likely to suffer from severe ED than patients aged 40 years. They also stated that no other variable could explain this result through regression analysis²⁰. However, the NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence concluded that ED is not caused by age alone, as other risk factors, such as atherosclerosis, may also occur simultaneously with aging²¹.

ED is often an early sign of cardiovascular disease, and one of its most common causes is vascular disorders such as DM, SAH, and dyslipidemia²². DM is the primary cause of CKD worldwide and is also considered an independent risk factor for ED in patients with CKD²³. Up to 75% of men with DM are at risk of developing ED²⁰,²². Mesquita et al.¹⁵ demonstrated that diabetic patients with CKD on conservative treatment had a 4.05 times higher chance of experiencing ED compared to non-diabetic patients. Our study revealed an ED frequency as higher as 80% in men with CKD and DM, significantly higher than CKD patients without DM. We did not find a statistically relevant association between SAH and ED, although SAH is related to ED in patients undergoing HD²³.

Even though we did not find any correlation between BMI and ED, some studies have suggested a conflicting association between this index and erectile function²⁴. While Stolic and Bukumiric found a higher prevalence of ED in obese patients²⁵, Molnar et al.²⁶ reported more ED cases in underweight patients, particularly men with lower pre-dialysis weight, in a cross-sectional study conducted in Iran. Both malnutrition and obesity have established health implications and are associated with low testosterone levels, which help explain the low erectile function quality found in the literature²⁴,²⁶.

While the negative impact of smoking on erectile function is well-known, our research did not find any connection between certain legal drugs and ED. This is consistent with a survey conducted in southern Brazil²⁷. However, a study by Costa et al.¹⁹ found a link between ED, CKD, alcohol consumption, and smoking for more than ten years in patients receiving conservative treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct prospective studies to clarify the correlations between these factors and ED in patients with CKD.

Most patients experienced HD for 1 to 5 years (55.10%). However, there was no significant correlation between HD and ED. This finding is consistent with the study conducted by Arslan et al.²⁸. Conversely, Costa et al.¹⁹ found that time on dialysis was an independent factor for ED. In a survey by Fryckstedt and Hylander²⁹, pre-dialysis patients showed less sexual dysfunction than patients on active treatment. However, the degree of dysfunction was not related to treatment modality or medication used. According to a study conducted in Senegal, age and dialysis time were among the most crucial factors for ED³⁰.

Our results showed that patients with higher serum creatinine levels had better erectile function outcomes, consistent with other studies that reported a link between ED and lower creatinine levels³¹,³². These results are typical of sarcopenia in elderly patients since creatinine is a marker of muscle mass and tends to be higher in younger patients and in those with no protein-calorie restriction³². However, Bodie et al.³³ suggested that creatinine may increase in men with ED and do not recommend routine screening of serum creatinine.

Like our findings, several studies have found that higher serum albumin levels are linked to better ED outcomes. For instance, a cross-sectional observational study of patients with CKD found that albumin levels below 3.5 g per 100 mL were associated with ED³⁴. Similarly, a cross-sectional multicenter study found low serum albumin levels related to ED³⁵. Finally, Schiavi et al.³⁶ conducted a retrospective and prospective sleep laboratory study and found that albumin-bound testosterone levels correlated positively with erection during sleep in men.

Total calcium was inversely correlated with IIEF-5 score. However, in a cross-sectional study of men and women on peritoneal dialysis, no independent association was found between serum calcium levels and sexual function scores³⁷. On the other hand, MCH levels were positively correlated with IIEF-5 and MSQ. Nonetheless, Fugl-Meyer et al.¹² found a significant decrease in hemoglobin and total testosterone levels associated with increasing stages of CKD.

We found that lower family income was associated with worse erectile function outcomes. Another study supports this result, showing an inverse relationship between the average monthly family income and ED³⁷. Interestingly, black individuals obtained the highest MSQ score. However, several studies have failed to prove any association between ethnicity and ED³¹.

PE is a common sexual issue in men with CKD, likely due to abnormalities in serotonergic neurotransmission. Research in animal models suggests that kidney dysfunction affects the regulation of serotonin, controlling ejaculation through receptors in the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral autonomic ganglia³⁸. In this study, it was found that 36.70% of the participants suffered from PE. This result was consistent with another study in which a similar PE prevalence (36.54%) was found in the same city but for the general male population⁹. In contrast, DE was reported by 14% of CKD patients, which was more than double the percentage found by Teixeira et al.⁹ (6.50%) for the male adult population of Macapá, Brazil.

Lastly, HSDD was observed in 17.30% of the patients, while the local population had a lower rate of 11.69%⁹. Patients with CKD commonly experience a decrease in libido. This is due to hypogonadism, since sexual hormones play a crucial role in regulating male sexual desire. Additionally, low levels of hemoglobin resulting from reduced erythropoietin in CKD patients seem to be linked to this issue, as treating anemia has shown to improved libido¹⁹.

According to a study conducted on nephrologists in the Netherlands, sexual problems are not usually discussed in routine check-ups³⁹. This is due to factors such as lack of knowledge, inadequate education, and insufficient time, all of which contribute to ED being undervalued in patients with CKD.

It should be noted that there are some limitations to the study, such as the cross-sectional design, which cannot be used to infer causality, and the small sample size, which may have affected the accuracy of some outcomes. Surveys about the prevalence of sexual dysfunction have bias potential, since participants may not report specific sexual issues or might overestimate their performance⁴⁰. Therefore, to minimize these biases, the diagnosis of the sexual health conditions were clinically confirmed by a specialist.

Conclusion

Finally, this study conducted in Macapá, Brazil, found that 66.30% of adult males with CKD had unsatisfactory erectile function, characterized as ED. Nonetheless, most participants reported regular to excellent sexual quality of life. The study highlights the need for developing effective screening procedures, conducting periodic evaluations, providing sexual psychotherapy, and referring patients to specialists for ED treatment. This is crucial since sexual function plays a significant role in improving the quality of life of men with CKD who are undergoing HD.

References

• ^1.
  Pizzol D, Xiao T, Yang L, Demurtas J, McDermott D, Garolla A, et al. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(5):508–15. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0295-8. PubMed PMID: 32358511.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0295-8
• ^2.
  Finkelstein FO, Shirani S, Wuerth D, Finkelstein SH. Therapy insight: sexual dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2007;3(4):200–7. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0438. PubMed PMID: 17389889.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0438
• ^3.
  Nerbass FB, Lima HDN, Moura-Neto JA, Lugon JR, Sesso R. Brazilian Dialysis Survey 2022. J Bras Nefrol. 2024;46(2):e20230062. PubMed PMID: 38078834.
• ^4.
  National Institutes of Health (US) Office of Medical Applications of Research. Impotence. NIH Consens Statement. 1992;10(4):1–33. PubMed PMID: 1307265.
• ^5.
  Rosas S, Joffe M, Franklin E, Strom B, Kotzker W, Brensinger C, et al. Prevalence and determinants of erectile dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2001;59(6):2259–66.doi: http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00742.x. PubMedPMID: 11380829.
  » https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00742.x
• ^6.
  Türk S, Guney I, Altintepe L, Tonbul Z, Yildiz A, Yeksan M. Quality of life in male hemodialysis patients: role of erectile dysfunction. Nephron Clin Pract. 2004;96(1):c21–7. doi: http://doi.org/10.1159/000075568. PubMed PMID: 14752250.
  » https://doi.org/10.1159/000075568
• ^7.
  Raymond CR, Alan R, Gorm W, Ian H, Osterloh JK. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Avanish Mishra. 1997;49(6):822–30.
• ^8.
  Abdo CHN. The male sexual quotient: a brief, self-administered questionnaire to assess male sexual satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2007;4(2):382–9. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00414.x. PubMed PMID: 17367433.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00414.x
• ^9.
  Teixeira T, Nazima M, Hallak J. Male sexual quality of life is maintained satisfactorily throughout life in the Amazon rainforest. Sex Med. 2018;6(2):90–6. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.11.002. PubMed PMID: 29523489.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.11.002
• ^10.
  Gomes CM, Miranda EP, Bessa Jr J, Bellucci CHS, Battistella LR, Abdo CHN, et al. Erectile function predicts sexual satisfaction in men with spinal cord injury. Sex Med. 2017;5(3):e148–55. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.06.002. PubMed PMID: 28823312.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.06.002
• ^11.
  Pedrenho No R, Nascimento BCG, Carvalho ASG, Barbosa JABA, Bessa Jr J, Teixeira TA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the sexual function of health professionals from an epicenter in Brazil. Sex Med. 2021;9(5):100408. PubMed PMID: 34333225.
• ^12.
  Fugl-Meyer AR, Lodnert G, Branholm IB, Fugl-Meyer KS. On life satisfaction in male erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1997;9(3):141–8. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900269. PubMed PMID: 9315491.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900269
• ^13.
  Perelman M, Shabsigh R, Seftel A, Althof S, Lockhart D. Attitudes of men with erectile dysfunction: a cross-national survey. J Sex Med. 2005;2(3):397–406. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20355.x. PubMed PMID: 16422872.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20355.x
• ^14.
  Corona G, Rastrelli G, Maseroli E, Forti G, Maggi M. Sexual function of the aging male. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27(4):581–601. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.007. PubMed PMID: 24054932.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.007
• ^15.
  Mesquita JFP, Ramos TF, Mesquita FP, Bastos No JM, Bastos MG, Figueiredo AA. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in chronic renal disease patients on conservative treatment. Clinics. 2012;67(2):181–3. doi: http://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(02)15. PubMed PMID: 22358245.
  » https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(02)15
• ^16.
  Papadopoulou E, Varouktsi A, Lazaridis A, Boutari C, Doumas M. Erectile dysfunction in chronic kidney disease: from pathophysiology to management. World J Nephrol. 2015;4(3):379–87. doi: http://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v4.i3.379. PubMed PMID: 26167462.
  » https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v4.i3.379
• ^17.
  Edey MM. Male sexual dysfunction and chronic kidney disease. Front Med. 2017;4:32. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00032. PubMed PMID: 28382300.
  » https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00032
• ^18.
  Rathi M, Ramachandran R. Sexual and gonadal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiology. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(2):214–9. doi: http://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.93738. PubMed PMID: 22470857.
  » https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.93738
• ^19.
  Costa MR, Ponciano VC, Costa TR, Oliveira AM, Gomes CP, Oliveira EC. Prevalence and factors associated with erectile dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease on conservative treatment. Int J Impot Res. 2017;29(6):219–24. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2017.20. PubMed PMID: 28424504.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2017.20
• ^20.
  Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151(1):54–61. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34871-1. PubMed PMID: 8254833.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34871-1
• ^21.
  NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA. 1993;270(1):83–90. doi: http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510010089036. PubMed PMID: 8510302.
  » https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510010089036
• ^22.
  Solomon H, Man JW, Jackson G. Erectile dysfunction and the cardiovascular patient: endothelial dysfunction is the common denominator. Heart. 2003;89(3):251–3. doi: http://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.3.251. PubMed PMID: 12591819.
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.3.251
• ^23.
  Naya Y, Soh J, Ochiai A, Mizutani Y, Ushijima S, Kamoi K, et al. Significant decrease of the International Index of Erectile Function in male renal failure patients treated with hemodialysis. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(3):172–7. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900854. PubMed PMID: 12058244.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900854
• ^24.
  Bao J, Yu Q, Yu H, Hao J, Liu J, Yao J, et al. Erectile dysfunction in male hemodialysis patients in China – one center experience. Clin Nephrol. 2011;75(2):135–40. doi: http://doi.org/10.5414/CN106408. PubMed PMID: 21255543.
  » https://doi.org/10.5414/CN106408
• ^25.
  Stolic RV, Bukumiric ZM. Intima-media thickness of carotid arteries and erectile dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2010;14(4):510–4. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4758.2010.00493.x. PubMed PMID: 20955285.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4758.2010.00493.x
• ^26.
  Molnar MZ, Carrero JJ, Mucsi I, Remport A, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Comparison of the malnutrition–inflammation score in chronic kidney disease patients and kidney transplant recipients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(6):1025–33. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0984-2. PubMed PMID: 25931272.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0984-2
• ^27.
  Neto AF, Rodrigues MADF, Fittipaldi JAS, Moreira ED. The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction and its correlates in men with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis in Londrina, southern Brazil. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(Suppl 2):S19–26. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900894. PubMed PMID: 12161764.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900894
• ^28.
  Arslan D, Aslan G, Sifil A, Cavdar C, Celebi I, Gamsari T, et al. Sexual dysfunction in male patients on hemodialysis: assessment with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(6):539–42. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900937. PubMed PMID: 12494292.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900937
• ^29.
  Fryckstedt J, Hylander B. Sexual function in patients with end-stage renal disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(5):466–71. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/00365590802085877. PubMed PMID: 18609284.
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590802085877
• ^30.
  Seck SM, Dahaba M, Diouf B, Cisse MM, Gueye S, Ka EF, et al. The burden of erectile dysfunction in dialysis patients in Senegal. Hemodial Int. 2011;15(2):280–3. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00544.x. PubMed PMID: 21481157.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00544.x
• ^31.
  Messina LE, Claro JA, Nardozza A, Andrade E, Ortiz V, Srougi M. Erectile dysfunction in patients with chronic renal failure. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33(5):673–8. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000500008. PubMed PMID: 17980064.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000500008
• ^32.
  Costa MR, Reis AMB, Pereira BP, Ponciano VC, Oliveira EC. Associated factors and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40(1):44–55. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.07. PubMed PMID: 24642163.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.07
• ^33.
  Bodie J, Lewis J, Schow D, Monga M. Laboratory evaluations of erectile dysfunction: an evidence-based approach. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2262–4. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000063940.19080.58. PubMed PMID: 12771765.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000063940.19080.58
• ^34.
  Vecchio M, Palmer S, De Berardis G, Craig J, Johnson D, Pellegrini F, et al. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction in men on chronic haemodialysis: a multinational cross-sectional study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(6):2479–88. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr635. PubMed PMID: 22207325.
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr635
• ^35.
  Toda K, Miwa Y, Kuriyama S, Fukushima H, Shiraki M, Murakami N, et al. Erectile dysfunction in patients with chronic viral liver disease: its relevance to protein malnutrition. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(9):894–900. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-005-1634-8. PubMed PMID: 16211346.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-005-1634-8
• ^36.
  Schiavi RC, Schreiner-Engel P, White D, Mandeli J. The relationship between pituitary-gonadal function and sexual behavior in healthy aging men. Psychosom Med. 1991;53(4):363–74. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199107000-00002. PubMed PMID: 1924649.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199107000-00002
• ^37.
  Lai CF, Wang YT, Hung KY, Peng YS, Lien YR, Wu MS, et al. Sexual dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27(6):615–21. doi: http://doi.org/10.1159/000108357. PubMed PMID: 17851229.
  » https://doi.org/10.1159/000108357
• ^38.
  Sathianathen NJ, Hwang EC, Mian R, Bodie JA, Soubra A, Lyon JA, et al. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors for premature ejaculation in adult men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3):CD012799. PubMed PMID: 33745183.
• ^39.
  van Ek GF, Krouwel EM, Nicolai MP, Bouwsma H, Ringers J, Putter H, et al. Discussing sexual dysfunction with chronic kidney disease patients: practice patterns in the office of the nephrologist. J Sex Med. 2015;12(12):2350–63. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.13062. PubMed PMID: 26633081.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.13062
• ^40.
  Fenton KA, Johnson AM, McManus S, Erens B. Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77(2):84–92. doi: http://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.2.84. PubMed PMID: 11287683.
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.2.84

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  02 Aug 2024
• Date of issue
  Oct-Dec 2024

History

• Received
  16 Apr 2024
• Accepted
  28 May 2024