Phases | Procedures Description | ||
---|---|---|---|
Database | (1) Field study | 1.1 | Choice of scientific basis or journals |
1.2 | Delimitation of Terms Representing Field | ||
1.3 | Operationalization of search and filtering of articles | ||
(2) Data selection and organization | 2.1 | Download references in spreadsheet format | |
2.2 | Download references for use in CiteSpace | ||
2.3 | Spreadsheet Analysis Matrix Organization | ||
2.4 | Data Import into Other Analysis Software | ||
Discussion | (3) Research front | 3.1 | Volume and temporal analysis |
3.2 | Analysis of the most cited articles | ||
3.3 | Analysis of the central themes | ||
3.4 | Description, study of relationships and trends | ||
(4) Intellectual basis | 4.1 | Analysis of journal co-citation network | |
4.2 | Analysis of reference co-citation network |
Search systematization | Filters |
---|---|
Document Type | Article |
Categories of Web of Science | All categories |
Allotted time | 1997-2019 |
Research Date | August 2, 2019 |
Authors | Theoretical Support | Method | Citation |
---|---|---|---|
Wu & Wang (2005Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & management, 42(5), 719-729.) | (i) Perceived risk; (ii) Innovation diffusion theory; (iii) Technology acceptance model; | SEM | 474 |
Chen, Gillenson & Sherrell (2002Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & management, 39(8), 705-719.) | (i) Technology Acceptance Model; (ii) Innovation Diffusion Theory | CFA e SEM | 334 |
Mick and Fournier (1998Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer research, 25(2), 123-143.) | (i) Innovation Diffusion; (ii) Human Coping; (iii) Innovativeness Behavior. | Focus Group | 315 |
Chang, Cheung & Lai (2005Chang, M. K., Cheung, W., & Lai, V. S. (2005). Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping. Information & Management, 42(4), 543-559.) | (i) Technology adoption | Systematic review | 106 |
Lu & Su (2009Lu, H. P., & Yu-Jen Su, P. (2009). Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites. Internet Research, 19(4), 442-458.) | (i) Technology Acceptance Model; (ii) Theory Planned Behavior | SEM | 68 |
Wang & Cheung (2004Wang, S., & Cheung, W. (2004). E-business adoption by travel agencies: prime candidates for mobile e-business. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 43-63.) | (i) Innovation Adoption | CFA | 55 |
Poon (2008Poon, W. C. (2007). Users' adoption of e-banking services: the Malaysian perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23(1), 59-69.) | (i) Innovation Adoption | CFA | 41 |
Ploetz, Schneider, Globisch & Duetschke (2014) | (i) Innovation Adoption | Experiment design | 33 |
Bartels & Reinders (2011Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 601-609.) | (i) Innovative behavior | Systematic review | 31 |
Lee, Lee & Schumann (2002Lee, E. J., Lee, J., & Schumann, D. W. (2002). The influence of communication source and mode on consumer adoption of technological innovations. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(1), 1-27.) | (i) Diffusion of Innovations Theory; (ii) Communication Modality | Multinomial Logit Analysis | 30 |
Authors | Theoretical Support | Citation |
---|---|---|
Davis, Bagozzi & Warshow (1989Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.) | (i) Technology Acceptance Model; (ii) Theory of Reasoned Action | 24 |
Rogers (1995) | Innovation of Diffusion | 18 |
Rogers (2003Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, (5th ed). New York: Free Press.) | Innovation of Diffusion | 17 |
Davis (1989Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.) | Technology Acceptance Model | 16 |
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis & Davis (2003Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.) | Multiple Theories | 15 |
Ajzen (1991Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.) | Planned Behavior | 13 |
Agarwal and Prasad (1998Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information systems research, 9(2), 204-215. ) | (i) Innovation Adoption; (ii) Technology Acceptance Model | 12 |
Fornell and Larcker (1981Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.) | Structural Equation Modeling | 12 |
Midgley e Dowling (1978) | Innovativeness Behavior | 11 |
Venkatesh & Davis (2000Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.) | (i) Diffusion of Innovations Theory; (ii) Theory of Reasoned Action; (iii) Technology Acceptance Model; (iv) Planned Behavior | 11 |