Abstract
Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease. There is no effective treatment for neurodegenerative diseases. Snake venoms are a cocktail of proteins and peptides with great therapeutic potential and might be useful in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Crotapotin is the acid chain of crotoxin, the major component of Crotalus durissus collilineatus venom. PD is characterized by low levels of neurotrophins, and synaptic and axonal degeneration; therefore, neurotrophic compounds might delay the progression of PD. The neurotrophic potential of crotapotin has not been studied yet.
Methods: We evaluated the neurotrophic potential of crotapotin in untreated PC12 cells, by assessing the induction of neurite outgrowth. The activation of the NGF signaling pathway was investigated through pharmacological inhibition of its main modulators. Additionally, its neuroprotective and neurorestorative effects were evaluated by assessing neurite outgrowth and cell viability in PC12 cells treated with the dopaminergic neurotoxin MPP+ (1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium), known to induce Parkinsonism in humans and animal models.
Results: Crotapotin induced neuritogenesis in PC12 cells through the NGF-signaling pathway, more specifically, by activating the NGF-selective receptor trkA, and the PI3K/Akt and the MAPK/ERK cascades, which are involved in neuronal survival and differentiation. In addition, crotapotin had no cytotoxic effect and protected PC12 cells against the inhibitory effects of MPP+ on cell viability and differentiation.
Conclusion: These findings show, for the first time, that crotapotin has neurotrophic/neuroprotective/neurorestorative potential and might be beneficial in Parkinson's disease. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate the toxicity of crotapotin in other cell models.
Keywords: Crotapotin; Snake venom; Neuroprotection; Neuritogenesis; MPP+; Parkinson's disease
Background
Venoms are complex and specialized mixtures of enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins, peptides, and non-protein compounds with great pharmacological potential [1-4]. These bioactive molecules target ion channels, receptors, and a variety of modulators. They might serve as the basis for developing new drugs for treating several diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases [5].
Crotalus durissus collilineatus (C. d. collilineatus) is a subspecies found in the Brazilian Southeast and Central West regions [6, 7]. Its venom consists of different classes of proteins and peptides like bradykinin-potentiating peptides, convulxin, crotamine, crotoxin, and gyroxin [7-10], crotoxin being the major component [11-13]. Crotoxin is a molecule composed of two subunits that are non-covalently bonded, i.e., subunit A or crotapotin (crotoxin acid chain) and subunit B or phospholipase A2 (PLA2) [11, 14-17]. Crotapotin is a non-toxic, non-enzymatic protein [6, 14] with anti-inflammatory [18-20], and antimicrobial activities [16, 18, 19, 21, 22]. The neurotrophic activity of crotapotin is unknown. This study investigates if crotapotin has neurotrophic potential and if it could be involved in the neuroprotection against the toxicity induced by MPP+. This neurotoxin is the active metabolite of MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine). Both MPTP (parent drug) and MPP+ (its active metabolite) are associated with Parkinsonian syndrome in primates [23].
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease; it is characterized by synaptic and axonal degeneration, loss of dopaminergic neurons, and reduced levels of dopamine in the nigrostriatal pathway. The treatment of PD is restricted to motor symptoms’ alleviation, without any beneficial effect on cognitive decline. Moreover, long-term treatment induces important side effects and adaptive tolerance [24-26].
Neuronal survival, differentiation, and regeneration are controlled by neurotrophins both during the nervous system development and in the mature nervous system [27-30]. Studies provide evidence that reduced levels of neurotrophins are involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases [31-35]. Therefore, compounds that mimic or enhance the action of neurotrophins might be of use to slow the progression of neurodegeneration or restore the lost neuronal function [36-38]. In this scenario, animal toxins represent a promising source of new molecules with neuroprotective activity and therapeutic potential against neurodegeneration [39-43].
Based on these premises, this study investigates the neuroprotective activity of crotapotin in PC12 cells treated with the dopaminergic neurotoxin MPP+, with a focus on the neurotrophic signaling pathway triggered by the neurotrophin NGF as a possible mechanism of neuroprotection. This is a prospective work in which different isoforms of crotapotin have been tested for the initial characterization of the neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects of crotapotin.
Methods
Reagents
1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium iodide (MPP+, D048), LY-294002 hydrochloride (L9908), 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, M2128), K252a (K2015), U0126 monoethanolate, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES, H3375), sodium bicarbonate (S5761), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (D5648), Ham′s F12K medium (N6658), Trypsin-EDTA solution (59427C), Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) from Vipera lebetina venom (N8133), Collagen Type-IV (C5533) and Fetal bovine serum (F2561) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Equine serum and antibiotic mix (PSN, 5 mg/mL penicillin, 5 mg/mL streptomycin, and 10 mg/mL neomycin) were purchased from GIBCO® (Life Technologies Corporation, USA).
Crotapotin identification
C. d. collilineatus venom fractionation and crotapotin isolation were performed as described previously [44]. Crotapotin purity was assessed by Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography or FPLC (Äkta Purifier UPC10 GE Healthcare, Sweden), with a reversed-phase C4 Jupiter column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, 300 Å, Phenomenex, USA), employing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as solution A, and 80% acetonitrile (ACN) + 0.1% TFA as solution B. The elution was performed through a linear gradient of 0-100% solution B, at a 1 mL/min flow rate. Absorbance was monitored at 280 nm.
Additionally, crotapotin was analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) with a time of flight (TOF) analyzer to determine its molecular mass and identity. The molecular mass was analyzed by using an ultrafleXtreme instrument (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) with the Smartbeam II laser. Data acquisition was performed with FlexControl software, version 3.3 (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). The following parameters were employed: 500 laser shots per spectrum; 1000 Hz laser frequency; positive reflected mode; and a range of 5 to 30 kDa. A mixture of peptides (Peptide calibration standard, NC9846988, Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) and proteins (Protein calibration standard I, NC0239984, and Protein calibration standard II, NC0416074, Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) was used for calibration. As a matrix, a saturated solution of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (α-CHCA) in ACN and 0.1% TFA (V/V), at the ratio of 1:1 (V/V) was used. The software FlexAnalysis, version 3.3 (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) was used for data analysis.
For identification, the crotapotin fraction that eluted from RP-FPLC was reduced, alkylated, digested with sequencing grade porcine pancreatic trypsin, and analyzed by Axima Performance (Shimadzu, Manchester, UK). MS/MS data were analyzed with the MASCOT program, against databank protein sequence deposited in the NCBI (65,519,838 sequences, 23,472,502,492 residues) and SwissProt (548,208 sequences, 195,282,524 residues). Cysteine carbamidomethylation was included as a fixed modification, and methionine oxidation was included as a variable modification. MS/MS mass tolerance was set to ± 0.8 Da.
Cell culture
Rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cell line (PC12 - CRL-1721) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). PC12 cells were cultured in high-glucose DMEM, supplemented with 10% equine serum, 5% fetal bovine serum, and 1% antibiotic mix, at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The medium was replaced every 2 days. For the assays, cells were detached with trypsin-EDTA solution and the enzymatic reaction was stopped with an equal volume of culture medium.
Differentiation/neurite outgrowth assay
PC12 cells (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with crotapotin (2.5; 5; and 10 µg/mL) or NGF (100 ng/mL, positive control) and incubated for 72 h. Untreated cells were used as negative controls. Three independent experiments from different cell cultures were assayed; each sample was assayed in triplicate. The morphometric analysis was performed under inverted phase contrast microscopy (Carl Zeiss Axio Observer A1 Inverted Microscope, magnification of 400×). The wells were scanned from left to right and three fields/wells were randomly selected; investigators were blinded about cell treatments (numbers identified groups). The percentage of cells with neurites was determined in digitalized images by using the ImageJ open source software [45]. Cells bearing at least one neurite longer than the diameter of their cell bodies were considered neurite-bearing cells [46]. Data were expressed as a percentage of total cells.
Inhibition of NGF-signaling pathway
PC12 cells (2.0 × 105 cells/well) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% equine serum, 5% fetal bovine serum, and 1% antibiotic mix. After 24 hours, the medium was replaced with F-12K Nutrient Mixture Kaighn's Modification (GIBCO®, Life Technologies Corporation, USA) supplemented with 1% equine serum and 1% antibiotic mix (PSN, GIBCO®). Crotapotin-induced cell differentiation was evaluated in the presence of (i) the antagonist of trkA receptor (K252a), or the inhibitors of the (ii) PI3K/Akt pathway (LY294002) or (iii) MAPK/ERK pathway (U0126). PC12 cells were pretreated with K252a (100 nM), LY294002 (30 µM), or U0126 (10 µM) as previously described [47, 48] with minor modifications, and incubated for one hour prior to the addition of crotapotin (10 µg/mL) or NGF (100 ng/mL), following incubation for 72h. Neurite outgrowth assay was performed as described for the Neurite Outgrowth Assay.
Evaluation of the protective effects of crotapotin against MPP-induced toxicity on neuritogenesis
PC12 cells were plated onto 24 well plates (2 × 105 cells/well) and incubated. After 24h, cells were treated with crotapotin (10 µg/mL) and/or MPP+ (100 μM). Cells treated with NGF were used as positive controls and untreated cells were used as negative controls. This concentration of MPP+ (100 μM) inhibits neurite outgrowth without inducing cell death, as we have previously determined [49]. Neurite outgrowth assay was performed as described in the section “Differentiation/Neurite outgrowth assay”.
Evaluation of the protective effects of crotapotin against MPP-induced toxicity on cell viability
Cells (2 × 104 cells per well, final volume of 200 μL) were plated onto 96-well plates. After 24 hours of incubation, cells were treated with crotapotin (10 µg/mL) and/or MPP+ (1 mM). This concentration of MPP+ (1 mM) corresponds to the IC50 for viability in PC12 cells, as we have previously determined [49]. After 72 hours of treatment, MTT solution (5 mg/mL, 20 μL/well) was added and the plates were incubated (3h, 37 °C). Then, the plates were centrifuged (1000 rpm, 5 minutes), the supernatant was removed and the crystals formed were solubilized in DMSO (200 μL/well). Untreated cells were used as negative controls and cells treated with Triton X-100 were used as positive controls. Samples were assayed in triplicate. The plates were mixed (37 °C, 5 minutes) and the absorbance was determined at 570 nm, in a microplate reader (Multiskan™ FC Microplate Photometer, Thermo Scientific, USA). This procedure was based on previous reports [50, 51].
Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). Multiple comparisons were performed by the One-way ANOVA test and Post-hoc Tukey’s multicomparison test (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Values of p < 0.05 were considered significantly different.
Results
Fractionation of venom and isolation of crotapotin
Crotapotin homogeneity, mass spectrometry, and protein sequencing are presented as Supplementary Material (Additional file 1A-1C).
As previously reported, the fractionation of Crotalus durissus collilineatus venom yielded six fractions containing crotapotin, corresponding to the subunit A of the crotoxin complex [44]. There are several isoforms of the subunits A and B of crotoxin with different biological properties [8, 11, 12, 52-56]. In the present study, we evaluated six fractions of crotapotin for their ability to induce differentiation in PC12 cells (Additional file 2A-2B); the most effective, with the lower degree of contaminants (fraction 4) was selected to perform the mechanistic assays and the neuroprotection evaluation.
Crotapotin-induced cellular differentiation in NGF-deprived PC12 cells
Crotapotin significantly induced the differentiation of PC12 cells after 72 hours of incubation when compared to untreated controls (1.31 ± 0.40%). The effect was concentration-dependent as shown by the percentage of neurite-bearing cells stimulated by the following concentrations of crotapotin: 2.5 μg/mL (8.63 ± 1.9%, p < 0.0001), 5 μg/mL (17.21 ± 4%, p < 0.0001) and 10 μg/mL (26.56 ± 3.8%, p < 0.0001). The percentage of neurite-bearing cells in the positive control (NGF-stimulated) was significantly higher (5.96 ± 0.80%, p < 0.01) in comparison with untreated controls (1.31 ± 0.40%). Results are presented in Figure 1 A -1F.
Effects of different concentrations of crotapotin on the differentiation of PC12 cells after 72h incubation. (A) The bar graph represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Cells with at least one neurite with a length equal to or greater than the cell body were considered differentiated and expressed as a percentage of total cells in the field. (B-F) Inverted phase-contrast photomicrographs of (B) control (untreated), (C) NGF (100 ng/mL), (D) crotapotin (2.5 µg/mL), (E) crotapotin (5 µg/mL) and (F) crotapotin (10 µg/mL). Cells with at least one neurite with a length equal to or greater than the cell body were considered differentiated and expressed as a percentage of the total cells in the field (n = 3). **Significantly different from control (p < 0.01); ****Significantly different from control (p < 0.0001).
Pretreatment with K252a (antagonist of trkA) reduced the differentiation induced by crotapotin
The NGF group (12.58 ± 0.92%, p < 0.01) and the crotapotin group (47.9 ± 2.7%, p < 0.0001) presented higher percentages of neurite-bearing cells in comparison with the control group (4.28 ± 0.46%). Pretreatment with k252a significantly reduced the neuritogenesis induced in both groups NGF+k252a (5.91 ± 0.5%, p < 0.05) and crotapotin+k252a (23.32 ± 1.1%, p < 0.0001) in relation to the groups treated solely with NGF or crotapotin, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the control group (4.28 ± 0.46%) and the group treated solely with k252a (2.94 ± 0.45%). Results are presented in Figure 2 A -2G.
Effect of K252a (trkA antagonist) on the differentiation of PC12 cells treated with crotapotin. Cells were pretreated with K252a (100 nM) and incubated for one hour prior to the addition of NGF (100 ng/mL) or crotapotin (10 µg/mL). (A) The bar graph represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Cells with at least one neurite with a length equal to or greater than the cell body were considered differentiated and expressed as a percentage of the total cells in the field. **Significantly different from control (p < 0.01). #Significantly different from NGF (p < 0.05). ****Significantly different from control (p < 0.0001). ####Significantly different from crotapotin (p < 0.0001). (B-G) Inverted phase-contrast photomicrographs of (B) control, (C) K252a (100 nM), (D) NGF (100 ng/mL), (E) NGF (100 ng/mL) + K252a (100 nM), (F) crotapotin (10 µg/mL) and (G) crotapotin (10 µg/mL) + K252a (100 nM), after 72h incubation.
Inhibition of PI3K/Akt pathway reduced the differentiation induced by crotapotin
The NGF group (14.46 ± 2.07, p < 0.01) and the crotapotin group (33.36 ± 3.51, p < 0.0001) presented higher percentages of neurite-bearing cells in comparison with the control group (3.60 ± 0.1%). The inhibition of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by LY294002 (30 µM) reduced the cell differentiation induced in the groups NGF+LY294002 (2.79 ± 0.3%, p < 0.005) and crotapotin+LY294002 (12.09 ± 0.75%, p < 0.0001) in comparison with the groups treated solely with NGF or crotapotin, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the group treated solely with the inhibitor LY294002 (0.50 ± 0.33%) and the controls (3.6 ± 0.1%). Results are presented in Figure 3 A -3G.
Effect of LY294002 (PI3k/Akt pathway inhibitor) on the differentiation of PC12 cells treated with crotapotin. Cells were pretreated with LY294002 (30 nM) and incubated for one hour prior to the addition of NGF (100 ng/mL) or crotapotin (10 µg/mL). (A) The bar graph represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Cells with at least one neurite with a length equal to or greater than the cell body were considered differentiated and expressed as a percentage of the total cells in the field. **Significantly different from control (p < 0.005). ****Significantly different from control (p < 0.0001). ##Significantly different from NGF (p < 0.005). #### Significantly different from crotapotin (p < 0.0001). (B-G) Inverted phase-contrast photomicrographs of (B) control, (C) LY294002 (30 nM), (D) NGF (100 ng/mL), (E) NGF (100 ng/mL) + LY294002 (30 nM), (F) crotapotin (10 µg/mL) and (G) crotapotin (10 µg/mL) + LY294002 (30 nM), after 72h incubation.
Inhibition of the MAPK/ERK pathway reduced the differentiation induced by crotapotin
The percentage of neurite-bearing cells increased in the groups treated with crotapotin (31.93 ± 1.81%, p < 0.0001) and NGF (8.7 ± 0.78%, p < 0.005) in comparison with controls (2.09 ± 0.31). Pretreatment with U0126 reduced the neuritogenesis in the groups NGF+U0126 (1.52 ± 0.14%, p < 0.0005) and crotapotin +U0126 (21.93 ± 1.42%, p < 0.0001) in comparison with the groups treated solely with NGF or crotapotin, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the percentage of neurite-bearing cells between the group treated solely with the inhibitor U0126 (0.31 ± 0.21%) in comparison with controls (2.09 ± 0.31%). Results are presented in Figure 4 A -4G.
Effect of U0126 (MAPK/Erk pathway inhibitor) on the differentiation of PC12 cells treated with crotapotin. Cells were pretreated with U0126 (10 µM) and incubated for one hour prior to the addition of NGF (100 ng/mL) or crotapotin (10 µg/mL). (A) The bar graph represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Cells with at least one neurite with a length equal to or greater than the cell body were considered differentiated and expressed as a percentage of the total cells in the field. **Significantly different from control (untreated cells) (p < 0.005). ****Significantly different from control (untreated cells) (p < 0.0001). ###Significantly different from NGF (p < 0.0005). ####Significantly different from crotapotin (p < 0.0001). (B-G) Inverted phase-contrast photomicrographs of (B) control, (C) U0126 (10 µM), (D) NGF (100 ng/mL), (E) NGF (100 ng/mL) + U0126 (10 µM), (F) crotapotin (10 µg/mL) and (G) crotapotin (10 µg/mL) + U0126 (10 µM), after 72h incubation.
Crotapotin protected PC12 cells against the inhibition of neurite outgrowth induced by MPP+
The neurotoxin MPP+ reduced the neurite outgrowth (2.71 ± 1.2%, p < 0.0001) in comparison with the NGF group (15.37 ± 2.57%). Crotapotin protected cells (21.68 ± 6.1%, p < 0.0001) against the inhibition of neurite outgrowth induced by MPP+ (2.71 ± 1.2%). Results are presented in Figure 5 A -5E.
Effects of crotapotin on the differentiation of PC12 cells treated with MPP+. (A) The bar graph represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Cells with at least one neurite with a length equal to or greater than the cell body were considered differentiated and expressed as a percentage of the total cells in the field. (B-E) Photomicrographs of (B) control, (C) NGF (100 ng/mL), (D) MPP+ (100 µM), (E) crotapotin (10 µg/mL) + MPP+ (100 µM). ****Significantly different from control (p < 0.0001). ####Significantly different from MPP+ (p < 0.0001).
Crotapotin increased cell viability in MPP+-treated PC12 cells
Crotapotin (98.84 ± 4.8%) does not alter cell viability in comparison with controls (normalized to 100%). MPP+ significantly decreased the viability of cells (52.06 ± 4.4%, p < 0.0001) in comparison with controls. Crotapotin significantly increased the viability of cells (90.89 ± 0.30%, p < 0.0001) treated with MPP+ in comparison with cells treated solely with MPP+ (52.06 ± 4.41). Results are presented in Figure 6.
Effects of crotapotin on MPP+-induced cytotoxicity. The bar graph represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). ****Significantly different from control (p < 0.001). ####Significantly different from MPP+ (p < 0.01).
Discussion
In this study, we have used the PC12-cell-neuronal model to evaluate the neurotrophic potential of crotapotin obtained from the venom of Crotalus durissus collilineatus. Additionally, we investigated the involvement of the NGF-signaling pathway in the neurotrophic mechanism of crotapotin and the protective effect of crotapotin against the toxicity of MPP+, a neurotoxin associated with Parkinsonism in animal models and humans. The PC12 cell line is a suitable model of neuronal differentiation, particularly for the investigation of compounds that mimic the NGF action, because they naturally express the NGF-selective receptor trkA, but do not express other neurotrophic receptors such as trkB or trkC, which have high affinity for BDNF and NT-3, respectively. The differentiated PC12 cells acquire the phenotype of sympathetic and dopaminergic neurons, which are affected in PD. They are electric excitable, respond to neurotransmitters, and express several neuronal markers. Additionally, they synthesize, store, release, and uptake dopamine, besides expressing α-synuclein. Therefore, PC12 cells are also a suitable model for Parkinson’s disease research [42, 57, 58].
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the activation of multiple cellular processes such as oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and protein aggregation, resulting in loss of neuronal function [59]. The diversity of biomolecules in animal venoms and their biotechnological potential can be useful as therapeutic tools for neuroprotection and neuromodulation. Toxins isolated from animal venoms have shown promising pharmacological and therapeutic activity [60-62] such as reducing inflammation, modulating synapses, and reducing protein aggregation [63].
Crotapotin (subunit A of crotoxin) is an acidic protein without enzymatic activity. The most known biological activity of crotapotin is acting as a chaperone for PLA2 [18] avoiding non-specific bindings of the subunit B of crotoxin [11, 64, 65]. Several isoforms of crotoxin subunits A and B have been described; they form different complexes with crotoxin and have different biological activities [11, 52, 54]. For instance, it has been demonstrated that crotoxin induces an analgesic effect and decreases motor impairment in an animal model of Multiple Sclerosis [66]; inhibits tumor growth by reprogramming macrophages and inducing antiangiogenic effect [67], and has beneficial effects on skeletal muscle repair [68]. It has also been demonstrated that crotapotin can form complexes with subunit B from C. durissus ssp., with PLA2 from other venoms, and modify the biological activity of these toxins [13, 16, 52, 69]. Accordingly, crotapotin inhibited paw edema induced in rats by PLA2 from Naja naja and Apis mellifera venoms, but potentiated the edematogenic effects of PLA2 from Naja mocambique mocambique venom, showing different interactions [15, 19, 20]. Cecchini and colleagues demonstrated that crotapotin inhibited the edema induced by BthTX-I, BthTX-II, PrTX-I, PrTX-III, and MjTX-II on mouse paws [70]. However, several studies have shown that crotapotin alone has different pharmacological activities. Castro and colleagues [71] evaluated the effects of crotapotin modulation on experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN), widely used animal models of autoimmune peripheral demyelinating diseases [72, 73]. Crotapotin reduces the clinical signs and slows down the initiation of the effects associated with the disease [15, 71]. Garcia and colleagues [18] showed that crotapotin inhibited the T-cell response to Concanavalin A in a dose-dependent manner. Also, the toxin increases the production of PGE2 in T cells [18]. Oliveira et al. [56] demonstrated that the crotapotin isolated from C. d. cascavella venom has a bactericidal effect against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. passiflorae and Claribacteri ssp [56]. Shimizu et al. [74] evaluated the antiviral effect of crotapotin at different stages of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cycle as entry, replication, and release. The authors demonstrated that treating cells with crotapotin inhibited the release of HCV in addition to interfering with lipid metabolism [74].
Despite all the described biological activities of crotapotin, its neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects, and the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. It is known that, in PD, there is an early stage characterized by axonal and dendritic degeneration that precedes the death of dopaminergic neurons [75-80]. Low levels of NGF and reduced trkA signaling play important roles in neurodegenerative disorders, constituting therapeutic targets in neurodegenerative disorders’ treatment [31, 81]. Depletion of neurotrophic factors such as BDNF, GDNF, and NGF has been associated with Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and Huntington's diseases [82]. The therapeutic use of neurotrophins is limited; the clinical trials featuring the administration of NGF to treat neurodegenerative diseases have failed. The main limitations of NGF are poor bioavailability (low stability, short half-life), low blood-brain barrier permeability, and pleiotropic effects (due to the activation of the low-affinity p75 receptors, besides the high-affinity trkA receptors) [83, 84].
NGF is essential for the neurons’ growth, differentiation, regeneration, and maintenance [36, 85-87]. The neurotrophic signaling of NGF on trkA receptors mediates cell survival and differentiation, mainly through the activation of MAPK/Erk and PI3K/AKT pathways [88]. It has been demonstrated that, in PC12 cells, NGF activates the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK pathways [89-91], promoting initiation, elongation, and branching of neurites able to form functional synapses [42, 91-97]. In this study, we demonstrated that the inhibition of one of the main modulators of these pathways (MAPK or PI3K), induced by pretreatment with specific pharmacological inhibitors (U0126, LY294002, respectively), inhibits the neurotrophic effect of crotapotin. These findings suggest that crotapotin activates the same pathways activated by the endogenous neurotrophin NGF in PC12 cells. The PC12 cell line has been largely used to explore cell differentiation and neurite outgrowth due to their well-characterized response to NGF [98, 99]. Upon NGF stimulation, PC12 cells differentiate into cells that are morphologically and functionally similar to adult sympathetic neurons; these neuron-like cells constitute a suitable model for neurobiological studies [100, 101]. NGF induces cell differentiation in PC12 cells by activating trkA receptors, which are naturally expressed by PC12 cells [102]. We observed that the neurotrophic effect of crotapotin on PC12 cells was inhibited by the trkA antagonist, k252a, which indicates that the neurotrophic mechanism of crotapotin involves the activation of the NGF-high-affinity receptor, trkA.
We further evaluated the protective potential of crotapotin against MPP+ toxicity. Many studies use MPP+ to induce damage that resembles Parkinson’s disease, in order to evaluate the effect of potential neuroprotective agents [103-106]. MPP+ is the active metabolite of the neurotoxin MPTP. MPP+ is taken up by neuronal cells through the dopamine transporter (DAT) present in the dopaminergic neurons [107]. MPP+ blocks complex I of the electron transport chain, inhibiting cellular respiration and ATP synthesis, therefore leading to the death of, specifically, dopaminergic neurons [107, 108]. Consistent with previous research, our results showed that MPP+ exposure significantly reduces PC12 cells’ viability [103] and differentiation [109-112]. Crotapotin protected PC12 cells against MPP+ toxicity by increasing cell viability and cell differentiation in the groups treated with MPP+ plus crotapotin, in comparison with the group treated with MPP+ alone. Several neurotrophins protect dopaminergic neurons from the toxicity of MPP+, including GDNF [113], NGF, BDNF, and NT-5 [114]. One of the mechanisms by which neurotrophins protect neurons is reducing oxidative stress-mediated apoptotic death through the modulation of PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk pathways [107, 115]. Accordingly, our study showed that crotapotin induces neuritogenesis by activating these two neurotrophic pathways, PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk, which might explain the neuroprotection against MPP+ toxicity.
Conclusion
Taken together, our results indicate that crotapotin induces neuritogenesis in PC12 cells and protects them against MPP+-induced neurotoxicity. Additionally, our data suggest that the neurotrophic effects induced by crotapotin are mediated by the activation of the trkA receptor, and the downstream PI3k/Akt and MAPK/ERK pathways, which are the same cascades triggered by NGF. This is the first study to show the neurotrophic and neuroprotective potential of crotapotin. Further studies are necessary to better understand its mechanisms of action and its therapeutic potential for neurodegenerative diseases. The possible toxicity of crotapotin should be investigated in other cell models.
Abbreviations
MPTP: 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine; MPP+: 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium; Aβ: amyloid beta; TrkA: tropomyosin-related kinase A; BNDF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; PI3K/Akt: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; MAPK/ERK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; NGF: nerve growth factor.; DMEM: Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium; GDNF: glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor; EDTA: ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid; DMSO: dimethylsulfoxide; NT-5: neurotrophin 5.
References
- 1. Bernardes CP, Menaldo DL, Camacho E, Rosa JC, Escalante T, Rucavado A, Lomonte B, Gutiérrez JM, Sampaio SV. Proteomic analysis of Bothrops pirajai snake venom and characterization of BpirMP, a new P-I metalloproteinase. J Proteomics. 2013 Mar 27;80:250-67.
- 2. Powell R. Snakes, in Encyclopedia of Toxicology (Second Edition), Wexler P, Editor. 2005, Elsevier: New York. p. 57-60.
- 3. Chippaux JP, Williams V, White J. Snake venom variability: methods of study, results and interpretation. Toxicon. 1991;29(11):1279-303.
- 4. Munawar A, Ali SA, Akrem A, Betzel C. Snake Venom Peptides: Tools of Biodiscovery. Toxins (Basel). 2018 Nov;10(11):474.
- 5. de Oliveira Amaral H, Monge-Fuentes V, Mayer AB, Campos GAA, Lopes KS, Camargo LC, Schwartz MF, Galante P, Mortari MR. Animal venoms: therapeutic tools for tackling Parkinson’s disease. Drug Discov Today. 2019 Nov;24(11):2202-11.
- 6. da Silva- Júnior LN, Abreu LS, Rodrigues CFB, Galizio NC, Aguiar WS, Serino-Silva C, dos Santos VS, Costa IA, Oliveira LVF, Sant'Anna SSS, Grego KF, Tanaka-Azevedo AM, Rodrigues LNS, Morais-Zani K. Geographic variation of individual venom profile of Crotalus durissus snakes. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 26;26:e20200016. Doi: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2020-0016. eCollection 2020.
- 7. Boldrini-França J, Rodrigues RS, Fonseca FPP, Menaldo DL, Ferreira FB, Henrique-Silva F, Soares AM, Hamaguchi A, Rodrigues VM, Otaviano AR, Homsi-Brandeburgo MI. Crotalus durissus collilineatus venom gland transcriptome: analysis of gene expression profile. Biochimie. 2009 May;91(5):586-95.
- 8. Ponce-Soto LA, Lomonte B, Rodrigues-Simioni L, Novello JC, Marangoni S. Biological and structural characterization of crotoxin and new isoform of crotoxin B PLA(2) (F6a) from Crotalus durissus collilineatus snake venom. Protein J. 2007 Jun;26(4):221-30.
- 9. de Andrade CM, Rey FM, Bianchini FJ, Sampaio SV, Torqueti MR. Crotoxin, a neurotoxin from Crotalus durissus terrificus snake venom, as a potential tool against thrombosis development. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Aug 1;134:653-9.
- 10. Ribeiro CB, dos Santos JC, Silva JM, de Godoi PHS, Magalhães MR, Spadafora-Ferreira M, Fonseca SG, Pfrimer IAH. Crotalus durissus collilineatus Venom Induces TNF- α and IL-10 Production in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. ISRN Inflamm. 2014 Jan 19;2014:563628.
- 11. Lomeo RS, Gonçalves APF, Silva CN, de Paula AT, Santos DOC, Fortes-Dias CL, Gomes DA, de Lima ME. Crotoxin from Crotalus durissus terrificus snake venom induces the release of glutamate from cerebrocortical synaptosomes via N and P/Q calcium channels. Toxicon. 2014 Jul;85:5-16.
- 12. Hernandez-Oliveira S, Toyama MH, Toyama DO, Marangoni S, Hyslop S, Rodrigues-Simioni L. Biochemical, pharmacological and structural characterization of a new PLA2 from Crotalus durissus terrificus (South American rattlesnake) venom. Protein J. 2005 May;24(4):233-42.
- 13. Ponce-Soto LA, Toyama MH, Hyslop S, Novello JC, Marangoni S. Isolation and preliminary enzymatic characterization of a novel PLA2 from Crotalus durissus collilineatus venom. J Protein Chem. 2002 Mar;21(3):131-6.
-
14. de Oliveira LA, Ferreira Jr RS, Barraviera B, Carvelho FCT, Barros LC, Santos LD, Pimenta DC. Crotalus durissus terrificus crotapotin naturally displays preferred positions for amino acid substitutions. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2017;23(1):46. Doi.org/10.1186/s40409-017-0136-5.
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40409-017-0136-5 -
15. Sartim MA, Menaldo DL, Sampaio SV. Immunotherapeutic potential of Crotoxin: anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2018;24:39. Doi.org/10.1186/s40409-018-0178-3.
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40409-018-0178-3 - 16. Sampaio SC, Hyslop S, Fontes MRM, Prado-Franceschi J, Zambelli VO, Magro AJ, Brigatte P, Gutierrez VP, Cury Y. Crotoxin: novel activities for a classic beta-neurotoxin. Toxicon. 2010 Jun 1;55(6):1045-60.
- 17. Aguiar AS, Melgarejo AR, Alves CR, Giovanni-De-Simone S. Single-step purification of crotapotin and crotactine from Crotalus durissus terrificus venom using preparative isoelectric focusing. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1997 Jan;30(1):25-8.
- 18. Garcia F, Toyama MH, Castro FR, Proença PL, Marangoni S, Santos LMB. Crotapotin induced modification of T lymphocyte proliferative response through interference with PGE2 synthesis. Toxicon. 2003 Sep 15;42(4):433-7.
- 19. Landucci EC, Toyama M, Marangoni S, Oliveira B, Cirino G, Antunes E, Nucci G. Effect of crotapotin and heparin on the rat paw oedema induced by different secretory phospholipases A2. Toxicon. 2000 Feb;38(2):199-208.
- 20. Landucci EC, Antunes E, Donato JL, Faro R, Hyslop S, Marangoni S, Oliveira B, Cirino G, de Nucci G. Inhibition of carrageenin-induced rat paw oedema by crotapotin, a polypeptide complexed with phospholipase A2. Br J Pharmacol. 1995 Feb;114(3):578-83.
- 21. Castro FR, Farias AS, Proença PLF, de La Hoz C, Langone F, Oliveira EC, Toyama MH, Marangoni S, Santos LMB. The effect of treatment with crotapotin on the evolution of experimental autoimmune neuritis induced in Lewis rats. Toxicon. 2007 Mar 1;49(3):299-305.
- 22. de Oliveira LA, Ferreira Jr RS, Barraviera B, Carvalho FCT, Barros LC, Santos LD, Pimenta DC. Crotalus durissus terrificus crotapotin naturally displays preferred positions for amino acid substitutions. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2017 Nov 28;23:46.
-
23. Sian JYM, Riederer P. MPTP-Induced Parkinsonian Syndrome in Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects. Siegel GJ, Albers RW, editors. 1999. Lippincott-Raven. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27974/:Philadelphia.
» https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27974/ - 24. Burke RE, O'Malley K. Axon degeneration in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 2013 Aug;246:72-83.
- 25. Radhakrishnan DM, Goyal V. Parkinson's disease: A review. Neurol India. 2018;66(Supplement):S26-35.
- 26. Helley MP, Pinnell J, Sportelli C, Tieu K. Mitochondria: A Common Target for Genetic Mutations and Environmental Toxicants in Parkinson's Disease. Front Genet. 2017;8:177.
- 27. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:677-736.
- 28. Bhattacharyya A, Svendsen C. Neurotrophins, in Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences, M.J. Aminoff and R.B. Daroff, Editors. 2003, Academic Press: New York. p. 621-23.
- 29. Boschen KE, McKeown SE, Roth TL, Klintsova AY. Impact of exercise and a complex environment on hippocampal dendritic morphology, Bdnf gene expression, and DNA methylation in male rat pups neonatally exposed to alcohol. Dev Neurobiol. 2017 Jun;77(6):708-25.
- 30. Bibel M, Barde YA. Neurotrophins: key regulators of cell fate and cell shape in the vertebrate nervous system. Genes Dev. 2000;14(23):2919-37.
- 31. Dawbarn D, Allen SJ. Neurotrophins and neurodegeneration. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2003;29(3):211-30.
- 32. Levy YS, Gilgun-Sherki Y, Melamed E, Offen D. Therapeutic potential of neurotrophic factors in neurodegenerative diseases. BioDrugs. 2005;19(2):97-127.
- 33. Weinreb O, Amit T, Mandel S, Youdim MBH. Neuroprotective molecular mechanisms of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate: a reflective outcome of its antioxidant, iron chelating and neuritogenic properties. Genes Nutr. 2009 Dec;4(4):283-96.
- 34. Shohayeb B, Diab M, Ahmed M, Ng DCH. Factors that influence adult neurogenesis as potential therapy. Transl Neurodegener. 2018 Feb 21;7(1):4.
- 35. Hogan MK, Hamilton GF, Horner PJ. Neural Stimulation and Molecular Mechanisms of Plasticity and Regeneration: A Review. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020 Oct 14;14:271.
- 36. Skaper SD. Neurotrophic Factors: An Overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1727:1-17.
- 37. Skaper SD. Peptide mimetics of neurotrophins and their receptors. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(25):2704-18.
- 38. More SV, Koppula S, Kim IS, Kumar H, Kim BW, Choi DK. The role of bioactive compounds on the promotion of neurite outgrowth. Molecules. 2012 Jun 4;17(6):6728-53.
- 39. Martins NM, Ferreira DAS, Rodrigues MAC, Cintra ACO, Santos NAG, Sampaio SV, Santos AC. Low-molecular-mass peptides from the venom of the Amazonian viper Bothrops atrox protect against brain mitochondrial swelling in rat: potential for neuroprotection. Toxicon. 2010 Aug 1;56(1):86-92.
- 40. de Souza JM, Gonçalves BDC, Gomez MV, Vieira LB, Ribeiro FM. Animal Toxins as Therapeutic Tools to Treat Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:145.
- 41. Chen N, Xu S, Zhang Y, Wang F. Animal protein toxins: origins and therapeutic applications. Biophys Rep. 2018;4(5):233-242.
- 42. Bennison SA, Blazejewski SM, Smith TH, Toyo-Oka K. Protein kinases: master regulators of neuritogenesis and therapeutic targets for axon regeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020 Apr;77(8):1511-30.
- 43. Jesky R, Chen H. The neuritogenic and neuroprotective potential of senegenin against Aβ-induced neurotoxicity in PC 12 cells. BMC Compl Alt Med. 2016;16(1):26.
- 44. Oliveira IS, Cardoso IA, Bordon KCF, Carone SEI, Boldini-França J, Pucca MB, Zoccal, KF, Faccioli LH, Sampaio SV, Rosa JC, Arantes EC. Global proteomic and functional analysis of Crotalus durissus collilineatus individual venom variation and its impact on envenoming. J Proteomics. 2019 Jan 16;191:153-65.
-
45. Rasband WS, ImageJ US. National Institutes of Health. 1997-2014. Bethesda, Maryland, USAl. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
» http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ - 46. Smalheiser NR, Dissanayake S, Kapil A. Rapid regulation of neurite outgrowth and retraction by phospholipase A2-derived arachidonic acid and its metabolites. Brain Res. 1996 May 20;721(1-2):39-48.
- 47. Phan CW, Lee GS, Hong SL, Wong YT, Brkljaca R, Urban S, Malek SNA, Sabaratnam V. Hericium erinaceus (Bull.: Fr) Pers. cultivated under tropical conditions: isolation of hericenones and demonstration of NGF-mediated neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells via MEK/ERK and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. Food Funct. 2014 Dec;5(12):3160-9.
- 48. Xiong C, Luo Q, Huang WL, Li Q, Chen C, Chen ZQ, Yang ZR. The potential neuritogenic activity of aqueous extracts from Morchella importuna in rat pheochromocytoma cells. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Dec 12;26(6):1685-92.
- 49. dos Santos NA, Martins NM, Silva RB, Ferreira RS, Sisti FM, Santos AC. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) protects PC12 cells from MPP+ toxicity by inducing the expression of neuron-typical proteins. Neurotoxicology. 2014 Dec;45:131-8.
- 50. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1-2):55-63.
- 51. Hansen MB, Nielsen SE, Berg K. Re-examination and further development of a precise and rapid dye method for measuring cell growth/cell kill. J Immunol Methods. 1989;119(2):203-10.
- 52. Faure G, Choumet V, Bouchier C, Camoin L, Guillaume JL, Monegier B, Vuilhorgne M, Bon C. The origin of the diversity of crotoxin isoforms in the venom of Crotalus durissus terrificus Eur J Biochem. 1994 Jul 1;223(1):161-4.
- 53. Faure G, Bon C. Crotoxin, a phospholipase A2 neurotoxin from the South American rattlesnake Crotalus durissus terrificus: purification of several isoforms and comparison of their molecular structure and of their biological activities. Biochemistry. 1988;27(2):730-8.
- 54. Faure G, Bon C. Several isoforms of crotoxin are present in individual venoms from the South American rattlesnake Crotalus durissus terrificus Toxicon. 1987;25(2):229-34.
- 55. Martins NM, Santos NAG, Sartim MA, Cintra ACO, Sampaio SV, Santos AC. A tripeptide isolated from Bothrops atrox venom has neuroprotective and neurotrophic effects on a cellular model of Parkinson's disease. Chem Biol Interact. 2015 Jun 25;235:10-6.
- 56. de Oliveira DG, Toyama MH, Martins AMC, Havt A, Nobre ACL, Marangoni S, Câmara PR, Antunes E, de Nucci G, Beliam LOS, Fonteles MC, Monteiro HSA. Structural and biological characterization of a crotapotin isoform isolated from Crotalus durissus cascavella venom. Toxicon. 2003 Jul;42(1)53-62.
- 57. Malagelada C, Greene LA. Chapter 29 - PC12 Cells as a model for parkinson's disease research, in Parkinson's Disease R. Nass and S. Przedborski, Editors. Academic Press: San Diego. 2008. p. 375-87.
- 58. Guroff G. PC12 Cells as a Model of Neuronal Differentiation, in Cell Culture in the Neurosciences, J.E. Bottenstein and G. Sato, Editors. Springer US: Boston, MA. 1985. p. 245-72.
- 59. de Souza JM, Gonçalves BDC, Gomez MV, Vieira LB, Ribeiro FM. Animal Toxins as Therapeutic Tools to Treat Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:145.
- 60. Bhattacharjee P, Bhattacharyya D. Factor V activator from Daboia russelli russelli venom destabilizes β-amyloid aggregate, the hallmark of Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(42):30559-70.
- 61. Hwang DS, Kim SK, Bae H. Therapeutic Effects of Bee Venom on Immunological and Neurological Diseases. Toxins (Basel) . 2015;7(7):2413-21.
- 62. Wang T, Wang SW, Zhang Y, Wu X, Peng Y, Cao Z, Ge BY, Wang X, Wu Q, Lin JT, Zhang WQ, Li S, Zhao J. Scorpion venom heat-resistant peptide (SVHRP) enhances neurogenesis and neurite outgrowth of immature neurons in adult mice by up-regulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). PLoS One. 2014 Oct 9;9(10):e109977.
- 63. Silva J, Monge-Fuentes V, Gomes F, Lopes K, dos Anjos L, Campos G, Arenas C, Biolchi A, Gonçalves J, Galante P, Campos L, Mortari M. Pharmacological Alternatives for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders: Wasp and Bee Venoms and Their Components as New Neuroactive Tools. Toxins (Basel). 2015 Aug;7(8):3179-209.
- 64. Bon C, Changeux JP, Jeng TW, Fraenkel-Conrat H. Postsynaptic effects of crotoxin and of its isolated subunits. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Sep;99(3):471-81.
- 65. Radvanyi F, Saliou B, Lembezat MP, Bon C. Binding of Crotoxin, a Presynaptic Phospholipase A2Neurotoxin, to Negatively Charged Phospholipid Vesicles. J Neurochem. 1989 Oct;53(4):1252-60.
- 66. Teixeira NB, Sant' Anna MB, Giardini AC, Araujo LP, Fonseca LA, Basso AS, Cury Y, Picolo G. Crotoxin down-modulates pro-inflammatory cells and alleviates pain on the MOG35-55-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Feb;84:253-68.
- 67. de Araújo Pimenta L, de Almeida MES, Bretones ML, Cirillo MC, Curi R, Sampaio SC. Crotoxin promotes macrophage reprogramming towards an antiangiogenic phenotype. Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 12;9(1):4281.
- 68. Silva NC, Alvarez AM, DeOcesano-Pereira C, Fortes-Dias CL, Moreira V. Catalytically active phospholipase A2 myotoxin from Crotalus durissus terrificus induces proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts dependent on prostaglandins produced by both COX-1 and COX-2 pathways. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021 Sep 30;187:603-13.
- 69. Faure G, Guillaume JL, Camoin L, Saliou B, Bon C. Multiplicity of acidic subunit isoforms of crotoxin, the phospholipase A2 neurotoxin from Crotalus durissus terrificus venom, results from posttranslational modifications. Biochemistry. 1991 Aug 13;30(32):8074-83.
- 70. Cecchini AL, Soares AM, Cecchini R, de Oliveira AHC, Ward RJ, Giglio JR, Arantes EC. Effect of crotapotin on the biological activity of Asp49 and Lys49 phospholipases A(2) from Bothrops snake venoms. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;138(4):429-36.
- 71. Castro FR, Farias AS, Proença PLF, de La Hoz C, Langone F, Oliveira EC, Toyama MH, Marangoni S, Santos LMB. The effect of treatment with crotapotin on the evolution of experimental autoimmune neuritis induced in Lewis rats. Toxicon. 2007 Mar 1;49(3):299-305.
- 72. Gonsalvez DG, Fletcher JL, Yoo SW, Wood RJ, Murray SS, Xiao J. A Simple Approach to Induce Experimental Autoimmune Neuritis in C57BL/6 Mice for Functional and Neuropathological Assessments. J Vis Exp. 2017 Nov 9;(129):56455.
- 73. Zhang B, Wang G, He J, Yang Q, Li D, Li J, Zhang F. Icariin attenuates neuroinflammation and exerts dopamine neuroprotection via an Nrf2-dependent manner. J Neuroinflammation. 2019 Apr 22;16(1):92.
- 74. Shimizu JF, Pereira CM, Bittar C, Batista MN, Campos GRF, Silva S, Cintra ACO, Zothner C, Harris M, Sampaio SV, Aquino VH, Rahal P, Jardim ACG. Multiple effects of toxins isolated from Crotalus durissus terrificus on the hepatitis C virus life cycle. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187857.
- 75. Guidoboni G, Sacco R, Szopos M, Sala L, Vercellin ACV, Siesky B, Harris A. Neurodegenerative Disorders of the Eye and of the Brain: A Perspective on Their Fluid-Dynamical Connections and the Potential of Mechanism-Driven Modeling. Front Neurosci. 2020 Nov 12;14:566428.
- 76. Ofengeim D, Shi P, Miao B, Fan J, Xia X, Fan Y, Lipinski MM, Hashimoto T, Polydoro M, Yuan J, Wong STC, Degterev A. Identification of small molecule inhibitors of neurite loss induced by Aβ peptide using high content screening. J Biol Chem. 2012 Mar 16;287(12):8714-23.
- 77. Gorman AM. Neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative diseases: recurring themes around protein handling. J Cell Mol Med. 2008; 12(6a):2263-80.
- 78. Dugger BN, Dickson DW. Pathology of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(7).
- 79. Cattaneo A, Calissano P. Nerve growth factor and Alzheimer's disease: new facts for an old hypothesis. Mol Neurobiol. 2012;46(3):588-604.
- 80. Winner B, Winkler J. Adult neurogenesis in neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(4):a021287.
- 81. Longo FM, Massa SM. Small-molecule modulation of neurotrophin receptors: a strategy for the treatment of neurological disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(7)507-25.
- 82. Allen SJ, Watson JJ, Shoemark DK, Barua NU, Patel NK. GDNF, NGF and BDNF as therapeutic options for neurodegeneration. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138(2):155-75.
- 83. Moskowitz MA, Lo EH, Iadecola C. The science of stroke: mechanisms in search of treatments. Neuron. 2010;67(2):181-98.
- 84. Weissmiller AM, Wu C. Current advances in using neurotrophic factors to treat neurodegenerative disorders. Transl Neurodegener. 2012;1(1):14.
- 85. Skaper SD. The neurotrophin family of neurotrophic factors: an overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;846:1-12.
- 86. Jacovina AT, Zhong F, Khazanova E, Lev E, Deora AB, Hajjar KA. Neuritogenesis and the nerve growth factor-induced differentiation of PC12 cells requires annexin II-mediated plasmin generation. J Biol Chem. 2001 Dec 28;276(52):49350-8.
- 87. Razavi S, Nazem G, Mardani M, Esfandiari E, Salehi H, Esfahani SHZ. Neurotrophic factors and their effects in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Adv Biomed Res. 2015 Feb 17;4:53.
- 88. Venkatesan R, Ji E, Kim SY. Phytochemicals that regulate neurodegenerative disease by targeting neurotrophins: a comprehensive review. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:814068.
- 89. Leopold AV, Chernov KG, Shemetov AA, Verkhusha VV. Neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinases regulated with near-infrared light. Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 8;10(1):1129.
- 90. Ito H, Nomoto H, Furukawa S. Growth arrest of PC12 cells by nerve growth factor is dependent on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway via p75 neurotrophin receptor. J Neurosci Res. 2003;72(2):211-7.
- 91. Franco E, Blanchini F. Structural properties of the MAPK pathway topologies in PC12 cells. J Math Biol. 2013;67(6):1633-68.
- 92. Kumar A, Singh A, Ekavali E. A review on Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology and its management: an update. Pharmacol Rep. 2015 Apr;67(2):195-203.
- 93. Kao S, Jaiswal RK, Kolch W, Landreth GE. Identification of the mechanisms regulating the differential activation of the mapk cascade by epidermal growth factor and nerve growth factor in PC12 cells. J Biol Chem. 2001 May 25;276(21):18169-77.
- 94. Watanabe H, Yokozeki T, Yamazaki M, Miyazaki H, Sasaki T, Maehama T, Itoh K, Frohman MA, Kanaho Y. Essential Role for Phospholipase D2 Activation Downstream of ERK MAP Kinase in Nerve Growth Factor-stimulated Neurite Outgrowth from PC12 Cells. J Biol Chem. 2004 Sep 3;279(36):37870-7.
- 95. Amatu A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Bencardino K, Pizzutilo EG, Tosi F, Siena S. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) biology and the role of NTRK gene fusions in cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019 Nov;30(Suppl_8):viii5-15.
- 96. Kim Y, Seger R, Babu CVS, Hwang SY, Yoo YS. A positive role of the PI3-K/Akt signaling pathway in PC12 cell differentiation. Mol Cells. 2004 Dec 31;18(3):353-9.
- 97. Hemmings BA, Restuccia DF. PI3K-PKB/Akt pathway. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012 Sep 1;4(9):a011189.
- 98. Chen J, Chen Y, Zheng Y, Zhao J, Yu H, Zhu J, Li D. Protective Effects and Mechanisms of Procyanidins on Parkinson’s Disease In Vivo and In Vitro Molecules. 2021 Sep 13;26(18):5558.
- 99. Santos SDM, Verveer PJ, Bastiaens PIH. Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC12 cell fate. Nature Cell Biology. 2007;9(3):324-30.
- 100. Parran DK, Barone SJr, Mundy WR. Methylmercury decreases NGF-induced TrkA autophosphorylation and neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2003;141(1-2):71-81.
- 101. Wiatrak B, Balon K. Protective Activity of Abeta on Cell Cultures (PC12 and THP-1 after Differentiation) Preincubated with Lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58(4):1453-64.
- 102. Fukuda Y, Fukui T, Hikichi C, Ishikawa T, Murate K, Adachi T, Imai H, Fukuhara K, Ueda A, Kaplan AP, Mutoh T. Neurotropin promotes NGF signaling through interaction of GM1 ganglioside with Trk neurotrophin receptor in PC12 cells. Brain Res. 2015 Jan 30;1596:13-21.
- 103. Talepoor Ardakani M, Delavar MR, Baghi M, Nasr-Esfahani H, Kiani-Esfahani A, Ghaedi K. Upregulation of miR-200a and miR-204 in MPP+-treated differentiated PC12 cells as a model of Parkinson’s disease. Mol Gen Genomic Med. 2019 Mar;7(3):e548.
- 104. Xu J, Gao X, Yang C, Chen L, Chen Z. Resolvin D1 Attenuates Mpp+-Induced Parkinson Disease via Inhibiting Inflammation in PC12 Cells. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 2;23:2684-91.
- 105. Yang SF, Wu Q, Sun AS, Huang XN, Shi JS. Protective effect and mechanism of Ginkgo biloba leaf extracts for Parkinson disease induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2001 Dec;22(12):1089-93.
- 106. Blum D, Torch S, Lambeng N, Nissou MF, Benabid AL, Sadoul R, Verna JM. Molecular pathways involved in the neurotoxicity of 6-OHDA, dopamine and MPTP: contribution to the apoptotic theory in Parkinson's disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2001 Oct;65(2):135-72.
- 107. Smeyne RJ, Jackson-Lewis V. The MPTP model of Parkinson's disease. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;134(1):57-66.
- 108. Morin N, Jourdain VA, Di Paolo T. Modeling dyskinesia in animal models of Parkinson disease. Exp Neurol. 2014;256:105-16.
- 109. Bao JF, Wu RG, Zhang XP, Song Y, Li CL. Melatonin attenuates 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced PC12 cell death. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2005;26(1):117-23.
- 110. Soldner F, Weller M, Haid S, Beinroth S, Miller SW, Wullner U, Davis RE, Dichgans J, Klockgether T, Schulz JB. MPP+ inhibits proliferation of PC12 cells by a p21(WAF1/Cip1)-dependent pathway and induces cell death in cells lacking p21(WAF1/Cip1). Exp Cell Res. 1999 Jul 10;250(1):75-85.
- 111. Itano Y, Kitamura Y, Nomura Y. 1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-induced cell death in PC12 cells: inhibitory effects of several drugs. Neurochem Int. 1994;25(5):419-24.
- 112. Lu XL, Lin YH, Wu Q, Su FJ, Ye CH, Shi L, He BX, Huang FW, Pei Z, Yao XL. Paeonolum protects against MPP+-induced neurotoxicity in zebrafish and PC12 cells. BMC Compl Alt Med. 2015;15(1):137.
- 113. Cheng FC, Ni DR, Wu MC, Kuo JS, Chia LG. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor protects against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced neurotoxicity in C57BL/6 mice. Neurosci Lett. 1998 Aug 14;252(2):87-90.
- 114. Kirschner PB, Jenkins BG, Schulz JB, Finkelstein SP, Matthews RT, Rosen BR, Beal MF. NGF, BDNF and NT-5, but not NT-3 protect against MPP+ toxicity and oxidative stress in neonatal animals. Brain Res. 1996 Mar 25;713(1-2):178-85.
- 115. Skaper SD, Floreani M, Negro A, Facci L, Giusti P. Neurotrophins rescue cerebellar granule neurons from oxidative stress-mediated apoptotic death: selective involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J Neurochem. 1998 May;70(5):1859-68
-
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
-
Funding
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP, grant numbers: 2015̸24808-2, 2011/23236-4, and 2019/10173-6, and 2020/13176-3), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, CAPES, Finance Code 001, scholarship to IGF), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (The National Council for Scientific and Technological, CNPq, grant numbers: 306479/2017-6 and 308164/2022-9).
-
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
-
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Supplementary material
The following online material is available for this article:
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
14 June 2024 -
Date of issue
2024
History
-
Received
23 Aug 2023 -
Accepted
08 May 2024