BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy using bovine pericardium is an acceptable alternative to great saphenous vein patch. Bovine pericardium is easily obtained and provides a shorter operative time and lower rupture rate. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rupture resistance of glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium patch in comparison with great saphenous vein patch. METHODS: The sample was divided into two groups: bovine pericardium patch (group I, n = 20) and great saphenous vein patch (group II, n = 20). Both bovine pericardium and saphenous vein patches were prepared in the same dimensions (50 mm x 5 mm) and tested using standard procedures. The patches were tested in the longitudinal axis until the point of material failure. The following parameters were addressed: failure force, ultimate force and failure stress. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Student t test and Pearson's linear correlation. RESULTS: Failure force and ultimate force parameters were significantly higher in the bovine pericardium patch group: 1.97 vs. 1.36 kgf (p = 0.001230) and 2.27 vs. 1.51 kgf (p = 0.0001087), respectively. Mean failure stress in the bovine pericardium patch group was also significantly higher than that in the great saphenous vein group (193.99±43.05 vs. 49.19±22.96 kgf/cm², p = 7.603e-16). The correlation between thickness and failure force was considered moderate (r = 0.5032993) for the bovine pericardium group and low (r = 0.3062166) for the great saphenous vein group. CONCLUSION: The failure stress related to the bovine pericardium group was considered appropriate in this study, and was significantly higher than that observed in the great saphenous vein group. In addition, patch thickness in both groups did not show a good correlation with rupture resistance.
Pericardium; saphenous vein; carotid endarterectomy
