Abstract
This work identifies whether the political/bureaucratic subfield of sports and leisure, (here represented by the PSLC Social Project) has appropriated the production of the scientific/academic subfield on public policies for sports and leisure, by looking into Rede Cedes and its agents’ main strategies for such appropriation. Data were collected through interviews with agents that somehow transited at the intersection of both subfields as well as questionnaires and emails sent to the 68 coordinators of Rede Cedes centers. The study found that the production of Rede Cedes has not contributed to actions under PSLC and that the project’s managers have used some strategies to approximate the political/bureaucratic and the scientific/academic subfields.
Keywords
Sports; Leisure activities; Public policy