Inventory of Supporting for Socio-Emotional Skills - Forced-Choice Version

Valentini, Felipe; Mose, Leonardo de Barros; Franco, Gabriel Carvalho; Oliveira, Jessica Aires da Silva; Bastos, Rafael Valdece Sousa; Mendes, Lívia; Montes, Antônio da Conceição; Campos, Leonardo Botinhon de; Primi, Ricardo; Wells, Craig

doi:10.1590/1982-4327e3408

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Psychological Evaluation • Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 34 • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3408 copy

Inventory of Supporting for Socio-Emotional Skills - Forced-Choice Version

Inventário de Suporte para Competências Socioemocionais: Versão Escolha Forçada

Inventario de Apoyo para Habilidades Socioemocionales: Versión Elección Forzada

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

Socioemotional skills are essential for students’ development at school. However, school support has barely generated debates. We aimed to analyze the evidence of the internal structure and convergent-discriminant validity of the scores of the forced-choice version of the Inventory of Supporting for Socio-Emotional Skills (ISSE). In total, 443 middle and high school students (54% of whom were girls) participated in this study. Results indicated that the revised instrument was consistent with its two-dimension theoretical model (support and demand); the forced-choice version showed an appropriate internal structure and no bias by acquiescence. Moreover, based on a multitrait-multimethod matrix, the scores of the Likert forced-choice version showed convergent and discriminant validity. This study contributes to the literature by proposing a multidimensional heteroevalutive instrument to assess support for socioemotional development in the forced-choice format, which reduces response bias.

Keywords:
inventories; psychometrics; bias; factor analysis; teacher characteristics

		Factor loading
		Forced choice		Likert		Likert (controling for acquiescence)
Triplet	Item	Suppor	Deman	Suppor	Deman	Suppor	Deman
1	01. My teachers encourage their students to research what they do not know.	0.71		0.40		0.38
	02. My teachers get the students excited.	0.90		0.58		0.57
	03. My teachers are overly critical.		0.38		−0.27 ^a		−0.29
2	04. My teachers motivate their students to be creative.	0.64		0.65		0.63
	05. My teachers demand the best from their students.		0.69		0.74		0.69
	06. My teachers get annoyed when their students ask questions.	−0.04^ns		−0.36		−0.39
3	13. My teachers demand dedication from their students.		0.54		0.64		0.59
	14. My teachers say students can have a bright future.	0.37		0.55		0.54
	15. My teachers do not mind if students are bullied.	−0.96		−0.68		−0.71
4	22. My teachers demands students to be organized.		0.74		0.61		0.57
	23. My teachers encourage their students to be optimistic.	0.71		0.62		0.60
	24. My teachers criticize innovative students.	−0.6^ns		−0.20		−0.23
5	28. My teachers believe in their students’ ability.	0.71		0.74		0.73
	29. My teachers ask their students to be calm when they are agitated.	0.36		0.40		0.38
	30. My teachers make students feel in a bad mood.	−0.48		−0.50		−0.53
6	37. My teachers teach their students to respect differences.	0.71		0.40		0.37
	38. My teachers correct the assigned homework.		0.58		0.46		0.43
	39. My teachers do not give feedback on the exercises their students make.		−0.04^ns		0.30		−0.32
7	46. My teachers have no patience with their students.	−0.67		−0.59		−0.61
	47. My teachers humiliate their students.	−1.00		−0.65		−0.67
	48. My teachers keep their students in a good mood.	0.01		0.60		0.58
8	52. My teachers prevent their students from being participatory.		−0.39		0.02^ns		−0.01^ns
	53. My teachers ridicule their students.	−0.77		−0.71		−0.72
	54. My teachers praise organized students.	0.35		0.55		0.55

	1.	2.	3.	4.	5.
1. Support (FC)		0.61	0.86	0.63	0.01 ^ns
2. Demand (FC)	0.62		0.53	0.88	−0.04 ^ns
3. Support (L)	0.86	0.52		0.8	0 (fixed)
4. Demand (L)	0.61	0.81	0.77		0 (fixed)
5. Acquiescence	na	na	na	na	0.09^a

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Av.Bandeirantes 3900 - Monte Alegre, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto - São Paulo - Brasil, Tel.: (55 16) 3315-3829 - Ribeirão Preto - SP - Brazil
E-mail: paideia@usp.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Correspondence address: Felipe Valentini. Universidade São Francisco. R. Waldemar César da Silveira, 105 - Jardim Cura D’ars, Campinas - SP, Brasil. CEP 13.045-510. E-mail: valentini.felipe@gmail.com