Validez de Constructo y Confiabilidad de la Escala de Actitudes ante las Evaluaciones Externas a Gran Escala

Soares, Denilson Junio Marques; Prado, Wallacy Campos; Soares, Talita Emidio Andrade; Santos, Wagner dos

Denilson Junio Marques Soares

Conception and design of this study

data analysis and interpretation

manuscript revision

approval of the final version

assume public responsibility for the content of the manuscript

Denilson Junio Marques Soares is a Professor of the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais, Ouro Preto-MG, Brazil.

Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais, Ouro Preto - MG, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3075-3532

Wallacy Campos Prado

Conception and design of this study

data analysis and interpretation

manuscript revision

approval of the final version

assume public responsibility for the content of the manuscript

Wallacy Campos Prado is a Professor of the Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-675X

Talita Emidio Andrade Soares

Conception and design of this study

data analysis and interpretation

manuscript revision

approval of the final version

assume public responsibility for the content of the manuscript

Talita Emidio Andrade Soares is a Professor of the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais, Passos-MG, Brazil.

Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais, Passos - MG, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-4941

Wagner dos Santos

Conception and design of this study

data analysis and interpretation

manuscript revision

approval of the final version

assume public responsibility for the content of the manuscript

Wagner dos Santos is a Professor of the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória-ES, Brazil.

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória - ES, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9216-7291

Correspondence address: Denilson Junio Marques Soares. Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciências e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais - Campus Ouro Preto - Rua Pandiá Calógeras, 898, Bauxita, Ouro Preto, CEP 35400-000. E-mail: denilson.marques@ifmg.edu.br

Associate editor: Sônia Maria Guedes Gondim

Scale and its dimensions	Quantity of items	Mean Score	Standard Deviation	Coefficient of Variation	Range
Cognitive	12	34.55	10.00	28.94%	12-60
Affective	8	22.32	7.60	34.05%	8-40
Behavioral	10	34.7	7.80	22.48%	10-50
Full Scale	30	91.57	21.97	23.99%	30-150

Item	Factor I	Factor II	Factor III	Threshold_1-2	Threshold_2-3	Threshold_3-4	Threshold_4-5
1 - Adequately assess the quality of teaching and learning	0.734			−1.232	−0.017	0.471	1.843
2 - They are the main instrument for monitoring the effectiveness of educational policies	0.615			−1.470	−0.463	−0.003	1.430
3 - Satisfactorily fulfill the purpose of measuring students’ learning levels	0.792			−1.189	0.072	0.565	1.773
4 - They are useful to properly select students for other stages/levels of education	0.722			−1.277	−0.106	0.448	1.773
5 - Impact the selection of content taught in school	0.484	0.312		−1.843	−0.788	−0.280	1.149
6 - Adequately measure the level of knowledge of students based on the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC)	0.742			−1.277	−0.099	0.541	1.682
7 - Its curricular matrices give equal value to all the knowledge provided for in the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC)	0.601			−1.217	−0.210	0.426	1.555
8 - They allow the analysis of the social and cultural aspects of the students	0.707			−1.014	−0.196	0.345	1.603
9 - They are necessary instruments to reduce educational inequalities	0.829			−1.003	−0.044	0.418	1.511
10 - They are important instruments of accountability to society	0.764			−1.176	−0.330	0.338	1.533
11 - They are important instruments for monitoring teaching practice	0.820			−0.969	−0.182	0.345	1.710
12 - They are efficient instruments to promote financial bonuses to education professionals	0.751			−0.926	0.024	0.581	1.682
Items related to the cognitive dimension (12 items)
13 - I appreciate this kind of assessment	0.371		0.520	−1.025	−0.168	0.557	1.773
14 - I yearn for finding their results			0.471	−1.325	−0.581	−0.017	1.470
15 - I trust their results			0.725	−1.025	−0.134	0.517	1.682
16 - I trust the comparisons between schools and students based on them			0.844	−0.875	0.010	0.597	1.773
17 - I trust the certifications of completion of a level/stage of education that are performed from them			0.772	−1.003	−0.168	0.541	1.806
18 - I feel that my knowledge is valued by these assessments			0.729	−0.855	−0.038	0.647	1.881
19 - I realize that the subject I teach is valued by them			0.700	−0.826	−0.134	0.441	1.555
20 - I like to align my work based on their results			0.802	−1.014	−0.381	0.323	1.603
Items related to the affective dimension (8 items)
21 - I plan my classes based on their results		0.744		−1.393	−0.605	−0.003	1.376
22 - I incorporate their results into my daily actions in the classroom		0.748		−1.533	−0.798	−0.161	1.430
23 - I organize the school schedule to value its accomplishment		0.718		−1.533	−0.807	−0.127	1.232
24 - I prioritize the teaching of the contents that are most frequent in these assessments		0.739		−1.555	−0.836	−0.106	1.341
25 - I talk to students about its importance		0.743		−2.208	−1.393	−0.698	0.855
26 - I recommend participating in these evaluations		0.694		−2.018	−1.511	−0.875	0.798
27 - I provide feedback on the results obtained in the classroom		0.808		−1.490	−0.980	−0.287	1.162
28 - I solve questions from previous external assessments in class		0.873		−1.555	−0.948	−0.389	1.123
29 - I use questions from previous external assessments in internal school assessments		0.740		−1.430	−0.707	−0.245	1.189
30 - I participate in specific training for a better use of their results		0.592		−1.176	−0.533	0.182	1.358
Items related to the behavioral dimension (10 items)
Explained Variance = 64%	Factor I	Factor II	Factor III
	25%	21%	18%
Composite reliability	0.9375430	0.9389661	0.7222134

[1] Correspondence address: Denilson Junio Marques Soares. Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciências e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais - Campus Ouro Preto - Rua Pandiá Calógeras, 898, Bauxita, Ouro Preto, CEP 35400-000. E-mail: denilson.marques@ifmg.edu.br

Brasil

Brasil

Validez de Constructo y Confiabilidad de la Escala de Actitudes ante las Evaluaciones Externas a Gran Escala

Resumen