Prácticas de Orientación en el Posgrado y Satisfacción del Estudiante de Doctorado

Hamburg, Sheila; Ferraz, Adriana Satico; Noronha, Ana Paula Porto; Santos, Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

School and Educational Psychology • Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 34 • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e33414 copiar

Prácticas de Orientación en el Posgrado y Satisfacción del Estudiante de Doctorado

Autoría SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Resumen:

La orientación en el Programa de Posgrado Stricto Sensu está asociada a la satisfacción de los estudiantes. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo investigar las relaciones entre las variables del proceso de orientación y los niveles de satisfacción de los estudiantes de doctorado con dichas prácticas. Estudiantes de posgrado de diferentes instituciones educativas y áreas de conocimiento ( N = 372) completaron el Cuestionario de Buenas Prácticas de Orientación de Investigación de Posgrado (forma remota/asincrónica). Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis de ruta y prueba de Kruskall-Wallis. Los resultados mostraron relaciones entre las características de la orientación (accesibilidad y nivel de exigencia del asesor y la satisfacción de los estudiantes (con el proyecto, el asesor, las oportunidades de crecimiento y las relaciones), mediadas por las horas de orientación mensuales. Se concluye que las prácticas de orientación requieren mayores estudios y discusiones que contribuyan a la calidad de la relación asesor-alumno, extendiéndose a la formación de nuevos investigadores y docentes.

Palavras clave:
orientación educacional; prosgrado; formación profesional

Independent Variables: Characteristics of Postgraduate Advising
Form of access to academic advising
Advisor always available = 191 (51.3%)			Pre-scheduling = 150 (40.3%)				Pre-scheduled days* = 31 (8.3%)
Level of demand from the advisor
Very low = 18 (4.8%)	Low = 24 (6.5%)		Medium = 77 (20.7%)		High = 129 (34.7%)		Very high = 124 (33.3%)
Number of hours per month allocated to advising
Minimum = 1 hour		Maximum = 10 hours			M = 3.70		SD = 2.84
Dependent Variables: Postgraduate student satisfaction
Level of enthusiasm with the project
Very dissatisfied = 5 (1.3%)		Dissatisfied = 22 (5.9%)		Regular = 80 (21.5%)		Satisfied = 149 (40.1%)		Very satisfied = 116 (31.2%)
Level of satisfaction with the advisor
Very dissatisfied = 27 (7.3%)		Dissatisfied = 40 (10.8%)		Regular = 60 (16.1%)		Satisfied = 106 (28.5%)		Very satisfied = 139 (37.4%)
Level of satisfaction with opportunities for gaining maturity
Very dissatisfied = 28 (7.5%)		Dissatisfied = 33 (8.9%)		Regular = 69 (18.5%)		Satisfied = 92 (24.7%)		Very satisfied = 150 (40.3%)
Level of satisfaction with interpersonal relationship
Very dissatisfied = 24 (6.5%)		Dissatisfied = 26 (7.0%)		Regular = 53 (14.2%)		Satisfied = 96 (25.8%)		Very satisfied = 173 (46.5%)
Control Variables
Experience in publishing articles
Minimum = 0		Maximum = 5			M = 2.09			SD = 1.72
Execution of paid teaching activities
No = 305 (81.99%)		Yes, 8 hours of classes per week = 26 (6.99%)		Yes, 9 to 20 hours of classes per week = 19 (5.10%)		Yes, 21/40 hours of classes per week = 17 (4.57%)		Yes, more than 40 hours of classes per week = 5 (1.35%)
Doctorate stage
Initial stage = 164 (44.09%)						Final stage = 208 (55.91%)
Autonomy in choosing the advisor
Yes = 282 (75.8%)						No = 90 (24.2%)
Choosing the research area of interest in the doctoral program
Yes = 39 (91.1%)						No = 33 (8.9%)
Areas of knowledge
Agricultural Sciences^* * Note. Reference category for conversion into a dummy variable. = 25 (6.75%)		Biological Sciences = 18 (4.88%)		Health Sciences = 44 (11.85%)		Exact and Earth Sciences = 21 (5.67%)		Human Sciences = 177 (47.61%)
Social and Applied Sciences = 18 (4.86%)		Types of engineering = 23 (6.21%)			Interdisciplinary = 22 (5.96%)			Linguistics, Literature and Arts = 23 (6.21%)

β of the Independent Variables over the Dependent Variables
	Ent_Proj	Sat_Adv	Sat_Opor_Growth_Mat	Sat_Rel
AA: pre-scheduling	-.04	-.01	-.01	-.05
AA: advisor always available	-.10	- .28 ^* ***** p < .001;	- .22 ^* * p < .05.	- .27 ^* * p < .05.
Level of demand from the advisor	- .10 ^* * p < .05.	- .21 ^* ***** p < .001;	- .21 ^* ***** p < .001;	-.02
β of the Control Variables o ver the Dependent Variables
	Ent_Proj	Sat_Adv	Sat_Opor_Growth_Mat	Sat_Rel
Number of articles published	- .14 ^ p < .01;	-.07	-.04	- .10 ^* * p < .05.
Paid teaching activity	-.03	- .08 ^* * p < .05.	- .11 ^* * p < .05.	- .17 ^* ***** p < .001;
Doctorate stage	-.14 ^ p < .01;	-.10 ^* * p < .05.	-.12 ^ p < .01;	-.12 ^ p < .01;
Choosing the advisor	-.08	-.04	-.03	-.02
Choosing the research line	- .20 ^* ***** p < .001;	- .10 ^ p < .01;	- .10*	-.09
AK: Biological Sciences	-.05	-.04	- .12*	- .12 ^* * p < .05.
AK: Health Sciences	-.04	-.09	- .19**	-.07
AK: Exact and Earth Sciences	-.06	-.01	-.11	-.06
AK: Human Sciences	-.01	- .32 ^ p < .01;	- .39 ^* ***** p < .001;	- .42 ^* ***** p < .001;
AK: Social and Applied Sciences	-.10	-.06	-.10	-.07
AK: Types of Engineering	-.10	-.04	- .12 ^* * p < .05.	-.09
AK: Interdisciplinary Programs	-.11	-.10	- .11 ^* * p < .05.	- .17 ^ p < .01;
AK: Linguistics, Literature and Arts	-.06	-.08	- .12 ^* * p < .05.	- .18 ^ p < .01;

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Av.Bandeirantes 3900 - Monte Alegre, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, Tel.: (55 16) 3315-3829 - Ribeirão Preto - SP - Brazil
E-mail: paideia@usp.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] E-mail: profsheilapsi@gmail.com