A STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF ANATOMICAL FEATURES IN SOME Ornithogalum SP. SPECIES

ÖZDEMIR, A.; KOCAYIGIT, H.; YETISEN, K.; AKYOL, Y.; ÖZDEMIR, C.

doi:10.1590/S0100-83582016340300009

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil
SciELO.org - Rede SciELO
Blog SciELO em Perspectiva

Abrir menu

Brasil

Español English

Planta Daninha

Sobre o periódico
Corpo Editorial
Instruções aos autores
Contato

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Compartilhe

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Sumário

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

ARTICLES • Planta daninha 34 (03) • Jul-Sep 2016 • https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340300009 copy

A STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF ANATOMICAL FEATURES IN SOME Ornithogalum SP. SPECIES¹ 1 Recebido para publicação em 1.9.2015 e aprovado em 5.2.2016.

Comparação Estatística das Características Anatômicas em Espécies de Ornithogalum sp.

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

In the present study, Ornithogalum narbonense, O. montanum, O. wiedemannii, O. sigmoideum and O. lanceolatum species were compared statistically with respect to anatomical characters. Some differences were found in root, stem and leaf anatomy of the species. These differences and similarities were indicated in this study. A big metaxylem was present in all root cross sections, except for O. lanceolatum, which has three metaxylema. 2-3 layered annular type collenchyma were present in all species. Aerenchyma is present in all mesophiles.

Keywords:
statistic; Ornithogalum; anatomy

Authorship

A. ÖZDEMIR

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics; Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyTurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics;

H. KOCAYIGIT

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics; Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyTurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics;

K. YETISEN

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Biology, 45030-Muradiye, Manisa,Turkey. <kadriyeyetisen@gmail.com>.Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyManisa, TurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Biology, 45030-Muradiye, Manisa,Turkey. <kadriyeyetisen@gmail.com>.

Y. AKYOL

C. ÖZDEMIR

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics; Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyTurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics;

Figures | Tables

Figures (3)
Tables (6)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Root cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C:O. wiedemannii, D,E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, en: endodermis, ep:epidermis, m:metaxylem, p:pericycle; scale bar 50 μm.

Thumbnail

Figure 2
Stem cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C,D:O. wiedemannii, E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, cl:collenchyma, ep:epidermis, rc:raphide crystals, vb:vascular bundle; scale bar 50 μm.

Thumbnail

Figure 3
Leaf cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C: O.sigmoedeum, D:O. lanceolatum; ab: abaxial epiderm

Thumbnail

Table 1
Anatomical measurements of the species

Thumbnail

Table 2
Pearson's correlation (Correlation) based on anatomical characters of the investigated taxa

Thumbnail

Table 3
Pearson correlation (Correlation) based on 8 anatomical characters of the leaves of the investigated taxa

Thumbnail

Table 4
Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

Thumbnail

Table 5
Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Pearson's correlation analysis

Thumbnail

Table 6
Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

Figure 1 Root cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C:O. wiedemannii, D,E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, en: endodermis, ep:epidermis, m:metaxylem, p:pericycle; scale bar 50 μm.

Figure 2 Stem cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C,D:O. wiedemannii, E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, cl:collenchyma, ep:epidermis, rc:raphide crystals, vb:vascular bundle; scale bar 50 μm.

Figure 3 Leaf cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C: O.sigmoedeum, D:O. lanceolatum; ab: abaxial epiderm

Table 1 Anatomical measurements of the species

O. narbonense	Min.-Max .	Ort±S.D	O. lanceolatum	Min.-Max.	Ort±S.D
Root			Root
Epidermis Width	20-50	35±13	Epidermis Width	38-52	47.5±6.4
Epidermis Length	15-50	30±12	Epidermis Length	30-50	42±8
Cortex (diameter)	70-23	140±62	Cortex (diameter)	30-170	100±99
Endodermis Width	18-23	21±1.8	Endodermis Width	12-22	17.8±3.7
Endodermis Length	10-15	12±1.8	Endodermis Length	7-12	10±1.7
Pericycle Width	15-18	17±1.2	Pericycle Width	15-26	21±4.6
Metaxylem ( diameter )	25-63	38±13	Metaxylem (diameter)	15-26	21±4.6
Stem			Stem
Epidermis Width	13-25	17±2.5	Epidermis Width	18-22	20±1.6
Epidermis Length	30-43	35±4.3	Epidermis Length	18-23	20.6±2
Cortex (diameter)	3-50	48±9.7	Cortex (diameter)	20-70	45±14.5
Trachea (diameter)	8-23	19±2.5	Trachea (diameter)	10-15	12±2.7
Leaf			Leaf
Abaxial epidermis Width	38-50	44±5.6	Abaxial epidermis Width	10-22	20±0.8
Abaxial epidermis Length	20-28	26±3.3	Abaxial epidermis Length	25-30	29±2.2
Palisade Length	28-40	34±4.7	Palisade Length	20-25	22.8±2.16
Adaxial epidermis Width	18-25	22±2.5	Adaxial epidermis Width	12-25	18.8± 4.5
Adaxial epidermis Length	30-38	34±2.5	Adaxial epidermis Length	12-20	16±4
O. sigmoideum	Min.-Max .	Ort±S.D	O. wiedemannii var. wiedemannii	Min.-Max.	Ort±S.D
Root			Root
Epidermis Width	15-38	24.5±9.8	Epidermis Width	10-20	15±5
Epidermis Length	20-50	32±13.8	Epidermis Length	20-40	30±10
Cortex (diameter)	10-35	25±10	Cortex (diameter)	22-10	16±6
Endodermis Width	18-23	20.6±2	Endodermis Width	5-15	9.6±5
Endodermis Length	11-18	14.6±3.5	Endodermis Length	10-18	13±3
Pericycle Width	10-18	15±3.4	Pericycle Width	15-25	20±5
Metaxylem (diameter)	35-40	38±2.1	Metaxylem (diameter)
Stem			Stem	30-38	34±3
Epidermis Width	20-35	26±6.5	Epidermis Width	25-30	26.5±2
Epidermis Length	30-40	37±4.4	Epidermis Length	28-88	72±22
Cortex (diameter)	35-110	64±31	Cortex (diameter)	25-38	33.5±5
Trachea (diameter)	15-30	23±6.7	Trachea (diameter)
Leaf			Leaf	15-23	20±5.1
Abaxial epidermis Width	25-40	32.5±6.4	Abaxial epidermis Width	15-20	17.5±2
Abaxial epidermis Length	20-25	23±2.4	Abaxial epidermis Length	63-70	66±2.8
Palisade Length	40-170	83.5±59	Palisade Length	12-25	19±4.8
Adaxial epidermis Width	13-20	16.3±3	Adaxial epidermis Width	15-22.5	17±3.2
Adaxial epidermis Length	20-27	23±2.6	Adaxial epidermis Length	10-20	15±5
O. montanum	Min.-Max .	Ort±S.D
Root	20-45	37±9.7
Epidermis Width	10-30	24±9
Epidermis Length	40-60	53±8.3
Cortex (diameter)	13-15	14±0.9
Endodermis Width	7-10	8.5±1.2
Endodermis Length	9-11	10±0.8
Pericycle Width	20-32	27±0.4
Metaxylem (diameter)
Stem	15-20	17±2.5
Epidermis Width	10-25	19±6.2
Epidermis Length	15-40	33.6±16
Cortex (diameter)	3-15	7.6±4.8
Trachea (diameter)
Leaf	10-28	20±7.5
Abaxial epidermis Width	20-40	27.5±8.6
Abaxial epidermis Length	38-15	33±3
Palisade Length	15-28	22±5
Adaxial epidermis Width	30-42	38±4.5
Adaxial epidermis Length	20-45	37±9.7

Table 2 Pearson's correlation (Correlation) based on anatomical characters of the investigated taxa

Features	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
1	0.607
	0.278
2	0.962	0.744
	0.009**	0.150
3	0.948	0.691	0.947
	0.014	0.196	0.015*
4	0.041*	0.798	0.204	0.220
	0.948	0.106	0.742	0.722
5	0.343	0.244	-0.138	0.055	0.565
	0.572	0.692	0.825	0.930	0.320
6	0.962	0.396	0.894	0.851	0.222	0.492
	0.009**	0.510	0.041*	0.068	0.720	0.400
7	0.874	0.721	0.872	0.745	0.221	0.456	0.819
	0.053	0.169	0.054	0.149	0.721	0.441	0.090
8	0.649	0.858	0.693	0.808	0.703	0.249	0.421	0.564
	0.236	0.063	0.194	0.098	0.186	0.686	0.480	0.322
9	0.751	0.415	0.667	0.869	0.118	0.011*	0.649	0.414	0.773
	0.144	0.487	0.219	0.056	0.850	0.985	0.236	0.488	0.126
10	0.873	0.622	0.778	0.857	0.241	0.371	0.762	0.795	0.797	0.820
	0.053	0.262	0.121	0.064	0.696	0.539	0.134	0.108	0.107	0.089
11	0.975	0.542	0.917	0.856	0.045	0.517	0.970	0.927	0.525	0.620	0.847
	0.005	0.345	0.028*	0.064	0.942	0.372	0.006**	0.023*	0.363	0.264	0.070
12	0.791	0.173	0.610	0.755	0.237	0.496	0.791	0.527	0.500	0.870	0.854	0.760
	0.111	0.781	0.274	0.140	0.701	0.395	0.111	0.362	0.391	0.055	0.066	0.136
13	0.910	0.730	0.928	0.800	0.194	0.382	0.863	0.988	0.570	0.451	0.770	0.944	0.528
	0.032	0.162	0.023*	0.104	0.755	0.526	0.060	0.002**	0.316	0.446	0.128	0.016*	0.361
14	0.737	0.959	0.804	0.809	0.700	0.082	0.533	0.785	0.937	0.614	0.814	0.672	0.429	0.781
	0.155	0.010*	0.101	0.097	0.188	0.896	0.355	0.116	0.019*	0.270	0.094	0.214	0.471	0.119
15	0.932	0.848	0.976	0.953	0.385	0.066	0.811	0.873	0.825	0.707	0.843	0.874	0.600	0.910	0.913
	0.021*	0.070	0.005**	0.012*	0.522	0.915	0.096	0.053	0.085	0.182	0.073	0.053	0.285	0.032*	0.030*

* Significant at the level of 0.05. ** Significant at the level of 0.01.

Table 3 Pearson correlation (Correlation) based on 8 anatomical characters of the leaves of the investigated taxa

Characters	A	B	C	D
B	0.362
	0.140
C	0.006**	0.573
	0.979	0.013*
D	0.007**	0.483	0.749
	0.978	0.042*	0.008**
E	0.029*	0.194	0.430	0.030*
	0.910	0.441	0.075	0.906

O. narbonense (A), O. lanceolatum (B), O. sigmoideum (C), O. wiedemannii (D), O. montanum (E), O. wiedemannii (D), O. montanum (E).

Table 4 Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

Takson	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1	0.582
	0.303
2	0.546	0.998
	0.341	0.010**
3	0.957	0.768	0.736
	0.010**	0.130	0.156
4	0.873	0.516	0.472	0.841
	0.053	0.373	0.422	0.074
5	0.759	0.932	0.925	0.852	0.688
	0.136	0.021*	0.024*	0.067	0.199
6	-0.057	0.458	0.447	0.202	0.028	0.136
	0.927	0.438	0.450	0.744	0.965	0.827
7	0.996	0.613	0.576	0.967	0.909	0.780	-0.007
	0.020*	0.272	0.310	0.007**	0.032	0.120	0.991
8	0.865	0.547	0.537	0.787	0.619	0.778	-0.382	0.833
	0.058	0.340	0.351	0.114	0.265	0.121	0.526	0.080

Table 5 Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Pearson's correlation analysis

Taxa	C1	C2	C3	C4
C2	0.631
	0.009
C3	0.211	0.503
	0.433	0.047*
C4	0.125	0.192	0.177
	0.644	0.476	0.511
C5	0.621	0.730	0.143	0.103
	0.010*	0.001**	0.597	0.705

Table 6 Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

How to cite

copy

Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas Departamento de Fitotecnia - DFT, Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV, 36570-000 - Viçosa-MG - Brasil, Tel./Fax::(+55 31) 3899-2611 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: rpdaninha@gmail.com

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org