(T.-C. Wang & Chang, 2007WANG T-C & CHANG T-H. 2007. Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications , 33(4): 870-880. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment |
431 |
269.3 |
(Cheng, 1997CHENG C-H. 1997. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research, 96(2): 343-350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00026-4 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function |
367 |
141.1 |
(Cheng & Lin, 2002CHENG C-H & LIN Y. 2002. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research , 142(1): 174-186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation |
342 |
162.8 |
(Cheng et al., 1999CHENG C-H, YANG K-L & HWANG C-L. 1999. Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. European Journal of Operational Research , 116(2): 423-435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00156-8 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight |
279 |
116.2 |
(Mon et al., 1994MON D-L, CHENG C-H & LIN J-C. 1994. Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight. Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 62(2): 127-134. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90052-3 https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016...
) |
Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight |
227 |
78.2 |
(Cheng & Mon, 1994CHENG C-H & MON D-L. 1994. Evaluating weapon system by Analytical Hierarchy Process based on fuzzy scales. Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 63(1): 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0165-0114(94)90140-6 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Evaluating weapon system by Analytical Hierarchy Process based on fuzzy scales |
174 |
60.0 |
(Cheng, 1999CHENG C-H. 1999. Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107(1): 25-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00348-5 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers |
158 |
65.8 |
(Sennaroglu & Varlik Celebi, 2018SENNAROGLU B & VARLIK CELEBI G. 2018. A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59: 160-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.022 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods |
105 |
210.0 |
(Bisdikian et al., 2013BISDIKIAN C, KAPLAN LM & SRIVASTAVA MB. 2013. On the quality and value of information in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 9(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2489253.2489265 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/...
) |
On the quality and value of information in sensor networks |
97 |
97.0 |
(Roussat et al., 2009ROUSSAT N, DUJET C & MÉHU J. 2009. Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis. Waste Management, 29(1): 12-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.010 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis |
92 |
65.7 |
(Farahani & Asgari, 2007FARAHANI RZ & ASGARI N. 2007. Combination of MCDM and covering techniques in a hierarchical model for facility location: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research , 176(3): 1839-1858. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.039 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Combination of MCDM and covering techniques in a hierarchical model for facility location: A case study |
77 |
48.1 |
(Gigovic´ et al., 2016GIGOVIĆ L, PAMUĈAR D, BAJIĆ Z & MILIĆEVIĆ M. 2016. The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for ammunition depots. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040372 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/...
) |
The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots |
73 |
104.3 |
(Greiner et al., 2003GREINER MA, FOWLER JW, SHUNK DL, CARLYLE WM & MCNUTT RT. 2003. A hybrid approach using the analytic hierarchy process and integer programming to screen weapon systems projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 50(2): 192-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.810827 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/...
) |
A hybrid approach using the analytic hierarchy process and integer programming to screen weapon systems projects |
69 |
34.5 |
(J. Lee et al., 2010LEE J, KANG S-H, ROSENBERGER J & KIM SB. 2010. A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 58(3): 521-527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.11.013 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection |
66 |
50.7 |
(Jiang et al., 2011JIANG J, LI X, ZHOU Z-J, XU D.-L & CHEN Y-W. 2011. Weapon System Capability Assessment under uncertainty based on the evidential reasoning approach. Expert Systems with Applications , 38(11): 13773-13784. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.179 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Weapon System Capability Assessment under uncertainty based on the evidential reasoning approach |
60 |
50.0 |
(Deng, 2015DENG Y. 2015. A Threat Assessment Model under Uncertain Environment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/878024 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/...
) |
A Threat Assessment Model under Uncertain Environment |
53 |
66.2 |
(Qu & He, 2002QU C & HE Y. 2002. A method of threat assessment using multiple attribute decision making. 2: 1091-1095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSP.2002.1179979 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/...
) |
A method of threat assessment using multiple attribute decision making |
53 |
25.2 |
(Rose-Pehrsson et al., 2000ROSE-PEHRSSON SL, SHAFFER RE, HART SJ, WILLIAMS FW, GOTTUK DT, STREHLEN BD & HILL SA. 2000. Multi-criteria fire detection systems using a probabilistic neural network. 69(3): 325-335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00481-0 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...
) |
Multi-criteria fire detection systems using a probabilistic neural network |
52 |
22.6 |
(Pamučar et al., 2018PAMUČAR D, BOŽANIĆ D, LUKOVAC V & KOMAZEC N. 2018. Normalized weighted geometric bonferroni mean operator of interval rough numbers - Application in interval rough dematel-copras model. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 16(2): 171-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME180503018P https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22190...
) |
Normalized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean operator of interval rough numbers - Application in interval rough DEMATEL-COPRAS model |
51 |
102.0 |
(Goossens & Basten, 2015GOOSSENS AJM & BASTEN RJI. 2015. Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; an application for naval ships. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 142, 31-41.) |
Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; An application for naval ships |
51 |
6.3 |