SUSTAINABLE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE IMPACTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

Genari, Denise; Macke, Janaina

doi:10.1590/S0034-759020220505

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista de Administração de Empresas

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

FORUM • Rev. adm. empres. 62 (5) • 2022 • https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020220505 copy

SUSTAINABLE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE IMPACTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

Prácticas de Gestión Sostenible de Recursos Humanos y los Impactos en el Compromiso Organizacional

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to identify the impact of sustainable human resource management (SHRM) practices on organizational commitment (OC). The study used a sample of 290 employees linked to six companies classified in the Bovespa Sustainability Index. The research hypotheses were tested based on a structural model, using the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique. The results show that SHRM practices are represented by three dimensions: attraction and retention of professionals, maintaining healthy and motivated professionals, and developing the skills of professionals. These practices have a significant and positive impact on affective commitment (AC) and normative commitment (NC). Besides, the AC stands out as a partial mediator of the relationship between SHRM practices and NC.

Keywords:
sustainable HRM; SHRM practices; organizational commitment; affective commitment; normative commitment

Factors	Variables	Commonalities	Factor loads
Attraction and retention of professional Mean: 5.68 SD: 1.094	1.1- The company offers an attractive and challenging work environment.	0.674	0.744
	1.2- The company offers career opportunities.	0.653	0.708
	1.3- The company promotes cultural and gender diversity in relation to its employees.	0.510	0.665
	1.4- The company has compensation and benefits practices that favor the attraction and retention of professionals.	0.556	0.658
Maintenance of healthy and motivated professional Mean: 5.22 SD: 1.217	2.1- The company develops actions that favor the reduction and prevention of stress.	0.741	0.830
	2.2- The company favors the adoption of a healthy lifestyle by its employees.	0.711	0.807
	2.3- The company is concerned about the well-being of its employees.	0.721	0.799
	2.4- The company favors the balance between the personal and professional life of its employees.	0.698	0.703
	2.5- The company provides ergonomic conditions in the workplace.	0.520	0.697
	2.6- The company is concerned about its employees’ satisfaction and motivation.	0.699	0.693
Developing the skills of professionals Mean: 5.64 SD: 1.183	3.1- The company offers professional training to employees, with a long-term vision.	0.808	0.837
	3.2- The company invests in the training and development of different groups of employees.	0.740	0.804
	3.3- The company invests in the employees’ education.	0.637	0.705
	3.4- The company invests in the training of employees and in the development of their knowledge.	0.654	0.671

	χ ²	Gl	χ²/gl
Three-factor solution	253.338	74	3.423
One-factor solution	630.894	77	8.193
Nested model comparison	377.556	3	-

	1	2	3	4	5
1. Attraction and retention of professionals	0.578
2. Maintenance of healthy and motivated professionals	0.412	0.723
3. Developin the skills of professionals	0.561	0.412	0.740
4. Affective commitment	0.376	0.327	0.139	0.819
5. Normative commitment	0.217	0.149	0.084	0.298	0.770
Average variance extracted	0.578	0.723	0.740	0.819	0.770
Composite reliability	0.844	0.939	0.919	0.931	0.909
Cronbach’s α	0.752	0.897	0.853	0.874	0.843

Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de S.Paulo Av 9 de Julho, 2029, 01313-902 S. Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 11) 3799-7999, Fax: (55 11) 3799-7871 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rae@fgv.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION

Denise Genari and Janaina Macke worked on the conceptualization and theoretical-methodological approach. The theoretical review was conducted by Denise Genari. Data collection was coordinated by Denise Genari. Data analysis included Denise Genari and Janaina Macke. Denise Genari and Janaina Macke worked together in the writing and final revision of the manuscript.