Efeito disposição entre gestores brasileiros de fundos de
                  ações

LUCCHESI, EDUARDO POZZI; YOSHINAGA, CLAUDIA EMIKO; CASTRO JUNIOR, FRANCISCO HENRIQUE FIGUEIREDO DE

doi:10.1590/S0034-759020150104

EDUARDO POZZI LUCCHESI

Professor at Centro Universitário Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado – São Paulo – SP, Brasil. eduardo.lucchesi@fecap.br

CLAUDIA EMIKO YOSHINAGA

Professor at Centro Universitário Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado – São Paulo – SP, Brasil. claudia.yoshinaga@fgv.br

FRANCISCO HENRIQUE FIGUEIREDO DE CASTRO JUNIOR

Professor at Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade – São Paulo – SP, Brasil. hcastro@usp.br

Independent variable	Model 1		Model 2
Independent variable	Coefficient	Std. error	Coefficient	Std. error
CR_i,f,t	0.5256^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.	0.0378
MER_i,f,t			0.4609^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.	0.0400
lnNAV_f,t	0.0411^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.	0.0058	0.0415^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.	0.0058
Intercept	-1.1667^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.	0.1005	-1.1380^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.	0.1004
Likelihood Ratio	252.6107^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.		189.7605^* Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.

Independent variable	Model 3		Model 4
Independent variable	Coefficient	Std. error	Coefficient	Std. error
CR_i,f,t	0.2926^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0343
MER_i,f,t			0.1745^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0365
lnNAV_f,t	0.0374^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0057	0.0378^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0057
τ₁	1.0872^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0981	1.0723^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0981
τ₂	2.0433^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0987	2.0273^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0986
τ₃	2.5312^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0991	2.5153^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0990
τ₄	2.8854^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0995	2.8696^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0994
τ₅	3.1654^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1001	3.1497^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1000
Likelihood Ratio	113.8497^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.		67.1709^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variables used are the stock continuous return (CR), the stock market excess return (MER) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.

Independent variable	Model 5		Model 6		Model 7
Independent variable	Coefficient	Std. error	Coefficient	Std. error	Coefficient	Std. error
MERi,f,t	0.1030^** Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0465	0.0730	0.0477	0.1387*	0.0486
GDCi,f,t	0.0859^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0229	0.1176^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0235	0.0577^** Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0239
LDCi,f,t	0.0171	0.0259	0.0227	0.0261	0.0230	0.0269
lnNAVf,t	0.0382^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0057	0.0393^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0057	0.0402^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0058
τ₁	1.1095^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0989	1.1399^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0997	1.1321^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1013
τ₂	2.0649^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0994	2.0984^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1003	2.0982^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1018
τ₃	2.5530^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.0997	2.5894^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1006	2.5892^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1022
τ₄	2.9073^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1002	2.9463^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1011	2.9517^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1027
τ₅	3.1874^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1007	3.2298^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1017	3.2403^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.	0.1033
Likelihood Ratio	80.4838^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.		93.2341^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.		76.8127^* Note: The dependent variable used in the estimation was based on the latent variable (PRSi,f,t). The independent variable is the stock market excess return (MER), the dummy variable for consistency of gain (GCD), the dummy variable for consistency of loss (LCD) and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (lnNAV). The symbols , * e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner according to the Huber/White procedure.

[TFN01t01] Total number of observations: 45,668

[TFN02t01] Note: The dependent variable is 1 when stocks were sold and zero otherwise. The independent variables are the stock continuous return (CR) and stock market excess return (MER), and the natural logarithm of the net asset value of the fund (NAV). The symbols *, ** e † denote the statistical significance of the coefficient at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The estimated residuals were calculated in a robust manner accordingto the Huber/White procedure.

Brasil

Brasil

Efeito disposição entre gestores brasileiros de fundos de ações