Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Vantagem competitiva: o construto e a métrica

Competitive advantage: the construct and a metric

Resumos

Apesar de quase onipresente nos trabalhos de estratégia e áreas correlatas, o conceito de vantagem competitiva continua sendo foco de debate na academia por não possuir uma definição aceita por consenso. Uma manifestação disso é a recente discussão quanto aos seus fundamentos lógicos e filosóficos, e o questionamento de sua própria existência. O presente trabalho oferece uma proposta de definição constitutiva e operacional de vantagem competitiva que possibilita o desenvolvimento de uma métrica. Essa métrica é aplicada em um trabalho empírico que mede a vantagem competitiva de 2.805 empresas em 16 países, com um total de 13.259 observações. O trabalho demonstra que a existência da vantagem competitiva não é um fato raro, e que cerca de 10% a 12% das empresas analisadas apresentam uma vantagem competitiva estatisticamente significativa, enquanto que uma porcentagem similar apresenta uma desvantagem competitiva igualmente significativa.

Vantagem competitiva; estratégia; competição; recursos; NAFTA; Europa


Despite ubiquitous in strategy and related fields, the concept of competitive advantage continues to be under debate in the academy still lacking a precise and widely accepted definition. A manifestation of this situation is the current debate about its philosophical grounds, and the questioning of its own existence. This paper offers a constitutive definition that allows an operationalization of the concept and the development of metric for the competitive advantage. This metric is applied to a sample of 2,805 firms in 16 countries, with a total of 13,259 observations. The analysis indicates the occurrence of competitive advantage in 10% to 12% of the firms with a similar percentage showing a competitive disadvantage. It demonstrates that the occurrence of competitive advantage is not a rare event. A statistical test is proposed to verify its statistical significance.

Strategy; competitive advantage; resources; competition; NAFTA; Europe


ESTRATÉGIA

Vantagem competitiva: o construto e a métrica

Competitive advantage: the construct and a metric

Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos; Luiz Artur Ledur Brito

FGV-EAESP

RESUMO

Apesar de quase onipresente nos trabalhos de estratégia e áreas correlatas, o conceito de vantagem competitiva continua sendo foco de debate na academia por não possuir uma definição aceita por consenso. Uma manifestação disso é a recente discussão quanto aos seus fundamentos lógicos e filosóficos, e o questionamento de sua própria existência. O presente trabalho oferece uma proposta de definição constitutiva e operacional de vantagem competitiva que possibilita o desenvolvimento de uma métrica. Essa métrica é aplicada em um trabalho empírico que mede a vantagem competitiva de 2.805 empresas em 16 países, com um total de 13.259 observações. O trabalho demonstra que a existência da vantagem competitiva não é um fato raro, e que cerca de 10% a 12% das empresas analisadas apresentam uma vantagem competitiva estatisticamente significativa, enquanto que uma porcentagem similar apresenta uma desvantagem competitiva igualmente significativa.

Palavras-chave: Vantagem competitiva, estratégia, competição, recursos, NAFTA, Europa.

ABSTRACT

Despite ubiquitous in strategy and related fields, the concept of competitive advantage continues to be under debate in the academy still lacking a precise and widely accepted definition. A manifestation of this situation is the current debate about its philosophical grounds, and the questioning of its own existence. This paper offers a constitutive definition that allows an operationalization of the concept and the development of metric for the competitive advantage. This metric is applied to a sample of 2,805 firms in 16 countries, with a total of 13,259 observations. The analysis indicates the occurrence of competitive advantage in 10% to 12% of the firms with a similar percentage showing a competitive disadvantage. It demonstrates that the occurrence of competitive advantage is not a rare event. A statistical test is proposed to verify its statistical significance.

Key words: Strategy, competitive advantage, resources, competition, NAFTA, Europe.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

Artigo recebido em 29.07.2003.

Aprovado em 04.03.2004.

Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos

Professor do Departamento de Administração Geral e Recursos Humanos da FGV-EAESP. Doutor em Administração de Empresas pela HEC-Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Paris. Interesses de pesquisa em estratégia e organizações. E-mail: fvasconcelos@fgvsp.br Endereço: Av. Nove de Julho, 2029, 9º andar, Bela Vista – São Paulo – SP, 01313-902.

Luiz Artur Ledur Brito

Professor do Departamento de Produção e Operações Industriais da FGV-EAESP. Doutorando em Administração de Empresas pela FGV-EAESP. Interesses de pesquisa em estratégia e operações. E-mail: lbrito@fgvsp.br Endereço: Av. Nove de Julho, 2029, 10º andar, Bela Vista – São Paulo – SP, 01313-902.ávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos

  • AAKER, D. A. How to select a business strategy. California Management Review, v. 26, n. 3, p. 167-175, 1984.
  • ALLEN, M. G. Strategic planning with a competitive focus. The McKinsey Quarterly, Autuum, n. 3, p. 2-13, 1978.
  • ANDREWS, K. R. The concept of corporate strategy Homewood: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1971.
  • ANSOFF, H. I. Corporate strategy Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965.
  • ANSOFF, H. I. Strategic management New York: Wiley, 1979.
  • AREND, R. J. Revisiting the logical and research considerations of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, n. 3, p. 279284, 2003.
  • BARNEY, J. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science, v. 32, n. 10, p. 1231-1241, 1986a.
  • BARNEY, J. Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, v. 11, n. 3, p. 656665, 1986b.
  • BARNEY, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99-120, 1991.
  • BARNEY, J. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, v. 27, n. 6, p. 643-650, 2001.
  • BARNEY, J. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 2002.
  • BESANKO, D. et al. Economics of strategy New York: Wiley, 2004.
  • BOWMAN, E. H.; HELFAT, C. E. Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-24, 2001.
  • BRANDENBURGER, A. M.; NALEBUFF, B. J. Co-opetition New York: Doubleday, 1996.
  • BRITO, L. A. L.; VASCONCELOS, F. C. How much does country matter? In: ENCONTRO ANUAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS PROGRAMAS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO, 27º, 2003, Atibaia. Anais.. Atibaia: Anpad, 2003.
  • CAVES, R. E. Economic analysis and the quest for competitive advantage. The American Economic Review, v. 74, n. 2, p. 127-132, 1984.
  • CHAKRAVARTHY, B. S. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 7, n. 5, p. 437-458, 1986.
  • COFF, R. W. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: the resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, v. 10, n. 2, p. 119-133, 1999.
  • COHEN, J.; COHEN, P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1983.
  • COOL, K.; COSTA, L. A.; DIERICKX, I. Constructing competitive advantage. In: PETTIGREW, A.; THOMAS, H.; WHITTINGTON, R. Handbook of strategic management London: Sage, 2002.
  • DURAND, R. Competitive advantages exist: a critique of Powell. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 9, p. 867-872, 2002.
  • GHEMAWAT, P. Sustainable advantage. Harvard Business Review, v. 64, n. 5, p. 53.-58, 1986.
  • GLUCK, F. W.; KAUFMAN, S. P.; WALLECK, A. S. Strategic management for competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, v. 58, n. 4, p. 154161, 1980.
  • HAWAWINI, G.; SUBRAMANIAN, V.; VERDIN, P. Is performance driven by industry or firm specific factors? A new look at the evidence. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-16, 2003.
  • HAYES, R. H.; WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. Restoring our compettive edge New York: Wiley, 1984.
  • HITT, M. A.; IRELAND, R. D.; HOSKISSON, R. E. Strategic management Cincinnati: South Western College, 1999.
  • HOOPES, D.; MADSEN, T.; WALKER, G. Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, n. 10, p. 889-902, 2003.
  • JACOBSEN, R. The persistence of abnormal returns. Strategic Management Journal, v. 9, n. 5, p. 415-430, 1988.
  • KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1996.
  • KHANNA, T.; RIVKIN, J. W. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, v. 22, n. 1, p. 45-74, 2001.
  • LEVITAS, E.; CHI, T. Rethinking rouse and daellenbach's rethinking: isolating vs. testing for sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 10, p. 957-962, 2002.
  • LIPPMAN, S.; RUMELT, R. The payments perspective: micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, n. 10, p. 903927, 2003a.
  • LIPPMAN, S.; RUMELT, R. A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, n. 11, p. 1069-1086, 2003b.
  • MARCH, J. G.; SUTTON, R. I. Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science, v. 8, n. 6, p. 698-706, 1997.
  • McGAHAN, A. M. The performance of US corporations: 1981-1994. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. XLVII, n. 4, p. 373-398, 1999.
  • McGAHAN, A. M.; PORTER, M. E. How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 1, p. 15-30, 1997.
  • McGAHAN, A. M.; PORTER, M. E. The persistence of shocks to profitability? The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 81, n. 1, p. 143-153, 1999.
  • MEYER, M. W. Rethinking performance measurement Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2002.
  • MONTGOMERY, C. A.; WERNERFELT, B. Diversification, ricardian rents, and Tobin's q. The Rand Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 4, p. 623-610, 1988.
  • MORRISON, J. R.; LEE, J. G. The anatomy of strategic thinking. The McKinsey Quarterly, Autumn, n. 3, p. 2-9, 1979.
  • NETER, J. et al. Applied linear regression models Chicago: Irwin, 1996.
  • OHMAEL, K. Effective strategies for competitive success. The McKinsey Quarterly, Winter, n. 4, p. 50-59, 1978.
  • PETERAF, M. The cornerstones of competitive advantage a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, n. 3, p. 95-117, 1993.
  • PORTER, M. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980.
  • PORTER, M. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press, 1985.
  • PORTER, M. E. The structure within industries and companies' performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 61, n. 2, p. 214-227, 1979.
  • POWELL, T. C. How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, n. 4, p. 323-312, 1996.
  • POWELL, T. C. Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal, v. 22, n. 9, p. 875-888, 2001.
  • POWELL, T. C. The philosophy of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 9, p. 873-880, 2002.
  • POWELL, T. C. Varieties of competitive parity. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, n. 1, p. 61-86, 2003.
  • PRAHALAD, C. K.; HAMEL, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, v. 68, n. 3, p. 79-92, 1990.
  • PRIEM, R. L.; BUTLER, J. E. Is the resource based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 1, p. 22-40, 2001.
  • RAUDENBUSCH, S. W.; BRYRK, A. S. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002.
  • REED, R.; DeFILLIPPI, R. J. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, v. 15, n. 1, p. 88-102, 1990.
  • ROQUEBERT, J. A.; PHILLIPS, R. L.; WESTFALL, P. A. Markets vs. management: what drives profitability? Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, n. 8, p. 653-664, 1996.
  • ROTHSCHILD, W. E. Surprise and the competitive advantage. The Journal of Business Strategy, v. 4, n. 3, p. 10-18, 1984a.
  • ROTHSCHILD, W. E. How to gain (and maintain) the competitive advantage in business New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984b.
  • ROUSE, M. J.; DAELLENBACH, U. S. Rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective: isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, v. 20, n. 5, p. 487-494, 1999.
  • ROUSE, M. J.; DAELLENBACH, U. S. More thinking on research methods for the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 10, p. 963-967, 2002.
  • RUMELT, R. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, n. 3, p. 167-119, 1991.
  • RUMELT, R. P.; SCHENDEL, D.; TEECE, D. J. Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, Special Issue, p. 5-29, 1991.
  • RUMELT, R. P.; SCHENDEL, D.; TEECE, D. J. Fundamental issues in strategy: a research agenda. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1994.
  • SCHMALENSEE, R. Do markets differ much? The American Economic Review, v. 75, n.. 3, p. 341-351, 1985.
  • SOUTH, S. E. Competitive advantage: the cornerstone of strategic thinking. The Journal of Business Strategy, v. 1, n. 4, p. 15-25, 1981.
  • SPENCE, A. M. Industrial organization and competitive advantage in multinational industries. The American Economic Review, v. 74, n. 2, p. 356360, 1984.
  • VENKATRAMAN, N.; RAMANUJAM, V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review, v. 11, n. 4, p. 801-814, 1986.
  • WALKER, G. Modern competitive strategy Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2004.
  • WARING, G. Industry differences in the persistence of firm-specific returns. The American Economic Review, v. 86, n. 5, p. 1253-1265, 1996.
  • WERNERFELT, B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, v. 5, n. 2, p. 171-180, 1984.
  • WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. Japan where operations are really strategic. Harvard Business Review, v. 59, n. 4, p. 67-74, 1981.
  • WHITTINGTON, R. What is strategy - and does it matter? London: Thomson Learning, 2001.

Datas de Publicação

  • Publicação nesta coleção
    09 Fev 2011
  • Data do Fascículo
    Jun 2004

Histórico

  • Aceito
    04 Mar 2004
  • Recebido
    29 Jul 2003
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de S.Paulo Av 9 de Julho, 2029, 01313-902 S. Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 11) 3799-7999, Fax: (55 11) 3799-7871 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rae@fgv.br