OS SIGNIFICADOS DO TRABALHO COMO PREDITORES DA INTENÇÃO DE PERMANÊNCIA/SAÍDA ENTRE DOCENTES

HELENO, CAMILA T.; BORGES, LIVIA O.; AGULLÓ-TOMÁS, ESTEBAN

CAMILA T. HELENO Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Camila T. Heleno, Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627, FAFICH - Sala 4100, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, CEP: 31270-901. E-mail: camilaheleno@gmail.com

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Camila T. Heleno, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Lívia de O. Borges, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília (UnB); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás, Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM). Camila T. Heleno is now Post-doctoral researcher at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Livia de O. Borges is now Professor at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás is now Professor at Departamento de Psicología at Universidad de Oviedo (UO).

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-0648

LIVIA O. BORGES

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Camila T. Heleno, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Lívia de O. Borges, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília (UnB); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás, Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM). Camila T. Heleno is now Post-doctoral researcher at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Livia de O. Borges is now Professor at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás is now Professor at Departamento de Psicología at Universidad de Oviedo (UO).

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2251-1373

ESTEBAN AGULLÓ-TOMÁS

Universidad de Oviedo (UO), Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.

Camila T. Heleno, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Lívia de O. Borges, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília (UnB); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás, Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM). Camila T. Heleno is now Post-doctoral researcher at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Livia de O. Borges is now Professor at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás is now Professor at Departamento de Psicología at Universidad de Oviedo (UO).

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3549-2928

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Camila T. Heleno, Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627, FAFICH - Sala 4100, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, CEP: 31270-901. E-mail: camilaheleno@gmail.com

Camila T. Heleno, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Lívia de O. Borges, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília (UnB); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás, Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM).

Camila T. Heleno is now Post-doctoral researcher at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Livia de O. Borges is now Professor at Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); and Esteban Agulló-Tomás is now Professor at Departamento de Psicología at Universidad de Oviedo (UO).

Value types. The work should be:	Descriptive types. The work represents specifically:
Equality and acceptance. Opportunity to consider own opinions, guarantee of survival, equal rights and duties, feeling of acceptance by peers.	Equality-recognition-acceptance. Professional opportunities, recognition, consideration of opinions, equal rights, security, and a sense of acceptance.
Achievement. Means to benefit others, and at the same time, a constant source in the search for improvement, productivity, and decisionmaking.	Achievement. Pleasuring the performance of tasks, opportunities to help others, as well as productivity, creativity, and decision-making.
Economic recognition. Means of recognition through economic rewards; proportionality between these rewards and effort; personal and family assistance; and social contribution.	Economic independence. Provision of livelihood, independence, economic rewards, stability, and assistance.
Growth and independence. Source of pleasure in tasks, livelihood and economic independence, the stable standard of living, respect, trust, learning, and creativity.	Exhaustion. Burden in the repetition of tasks, physical effort, and speed, causing the individual to feel exhausted.
Dignity-humanization. Provision of hygienic care, recognition of authority, sense of dignity, comfort, obligations, and tasks in proportion to the individual’s ability, adoption of measures of security, and psychological well-being.	Humanization-sociability. Feeling respected, rational, and accepted by others.
Normative safety. Ensuring compliance with rules and obligations according to safety criteria, avoiding physical and/or material risks.	Normative safety. Conciliation of challenges and self-demands with the need to comply with standards and obligations of protection to health and integrity.
Occupation (overburden). Providing occupation, but also the repetition of daily tasks, daily difficulties, and demands of speed.	Occupation-responsibility. Require the individual to remain occupied and confront dayto- day difficulties, try hard, and reconcile spheres of life.
Dehumanization (objectification). Characterized by exhaustion; demands of physical exertion; hurry; inhumane treatment.	Dehumanization. Treatment of worker in an inhumane way and giving a sense of discrimination in front of other people.

Average ^a a Scale from -3 a +3.	Standard Deviation	% of participants by score interval
			Remain		Balance		Leave
			⇦				⇨
		Strong	Mean	Weak	-	Weak	Mean	Strong
		x ≤-2	-2<x≤-1	-1<x<0	x=0	0<x≤1	1<x≤2	x>2
0.20	1.09	5.2	9.1	22.1	6.5	36.5	18.2	2.6

Independent variables	Wald	Significance level
Dignity-humanization	4.46	0.04
Growth and independence	1.43	0.23
Economic recognition	0.31	0.58
Achievement	0.11	0.75
Equality and acceptance	1.08	0.30
Dehumanization (objectification)	1.65	0.20
Occupation (overburden)	6.94	<0.01
Normative safety	0.01	0.93
Constant	1.77	0.18

Independent variables Wald	Significance level
Block 1 (Nagelkerke’s R Squared = 0.191)
Dignity-humanization. 3.43	0.06
Occupation (overburden) 5.33	0.02
Constant 5.80	0.16
Block 2 (Nagelkerke’s R Squared = 0.396)
Dignity-humanization. 2.74	0.10
Occupation (overburden) 4.82	0.03
Dehumanization 3.92	0.05
Exhaustion 10.96	<0.01
Constant 6.29	0.01

[1] Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Camila T. Heleno, Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627, FAFICH - Sala 4100, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, CEP: 31270-901. E-mail: camilaheleno@gmail.com

Brasil

Brasil

OS SIGNIFICADOS DO TRABALHO COMO PREDITORES DA INTENÇÃO DE PERMANÊNCIA/SAÍDA ENTRE DOCENTES

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Originalidade/valor:

Design/metodologia/abordagem:

Resultados: