Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Interpretations on a rare localization of endometriosis: labium minus

Even though endometriosis, a growth of the ectopic endometrial tissue out of the uterine cavity that responds to hormonal stimulation, is a benign condition, its lesions can progress severely. This transformation seldom transpires for cutaneous endometriosis with a malignant degeneration, accounting for 0.3 to 1% for the surgical scar endometrioses. In the upfront surgery setting, a wide surgical excision with or without reconstruction has been recommended for the surgical therapy. It is the gold standard treatment of choice for endometriosis with a safety margin. To this end, some authors recommended a wide excision with at least 1 cm margins for cesarean section and scar endometriomas in order to preclude the recurrence and to avoid its possible transformation11. Kocher M, Hardie A, Schaefer A, McLaren T, Kovasc M. Cesarean-section scar endometrioma: a case report and review of the literature. J Radiol Case Rep. 2017;11(12):16-26. https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v11i12.3178
https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v11i12.3178...
. The interval of time from the onset of benign endometriosis to the development of malignancy has been described as a broad variation, ranging from 3 to 39 years with a mean of 17 years, in cesarean section scar endometriosis22. Matter M, Schneider N, McKee T. Cystadenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall following caesarean section: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91(2):438-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.07.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.07....
.

Lorenz et al.33. Lorenz U, Gassel AM, Thiede A, Gassel HJ. Endometrial carcinoma recurrence in an abdominal scar 14 years after total hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(2):393-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.043
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05....
recommended the surgical resection with 5 mm margins, which is a ‘wide and complete’ excision of the endometrial tissue, as a standard approach for the surgical treatment of malignant endometriosis in order to avoid recurrence. We also had performed the complete surgical resections with clear margins for our case series of incisional cesarean section endometriosis44. Sengul I, Sengul D, Kahyaoglu S, Kahyaoglu I. Incisional endometriosis: a report of 3 cases. Can J Surg. 2009;52(5):444-5. PMID: 19865584. Atilgan et al.55. Atilgan AE, Ercan F, Kiliç F. A rare localization of endometriosis: labium minus. Turkiye Klinikleri J Case Rep. 2019;27(2):68-71. 1 https://doi.org/0.5336/caserep.2018-62453
https://doi.org/0.5336/caserep.2018-6245...
proposed that a surgeon should avoid unnecessary labia minora dissection for the surgical approach of labium minus endometriosis, due to its specialized and sexually responsive structure with highly vascular folds of the tissue and an abundance of the neural elements. They have also mentioned the preoperative sensory mapping of the labium and clitoral hood in order to refrain from the painful injury, particularly in the regions important in arousal pathways. Herein, they might be reasonable and justifiable for their choice and apprehensions regarding in order not to suggest a wide surgical resection for this kind of endometriosis due to its organ-specific different features.

As a consequence, wide and complete resection with a safety margin, such as the abdominal wall musculature involvement necessitating en bloc resection of the myofascial elements, per se, is noteworthy, essential, and recommended because it offers the best choice in the management of this disease44. Sengul I, Sengul D, Kahyaoglu S, Kahyaoglu I. Incisional endometriosis: a report of 3 cases. Can J Surg. 2009;52(5):444-5. PMID: 19865584,66. Sengul D, Sengul I. Scar endometriosis: a review. Rem Open Access. 2016;1:1038.. Of note, we recommend complete surgical resection with a safety margin in order to not be faced with an undesirable recurrence nor a potential malignant transformation in regard to its primary focus. This issue merits further investigation. We thank Atilgan et al.55. Atilgan AE, Ercan F, Kiliç F. A rare localization of endometriosis: labium minus. Turkiye Klinikleri J Case Rep. 2019;27(2):68-71. 1 https://doi.org/0.5336/caserep.2018-62453
https://doi.org/0.5336/caserep.2018-6245...
for their remarkable report.

  • Funding: none.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Kocher M, Hardie A, Schaefer A, McLaren T, Kovasc M. Cesarean-section scar endometrioma: a case report and review of the literature. J Radiol Case Rep. 2017;11(12):16-26. https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v11i12.3178
    » https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v11i12.3178
  • 2
    Matter M, Schneider N, McKee T. Cystadenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall following caesarean section: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91(2):438-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.07.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.07.003
  • 3
    Lorenz U, Gassel AM, Thiede A, Gassel HJ. Endometrial carcinoma recurrence in an abdominal scar 14 years after total hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(2):393-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.043
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.043
  • 4
    Sengul I, Sengul D, Kahyaoglu S, Kahyaoglu I. Incisional endometriosis: a report of 3 cases. Can J Surg. 2009;52(5):444-5. PMID: 19865584
  • 5
    Atilgan AE, Ercan F, Kiliç F. A rare localization of endometriosis: labium minus. Turkiye Klinikleri J Case Rep. 2019;27(2):68-71. 1 https://doi.org/0.5336/caserep.2018-62453
    » https://doi.org/0.5336/caserep.2018-62453
  • 6
    Sengul D, Sengul I. Scar endometriosis: a review. Rem Open Access. 2016;1:1038.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    09 June 2021
  • Date of issue
    Jan 2021

History

  • Received
    06 July 2020
  • Accepted
    27 Oct 2020
Associação Médica Brasileira R. São Carlos do Pinhal, 324, 01333-903 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel: +55 11 3178-6800, Fax: +55 11 3178-6816 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: ramb@amb.org.br