-
1. Is the irradiation of the abdominal area using conformal radiotherapy superior compared to conventional radiotherapy in pancreatic tumors?
-
a. Radiation entry in different angles can increase damage to the pancreas.
-
b. Radiation entry into different angles shows better results.
-
c. They have similar results in the planning of radiation therapy.
-
d. Conformal radiotherapy can produce higher irradiation of adjacent organs.
-
-
2. Is the irradiation of the abdominal area using conformal radiotherapy superior compared to conventional radiotherapy in sarcomas?
-
a. There is better dose distribution only in adults.
-
b. There is better dose distribution only in children.
-
c. There is better dose distribution in both children and adults.
-
d. There is no difference in the results, despite the target volume recognition feature.
-
-
3. Is there less toxicity in the use of conformal radiotherapy compared to conventional radiotherapy for abdominal tumors in pancreatic cancer?
-
a. There is less toxicity with conformal radiotherapy.
-
b. There is no difference in toxicity rates.
-
c. There is less toxicity with conventional radiotherapy.
-
d. The decline in renal function is similar between the two techniques.
-
-
4. Is there less toxicity in the use of conformal radiotherapy compared to conventional radiotherapy for abdominal tumors in sarcomas?
-
a. Bleeding rates are higher in the conformal technique.
-
b. The intestinal obstruction rates are similar.
-
c. Nephropathy rates are high in the conformal technique.
-
d. Toxicity in the conventional technique can lead to the need for hospital interventions.
-
-
5. Is there a difference in the effectiveness of conformal and conventional radiotherapy?
-
a. In stomach tumors relapse-free survival is higher in the conformal technique.
-
b. In sarcomas relapse-free survival is higher in the conformal technique.
-
c. In pancreatic tumors relapse-free survival is lower in the conformal technique.
-
d. In abdominal tumors overall survival is higher with conformal technique.
-
Answers to clinical scenario: femoral neck fracture in children: treatment and complications [published in RAMB 2015; 61(1)]
-
1. Most relevant risk factors for the development of avascular necrosis after femoral neck fractures do NOT include:
-
Gender and race (Alternative C).
-
-
2. Surgical or conservative treatment?
-
Fracture surgical fixation is recommended (Alternative B).
-
-
3. What kind of reduction (open or closed) is most appropriate in this type of fracture?
-
Anatomical reduction (closed or open) (Alternative D).
-
-
4. Does early hip decompression reduce the risk of avascular necrosis (AVN)?
-
Decompression of the early hematoma reduces the risk of AVN (Alternative A).
-
-
5. What is the maximum time between the accident and early therapeutic approach to minimize the most common complications?
-
The first 24 hours (Alternative B).
-
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
mar-apr 2015