METHODS FOR KINO EVALUATION AND ESTIMATES OF GENETIC PARAMETERS IN <i>Corymbia</i>

Damacena, Michele Brandão; Alves, Rodrigo; Santos, Gleison Augusto dos; Bhering, Leonardo Lopes; Souza, Genaina Aparecida de; Caiafa, Karine Fernandes; Oliveira, Caio Varonill de Almada; Gouvêa, Ana Luiza Machado

doi:10.53661/1806-9088202448263712

Michele Brandão Damacena ^**Corresponding author.

literature review

data acquisition

data analysis

interpretation

and manuscript preparation

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Melhoramento, Viçosa, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-2739

Rodrigo Alves

conception

design of the study

literature review

data analysis

interpretation

preparation of the manuscript

Cenibra, Guanhães, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-6210

Gleison Augusto dos Santos

conception

design of the study

supervision of the experiment

and preparation of the manuscript

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Viçosa, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0773-810X

Leonardo Lopes Bhering

conception

design of the study

supervision of the experiment

and preparation of the manuscript

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Viçosa, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-0996

Genaina Aparecida de Souza

conception

design of the study

literature review

data analysis

interpretation

preparation of the manuscript

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisiologia Vegetal, Viçosa, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-3451

Karine Fernandes Caiafa

intellectual review of the manuscript

final approval of the version submitted to the journal

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-0405

Caio Varonill de Almada Oliveira

data acquisition

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Florestal, Viçosa, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0584-5665

Ana Luiza Machado Gouvêa

data acquisition

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Florestal, Viçosa, MG - Brasil

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7756-5411

*Corresponding author.

Table 1 Genetic materials used in the study

Clone	Genetic material	Origin
AM01	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM02	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM03	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM04	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM05	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM06	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM07	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM08	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM09	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AM10	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	AMBIO
AEC0001	C. citriodora × C. torelliana	APERAM
AEC0004	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	APERAM
AEC0007	C. torelliana × C. citriodora	APERAM
AEC0022	C. citriodora × C. torelliana	APERAM
AEC0043	C. citriodora × C. torelliana	APERAM
AEC0044	C. citriodora × C. torelliana	APERAM
AEC144	E. urophylla	APERAM
AEC1528	E. urophylla × E. grandis	APERAM
AEC2233	E. urophylla × (E. camaldulensis × E. grandis)	APERAM
AEC2475	E. urophylla × E. pellita	APERAM
VM04	E. urophylla × E. grandis	VALLOUREC

Table 2 Deviance and likelihood ratio test (LRT) for the incidence, length, and weight of kino in 21 clones of Corymbia spp. and Eucalyptus spp.

Effect	Incidence	Length (cm)	Weight (g)
Effect	Deviance LRT	Deviance LRT	Deviance LRT
Genotype	-1436.75 -8.44^* * , significant at P < 0.05 by the chi-square test; ns, not significant at P < 0.05 by the chi-square test; H0, null hypothesis (full model = reduced model; the reduced model does not consider Genotype or Method × Genotype effects).	4755.24 -10.54^* * , significant at P < 0.05 by the chi-square test; ns, not significant at P < 0.05 by the chi-square test; H0, null hypothesis (full model = reduced model; the reduced model does not consider Genotype or Method × Genotype effects).	16138.31 -5.68^* * , significant at P < 0.05 by the chi-square test; ns, not significant at P < 0.05 by the chi-square test; H0, null hypothesis (full model = reduced model; the reduced model does not consider Genotype or Method × Genotype effects).
Method × Genotype	-1445.00 -0.19ns	4744.73 -0.03ns	16132.73 -0.10ns
Full model	-1445.19	4744.70	16132.63

Table 3 Deviance and likelihood ratio test (LRT) for the incidence (I1 and I2), length (cm) (L1 and L2), and weight (g) (W1 and W2) of kino induced by method 1 (Pilodyn perforation of tree bark) or method 2 (Pilodyn penetration after bark removal) in 21 clones of Corymbia spp. and Eucalyptus spp.

Effect	I1	I2	L1	L2	W1	W2
Genotype	-555.97	-252.74	674.55	487.79	2407.14	2434.56
Full model	-593.51	-260.96	650.44	485.93	2392.33	2429.61
LRT	37.54^*	8.22^*	24.11^*	1.86ns	14.81^*	4.95^*

Table 4 Variance components and genetic and nongenetic parameters for the incidence (I1 and I2), length (L1 and L2), and weight (W1 and W2) of kino induced by method 1 (Pilodyn perforation of tree bark) or method 2 (Pilodyn penetration after bark removal) in 21 clones of Corymbia spp. and Eucalyptus spp.

Component	I1	I2	L1	L2	W1	W2
σg2	0.0058	0.0106	2.0920	0.1846	8.9976	5.4066
σ_e2	0.0138	0.0787	7.1201	3.4364	44.2904	55.7140
σ_p2	0.0196	0.0893	9.2121	3.6210	53.2880	61.1206
h_g2	0.30 (0.11)†	0.12 (0.07)	0.23 (0.09)	0.05 (0.04)	0.17 (0.08)	0.09 (0.06)
h_mc2	0.81	0.57	0.75	0.35	0.67	0.49
^r $\hat{g}$ g	0.90	0.76	0.86	0.59	0.82	0.70
CV_gi (%)	8.01	14.10	205.28	108.32	205.90	52.49
CV_e (%)	12.31	38.40	378.70	467.33	456.83	168.49
CV_r	0.65	0.37	0.54	0.23	0.45	0.31
PEV	0.00	0.01	0.53	0.12	2.97	2.75
SEP	0.03	0.07	49.60	0.35	0.68	52.38
Overall mean	0.95	0.73	0.70	0.40	46.07	140.09

\hat{ρ} = (Σ_{i} (x_{i} - \bar{x}) (w_{i} - \bar{w})) / (\sqrt{} (Σ_{i} {(x_{i} - \bar{x})}^{2} \sum_{i} {(w_{i} - \bar{w})}^{2})

[1] *Corresponding author.

Brasil

Brasil

METHODS FOR KINO EVALUATION AND ESTIMATES OF GENETIC PARAMETERS IN Corymbia

METODOLOGIAS PARA AVALIAÇÃO DE KINO E ESTIMATIVAS DE PARÂMETROS GENÉTICOS EM Corymbia

ABSTRACT