OBJECTIVE: To compare radiological techniques used in Brazil and in Australia, and to evaluate radiation doses of the most common x-ray procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The entrance skin dose (ESD) and the effective dose (ED) were obtained with the software DoseCal. In both countries the study was conducted in large public hospitals. Four distinct procedures were evaluated: chest, abdomen, pelvis and thoracic spine in three views (anterior-posterior, posterior-anterior and lateral) In Australia, all x-ray equipment are digital and linked with PACS whereas in Brazil conventional equipment is used. RESULTS: The mean values of ESD and ED were consistently higher in Brazil, except for chest x-rays. The higher differences were seen in pelvis (26 fold higher in Brazil) and thoracic spine (43 fold higher in Brazil) radiographs. CONCLUSION: All Australian hospitals have quality assurance programs (QAP) implemented on a permanent basis, the most advanced digital equipment and count with an effective medical physics service. These factors are determinant for high quality images, low rejection rates and low doses imparted to patients when compared to Brazilian standards. Theses results reinforce the need of implementation of quality assurance programs in Brazil. However, when analyzing the results of ESD for chest x-rays, we concluded that low doses can also be achieved in Brazil with the use of appropriate x-ray techniques.
Entrance skin dose; Radiodiagnosis; Effective dose; Dosimetry
