ABSTRACT
Managing fertile eggs and minimizing seasonal impacts is crucial in poultry farming. This study evaluated the effects of the storage time of fertile eggs, broiler breeder strain, and age on hatchability and first-week broiler performance. Twelve treatments were carried out in a factorial arrangement with two broiler breeder strains (Cobb MV and Ross 308AP), two breeder age intervals (between 30-40 weeks and between 50-60 weeks), and three egg storage times (4, 7 and 9 days). The Ross 308AP strain showed the highest hatchability (91.74%) at 30-40 weeks, while Cobb MV had the greatest weight gain (162.75g) from days 1 to 7 at 50-60 weeks. Longer egg storage affected weight gain at 7 days for Cobb MV. Nine-day storage reduced chick weight (45.46g) from breeders aged 50-60 weeks. Lower first-stage embryonic mortality was observed in Ross 308 AP (3.83%) in breeders aged 30-40 weeks (4.13%), and in eggs stored for 4 days (4.01%). The Ross 308AP had the greatest percentage of infertile eggs (10.25%), and breeders aged 50-60 weeks showed greater percentages of infertility (10.14%). The Cobb MV had lower second-stage embryonic mortality but higher percentages of discarded chicks. Hatchability and first-week broiler performance depend on storage time, breeder age and strain.
Keywords: Chicks; Hatching; Incubation; Viability; Weight
INTRODUCTION
Chick quality is one of the main parameters used in poultry farming, with qualitative and quantitative methods being used to assign reference measures such as mortality, weight, and visual scores (Ishaq et al., 2015). Well-managed fertile eggs reflect on chicks’ health quality at hatch, leading to dry navels and no residual yolk or lesions on the limbs (Franco et al., 2019). After collection at the farm and transportation of the fertile eggs to the hatchery, several aspects must be considered during incubation, such as breeder age and health status, thus avoiding the mixing of chicks at birth. Considering these aspects, storing fertile eggs for different periods is necessary to ensure the homogeneity and quality of one-day-old chicks (Schmidt et al., 2012). For these reasons, artificial incubation is a fundamental process for modern poultry farming and has a relationship with the use and performance of the animals (Franco et al., 2019).
Broiler performance is mainly influenced by the strain (Lara et al., 2008; Marcato et al., 2010; Tona et al., 2010), as well as nutritional and environmental factors (Tona et al., 2004). However, other factors, such as breeder age and the storage time of fertile eggs can influence the embryo and one-day-old chick, impacting the growth potential of the birds. Cobb and Ross are the most widely produced broiler strains worldwide for meat production (Tona et al., 2010; Kpomasse et al., 2021). Chicks derived from both strains have different growth trajectories, which are deduced from differences in physiological parameters (Tona et al., 2010). However, the complexity of each genetic line influences its development (Shim et al., 2012), and the exact differences that can optimize the performance of each line is not well understood, involving many factors such as temperature and humidity during incubation, feed energy density, light programs, among others.
The effect of storage time on hatchability and its effect on progeny differs between studies. According to Elibol & Brake (2008), fresh fertile eggs have a greater hatching rate than stored eggs, while Nasri et al. (2020) observed that eggs stored for up to 12 days are not affected if properly stored. Tona et al. (2004) showed that after three days of storage, fertile eggs already suffer negative effects on hatching and chick quality, as well as requiring a longer incubation period, mainly due to the increase in albumen pH during storage.
Breeder age also has an impact on fertility, hatchability, and embryonic mortality, resulting in worse egg quality (Alsobayel et al., 2012). As there is seasonality in the production of hatching eggs and the consumption of chicken meat, the supply of hatching eggs fluctuates greatly throughout the year. Therefore, we hypothesized that storage time on fertile eggs, broiler breeder strain, and age, isolated or integrated, affect hatchery and first-week performance traits in broiler chicks. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of the storage time on fertile eggs, broiler breeder strain, and age on hatchery and first-week performance traits in broiler chicks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethical approval
Research on animals was conducted according to the determinations of the institutional committee on animal use (437/2021).
Experimental treatments
Fertile eggs from two broiler breeder strains, Cobb MV and Ross 308AP, were used. Eggs were obtained from breeders with two different age intervals, between 30 and 40 weeks, and 50 and 60 weeks. The progenies received the same vaccine program in the rearing and production phases. After collection, the eggs were allocated in plastic trays for 84 eggs and stored in a proper setter trolley. The eggs were fumigated with paraformaldehyde, at a dosage of 6 g/m³ in the room. After total volatilization of the product, the eggs remained in contact with the disinfectant for 15 minutes. At the end of the disinfection process, the setter trolleys with the eggs were stored in a climate-controlled room at a temperature of 20°C, with relative humidity between 50 and 70%, and then sent to the broiler hatchery, located in Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil (latitude 27°49’0” south, longitude 50°19’35” west, and altitude of 916 meters).
In the hatchery, the fertile eggs were stored until incubation for 4, 7, and 9 days after oviposition in a room with adequate climate control, at a temperature between 18 and 21°C, and relative humidity between 50 and 70%. Twelve experimental treatments were carried out in a factorial arrangement, with two strains of broiler breeder hens (Cobb MV and Ross 308AP), two breeder ages (between 30-40 weeks and between 50-60 weeks), and three storage times of fertile eggs (4, 7 and 9 days). One thousand and eight fertile eggs were used in each treatment, being distributed in trays containing 84 eggs. Each tray of 84 eggs was identified and considered an experimental unit, totaling 12 repetitions per treatment in the hatchery.
Incubation
The eggs were incubated in trays of 84 eggs in multistage machines (CASP, model CM 125, Brazil) with a capacity of 20,736 eggs per load. The trays were randomly distributed in the hatchery to occupy all possible positions and heights inside the machine (i.e. front, middle, and back; bottom, middle and top). A dry bulb temperature of 37.5°C and wet bulb humidity of 29.5°C were used in the hatchery. At 12 days of incubation, ovoscopy was performed to account for infertile eggs and early mortality by diagnosing embryos. At 19 days of incubation, the eggs were transferred and vaccinated in ovo with Marek, Bouba, and Gumboro vaccines. Contaminated and broken eggs during the process were counted. After being vaccinated, the eggs were transferred to hatching trays and placed in the hatchers for another 48 hours, and chicks were collected at 21 days post-incubation.
The hatchability was measured as the total number of hatched chicks divided by the total number of hatched fertile eggs for each treatment, with fertile eggs counted through the embryo diagnosis of each tray. The embryo diagnosis consisted of breaking all the eggs that did not result in hatched chicks and evaluating them through a careful analysis. Eggs without signs of fertilization were considered infertile, and thus made up the percentage of infertile eggs over the total number of incubated eggs. Embryo mortalities were classified into Phase 1 - first phase mortality: embryos with death between 1 to 4 days of incubation; Phase 2- second phase mortality: embryos with death between 5 to 8 days of incubation; Phase 3 - third phase mortality: embryos with death between 9 to 17 days of incubation; Phase 4 - fourth phase mortality: embryos with death between 18 to 21 days of incubation. The parameters of eggs pipped live and pipped dead were also evaluated during the process of opening unhatched eggs. Eggs where the chick had already broken the eggshell and was still alive were considered pipped live eggs, while those that had pipped (and were already dead) were accounted for as eggs pipped dead.
Chicks
The hatched chicks were sexed, classified, and allocated in plastic boxes with 100 chicks per box, respecting animal welfare standards. The classification evaluated the individual quality of each chick, observing dry down, good healing of the navel, locomotion characteristics, absence of beak lesions, as well as physical anomalies that could compromise the development of the chick, according to Tona et al. (2003).
Only male chicks were used for performance evaluation. They were weighed individually, with a minimum weight of 40.05 grams and a maximum of 47.37 grams. All of them received spray vaccination for Chicken Infectious Bronchitis (Massachusetts strain).
After vaccination, the pens with chicks were identi-fied according to each treatment and kept in rooms with a controlled environment, with temperatures between 22 and 28°C and relative humidity between 50 and 70%. Subsequently, they were sent to the experimental farm in an air-conditioned truck, maintaining the aforementioned temperature and relative humidity parameters. Individuals classified as discarded chicks were sacrificed following animal welfare standards, using a high-speed macerator.
Experimental farm
The chicks were housed in an experimental farm located in the city of Içara, Santa Catarina, Brazil (latitude 28°41’00.1” south, longitude 49°12’58.8” west, and altitude of 31 meters), where the climate is mesothermal, humid type (Cfa) according to the classification of Köppen & Geiger (1928), with an annual average temperature of 25°C. The farm consisted of a conventional 60x12m building, with fans, nebulizers, heating, hanging feeders, and nipple drinkers. Rice husks were used as poultry litter.
Three thousand eight hundred and forty chicks were allocated in 96 pens measuring 1.8x1.8m, with a capacity for 40 birds/pen and eight replications per treatment. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. The birds received a pre-starter diet (from 1 to 7 days of age) with 23.33% crude protein and 2.950 kcal/kg of metabolizable energy, consisting of milled corn (54%), soybean meal (39%), corn oil (1.59%), limestone (1.15%), and mineral-vitamin premix (4.26%), formu-lated to meet the nutritional requirements of the rearing phase.
The birds were individually weighed on arrival at the farm and at the end of the first week of life using a bench scale, with a graduation of 0.5g. Weight gain was calculated by subtracting the final live weight at 7 days of life from the weight on arrival at the farm. The weight multiplication at 7 days was calculated by dividing the value of the weight at 7 days by the weight on arrival at the farm. The number of dead birds was counted daily from the housing up to seven days of age in each pen, and used to calculate the mortality rate, dividing the total number of dead birds by the number of housed birds.
Experimental design and statistical analysis
The experimental design was completely randomized with twelve treatments in a 2 x 2 x 3 factorial arrangement, with two broiler breeder strains (Cobb MV and Ross 308AP), two breeder ages (between 30-40 weeks and between 50-60 weeks), and three storage times of fertile eggs (4, 7 and 9 days), with twelve replications for hatchery variables and eight replications for performance variables.
Hatchery and performance traits data were tested for normal distribution and residue homogeneity using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Parametric data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in a model that included strain, age, and storage time as a fixed effect and tray as a random effect. The random tray effect was only considered for the hatchery data. Interactions between strain, age, and storage time were tested. Means were compared using Tukey’s test. Using Akaike’s information criterion, the variance components (VC) structure was found to be the best model for the residual covariance structure. The following statistical model was used:
where Y ijklm represents dependent variables; μ is the overall mean of the observations; Bi is the fixed effect of the breeder strain (i = Cobb MV and Ross 308AP); A j is the fixed effect of the breeder age (j = between 30-40 weeks and between 50-60 weeks); S k is the fixed effect of the storage time (K = 5, 7 and 9 days); BA ij is the interaction between strain and age; BS ik is the interaction between strain and storage time, AS jk is the interaction between age and storage time; T l is the random effect of the tray (l = 1 to 12); and εijklm is the random residual experimental error.
Nonparametric data were analyzed using the NPAR1WAY procedure (Kruskal Wallis), and means were compared using the DSCF test. The following statistical model was used:
where Y ij represents dependent variables; μ is the overall mean of the observations; T i is the fixed effect of the treatment (strain, age, or storage time); and εi is the random residual experimental error in Y ij observations.
Analyzes were performed using the SAS software (Statistical Analysis System Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, version 9.3), and differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05.
RESULTS
The effects of the interactions (strain × age, strain × storage, age × storage, and strain × age × storage) and the main factors (strain, age, and storage) on hatchery and broiler performance traits are shown in Table 1.
There was an interaction between breeder strain and age on the hatching percentage of fertile eggs (p=0.0112), 1-day weight (p=0.0014), 7-day weight (p=0.0002), and weight gain from 1 to 7 days (p=0.0042) (Table 2). The greatest hatching percentage of fertile eggs was observed in the Ross 308AP strain, in the breeder age between 30-40 weeks (91.74%). The Ross 308AP strain also showed a difference in the hatching percentage of fertile eggs for different breeder ages of the broiler breeders (30-40 and 50-60 weeks), while this effect was not observed in the Cobb MV strain. Chick weights at 1 and 7 days were lower for the Ross 308AP strain for breeder ages between 30-40 weeks, with 40.79g and 174.88g, respectively. The greatest weights of chicks at 1 and 7 days were observed in the Cobb MV strain with the breeder ages between 50-60 weeks, 46.51g and 208.67g, respectively. The greatest weight gain from 1 to 7 days (162.75g) was observed in the Cobb MV strain with breeder ages between 50-60 weeks.
There was an interaction between the storage time of fertile eggs and the strain on the weight at day 7 (p=0.0009), weight gain from 1 to 7 days (p=0.0005), and weight multiplication (p=0.0054) (Table 3).
The Cobb MV strain with a 4-day storage time for fertile eggs showed the greatest weight at day 7 (204.88g). Increasing the storage time of fertile eggs in this strain affected weight gain at 7 days, while this effect was not observed in the Ross 308AP strain. The weight gain from 1 to 7 days was greater in the Cobb MV strain with a 4-day storage time of fertile eggs (160.69g). The 7-day storage time of fertile eggs affected weight multiplication in the Cobb MV strain, while this effect was not observed in the Ross 308AP strain. Weight multiplication at day 7 was greater in the Cobb MV strain with a 4-day storage time for fertile eggs, resulting in 3.57 times the initial weight. In this strain, the storage time of fertile eggs harmed weight multiplication at day 7, while this effect was not observed in the Ross 308AP strain (Table 3).
There was an interaction between the storage time of fertile eggs and breeder age on the weight at day 1 (p=0.0203), weight at day 7 (p=0.0286), and weight multiplication at day 7 (p=0.0270) (Table 4). The weight of one-day-old chicks was greater for breeders aged 50-60 weeks, and storage time of fertile eggs for 4 and 7 days (respectively 46.22g and 46.01g). The 9-day storage time for fertile eggs negatively affected the weight of one-day-old chicks from 50-60-week-old breeders (45.46g). Chick weight at day 7 was greater for breeders aged 50-60 weeks and was not influenced, at this breeder age, by the storage time of fertile eggs of 4, 7, and 9 days (200.82g, 201.44g, and 202.00g, respectively). Weight multiplication at day 7 was lower for chicks from breeders age 50-60 weeks and 4 days of storage time, resulting in 3.35 times the initial weight.
There was an effect of breeder strain (p<0.0001), breeder age (p=0.0001), and storage time of fertile eggs (p=0.0236) on first-stage embryonic mortality (Table 5). The Ross 308AP strain showed lower first-stage embryonic mortality compared to the Cobb MV strain, with mean values of 3.83 and 6.07%, respectively. Breeders with ages between 30-40 weeks showed lower first-stage embryonic mortality compared to those between 50-60 weeks, with mean values of 4.13 and 5.74%, respectively. Eggs stored for 4 days (4.01%) showed lower first-stage embryonic mortality when compared to eggs stored for 9 days (5.62%).
There was an effect of strain on second-stage embryonic mortality (p=0.0004) and discard chicks (p=0.0448) (Table 5). The Cobb MV strain showed a lower percentage of second-stage embryonic mortality and a greater percentage of discarded chicks compared to the Ross 308AP strain, with mean values of 0.56 and 1.45%, and 1.45 and 1.10%, respectively.
There was an effect of breeder age on fourth-stage embryonic mortality (p=0.0144) (Table 5). Breeders with ages between 30-40 weeks showed lower fourth-stage embryonic mortality, with the mean value of 1.94%.
There was an effect of breeder strain (p<0.0001) and age (p<0.0001) on the percentage of infertile eggs (Table 5). The Ross 308AP strain had the greatest percentage of infertile eggs, with 10.25% infertility. Breeders with ages between 50-60 weeks also showed greater percentages of infertility, with 10.14% of infertile eggs.
DISCUSSION
In the hatchery routine, eggs are rarely incubated on the same day of oviposition, being stored for later incubation for at least one day in an appropriate room. Macari et al. (2013) highlighted that incubating eggs after laying reduces the hatching rate, requiring eggs to be stored for at least 24 hours before incubation. However, short pre-incubation storage periods (three-seven days) help incubation, as this period is necessary for gelatinization, for an adequate pH to be reached, and for the formation of the air sac, which is essential for embryonic development (Nasri et al., 2020).
Thus, egg storage time is an important factor to obtain adequate incubation and production indicators. In this study, the egg storage time of up to 9 days did not influence the hatchability of fertile eggs. However, Alsobayel et al. (2012) showed a negative impact on the hatching of fertile eggs derived from broiler breeders stored for 7 days or more when compared to eggs incubated on the same day of oviposition.
According to Yassin et al. (2008), storage of up to 7 days has a negative daily impact of 0.2% on total hatchability, which increases to 0.5% per day when the period exceeds 7 days. However, the same study showed that there was a difference in total hatchability between the three tested hatcheries, demonstrating that other factors such as embryonic mortality, fertility, strain, and egg management can influence the hatching of fertile eggs.
The management of fertile egg in storage has two important variables: temperature and humidity. The temperature directly influences the uniformity and homogenization of embryonic development. The recommendation for storage are temperatures below 21°C and relative humidity of the air between 70 and 90%, which helps avoids egg dehydration (Fasenko, 2007). Moreover, regarding handling time, an interval of 5 hours between oviposition and cold room storage of fertile eggs led to the best hatching rates (Fiuza et al., 2006).
Iqbal et al. (2016) demonstrated that breeder age influenced the fertility of eggs: the older the breeder, the greater the percentage of infertility, which was reported to be 7.11 and 11.44% for breeders with 30 and 60 weeks, respectively. Differing from what was observed in this study, Islam et al. (2007) showed that the Ross strain had lower mean percentages of infertility when compared to the Cobb 500 strain, with 8.12 and 8.89%, respectively. This difference may be related to genetic improvement during the inter-study period, but it demonstrates that breeder age affects fertility and may be related to the breeder strain.
The greatest percentage of fertile egg hatching and the lowest first-stage embryonic mortality was observed in the Ross 308AP line aged 30-40 weeks. In a study with the Cobb strain, Tona et al. (2010) reported that the greatest hatchability rates were in hens aged 40 weeks. Alsobayel et al. (2012) showed a better hatching result on fertile eggs for the Cobb strain, with 82.4% hatchability compared to Ross and Arbor Acres (78.0 and 71.2%, respectively). This can be explained by evolution or genetic improvement in the time between experiments. Furthermore, hatching rates with a breeder age between 30-40 weeks are mainly related to lower early and late embryonic mortalities (Gucbilmez et al., 2013). Gucbilmez et al. (2013) observed that the best hatching results of fertile eggs were in Ross 308 aged 38 weeks, and these results were enhanced by a different egg handling practices, with a short-term heating technique during the days of storage.
The storage of fertile eggs for more than 4 days influenced the initial embryonic mortality. Alsobayel et al. (2012) observed lower rates of early and late embryonic mortality in eggs with zero days of storage when compared to eggs with 7 and 14 days of storage, reporting total embryonic mortalities of 9.6, 17.7, and 31.5%, respectively. These alterations in embryonic mortality following a longer storage period may be associated with a reduction in egg quality, such as poorer albumen quality, mainly due to albumen pH changes that affect the quality of the chalaza and the vitelline membrane (Rocha et al., 2013). This fragility of both the chalaza and the vitelline membrane makes the embryo more exposed in the first days of incubation, increasing mortality rates. In addition, the longer the eggs are stored, the lower the yolk height-to-diameter ratio. Over time, the vitelline membrane surrounding the yolk degrades, making it more liquefied (Rocha et al., 2013).
The strain influenced the percentage of chicks discarded at birth, with the lowest percentage being observed in the Ross 308AP strain. However, the first-week mortality of chicks was not influenced by the breeder strain, breeder age, or the storage time of fertile eggs. This differed from Yassin et al. (2009), who observed effects of strain, age, and egg storage time. This difference between the studies can be explained by the use of farm data from different hatcheries, and different breeder batches without considering the hatchery and chick farm traits.
There was an interaction between breeder strain and age, and between the storage time of fertile eggs and the breeder age for first-day chick weight. The Cobb MV strain at 50-60 weeks of age had greater chick weight on the first day. The thinner eggshell of the Ross 308AP strain compared to the eggshell of the Cobb MV strain results in a greater weight loss of the embryos during the incubation period, reflecting on their birth weight (Nangsuay et al., 2015). Greater first-day chick weights were observed in breeders at 50-60 weeks of age with a storage time of up to 7 days. This can be explained by the fact that the longer the egg storage time, the more water the egg will lose, resulting in lower oxygen rates for the embryo and less development, due to the decrease in cell metabolism (Rocha et al., 2013).
Integrative effects between strain and breeder age, between strain and storage time of fertile eggs, and between breeder age and storage time of fertile eggs were observed for chick weight at 7 days. The Cobb MV strain aged 50-60 weeks had the greatest chick weight at 7 days. The greatest weight of chicks at 7 days was observed in the Cobb MV strain when fertile eggs were stored for 4 days. Despite having a lower first-week weight than the Cobb MV strain, the Ross 308AP strain did not have a negative impact on the storage time of fertile eggs.
The Cobb MV strain has a greater metabolism rate, evidenced by the greater heat production when compared to the Ross 308AP strain, not only during the incubation period but also during the first week of life development (Tona et al., 2010). This greater metabolism rate explains the faster development and greater weight gain at the end of the 7 days of life (Tona et al., 2010). Furthermore, the Ross 308AP strain has a lower amount of liver glycogen three hours after hatching (Nangsuay et al., 2015), which could explain its lower performance in the first days of life. However, the complexity of each genetic line influences its development (Shim et al., 2012), and the exact differences that can optimize the performance of each line is not well understood, involving many factors such as temperature and humidity during incubation, feed energy density, and light programs, among others.
CONCLUSIONS
The Ross 308AP strain showed greater hatching of fertile eggs at breeder age between 30-40 weeks, but did not differ from the Cobb MV strain when reproduction age increased.
Despite not influencing the hatching rate of fertile eggs, their storage time negatively impacts first-phase embryonic mortality and the weight of one-day-old chicks.
The Cobb MV strain shows greater chick weight at 1 and 7 days, and weight gain from 1 to 7 days when compared to the Ross 308AP strain.
Lower first-stage embryonic mortality was observed in Ross 308 AP, for breeder age between 30-40 weeks, and in eggs stored for 4 days. The Ross 308AP strain had the greatest percentage of infertile eggs, and breeders aged 50-60 weeks showed greater percentages of infertility. The Cobb MV strain showed a lower percentage of second-stage embryonic mortality and a greater percentage of discarded chicks.
These findings suggest that differences in hatchability and first-week broiler performance depend on storage time, and breeder age and strain.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - Brazil) for a scholarship, and SEARA Alimentos for providing the eggs, chicks, and facilities.
REFERENCES
-
Alsobayel AA, Almarshade MA, Albadry MA. Effect of breed, age and storage period on fertility and hatchability of hatching eggs of commercial broilers breeders. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research 2012;30(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.51758/AGJSR-01-2012-0001
» https://doi.org/10.51758/AGJSR-01-2012-0001 -
Elibol O, Brake, J. Effect of egg position during three and fourteen days of storage and turning frequency during subsequent incubation on hatchability of broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science 2008;87(6):1237-41. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00469
» https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00469 -
Fasenko GM. Egg storage and the embryo. Poultry Science 2007;86(5):1020-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.5.1020
» https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.5.1020 -
Fiuza MA, Lara LJC, Aguilar CAL, et al. Efeitos das condições ambientais no período entre a postura. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2006;58(3):408-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000300019
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000300019 -
Franco MJM, Olivieri OCL, Fernandes EA, et al. Embryonic mortality and broiler chick quality (Gallus gallus) from glass-shelled eggs. Ciência Animal Brasileira 2019;20(1-10):e49586. https://doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v20e-49586
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v20e-49586 -
Gucbilmez M, Ozlü S, Shiranjang R, et al. Effects of preincubation heating of broiler hatching eggs during storage, flock age, and length of storage period on hatchability. Poultry Science 2013;92(12):3310-3. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03133
» https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03133 -
Iqbal J, Khan SH, Mukhtar N, et al. Effects of egg size (weight) and age on hatching performance and chick quality of broiler breeder. Journal of Applied Animal Research 2014;44(1):54-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2014.987294
» https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2014.987294 - Ishaq HM, Akram M, Baber ME, et al. Chick quality of Hubbard broiler breeders train with three different egg weights and storage periods at four production phases. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2015;25(1):37-44.
-
Islam F, Bulbul SM, Islam MA. Comparative egg production, fertility and hatchability of Cobb-500, Ross, and Hubbard-Hi-Yield broiler parent stock in Bangladesh. The Agricultures 2007;5(1-2):131-4. https://doi.org/10.3329/agric.v5i1.5207
» https://doi.org/10.3329/agric.v5i1.5207 -
Kpomasse CC, Oke OE, Houndonougbo FM, et al. Broiler production challenges in the tropics: a review. Veterinary Medicine and Science 2021;7:831-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.435
» https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.435 - Köppen W, Geiger R. Klimate der Erde [wall-map 150cmx200cm]. Gotha: Verlag Justus Perthes; 1928.
-
Lara LJC, Baião NC, Rocha JSR, et al. Influência da forma física da ração e da linhagem sobre o desempenho e rendimento de cortes de frangos de corte. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2008;60(4):970-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352008000400028
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352008000400028 - Macari M, Gonzales E, Patrício IS, et al. Manejo de incubação. Campinas: Facta; 2013.
-
Marcato SM, Sakomura NK, Fernandes JBK, et al. Crescimento e deposição de nutrientes nos órgãos de frangos de corte de duas linhagens comerciais. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2010;39(5):1082-91. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500019
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500019 -
Nangsuay A, Meijerhof R, van den Anker I, et al. Development and nutrient metabolism of embryos from two modern broiler strains. Poultry Science 2015:94(10):2546-54. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev234
» https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev234 -
Nasri H, van den Brand H, Najar T, et al. Interactions between egg storage duration and breeder age on selected egg quality, hatching results, and chicken quality. Animals 2020;10(10):1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101719
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101719 -
Rocha JSR, Baião NC, Barbosa VM, et al. Negative effects of fertile egg storage on the egg and the embryo and suggested hatchery management to minimize such problems. World's Poultry Science Journal 2013;69(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000044
» https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000044 -
Shim MY, Tahir M, Karnuah AB, et al. Strain and sex effects on growth performance and carcass traits of contemporary commercial broiler crosses. Poultry Science 2012;91(11):2942-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02414
» https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02414 - Schmidt GS, Figueiredo EAP, Ávila VS. Incubação: estocagem dos ovos férteis [comunicado técnico 303]. Concórdia: EMBRAPA-CNPSA; 2012.
-
Tona K, Onagbesan OM, Kamers B, et al. Comparison of Cobb and Ross strains in embryo physiology and chick juvenile growth. Poultry Science 2010;89(8):1677-83. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00386
» https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00386 -
Tona K, Onagbesan O, De Ketelaere B, et al. Effects of age of broiler breeders and egg storage on egg quality, hatchability, chick quality, chick weight, and chick post-hatch growth to forty-two days. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2004;13(1):10-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.1.10
» https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.1.10 -
Tona K, Bamelis F, De Ketelaere, B, et al. Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality, and chick juvenile growth. Poultry Science 2003;82(5), 736-741. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.5.736
» https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.5.736 -
Yassin H, Velthuis AG, Boerjan M, et al. Field study on broiler eggs hatchability. Poultry Science 2008;87(11):2408-17. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00515
» https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00515 -
Yassin H, Velthuis AG, Boerjan M, et al. Field study on broilers' first-week mortality. Poultry Science 2009;88(4):798-804. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00292
» https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00292
-
FUNDING
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
-
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data is be available upon request.
-
DISCLAIMER/PUBLISHER’S NOTE
The published papers’ statements, opinions, and data are the responsibility of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The editor(s) are not responsible for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
Data availability
Data is be available upon request.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
12 Aug 2024 -
Date of issue
2024
History
-
Received
22 Jan 2024 -
Accepted
16 May 2024