The Effect of Different Levels of Lentil by Product on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Egg Yield in Quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica)

ABSTRACT

The subject of this study was to evaluate the effects of lentil byproduct (LP) on growth performance, carcass traits and egg yield of quail (Coturnix coturnix Japonica). To achieve this goal, a total of 600 0-day-old quail chicks were used. The birds were divided into 5 groups with 3 replicates. The 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th and 5^th groups received 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% lentil byproduct, respectively. All the diets were prepared as isonitrogenous and isocaloric. As a result of this study, the highest live body weights of quails as Laudadio mixed gender were observed in the 3^rd (195.5 g) and 5^th (195.3 g) groups at the end of the study, however the differences between the control and treatment groups were not significant (p>0.05). Similar results were observed in the carcass traits, as well. The best feed conversion ratio (FCR) was noted in both the 2^nd and 3^rd groups as 3.04 and it was significantly (p<0.05) different than in the control and other treatment groups. The least feed intake (FI) was observed in the 2^nd group. The highest and the lowest egg yield percentages were in the 3^rd (90.78 %) and 5^th (66.57 %) groups, and differences were significant (p<0.01). Linear increments were observed in the yolk color when LP increased in the diet. As a result, it could be concluded that lentil by product could be added into quail diets up to 15% with no negative effect on live body weight (BW) and carcass traits and to get better yolk color.

Keywords: Carcass; egg production; fattening; lentil byproduct; quail; yolk color

INTRODUCTION

It is a fact that feed is the single greatest cost of poultry production. In non-ruminant diets, soybean meal and corn have been used widely as protein and energy sources. However, the price of soybean meal as a main source of protein has doubled over the last 7 years (Woyengo & Zijlstra, 2014). Soybean meal, which is traditionally the stable vegetable protein source for poultry feed in Turkey as in other countries, is mainly imported and it is predicted that soybean will be insufficient and expensive (Leeson & Summer, 1997; Laudadio & Tufarelli, 2011). Therefore the need of alternative feedstuffs to reduce the cost of diets and to replace animal meal concentrate during the period of soybean shortage exists (Leeson & Summer, 1997; Robinson & Singh, 2001; Defang et al., 2008; Laudadio et al., 2012).

Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) is one of legume grains and an important source of protein; it has been used in ruminants and non-ruminant diets including poultry (Mavromichalis, 2013; Çabuk et al., 2014; Woyengo et al., 2014) and it is relatively tolerant to drought and grown all over the world. Canada, India and Turkey produce nearly 60% of lentil in the world (Bathy, 1995; Wang & Daun, 2005). Depending on the cultivar type, lentil seeds vary in color, and typically red lentils are grown by farmers as human nutrition in Turkey. Lentil seeds have to be processed before using human diet to remove inedible parts. Various byproducts are generated during the processing time such as lentil, pea byproduct, etc. Recently lentils are separated by a special machine according to color. If the lentils are suffered from quality problems (such as discolored, frost damage or seed damage), and are considered as byproducts after the processing, (Ogretmen et al., 1993; Çabuk et al., 2014), they become occasionally available to the animal feed industry. These byproducts do not pose any problems when such lentils are fed to nonruminant animals like poultry and pigs of all ages in appropriate amounts (Mavromichalis, 2013).

The nutritive value of lentil depends on the processing methods and the amount of present antinutritional factors (Xu & Chang, 2010). Lentil seeds have a relatively high protein (27%) and energy content (3570 kcal/kg ME) and low digestive inhibitors (Gorgulu, 2010). However, the major antinutritional factors in lentils are protease inhibitor, excessive content of polyphenols, especially tannins, but these are not present in sufficient quantities to depress animal performance (Mavromichalis, 2013).

There is little information and research available on the use of lentil byproducts in quail diets. Significantly decrease in egg weight were observed in quails with 20% lentil byproduct in diets (Çabuk et al., 2014). Similarly, researches (Kanat 1992; Kanat & Camcı 1993) indicated that more than 20% of lentil byproducts in quail diets had negative effects on quail performance. Up to 30% of row lentils have been used with success in pig diets (Mavromichalis, 2013). On the other hand, more than 5% of lentil byproducts had adverse effects on layer egg’s production (Kılıçalp & Benli, 1994). Besides this, 15% of lentil byproducts in the diets of layers decreased body weight, egg yield, FCR, but it did not affect egg quality (Yalcın et al., 1991).

There is little information available about lentil byproducts on quails so far. Therefore, the subject of this study was to figure out the effect of different levels of lentil byproducts on quail growth performance, carcass traits, egg yield and egg quality.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Two experiments were conducted in this study. The first one was to figure out the effect of lentil byproduct (LP) on growth performance and carcass traits, and the second one was on egg yield and egg quality evaluation. All the chicks in this experiment were obtained from a commercial hatchery in Van, in Turkey. A total of 600, 0-day-old quail chicks (Coturnix coturnix Japonica) were leg (first 2 wk)-wing (3-6 wk) banded and weighed, then divided into 5 groups (1 control and 4 treatments) with three replicates, 40 chicks in each cage (replicate), randomly. The first group (control) did not have lentil byproduct (LP), the 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th and 5^th groups received 5, 10, 15 and 20% of LP both in the diet of growing and laying period. The content of the diet for grower and layer are given in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 1
Nutrient content of lentil byproduct.

Ca, %	0.05
P , %	0.35
Dry Matter, %	90.1
Crude ash, %	5.8
Ether extract, %	1.4
Crude cellulose, %	8.8
Crude protein, %	18.72
Metabolisable energy, Kcal/kg	2100

Table 2
Nutrient content (%) of diet with 24 % crude protein and 2900 kcal/kg ME at 0-6 weeks of age

	Diet included lentil byproduct, %
Ingredients	0	5	10	15	20
Corn	49.85	46.10	44.00	41.50	39.60
Lentil Byproduct	-	5.00	10.00	15.00	20.00
Soybean meal 44 CP %	5.00	4.00	4.10	4.30	5.80
Sunflower seed meal 33CP %	23.00	18.50	15.00	10.80	5.30
Whole soybean	10.00	13.50	14.50	16.00	16.90
Fish powder	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00	6.00
Meat-bone powder	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00
Limestone	0.15	0.40	0.40	0.40	0.40
DCP	-	0.50	-	-	-
Vitamin - Mineral*	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
Methionine	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.20
Lysine	0.35	0.35	0.35	0.35	0.30
Nutrient content %
Crude Protein	24.08	24.08	24.10	24.08	24.03
ME	2903.9	2903.4	2908.3	2907.6	2909.7
Ca	1.05	1.25	1.12	1.11	1.10
P	0.93	0.99	0.89	0.87	0.84
Methionin+Sistin	1.00	0.97	0.95	0.93	0.95
Lysine	1.49	1.50	1.50	1.50	1.47

• *:Added per kg: vit. A - 11.00 IU; vit. D - 32,000 IU; vit. B1 - 2.5 mg; vit. B6 - 1.25 mg; vit. B12 - 0.01 mg
• ; a-tocopheryl acetate - 50 mg; biotin - 0.06 mg; vit. K - 2.5 mg; niacin - 15 mg; folic acid - 0.30 mg; pantothenic
• acid - 10 mg; choline - 600 mg; Mn - 60 mg; Fe - 50 mg; Zn - 15 mg; I - 0.5 mg; Co - 0.5 mg

Table 3
The least square means of body weight (g) and standard error (±) of quails

	Treatment groups
	1	2	3	4	5	Sig. level
M	172.5±4.8	174.1±5.5	179.5±6.9	185.9±6.3	184.7±5.4	0.0790
F	201.1±7.3	204.3±6.4	211.1±5.4	201.9±5.8	205.9±5.9	0.4634
M+F	187.2±4.2	189.7±4.3	195.5±4.3	192.6±4.3	195.3±4.1	0.7354
FI	623.37±1.02a	580.48±1.02b	596.83±1.02c	618.654±1.02d	630.0±1.02e	0.001**
FCR	3.41±0.03a	3.04±0.03b	3.04±0.03b	3.19±0.03c	3.22±0.03c	0.001**

• *a, b, c: Differences between means of the same line with different letters are significant. M: Male, F: Female. FI: Feed intake, FCR:Feed conversion ratio; **: p<0.01.

Chicks were reared in multiple floor cages (45x90x20cm) with heat and light control. All the birds (males+females together) were reared under similar environmental conditions. The temperatures of the experimental unit was maintained at 35±1°C during the first week and gradually decreased to 21°C till 3 weeks of age. A 23L:1D lighting regiment was applied through 42 days of the experiment, however, it was 16L:8D through the laying period (43 to 143 d). The birds were fed ad libitum and fresh water was provided through the experiment.

All diets were balanced with energy and protein and formulated to contain adequate nutrient levels as defined by the National Research Council, NRC (1994). The diet was based on corn and soybean meal, and it was calculated based on nutrient level of feed stuffs. To calculate protein and energy level, estimated nutrient content of feed was (NRC, 1994) used except for lentil byproduct. Nutrition content of lentil byproduct is given in Table 1. In the first experiment, all the birds were fed by the feed containing either 24% crude protein and 2900 kcal kg^-1ME from 1-42 days of age and the feed containing 20% crude protein and 2900 kcal kg^-1ME was given during the laying period.

Birds and feed were weighed weekly and individually to determine live body weight (BW), feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR).

At the end of the first experiment (at 42 days), 10 male and 10 female birds were bled, defeathered and eviscerated by hand. Carcasses were pre-chilled then aged in ice water for 5 h and then separated for the parts as carcass yield, breast, legs (thighs and drumsticks) liver and heart. After 42 days of the first experiment, 75 females in each experiment group (totally 5 x 75=375 birds) were kept in 3 laying cages (25 in each cage) to calculate the number of eggs laid during the laying period in experiment 2. If all the birds laid 10 % of eggs, we started to collect eggs. The 2^nd experiment lasted 3 months. Eggs were collected daily. Every month 30 eggs in each group were weighted then they were broken to figure out egg quality traits [egg yield (%), egg weight (g), yolk index, haugh unit (HU), internal quality unit (IQU) and yolk color]. The egg yolk color was measured visually by using La Roche scale (today also named as DSM Yolk Color Fan).

Haugh Unit (HU) and Internal Quality Unit (IQU) were calculated with the following equation (Kaya & Aktan, 2011);

$HU=100log\left[H+7.57–1.7x{W}^{0.37}\right]$

$IQU=100log\left[H+4.18–0.8989x{W}^{0.6674}\right]$

Where; H= thick Albumen height (mm); W= egg weight (g)

Data were analyzed by using the GLM procedure of a Statistic Packed Program (SAS, 1998). The BW, FI, FCR and carcass characteristics were studied by analysis of variance including the effect of rearing conditions. When the F-test was significant, the least mean square was compared by using pdiff of SAS. The level (p<0.05) at which differences were considered significant.

RESULTS

The studies about the effect of lentil byproduct (LP) on egg yield and growth performance of quails are still not clear so far. This is the experiment conducted to evaluate the impact of LP on fattening performance, carcass traits (CT), feed intake (FI), FCR, egg yield and egg quality traits of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix Japonica).

The effect of dietary LP on Live Body Weight (BW) at different age, CT, FI, FCR and some internal egg quality traits are given Table 3, 4, and 5, respectively,

Table 4
Some carcass traits of quails in different treatment groups

		Treatment Groups
Traits		control	5%	10%	15%	20%	Sig. level
	M	70.37±1.94a	69.31±2.17a	68.94±1.94a	60.00±2.17b	61.06±2.17b	0.01
Dressing %.	F	63.78±5.6	64.18±5.12	61.69±5.6	57.19±5.6	62.96±5.12	0.89
	M+F	66.58±3.01a	62.13±3.03ab	64.82±3.02ab	58.17±3.18b	62.11±3.03ab	0,05
Breast (g)	M	41.7±2.3a	40.48±2.6a	43.56±2.3a	44.02±2.6a	39.14±2.2a	0,64
	F	44.78±2.1a	44.22±1.9a	46.54±2.1a	45.37±1.9a	43.38±1.4a	0,85
	M+F	43.29±1.52a	42.42±1.52a	45.05±1.52a	44.52±1.52a	41.37±1.52a	0,43
Liver (g)	M	2.93±0.3a	2.75±0.3a	2.98±0.3a	3.88±0.3a	3.42±0.3a	0,23
	F	5.19±0.4a	4.18±0.4a	5.06±0.4a	4.09±0.4a	4.86±0.4a	0,24
	M+F	4.06±0.2a	3.45±0.2a	4.02±0.2a	3.86±0.2a	4.13±0.2a	0,50

• Mean±standart deviation a, b: Differences between means of the same line with different letters are significant. M: Male, F: Female.

Table 5
Egg production and some egg quality traits in different treatment groups

	Treatment groups
Traits	control	5%	10%	15%	20%	Sig. level
Egg yield, %	88,23±0,79a*	89,90±0,77ab	90,78±0,78b	78,04±0,78c	66,57,22±0,8d	0,01
Egg weight, gr	11.17±0.29	11.38±0.30	11.24±0.29	11.36±0.29	10.46±0.29	0,170
Yolk index	44.32±1.25	43.56±1.34	40.68±1.25	44.13±1.29	43.35±1.25	0,260
Haugh Unit	91.30±0.74a	87.57±0.77c	87.21±0.71c	89.85±0.74ab	88.44±0.77bc	0,001
IQU	57.92±2.00c	48.76±2.08b	47.94±1.92a	54.06±2.00bc	52.98±2.08b	0,004
Color	3.46±0.30a	3.64±0.31ab	3.73±0.30ab	4.80±0.30c	4.33±0.30bc	0,015

• *a, b, c: Differences between means of the same line with different letters are significant. IQU; Internal quality unit

Live Body weight (BW), Feed intake (FI) and Feed conversion ratio (FCR)

The mortality rate through the experiment was very low (1%) and was not related with the experiment. The results of fattening performance and feed intake, expressed as live body weight, intake of LP and FCR are summarized in Table 3. At the beginning of the experiment (day 7), there were no significant differences between treatment and control, and among the mean BW of all treatment groups. The weight of the birds in the groups (1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th and 5^th) ranked between 65.9 and 66.1g. At the end of the 6^th week of experiment, among the males, the highest BW with 185.9 g was observed in the 4^th group, which received 15% LP and followed by the 5^th (184. 7g), 3^rd (180.5 g) 2^nd 176.1 g) and 1^st (172.5 g), which received 20, 10, 5 and 0 % LP, respectively. The differences between the treatment and the control group, and among the treatments were not significant (p>0.05). Among the females, however, the highest BW value was observed in the 3^rd group with 211.1g, it was followed by the 5^th (205.9 g), 2^nd (204.1 g), 4^th (201.9 g) and 1^st (201.1 g). Same as in male, no significant differences were observed (p>0.05) among the females in all groups.

Carcass Traits (CT)

After sacrificing the birds (ten males and ten females/group) at the end of the 6^th week of the experiment, carcass traits of the birds were summarized in Table 4. Dressing percentage of the quails were affected by the treatment with 15 and 20% LP inclusion (p<0.05), even though lower dressing percentage was observed in 5 and 10% of LP groups than in the control, the differences were not significant in males (p>0.05) as in females. The best dressing percentage was observed in the control group. The average breast weight, which is the most important part of the quail carcass, was not affected by inclusion of LP with any doses in both genders. Similar results were observed in terms of liver weight.

Egg Traits (ET)

The egg yields were linearly increased (p>0.05) by including 5% (89.9) and 10% (90.8) of LP, however it was decreased (p>0.05) tremendously by including 15% (78) and 20% (66.6) of LP in comparison to the controls. No significant differences (p>0.05) were noticed in terms of egg weights and yolk indexes between treatment and control groups. Haugh Unit (HU) and Internal Quality Unit (IQU) was observed pretty high due to measurement taken one day after laying, however, the best one was noticed in control groups (Table 5). In general, LP treatment decreased (p>0.05) HU and IQU even though no significant differences were observed between the control and 15% LP group. Including of LP linearly increased the yolk color. The color of the yolk was increased linearly by LP treatment (p<0.05). The lowest value (3.46) was noticed in the control and the highest (4.80) one was in the 15% LP group.

DISCUSSION

We want to point out that this study is most probably the first one about lentil byproduct on quail production. That’s why it couldn’t be much discussed with quail studies. We tried to compare our results to other poultry breeds and leguminous seeds.

The inclusion of LP in excess of 5, 10, 15 and 20 % didn’t alter BW much (p>0.05), however, BW tended to increase in all treatment groups in comparison to the control. In the sight of these results, up to 15 and 20% of LP could be included in the diet of female and male quails with no negative effects. Similar results were reported by Yalcın et al., (1991) for broiler. The result of this study is in contrast to results of researchers (Kanat, 1992; Kanat & Camcı; 1993; Çabuk et al., 2014) who noted that using more than 15% of LP in quail diets had negative effects on the birds’egg and BW performance. Besides, using boiled cowpea (14 %) and black common bean (14 %) to replace fish meal and meat meal, members of leguminous family like lentil, in broiler diet acquired lighter weight gains (p<0.05) compared to the control group (Defang et al., 2008). The heavier BW in the present study disagrees with the findings of Defang et al., (2008). Similar results were also reported by Amaefule & Osuagwu (2005) that including row Bambara groundnut up to 20% into chicken starter and finisher diet to replace maize reduced BW gain. In a research, Bambara groundnut didn’t have positive effect on BW gain but made diet cheaper (Onwuke & Equakun, 1994).

Defang et al., (2008) reported that observing some increment in the liver and gizzard size may be related to the boiling which did not reduce toxic anti-nutritive compounds in the diets. The performance of data of broiler chicks fed the diets containing different level of plant concentrate which including faba bean, cowpea, pigeon pea and alfalfa meal showed that 5% plant concentrate had higher dressing carcass percentage (69.76%) than the control (67.63 %), however, 15% plant concentrate had the lowest (63.79 %; p>0.05) dressing percentage (Atti et al., 2011). Carcass weight and dressing percentage were not affected (p> 0.05) by up to 15 % cowpea in diet (Abdelgani et al., 2013; Kur et al., 2013). This similarity to the present study could be related to similar feed intake and diets of groups that were all isocaloric and isonitrogenous.

Observing significantly lower (p<0.01) feed intakes of the quails in all treatment groups except 20% of the control group indicating that adding LP into the quail diets did not have negative effects but also had positive effects in terms of FI. Similar results were also observed in the FCR. This indicates that the value of the FCR decreased when quail diets are included with the LP under investigation. These results are consistent with observation of Çabuk et al., (2014) who demonstrated that there were no differences (p>0.05) between the treatments through 11 weeks of experiment period in quail’s diet containing up to 20 % LP. In some researches, the effects of some legume seed on broiler performance were significantly lower FI (p<0.05) by the inclusion of faba bean, cowpea, pigeon pea and alfalfa meal (Atti et al. 2011), lower FI and FCR (p<0.05) by adding 5% raw bambarra groundnut (Osuagvu & Amaefule, 2005), no significant change (p>0.05) on FCR by inclusion of boiled cow pea and black common bean were (Atti et al. 2011; Abdelgani et al. 2013; Kur et al. 2013) noted. The results of the present study disagree with results of Abdelgani et al. (2013) and Kur et al. (2013).

If Table 4 is evaluated overall, it could be seen that the inclusion of LP up to 15 or 20 % into the diet didn’t alter dressing percentage of female of quail much but it did in males. That means that inclusion of 15 and 20% LP decreased dressing percentage of male quails due to the negative effect of LP. These results indicate that using LP up to 10% is not recommended in terms of dressing percentage in quail diets. Unlike the dressing percentage, the breast, the best carcass part of quails to eat and liver, were not significantly affected (p>0.05) by the inclusion of LP in the diet. These results show us breast weight or percentage should be used instead of dressing percentage in terms of CT. So, up to 15 % inclusion of LP could be used in quail diets because breast weights of 15% treatment group was higher than the control one. Even though the control group had higher breast weight than 20% LP group, the differences were not significant.

It may be concluded with these results that the inclusion of LP up to 15 % in quail diets may not have adverse effect on carcass features. In contrast to the results of the present study was by Defang et al. (2008) indicated that the significantly higher (p<0.05) carcass yield was observed in the groups with boiled cowpea diet in comparison to the other treatment groups. The authors also recommended that boiling cowpea and black common bean under uncontrolled temperature and pressure for 30 min could not be used to formulate broiler’s diet. Besides, the proportion of the heart, liver and gizzard were higher for birds fed with the treatment diets (Defang et al. 2008). Previously Teguia et al. (2003) noted similar results to Defang et al. (2008) that when birds of the same strain were fed raw cowpea and Bambara groundnut, the low carcass yield was attributed to the presence of untinutritional factors (ANFs) in the diet.

The observation of higher egg yield in 5 and 10% LP groups and lower egg yield in 15 and 20% groups in comparison to the control group indicating that the inclusion of LP in quail diets shouldn’t be used more than 10%. However, it is useful and has positive effect on egg yield when up to 10% LP is added to the quail diets. Çabuk et al. (2014) who demonstrated that the inclusion of 10 and 20 % LP in the diet increased (p<0.01) hen-day egg production above that of the control group, in our study, inclusion of 10 % LP increased egg production but 20% LP significantly decreased it. In contrast to our results, inclusion of 10% LP decreased hen-day egg production (Kılıçalp & Benli, 1994). In this study, egg weights just tended to increase in treatment groups (except 20%) in comparison to the controls but differences were not significant. However, Çabuk et al. (2014) who reported that while the inclusion of 10% LP did not alter the egg weight significantly, inclusion of 20% LP reduced the egg weight (p<0.01) compared to the control diet. In contrast to our results, Kılıçalp & Benli (1994) indicated that the inclusion of dietary LP in excess of 10% significantly decreased egg weight.

As an internal quality of the egg, yolk index did not change significantly with the inclusion of LP but HU and IQU were significantly altered by the inclusion. Yolk color is one of the very important factors on our perception of food and is the key demand of the food quality (Bovskova et al. 2014). Egg yolk color varies from pale yellow to dark orange (Beardsworth et al. 2004). In laying hens, yolk color is generally determined by the content and profile of carotenoids present in the diet and can easily be affected by their feed ingredients (Hernandez et al. 2005: Laudadio at al. 2015). The yolk color in the treatment groups linearly increased when the inclusion of LP increased compared with the control diet in this study. This result is in agreement with results of Çabuk et al. (2014) who noted that the yellowness was increased by the inclusion of 20% LP, but not by 10%. This result indicated that increased deposition of yellow pigment in the yolk was due to the inclusion of LP in the diet of quails.

CONCLUSION

Lentil byproduct could be easily found in many countries such as Canada, India and Turkey, which they lead in production of lentil in the world. This byproduct is mostly used in ruminant diets, not in poultry in such countries mentioned above. Since the use of up to 15% of lentil by product in the diet didn’t have adverse effect on BW carcass features and FCR, it could be used in the diet of quails to reduce cost of feed. Considering that yolk color is one of the important factors for consumer demands, Lentil byproduct could be used to increase yolk color. More research is needed to assess the effects of different lentil byproduct on the performance of quail and other poultry species. As in other leguminous, tannins are present in lentil and they have not been eliminated. These tannins could affect animal physiology, and it may decrease utilization of nutrients by enzyme inhibitor (Arora, 1983; South and Miller 1998; Kaya et al. 1999). For that reason, the effect of lentil byproduct on poultry should be investigated after heat treatments.

REFERENCES

• Abdel Atti KA, Dousa BM, Fadel Elseed AM. Effect of substitution the imported concentrate by plant concentrate on performance and blood chemistry of broiler chicks. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 2011;10(11):1000-1003.
• Abdelgani AA, Abdelatti KA, Elamin KM, Dafalla KY, Malik HEE, Dousa MB. Effects of dietary cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds on the performance of broiler chicks. Wayamba Journal of Animal Science 2013;5:678-684
• Amaefule KU, Osuagwu FM. Performance of pullet chicks fed graded levels of raw bambarra groundnut (Vigna subterranean (L.) Verdc) offal diets as replacement for soybean meal and maize. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2005;17:5-10.
• Arora SK. Chemistry and biochemistry of legumes. London: Edward Arnold; 1983.
• Bathy RS. Lentils as victory cereal complement. Cereal Food World 1995;40(5):387-392.
• Beardsworth PM, Hernandes JM. Yolk color an important egg quality attribute. International Poultry Production 2004;12(5):17-18.
• Bovskova H, Mikova K, Panovska Z. Evaluation of yolk color. Czech Journal Food Science 2014;32(3):213-217.
• Çabuk M, Eratak S, Malayoglu HB. Effects of dietary inclusion of lentil by product on performance and oxidative stability of eggs in laying quail. Scientific World Journal 2014;1-5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/742987
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/742987
• Defang HF, Awah-Ndukum ATJ, Kenfack A, Ngoula F, Metuge F. Performance and carcass characteristics of broilers fed boiled cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L Walp) and or black common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) meal diets. African Journal of Biotechnology 2008;7(9):1351-1356.
• Görgülü M. Ingredient of nutrients. 2010. Available from: http://www.muratgorgulu.com.tr/altekran.asp?id=79
  » http://www.muratgorgulu.com.tr/altekran.asp?id=79
• Hernandes JM, Beardswort PP, Weber G. Egg quality-meeting consumer expectations. International Poultry Production 2005;13(3):20-23.
• Kanat R, Camci Ö. The effects of different level of lentil byproduct in the diet on laying performance and some hatchery features. Proceedings of the 1st Southeastern Anatolia Animal Congress; 1993 May 12-15; Sanliurfa.
• Kanat R. The effects of different level of lentil byproduct in the diet on live body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and carcass traits of quails. Harran University Agriculture Journal 1992;3(4): 35-44.
• Kaya E, Aktan S. Flock age and duration of hatching egg storage of Japanese quails: 1. Effects on thick albumen characteristics. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 2011;6(2):30-38.
• Kaya S, Yarsan E, Özdemir M. Major items may cause growth retardation, yield decreasing and poisoning in poultry. Proceedings of the International Poultry Fair And Congress; 1999 June 3-6; Istanbul.
• Kiliçalp N, Benli Y. Possibilities of lentil byproduct using in laying hen diets. Animal Research Journal 1994;4:47-49.
• Kur ATY, Abdel Atti KA, Dousa BM, Elagib HAA, Malik HEE, Elamin KM. Effect of treated cowpea seeds on broiler chicken. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research 2013;1(1): 58-65.
• Laudadio V, Ceci E, Lastella NMB, Introna M, Tufarelli V. Low-fiber alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) meal in the laying hen diet: effects on productive traits and egg quality. Poultry Science 2014;93(7):1868-1874.
• Laudadio V, Tufarelli V. Dehulledmicronised lupin (Lupinus albus L. Cv. Multitalia) as the main protein source for broilers: Influence on growth performance, carcass traits and meat fatty acids. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2011;91:2081-2087.
• Laudadio, V, Nahashan SN, Tufarelli V. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of guinea fowl broilers fed micronized-dehulled pea (Pisum sativum L.) as a substitute for soybean meal. Poultry Science 2012;91:2988-2996.
• Leeson S, Summer J. Commercial poultry nutrition. 2nd ed. Ontario: University Books; 1997.
• Mavromichalis L. El papel de los antioxidantes en la nutrición porcina. Suis 2013;94:6-8.
• NRC. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. Washington: National Academy Press; 1994.
• Onwudike OC, Eguakun A. Nutritional evaluation of raw and heat-treated bambara groundnut meals for starter broilers birds. Journal of Agricultural Technology 1994;2:38-46.
• Robinson D, Singh DN. Rural industries research and development corporation [NDAQ-241]. Kingston: Queensland Poultry Research and Development Centre; 2001.
• SAS. Sas user's Guide: statistics. Cary: Sas Instutite; 1998.
• South PK, Miller DD. Iron binding by tannic acid: effects of selected ligands. Food Chemistry 1998;63(2):167-172.
• Tsopmo A, Muir AD. Chemical profiling of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Cultivars and isolation of compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010;58(15):8715-8721.
• Wang N, Daun JK. Determination of cooking times of pulses using an automated Mattson cooker apparatus. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2005;85(10):1631-1635.
• Woyengo TA, Beltranena E, Zijlstra RT. Controlling feed cost by including alternative ingredients into pig diets: A review. Journal of Animal Science 2014;92:1293-1305.
• Xu B, Chang SKC. Phenolic substance characterization and chemical and cell-Based antioxidant activities of 11 lentils grown in the Northern United States. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010;58(3):1509-1517.
• Yalçin S, Ergün A, Çolpan I. The possibilities of utilization of some leguminous seeds on poultry diets. Proceedings of the International Poultry Congress;1991 May 22-25; Istanbul. p.182-194.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Oct-Dec 2018

History

• Received
  31 Oct 2017
• Accepted
  08 Jan 2018