Emori et al.[1515 Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Tanaka A, et al. TCT-529 The correlation between Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(18 Suppl B):B213-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.666 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.6...
]
|
Multicenter |
Japan |
- |
- |
Intermediate stenosis with FFR |
0.8 |
Xu et al.[55 Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-87. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.0...
]
|
Prospective, multicenter |
China |
61 |
73.7 |
Intermediate stenosis with FFR |
0.8 |
Yazaki et al.[66 Yazaki K, Otsuka M, Kataoka S, Kahata M, Kumagai A, Inoue K, et al. Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed Fractional Flow Reserve for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Circ J. 2017 Jun 23;81(7):988-992. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261...
]
|
Retrospective, single-center |
Japan |
72.5 |
29.6 |
Intermediate stenosis with FFR |
0.8 |
Emori et al.[1313 Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Kitabata H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Myocardial Ischemia in Prior Myocardial Infarction. Circ J. 2018 Feb 23;82(3):807-814. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949...
] MI
|
Retrospective, single-center |
Japan |
69 |
83 |
Patients with previous MI undergoing CAG and FFR |
0.8 |
Emori et al.[1313 Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Kitabata H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Myocardial Ischemia in Prior Myocardial Infarction. Circ J. 2018 Feb 23;82(3):807-814. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949...
] non-MI
|
Retrospective, single-center |
Japan |
70 |
54 |
Intermediate stenosis with FFR |
0.8 |
Tu et al.[44 Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.0...
]
|
Prospective, multicenter |
China |
65.8 |
61 |
Intermediate stenosis with FFR |
0.8 |
Kameyama et al.[1111 Kameyama T, Kubo T, Emori H, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Yamano T, et al. TCT-542 Usefulness of QFR measurement for non-culprit lesion of ACS patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;.68(18 Suppl B):B219. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.679 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.6...
]
|
Multicenter |
Japan |
- |
- |
ACS patients with CAG and FFR |
0.8 |
van Rosendael et al.[1010 van Rosendael AR, Koning G, Dimitriu-Leen AC, Smit JM, Montero-Cabezas JM, van der Kley F, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep;33(9):1305-1312. doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1190-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1190-...
]
|
Prospective, single-center |
Netherlands |
64 |
71 |
Intermediate stenosis with FFR |
0.8 |
Mejia-Renteria et al.[99 Mejia-Renteria H, Lauri F, Lee JM, der Hoeven N, de Waard G, de Hoyps A, et al. TCT-70 Influence of microcirculatory resistance on the assessment of coronary stenosis severity with Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR): Results of an international multicentre study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(18 Suppl B): B30-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1...
]
|
Multicenter |
Spain |
- |
- |
Patients with CAG and FFR |
0.8 |
Spitaleri et al.[1212 Spitaleri G, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Westra J, Brugaletta S, Erriquez A, et al. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e006023. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006023. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTION...
]
|
Prospective, multicenter |
Italy |
62 |
28 |
STEMI patients with MVD and FFR |
0.8 |
Spitaleri et al.[1212 Spitaleri G, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Westra J, Brugaletta S, Erriquez A, et al. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e006023. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006023. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTION...
]
|
Prospective, multicenter |
Denmark |
61 |
67 |
Intermediate stenosis with FFR |
0.8 |