BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials comparing drug-eluting stents (DES) with bare metal stents (BMS) in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been showing conflicting results. Additionally, issues regarding stent thrombosis and the lack of long-term clinical outcomes have limited the widespread use of DES in STEMI. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis in unselected patients who underwent primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS implantation with those treated with DES. METHODS: Between January 2001 and July 2007, 251 consecutive patients with STEMI underwent PCI with BMS (n = 112) or DES (n =139). We investigated the incidence of MACE, including death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR), as well as stent thrombosis rates. RESULTS: Overall, the mean age was 63 ± 13 years-old and 77% were male. The median clinical follow-up was 2.8 years (1.3-4.4). The cumulative incidence of MACE was higher in patients who received BMS as compared with DES (25.2% vs. 10.1%; p < 0.01) driven by a higher incidence of all-cause mortality (17.8% vs. 5.1%; p < 0.01), mainly cardiac death (15.9 vs. 4.3; p < 0.01). TVR was detected in 8 patients (7.5%) with BMS and in 5 patients (3.6%) with DES (p = 0.25). The incidence of stent thrombosis was similar between groups (3.7% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational series, the use of DES in the setting of STEMI showed lower rates of MACE compared to BMS at the long-term follow-up.
Myocardial infarction; Stents; Drug-eluting stents; Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary; Outcome assessment
