BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents suggest efficacy and safety of the DES in the treatment of patients with myocardial infarction (MI). However, the late evolution of patients with MI treated with DES in the daily practice remains unknown. Our goal was to investigate the late follow-up of patients with MI recently treated with DES in the real world. METHODS: Between May 2002 and June 2009, 3,018 non-selected patients with indication for elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention have been consecutively treated with DES in a clinical institution. The 7-year follow-up was performed in 98% of these patients, with a median of 3.4 years. The patients were divided in two groups: patients with recent MI (< 30 days) and patients without recent MI. RESULTS: Patients with recent MI had less co-morbidities, but more multiarterial disease (68.1% vs. 60.7%; P < 0.001), lesions with thrombus (13.6% vs. 1.3%; P < 0.001), TIMI flow 0/1 (8.3% vs. 1.1%; P < 0.001), and moderate/severe LV dysfunction (23.2% vs. 10.9%; P < 0.001) when compared with patients without MI. The recent MI group received 1.6 ± 0.8 stents/patient and more glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (19.6% vs. 2%; P < 0.001), but the angiographic success (> 99%) was similar between groups. In the late follow-up, the incidence of cardiac death (6.4% vs. 2.7%; P < 0.001) and stent thrombosis (3.6% vs. 1.3%; P < 0.001) was significantly greater in the recent MI group. Recent MI remained an independent predictor of stent thrombosis in multivariate analysis (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.62-5.41; P < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MI < 30 days treated with DES had a worse prognosis when compared with patients without recent MI, including a higher incidence of cardiac death and a 2.5 times greater occurrence of stent thrombosis rate up to 7-year follow-up.
Stents; Drug-eluting stents; Myocardial infarction; Angioplasty
