BACKGROUND: Preliminary data have shown the Firebird™ and the Cypher® stents have similar safety and efficacy profiles. However, to date, no study has evaluated the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Firebird™ stent in diabetic patients. METHODS: The performance of the Firebird™ stent in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 100) was compared to that of the Cypher® stent, using historical data from the ARTS-II study (n = 159). We compared the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at one year. RESULTS: Most of the patients in the Firebird™ group were male (65%), with mean age of 63.3 ± 10.4 years and 5% were receiving insulin. Stable coronary syndromes were prevalent (60%), 45% had three-vessel CAD and ventricular function was preserved (56.6 ± 13.7%). In patients with three-vessel CAD, 135 lesions were treated with > 3 stents in 78% of the cases and 2 stents in the remaining ones. In patients with two-vessel CAD, 110 lesions were treated with > 2 stents in 80% of the cases and 1 stent in the remaining ones. The incidence of MACE at one year of the Firebird™ stent was 21%, death was observed in 3% of the patients, myocardial infarction in 2% and a new revascularization procedure in 18%, predominantly at the expense of a new PCI in 14% of the cases. Comparison with the Cypher® group did not show differences for any of the evaluated endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the use of the Firebird™ stent showed similar results to those of patients in the ARTS-II study, which makes it attractive for use in the complex scenario of diabetic patients with multivessel CAD.
Coronary disease; Angioplasty; Drug-eluting stents; Diabetes mellitus
