ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Alar cartilage cephalic malposition was first described as a parenthesis-shaped deformity by Sheen. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of treatment by caudal rotation of the lateral crus for this deformity.
Method:
A retrospective study was conducted with 49 cases, operated on between July 2011 and January 2013 at the 2nd Infirmary of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia in Rio de Janeiro and at a private clinic.
Results:
Most of the patients (76% of cases) had a severe form of this deformity. All others presented with a moderate form (24% of cases). Fifty seven percent of the patients (57%) had a “boxy tip” and an initial alar pinching, 61% showed alar retraction and 8%, external valve collapse. The “boxy tip” was corrected in 100% of cases; initial alar retraction, 97%; alar pinching, 96%; and external valve collapse, 100%. The 3 cases of unilateral relapse were corrected by the same technique during a second rhinoplasty.
Conclusions:
This study shows that caudal rotation of the lateral crus can treat the deformity described by Sheen with a small number of relapses and without serious complications.
Keywords:
Plastic Surgery; Rhinoplasty; Nasal Cartilages; Structural Collapse; Postoperative Complications
RESUMO
Introdução:
Sheen descreveu pela primeira vez uma má posição cefálica das cartilagens alares como a «deformidade em forma de parênteses». O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar os resultados do tratamento desta deformidade pela rotação caudal da cruz lateral.
Método:
Foi realizado estudo retrospectivo, com 49 casos, operados entre Julho 2011 e Janeiro 2013 na 2ª Enfermaria da Santa Casa da Misericórdia do Rio de Janeiro e em uma clínica particular.
Resultados:
A maioria dos pacientes (76% dos casos) tinha a forma severa desta deformidade, os outros apresentavam uma forma moderada (24% dos casos). Cinquenta e sete por cento dos pacientes tinham um “boxy tip” e um piçamento alar inicial, 61% apresentavam uma retração alar e 8% um colapso da válvula externa. O «boxy tip” foi corrigido em 100% dos casos, a retração alar inicial foi corrigida em 97% dos casos, o pinçamento alar em 96% e o colapso da válvula externa foi tratado em 100% dos casos. Os 3 casos de recidiva unilateral foram corrigidos pela mesma técnica durante uma segunda rinoplastia.
Conclusões:
Este trabalho mostra que a rotação caudal da cruz lateral permite tratar a deformidade descrita por Sheen com poucas recidivas e sem complicações graves.
Descritores:
Cirurgia Plástica; Rinoplastia; Cartilagens Nasais; Colapso Estrutural; Complicações Pós-Operatórias
INTRODUCTION
Cephalic-positioned alar cartilage was first described by Sheen11 Sheen JH. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1978.264-5.. According to Sheen, this is alar cartilage with a lateral crura oriented towards the medial instead of the lateral canthus of the eyelid11 Sheen JH. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1978.264-5.. Constantian22 Constantian MB. Functional effects of alar cartilage malposition. Ann Plast Surg. 1993; 30:487-99. described this anatomical variation as a “malposition of the alar cartilage”, in which the lateral crus is rotated in the anterior direction and moves away from the nostril plane at an angle of 45º or higher. Hamra33 Hamra S. Repositioning of the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7):1244-53. defines such variation as a “malrotated lateral crus” and presents a technique to correct it to the “correct anatomical position”. According to Peck44 Peck GC. Techniques in aesthetic rhinoplasty. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott. 1990. p.17-28. and Rees55 Rees TD. Aesthetic plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.1980: p.181-187., such “malposition” of the alar cartilage has received little attention, although it is a common anatomical variation. In a study of 50 consecutive cases by Daniel66 Daniel RK. Discussion: the two essential elements for planning tip surgery in primary and secondary rhinoplasty: observation based on review of 100 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(6):1582-5., the author defines “cephalic malposition of the lateral crus” as an offset of 7mm or more from the center of the alar rim. Clinically, the alar rim appears pinched and the tip squared (boxy tip), an appearance described as a “parenthesis-shaped deformity”7. Hamra33 Hamra S. Repositioning of the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7):1244-53. claims that, considering the high frequency of this anatomical condition, it would be more appropriate to name it “cephalic-positioned” alar cartilage than “malpositioned”.
The cephalic position of the alar cartilage leaves the ala without effective cartilaginous support77 Boahene KD, Hilger PA. Alar rim grafting in rhinoplasty: indications, technique, and outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):2859.,88 Hamra ST. Repositioning the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7): 1244-53.. It is important to identify this variation in the position of the alar cartilage during the preoperative period and surgery, since resection of excess malpositioned alar cartilage could cause weakening of the lateral crura and collapse under the force of cephalic traction due to scar retraction77 Boahene KD, Hilger PA. Alar rim grafting in rhinoplasty: indications, technique, and outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):2859.. Without proper treatment, alar retraction and pinching (“notching”), as well as external valve collapse due to lack of cartilaginous support, may develop during the late postoperative period88 Hamra ST. Repositioning the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7): 1244-53.,99 Rochira D, Ottaviani A. Malposition of alar cartilages: a personal modification of the Sheen technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(2): 72e-3e..
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to describe the alar cartilage caudal rotation technique based on Sheen’s technique and present the results in 49 operated cases.
METHOD
A retrospective study was conducted on 49 cases of patients with “parenthesis-shaped alar cartilage deformity” who benefited from a rhinoplasty with caudal rotation of the lateral crura performed between July 2011 and January 2013 at the 2nd Infirmary of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia in Rio de Janeiro and at one private clinic.
All patients underwent open rhinoplasty with general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation.
After marking of the domes and incisions with methylene blue, the nose was infiltrated with a 1/100,000 solution of adrenaline to reduce perioperative bleeding and facilitate dissection (hydrodissection). A marginal and transcolumellar incision in an “inverted V” shape, was performed to access the alar cartilages (Figure 1), which were detached (Figure 2). Excess cartilage in the lateral crura was assessed and resected at the cephalic and/or caudal edge (Figure 3).
Resection of the caudal excess allowed avoidance of irregularities at the alar rim99 Rochira D, Ottaviani A. Malposition of alar cartilages: a personal modification of the Sheen technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(2): 72e-3e.. Total detachment of the lateral crura and the dome was performed (release of the vestibule’s skin) to exposure them (Figure 4 and 5). Next, a “columellar strut” was fixed between the two medial crura to maintain tip support. In cases of very weak and/or short lateral crus, a cartilaginous graft was added for support (“lateral crural strut graft”) (Figure 6).
The lateral extremity of this graft (“lateral crural strut graft”) was supported at the edge of the piriform aperture, as shown by Gunter1010 Gunter JP, Friedman RM. Lateral crural strut graft: technique and clinical applications in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99:943., to prevent medial graft displacement. Transdomal and interdomal suturing was performed with 5/0 nylon thread, to stabilize the lateral crura in their new positions (Figure 7). With fine-tipped scissors, a pocket was made at the alar rim on each side to accommodate the rotated lateral crura (Figure 8). After the caudal rotation, the lateral crus stayed anchored inside the constructed pocket (Figure 9). In some cases, for greater safety, the cartilage was fixated with loose 6/0 nylon transcutaneous sutures (Figure 10) or 5/0 monocryl sutures on the skin of the vestibule.
The patients’ age group, sex, race, skin type, clinical characteristics of the alar cartilages, surgical modalities used to treat the deformity and the observed post-operative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS
In this study, 40 patients were female (92%) and 9 were male (18%). The mean age was 33 years, ranging from 18 to 74 years (Figure 11). Thirty-one patients were Caucasian
(63%) and 18 were of African descent (37%); no Asian patients were included in our sample.
In 90% of cases (44 patients), rhinoplasty was primary; in 4 patients, secondary rhinoplasty was performed, and in one patient, tertiary.
Thirty-five percent of patients (17 cases) had thick skin; 24%, thin skin (12 patients) and 41%, skin of intermediate thickness (20 patients). In 76% of cases (37 patients), the lateral crus was oriented towards the medial canthus of the eyelid, and in 24% of cases, it had an intermediate orientation (12 patients).
The clinical characteristics of the alar cartilages, relative to the parenthesis-shaped deformity, are summarized in Figure 12. We found excess alar cartilage in 61% of cases (30 patients), alar asymmetry in 18% (9 patients) and concave lateral crus in 12% of cases (6 patients). the surgical modalities used to treat the deformities are summarized in Figure 13.
Boxy tips were corrected in 100% of cases, as illustrated by Patients 1, 2 and 3 (Figures 14 to 18). Initial alar retraction was treated successfully in 97% of cases. Patients 1, 2 and 3 showed three different degrees of alar retraction, all corrected using the same technique (Figures 14 to 18). Alar pinching was corrected in 96% of cases, as shown in Figure 15. External valve collapse was successfully treated in 100% of cases, as shown in Patient 4 (Figure 19 and 20).
Front view and three-quarter view to the right of Patient 1. The case was a 37-year-old patient with a boxy tip, lateral crura oriented towards the medial canthus, bilateral marked alar retraction and left alar pinching. All characteristics were corrected using the technique described.
Front view and three-quarter view to the left of Patient 2. The case was a 24-year-old patient with a boxy tip, bilateral moderate alar retraction and lateral crura oriented towards the medial canthus. All characteristics of the deformity were corrected by the same technique.
Patient 3. The case was of a 29-year-old patient with a boxy tip, lateral crura oriented towards the medial canthus and mild bilateral alar retraction. The same technique was used to correct all characteristics.
Patient 4. The case was of a 27-year-old patient with external valve collapse and concave lateral crura oriented towards the medial canthus. All characteristics were corrected.
DISCUSSION
Sheen1111 Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty, 2nd Ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1987.,1212 Sheen JH. Malposition of the Alar Cartilages. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, May 1992; Los Angeles, USA. has described four characteristics of this deformity.
First, the caudal edge of the lateral crus appears almost perpendicular to the alar rim from the front, creating a visible discontinuity on the alar rim. He called it a “parenthesis-shaped deformity”. All patients with this appearance between July 2011 and January 2013 were included in our study and treated by caudal rotation of the lateral crus. The majority of patients (76%) had the severe form of this deformity and all others presented with a moderate form (24%). Second, a broad, square tip, a “boxy tip”, was found in 57% of patients. Third, pinching of the alar rim due to lack of support was observed in 57% of cases. Finally, the contour appeared square when viewed from the base of the nose (57% of patients).
Sheen1111 Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty, 2nd Ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1987. described the lateral crura caudal rotation technique to treat this deformity. Here, we have also added the alar graft (lateral crural strut graft) described by Gunter1010 Gunter JP, Friedman RM. Lateral crural strut graft: technique and clinical applications in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99:943.. Such a graft is suitable, according to Gunter, for the treatment of alar retraction, external valve collapse, or convex, concave or malpositioned lateral crus. The preferred source for this type of graft is the septal cartilage but, if this is depleted, costal cartilage could also be used1010 Gunter JP, Friedman RM. Lateral crural strut graft: technique and clinical applications in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99:943.. Other modalities exist to correct it.
The cartilaginous graft on the alar rim (alar rim graft) can be used in mild retraction cases (3-4mm), if nasal lining and skin with appropriate elasticity are present, to allow expansion of the retracted ala1313 Brissett AE, Shari’s DA. Changing the nostril shape. Face Plast Clin North Am. 2000; 8:433-45.. In more serious cases, composite grafts, cartilaginous grafts fixated on the lateral crus (lateral crural strut graft) or a cartilaginous graft can be used to avoid external valve collapse (alar batten graft)77 Boahene KD, Hilger PA. Alar rim grafting in rhinoplasty: indications, technique, and outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):2859..
Caudal rotation of the lateral crura was the technique of choice (100% of patients) here, since patients had either a severe (76% of cases) or moderate (24% of cases) form of the deformity, as described by Sheen. No mild form justifying an alar rim graft was found. A lateral crural strut graft with caudal rotation was applied in 27 patients (55% of cases), as they showed a weak and/or concave lateral crus, to ensure good definition and support of the alar rim. The use of septal cartilage grafts was also applied by several authors for cases of hypoplastic alar cartilage1414 Constantian MB. The incompetent external nasal valve: pathophysiology and treatment in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconst Surg. 1994; 93(5):919-31; discussion 932-3.,1515 Fomom S, Gilbert JG, Carou AL, Segal S. Collapsed ala. Arch Otolaryngol. 1950; 51:465-84.. In our sample, no case of scar retraction of the skin of the vestibule justified the use of a composite graft.
A wedge incision into the domes has been proposed by several authors88 Hamra ST. Repositioning the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7): 1244-53.,99 Rochira D, Ottaviani A. Malposition of alar cartilages: a personal modification of the Sheen technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(2): 72e-3e. to reduce tension in the domes at the time of caudal rotation, thereby making its approximation easier. This incision was used in 15% of our cases.
There were 3 cases of unilateral deformity relapse following caudal rotation (6% of patients). In these cases, lateral crura were not fixated into the prepared pockets. These patients benefited from a second rhinoplasty with a new lateral crura caudal rotation and fixation into the pocket. There have been no cases of relapse since we began performing routine fixation.
Initial alar retraction was corrected in 97% of cases, alar pinching in 96% and external valve collapse in 100% of cases. There were no iatrogenic cases of alar retraction or pinching or external valve collapse. In his study, Constantian1616 Constantian MB. The external Nasal Valve: The Forgotten Element in Rhinoplasty Diagnosis and Treatment. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; May 1992; Los Angeles, USA. showed that external valve collapse occurs at the time of inspiration, when the alar rim is left without cartilaginous support. Cephalic-positioned caudal rotation of the lateral crus provides good support to the alar rim, thereby improving functional and aesthetic features, as shown by our results.
CONCLUSIONS
Parenthesis-shaped alar cartilage deformity must be acknowledged when planning surgery, since resection of the alar excess leaves the ala unsupported77 Boahene KD, Hilger PA. Alar rim grafting in rhinoplasty: indications, technique, and outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):2859. and may cause retraction and collapse of the external valve in the late postoperative period88 Hamra ST. Repositioning the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7): 1244-53.,99 Rochira D, Ottaviani A. Malposition of alar cartilages: a personal modification of the Sheen technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(2): 72e-3e..
We conducted a retrospective study with 49 cases treated by lateral crura caudal rotation, between July 2011 and January 2013. Our results encourage the selection of this technique as the first choice in the treatment of this deformity.
REFERÊNCIAS
-
1Sheen JH. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1978.264-5.
-
2Constantian MB. Functional effects of alar cartilage malposition. Ann Plast Surg. 1993; 30:487-99.
-
3Hamra S. Repositioning of the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7):1244-53.
-
4Peck GC. Techniques in aesthetic rhinoplasty. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott. 1990. p.17-28.
-
5Rees TD. Aesthetic plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.1980: p.181-187.
-
6Daniel RK. Discussion: the two essential elements for planning tip surgery in primary and secondary rhinoplasty: observation based on review of 100 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(6):1582-5.
-
7Boahene KD, Hilger PA. Alar rim grafting in rhinoplasty: indications, technique, and outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):2859.
-
8Hamra ST. Repositioning the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7): 1244-53.
-
9Rochira D, Ottaviani A. Malposition of alar cartilages: a personal modification of the Sheen technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(2): 72e-3e.
-
10Gunter JP, Friedman RM. Lateral crural strut graft: technique and clinical applications in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99:943.
-
11Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty, 2nd Ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1987.
-
12Sheen JH. Malposition of the Alar Cartilages. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, May 1992; Los Angeles, USA.
-
13Brissett AE, Shari’s DA. Changing the nostril shape. Face Plast Clin North Am. 2000; 8:433-45.
-
14Constantian MB. The incompetent external nasal valve: pathophysiology and treatment in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconst Surg. 1994; 93(5):919-31; discussion 932-3.
-
15Fomom S, Gilbert JG, Carou AL, Segal S. Collapsed ala. Arch Otolaryngol. 1950; 51:465-84.
-
16Constantian MB. The external Nasal Valve: The Forgotten Element in Rhinoplasty Diagnosis and Treatment. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; May 1992; Los Angeles, USA.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
16 June 2023 -
Date of issue
Jan-Mar 2014
History
-
Received
18 June 2013 -
Accepted
25 Nov 2013