Abstract
This article aims to analyze the probative repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP, within the scope of sharing the COAF financial intelligence report. The research is of a qualitative nature and the methodology consists of a hypothetical-deductive method, through a bibliographic review of authors who deal with criminal procedural law, financial intelligence and data protection. In conclusion, it was determined that the appeal judged by the Brazilian Supreme Court imposes compliance with the chain of custody for the legality of sharing the financial intelligence report, under the chance of inadmissibility of the report in the process.
Keywords
Chain of custody; Financial intelligence report; means of obtaining evidence; data protection; informational self-determination