Nutritional balance in mango plants in the Brazilian semiarid using nutritional diagnostic methods

Rezende, Jefrejan S.; Freire, Fernando J.; Silva, Suellen R. V. da; Musser, Rosimar dos S.; Cavalcante, Ítalo H. L.; Saldanha, Eduardo C. M.; Santos, Renato L. dos; Cunha, Jailson C.

doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v28n11e277397

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Article • Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient. 28 (11) • Nov 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v28n11e277397 copy

Nutritional balance in mango plants in the Brazilian semiarid using nutritional diagnostic methods¹ 1 Research developed at Belém do São Francisco, PE, Brazil

Balanço nutricional em mangueiras no semiárido brasileiro utilizando métodos diagnósticos nutricionais

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Nutritional assessment of mango trees based on diagnostic methods considering nutritional balance is recommended. This study aimed to establish optimum nutritional ranges using diagnostic methods, compare them, identify the most efficient diagnostic method, and select the nutrients responding best to the application of the diagnostic method. The study was conducted in commercial mango orchards in the São Francisco Valley. Nutritional content was calculated using the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS-Beaufils, DRIS-Jones), modified DRIS (M-DRIS-Beaufils; M-DRIS-Jones), compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND), and mathematical chance (ChM) methods and compared using the chi-square test. Principal component analysis was applied to select the most efficient diagnostic method and the nutrients responsible for the greatest variability. The DRIS-Beaufils, M-DRIS-Beaufils, DRIS-Jones, M-DRIS-Jones, CND, and ChM methods generated nutritional sufficiency ranges for the evaluated cultivars. The nutritional diagnoses of the DRIS-Beaufils and M-DRIS-Beaufils methods were similar and discordant with those of DRIS-Jones, M-DRIS-Jones, and CND. The DRIS-Beaufils method, updated by Maia, proved to be more consistent for the nutritional assessment of mango trees. The nutrients N, P, K, Mg, and S in the Tommy Atkins cultivar; N, P, Mg, S, B, Mn, Zn, Mo, and Cl in the Kent cultivar; and N, P, K, Ca, S, B, Cu, Fe, Zn, Mo, and Cl in the Keitt cultivar showed significant responses to the application of the DRIS-Beaufils method updated by Maia.

Key words:
Mangifera indica L.; diagnosis and recommendation integrated system; modified DRIS; compositional nutrient diagnosis; mathematical chance

HIGHLIGHTS:

The mathematical chance diagnostic method is not recommended for evaluating nutritional imbalances in the present study.

The methods established by Beaufils-Maia and Jones have differentiated efficiencies in detecting nutritional imbalances.

The DRIS Beaufils diagnostic method updated by Maia is sensitive to the detection of nutritional imbalances.

Diagnostic method	Optimal range	Chi-square
Diagnostic method	Optimal range	DB	MDJ	MDB	CND	ChM
(g kg^-1)
N
DJ	14.4-18.2	1.11^ns	0.07^ns	1.11^ns	0.05^ns	5.21^ns
DB	15.1-18.9	-	1.68^ns	0.00^ns	0.71^ns	4.19^ns
MDJ	14.3-18.1		-	1.68^ns	0.21^ns	5.27^ns
MDB	15.1-18.9			-	0.71^ns	4.19^ns
CND	14.5-18.2				-	4.49^ns
ChM	14.9-17.5					-
P
DJ	1.5-2.3	3.31^ns	0.00^ns	3.31^ns	3.31^ns	44.80**
DB	1.6-2.4	-	3.31^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	28.04**
MDJ	1.5-2.3		-	3.31^ns	3.31^ns	44.80**
MDB	1.6-2.4			-	0.00^ns	28.04**
CND	1.6-2.4				-	28.04**
ChM	2.1-2.4					-
K
DJ	11.1-14.9	0.69^ns	0.00^ns	1.49^ns	1.49^ns	76.42**
DB	11.5-15.3	-	0.69^ns	0.16^ns	0.16^ns	64.45**
MDJ	11.2-15.0		-	1.49^ns	1.49^ns	76.42**
MDB	11.6-15.4			-	0.00^ns	58.98**
CND	11.6-15.4				-	58.98**
ChM	16.7-18.1					-
Ca
DJ	24.1-35.8	0.37^ns	0.43^ns	0.00^ns	0.42^ns	30.23**
DB	24.6-36.4	-	0.16^ns	0.00^ns	1.58^ns	29.61**
MDJ	24.2-36.0		-	0.16^ns	0.73^ns	29.96**
MDB	24.7-36.5			-	1.58^ns	29.61**
CND	23.6-35.4				-	31.52**
ChM	23.4-29.4					-
MG
DJ	1.5-2.1	2.62^ns	0.00^ns	2.62^ns	2.05^ns	13.96**
DB	1.7-2.2	-	2.62^ns	0.00^ns	0.27^ns	4.68^ns
MDJ	1.5-2.1		-	2.62^ns	2.05^ns	13.96**
MDB	1.7-2.2			-	0.27^ns	4.68^ns
CND	1.6-2.2				-	38.94**
ChM	1.9-2.4					-
S
DJ	1.0-1.9	0.00^ns	0.31^ns	0.31^ns	0.00^ns	30.84**
DB	1.0-1.9	-	0.31^ns	0.31^ns	0.00^ns	30.84**
MDJ	1.1-2.0		-	0.00^ns	0.31^ns	25.26**
MDB	1.1-1.9			-	0.31^ns	25.26**
CND	1.0-1.9				-	30.84**
ChM	1.7-2.1					-
(mg kg^-1)
B
DJ	121.1-200.5	3.24^ns	0.00^ns	3.24^ns	83.79**	11.07**
DB	141.8-221.3	-	3.24^ns	0.00^ns	57.98**	4.76^ns
MDJ	119.8-199.3		-	3.24^ns	83.79**	11.07**
MDB	141.3-220.8			-	57.98**	4.76^ns
CND	272.5-352.0				-	47.58**
ChM	161.1-196.2					-
Cu
DJ	8.3-16.2	5.18^ns	0.14^ns	5.18^ns	0.00^ns	6.94*
DB	6.6-14.5	-	6.69*	0.00^ns	5.18^ns	9.53**
MDJ	8.5-16.4		-	6.69*	0.14^ns	6.23*
MDB	6.7-14.6			-	5.18^ns	9.53**
CND	8.2-16.2				-	6.94*
ChM	8.6-12.2					-
Fe
DJ	71.2-407.7	7.60*	0.21^ns	7.60*	0.21^ns	6.77*
DB	113.1-449.6	-	5.45^ns	0.00^ns	5.45^ns	19.02**
MDJ	72.3-408.8		-	5.45^ns	0.00^ns	8.06*
MDB	113.7-450.2			-	5.45^ns	19.02**
CND	81.8-418.3				-	8.06*
ChM	57.6 - 281.6					-
Mn
DJ	409.5-765.2	3.14^ns	0.00^ns	2.51^ns	0.00^ns	6.71*
DB	328.3-684.1	-	3.14^ns	0.03^ns	3.14^ns	17.39**
MDJ	420.9-776.6		-	2.51^ns	0.00^ns	6.71*
MDB	336.8-692.5			-	2.51^ns	15.89**
CND	392.1-747.8				-	6.71*
ChM	516.8-653.4					-
Zn
DJ	51.7-168.1	0.11^ns	19.98**	0.00^ns	42.69**	-
DB	31.7-148.1	27.82**	0.54^ns	26.10**	12.09**	-
MDJ	53.8-170.2	-	21.57**	0.11^ns	46.11**	-
MDB	33.0-149.5		-	19.98**	13.39**	-
CND	51.2-167.6			-	42.69**	-
ChM	24.0-73.5				-	-
Mo
DJ	1.1-3.1	2.06 ^ns	0.00^ns	2.06^ns	0.80^ns	5.59^ns
DB	0.9-2.8	-	2.06^ns	0.00^ns	0.29^ns	10.31**
MDJ	1.1-3.0		-	2.06^ns	0.80^ns	5.59^ns
MDB	0.9-2.8			-	0.29^ns	10.31**
CND	1.0-2.9				-	7.91*
ChM	1.4-2.1					-
Cl
DJ	0.2-0.4	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	14.02**
DB	0.2-0.4	-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	14.02**
MDJ	0.2-0.4		-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	14.02**
MDB	0.2-0.4			-	0.00^ns	14.02**
CND	0.2-0.4				-	14.02**
ChM	0.2-0.3					-

Diagnostic method	Optimal range	Chi-square
Diagnostic method	Optimal range	DB	MDJ	MDB	CND	ChM
(g kg^-1)
N
DJ	13.4-16.7	0.68^ns	0.00^ns	0.68^ns	0.06^ns	7.04*
DB	12.7-16.0	-	0.68^ns	0.00^ns	0.37^ns	10.15**
MDJ	13.4-16.7		-	0.68^ns	0.06^ns	7.04*
MDB	12.6-16.0			-	0.37^ns	10.15**
CND	13.2-16.6				-	8.32*
ChM	15.1-17.1					-
P
DJ	1.7-2.1	1.50^ns	1.72^ns	1.50^ns	0.00^ns	16.77**
DB	1.6-2.0	-	0.04^ns	0.00^ns	1.50^ns	23.11**
MDJ	1.6-2.1		-	0.04^ns	1.72^ns	22.26**
MDB	1.6-2.0			-	1.50^ns	23.11**
CND	1.7-2.1				-	16.77**
ChM	2.1-2.3					-
K
DJ	14.0-17.9	2.17^ns	0.00^ns	2.17^ns	2.40^ns	15.33**
DB	12.8-16.7	-	2.17^ns	0.00^ns	0.71^ns	26.68**
MDJ	14.1-18.0		-	2.17^ns	2.40^ns	15.33**
MDB	12.9-16.8			-	0.71^ns	26.68**
CND	13.7-17.6				-	19.52**
ChM	16.4-18.2					-
Ca
DJ	18.0-30.6	0.04^ns	0.00^ns	0.04^ns	2.52^ns	16.22**
DB	18.6-31.2	-	0.04^ns	0.00^ns	1.89^ns	17.83**
MDJ	17.8-30.4		-	0.04^ns	2.52^ns	16.22**
MDB	18.6-31.2			-	1.89^ns	17.83**
CND	19.7-32.3				-	29.90**
ChM	21.3-26.6					-
Mg
DJ	2.2-2.8	3.00^ns	0.00^ns	1.63^ns	0.00^ns	32.70**
DB	2.0-2.6	-	3.00^ns	1.20^ns	3.00^ns	40.86**
MDJ	2.2-2.8		-	1.63^ns	0.00^ns	32.70**
MDB	2.0-2.7			-	1.63^ns	47.00**
CND	2.2-2.8				-	32.70**
ChM	2.8-3.1					-
S
DJ	1.0-2.1	0.78^ns	0.00^ns	0.78^ns	0.00^ns	18.35**
DB	1.2-2.3	-	0.78^ns	0.00^ns	0.78^ns	13.14**
MDJ	1.0-2.1		-	0.78^ns	0.00^ns	18.35**
MDB	1.2-2.3			-	0.78^ns	13.14**
CND	1.0-2.1				-	18.35**
ChM	1.8-2.7					-
(mg kg^-1)
B
DJ	128.1-298.7	6.05*	0.00^ns	6.05*	0.00^ns	0.73^ns
DB	97.3-267.9	-	6.05*	0.00^ns	6.05*	8.05*
MDJ	130.5-301.1		-	6.05*	0.00^ns	0.73^ns
MDB	98.2-268.8			-	6.05*	8.05*
CND	129.3-299.9				-	0.73^ns
ChM	129.0-212.6					-
Cu
DJ	8.8-19.2	14.45**	0.23^ns	14.45**	0.00^ns	23.06**
DB	5.3-15.8	-	15.11**	0.00^ns	14.45**	24.30**
MDJ	9.0-19.4		-	15.11**	0.23^ns	19.68**
MDB	5.4-15.9			-	14.45**	24.30**
CND	8.7-19.2				-	23.06**
ChM	7.3-12.1					-
Fe
DJ	93.1-213.5	12.45**	0.00^ns	12.45**	0.05^ns	13.32**
DB	44.2-164.6	-	12.45**	0.00^ns	11.39**	5.23^ns
MDJ	93.5-213.9		-	12.45**	0.05^ns	13.32**
MDB	44.4-164.8			-	11.39**	5.23^ns
CND	88.5-208.9				-	13.09**
ChM	72.1-129.3					-
Mn
DJ	495.2-873.6	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.47^ns	5.05^ns
DB	482.3-860.7	-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.47^ns	5.05^ns
MDJ	489.2-867.7		-	0.00^ns	0.47^ns	5.05^ns
MDB	481.3-859.7			-	0.47^ns	5.05^ns
CND	465.2-843.6				-	2.89^ns
ChM	387.1-689.3					-
Zn
DJ	43.7-108.9	0.72^ns	0.00^ns	0.72^ns	0.00^ns	15.78**
DB	38.1-103.3	-	0.72^ns	0.00^ns	0.72^ns	11.66**
MDJ	42.1-107.3		-	0.72^ns	0.00^ns	15.78**
MDB	37.3-102.6			-	0.72^ns	11.66**
CND	43.3-108.5				-	15.78**
ChM	24.5-76.7					-
Mo
DJ	0.02-3.4	14.25**	0.00^ns	14.25**	1.40^ns	12.30**
DB	0.4-3.8	-	14.25**	0.00^ns	9.07*	24.46**
MDJ	0.02-3.4		-	14.25**	1.40^ns	12.30**
MDB	0.4-3.8			-	9.07*	24.46**
CND	0.06-3.4				-	10.42**
ChM	0.03-1.4					-
Cl
DJ	0.2-0.4	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.90^ns
DB	0.2-0.4	-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.90^ns
MDJ	0.2-0.4		-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.90^ns
MDB	0.2-0.4			-	0.00^ns	0.90^ns
CND	0.2-0.4				-	0.90^ns
ChM	0.25-0.41					-

Diagnostic method	Optimal range	Chi-square
Diagnostic method	Optimal range	DB	MDJ	MDB	CND	ChM
(g kg^-1)
N
DJ	14.5-21.5	0.24^ns	0.24^ns	0.24^ns	0.06^ns	24.13**
DB	14.7-21.7	-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.06^ns	20.41**
MDJ	14.8-21.8		-	0.00^ns	0.06^ns	20.41**
MDB	14.8-21.8			-	0.06^ns	20.41**
CND	14.6-21.6				-	22.22**
ChM	22.6-25.0					-
P
DJ	1.6-2.2	1.17^ns	1.09^ns	1.09^ns	5.01^ns	10.20**
DB	1.7-2.2	-	0.11^ns	0.11^ns	1.40^ns	4.59^ns
MDJ	1.7-2.3		-	0.00^ns	1.54^ns	4.97^ns
MDB	1.7-2.3			-	1.54^ns	4.97^ns
CND	1.8-2.3				-	0.99^ns
ChM	2.0-2.4					-
K
DJ	10.8-24.6	5.24^ns	0.00^ns	5.24^ns	0.00^ns	11.10**
DB	7.7-21.5	-	5.24^ns	0.00^ns	5.24^ns	5.85^ns
MDJ	11.1-24.8		-	5.24^ns	0.00^ns	11.10**
MDB	7.9-21.7			-	5.24^ns	5.85^ns
CND	10.8-24.5				-	11.10**
ChM	9.0-15.4					-
Ca
DJ	23.5-30.4	0.10^ns	0.08^ns	0.10^ns	0.08^ns	18.54**
DB	24.3-31.2	-	0.07^ns	0.00^ns	0.07^ns	18.58**
MDJ	23.6-30.5		-	0.07^ns	0.00^ns	20.80**
MDB	24.3-31.2			-	0.07^ns	18.58**
CND	23.5-30.5				-	20.80**
ChM	29.2-32.2					-
Mg
DJ	2.0-2.5	0.07^ns	0.00^ns	0.07^ns	0.07^ns	0.56^ns
DB	2.0-2.6	-	0.07^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	1.62^ns
MDJ	2.0-2.5		-	0.07^ns	0.07^ns	0.56^ns
MDB	2.0-2.6			-	0.00^ns	1.62^ns
CND	2.0-2.6				-	1.62^ns
ChM	2.1-2.6					-
S
DJ	1.4-2.3	1.18^ns	0.10^ns	1.18^ns	0.00^ns	2.54^ns
DB	1.2-2.1	-	1.62^ns	0.00^ns	1.18^ns	1.42^ns
MDJ	1.4-2.4		-	1.62^ns	0.10^ns	3.65^ns
MDB	1.2-2.1			-	1.18^ns	1.42^ns
CND	1.4-2.3				-	2.54^ns
ChM	1.3-1.9					-
(mg kg^-1)
B
DJ	95.0-154.9	1.02^ns	0.09^ns	0.34^ns	0.00^ns	9.49**
DB	107.3-167.3	-	1.66^ns	0.32^ns	1.02^ns	15.56**
MDJ	91.0-150.9		-	0.78^ns	0.09^ns	7.84*
MDB	105.5-165.4			-	0.34^ns	13.10**
CND	95.0-154.9				-	9.49**
ChM	49.8-115.7					-
Cu
DJ	10.0-18.9	0.27^ns	0.00^ns	0.27^ns	0.00^ns	3.53^ns
DB	11.0-19.9	-	0.27^ns	0.00^ns	0.27^ns	2.24^ns
MDJ	10.0-18.9		-	0.27^ns	0.00^ns	3.53^ns
MDB	11.0-19.9			-	0.27^ns	2.24^ns
CND	10.0-19.0				-	3.53^ns
ChM	12.0-16.5					-
Fe
DJ	91.5-165.6	0.94^ns	0.57^ns	0.84^ns	0.00^ns	10.42**
DB	109.1-183.2	-	2.92^ns	0.82^ns	0.94^ns	14.00**
MDJ	81.3-155.4		-	2.75^ns	0.57^ns	7.89*
MDB	104.7-178.8			-	0.84^ns	14.93**
CND	91.5-165.6				-	10.42**
ChM	42.2-285.2					-
Mn
DJ	446.5-713.3	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	23.39**
DB	436.7-703.5	-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	23.39**
MDJ	448.1-714.9		-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	23.39**
MDB	437.5-704.3			-	0.00^ns	23.39**
CND	439.4-706.2				-	23.39**
ChM	791.1-945.5					-
Zn
DJ	55.8-219.0	7.16*	0.00^ns	7.16*	0.00^ns	13.80**
DB	39.9-203.0	-	7.16*	0.00^ns	7.16*	5.06^ns
MDJ	55.6-218.7		-	7.16*	0.00^ns	13.80**
MDB	39.7-202.9			-	7.16*	5.06^ns
CND	55.0-218.2				-	13.80**
ChM	32.9-103.2					-
Mo
DJ	0.9-3.2	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	22.79**
DB	0.6-2.9	-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	22.79**
MDJ	0.9-3.2		-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	22.79**
MDB	0.6-2.9			-	0.00^ns	22.79**
CND	0.8-3.1				-	22.79**
ChM	0.1-1.5					-
Cl
DJ	0.2-0.4	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	6.79*
DB	0.2-0.4	-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	6.79*
MDJ	0.2-0.4		-	0.00^ns	0.00^ns	6.79*
MDB	0.2-0.4			-	0.00^ns	6.79*
CND	0.2-0.4				-	6.79*
ChM	0.3-0.4					-

Variable	PC1	PC2	PC3	PC4	PC1	PC2	PC3	PC1	PC2	PC3
Variable	Tommy Atkins				Kent			Keitt
IN	0.70*	0.07	-0.57	-0.11	0.89*	0.11	-0.25	0.84*	0.36	-0.11
IP	0.27	-0.81*	0.27	-0.26	0.91*	-0.15	0.10	0.74*	-0.03	-0.44
IK	0.72*	0.16	0.44	-0.18	0.66	-0.55	-0.15	-0.42	0.73*	0.25
ICa	-0.19	-0.57	0.12	0.07	0.38	0.11	0.41	0.88*	-0.12	-0.17
IMg	0.78*	0.11	0.20	-0.05	0.90*	0.01	-0.22	0.65	0.32	0.44
IS	0.08	0.91*	-0.07	0.18	-0.30	0.89*	-0.18	0.32	0.90*	0.08
IB	0.63	-0.16	-0.03	-0.19	0.36	0.15	0.80*	0.72*	-0.51	-0.04
ICu	-0.24	0.04	-0.20	0.22	0.53	-0.03	-0.42	-0.14	-0.82*	-0.10
IFe	-0.51	0.07	0.68	-0.02	0.22	-0.58	-0.17	-0.38	0.32	-0.72*
IMn	-0.43	-0.13	-0.24	-0.74	0.15	0.22	0.74*	0.28	-0.42	0.56
IZn	-0.60	0.26	0.49	-0.14	0.09	-0.38	0.73*	-0.85*	0.12	-0.40
IMo	-0.51	-0.26	-0.63	0.15	-0.51	-0.80*	-0.15	-0.71*	-0.35	0.00
ICl	0.22	-0.47	0.17	0.74	0.34	0.86*	-0.19	-0.51	0.03	0.75*
Absolute variance (%)	25.26	17.44	14.77	10.74	30.90	23.83	18.16	38.34	22.86	16.04
Cumulative variance (%)	25.26	42.70	57.47	68.21	30.90	54.73	72.89	38.34	61.20	77.24

Unidade Acadêmica de Engenharia Agrícola Unidade Acadêmica de Engenharia Agrícola, UFCG, Av. Aprígio Veloso 882, Bodocongó, Bloco CM, 1º andar, CEP 58429-140, Campina Grande, PB, Brasil, Tel. +55 83 2101 1056 - Campina Grande - PB - Brazil
E-mail: revistagriambi@gmail.com

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] * Corresponding author - E-mail: jefrejansouza@pcs.uespi.br

Brasil

Brasil

Nutritional balance in mango plants in the Brazilian semiarid using nutritional diagnostic methods1 1 Research developed at Belém do São Francisco, PE, Brazil

Balanço nutricional em mangueiras no semiárido brasileiro utilizando métodos diagnósticos nutricionais

ABSTRACT

HIGHLIGHTS:

Nutritional balance in mango plants in the Brazilian semiarid using nutritional diagnostic methods¹ 1 Research developed at Belém do São Francisco, PE, Brazil