Daraï et al. (2010)1111 Daraï E, Dubernard G, Coutant C, Frey C, Rouzier R, Ballester M. Randomized trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open colorectal resection for endometriosis: morbidity, symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. Ann Surg. 2010;251(06):1018-1023. Doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d9691d
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d9...
|
n =52Laparoscopy (n = 26) versus open surgery (n = 26) |
Laparoscopy versus open surgery |
1 and 6 months, then every 6 months up to 3 years |
1.Pain VAS |
There is no report in the study |
There is no report in the study |
There is no report in the study |
When the overall result was assessed, there was a reduction in pain in both groups. However, when analyzed separately, the reduction of the complaint was not significant |
There is no report in the study |
Roman et al. (2018)1212 Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Zacharopoulou C, Daraï E, et al. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(01):47-57. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex336
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex336...
|
n= 60Conservative surgery (n = 27) versusRadical surgery (n = 33) |
Conservative surgery versus radical rectal resection |
6-month intervals for 2 years |
1.Fecal IncontinenceGIQLI, Kess and Wexner score2. Urinary Incontinence USP score3. Pain and quality of life VAS and SF-36 |
Patients presented gastrointestinal disorders such as fecal incontinence and gas loss, in addition to dyspareunia in both groups studied |
Both groups had gastrointestinal disorders after the 24-month evaluation, with no significant difference for the types of surgery |
There is no report in the study |
Despite the reduction in VAS in the groups studied, there was no significant difference for the types of surgery |
There is no report in the study |
Roman et al. (2019)1313 Roman H, Tuech JJ, Huet E, Bridoux V, Khalil H, Hennetier C, et al. Excisionversus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: 5-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(12):2362-2371. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez217
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez217...
|
n= 55Excision (n = 27) versus Resection (n = 28) |
Excision versus Colorectal segmental resection |
5 years |
1.Fecal Incontinence GIQLI, Kess, and Wexner score2.Urinary Incontinence USP score3. Pain and quality of life VAS and SF-36 |
Patients presented gastrointestinal disorders such as fecal incontinence and gas loss, in addition to dyspareunia in both groups studied |
Both groups had gastrointestinal disorders after a 5-year assessment. Despite the improvement when compared with preoperative values, there was no significant difference between the groups |
There is no report in the study |
Despite the reduction in VAS in the groups, there was no significant difference for the types of surgery |
There is no report in the study |
Roman et al. (2019)1414 Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Zacharapoulou C, Collinet P, et al. Baseline severe constipation negatively impacts functional outcomes of surgery for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: Results of the ENDORE randomized trial. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(08):625-629. Doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03....
|
n = 60Conservative surgery (n = 27) versus segmental resection (n = 33) |
Conservative surgery versus segmental resection |
6,12,18 and 24 months |
1.Fecal Incontinence GIQLI, Kess and Wexner score2.Urinary Incontinence USP score |
Patients had gastrointestinal disorders such as fecal incontinence and gas loss in both groups. The groups were not analyzed separately regarding the type of surgery |
Both groups showed significant improvement after an evaluation when compared together. When analyzed separately, there was no significant difference between groups |
There is no report in the study |
There is no report in the study |
There is no report in the study |
Posadzka et al. (2015)1515 Posadzka E, Jach R, Pitynski K, Jablonski MJ. Treatment efficacy for pain complaints in women with endometriosis of the lesser pelvis after laparoscopic electroablationvs. CO2 laser ablation. LasersMed Sci. 2015;30(01):147-152. Doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1630-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1630-...
|
n= 48Electroablation (n = 33) versus CO2 laser ablation (n = 15) |
Electroablation of endometriosis versus CO2 laser ablation |
3 and 6 months |
1. Pain NRS |
Both groups had dyspareunia. |
There is no report in the study |
There is no report in the study |
After an initial improvement verified in 3 months, the complaint worsened significantly in the exam of 6 months for the CO2 laser group. For the electroablation group, the complaint also increased significantly, 50% of the patients reported a level ≥ 10 points after 6 months |
There is no report in the study |
Candiani et al. (1992)1616 Candiani GB, Fedele L, Vercellini P, Bianchi S, Di Nola G. Presacral neurectomy for the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167(01):100-103. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91636-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91...
|
n = 71Conservative surgery (n = 36) versus Presacral neurectomy (n = 35) |
Conservative surgery versus Presacral neurectomy |
12 months |
1. Pain Andersch and Milsom Multidimensional Scoring System |
Both groups had dyspareunia (mild, moderate, and severe) |
There is no report in the study |
There is no report in the study |
Although not significant, there was a reduction in complaints in both groups |
There is no report in the study |
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
