| EDUCATION |
Topic: authorship order |
Macfarlane (2009MACFARLANE, B. Researching with integrity: the ethics of academic enquiry. New York: Routledge, 2009.) |
| Participants: supervisor, research student |
| Evaluation: research ethics, ethical conduct |
| Topic: determining authorship credit |
Macfarlane; Zhang; Pun (2012MACFARLANE, B.; ZHANG, J.; PUN, A. Academic integrity: a review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 39, n. 2, p. 1-20, 2012.) |
| Participants: students, faculty |
| Evaluation: academic integrity, academic power abuse |
| Topic: gift authorship, authorship order, legitimate claim to authorship |
Macfarlane (2017MACFARLANE, B. The ethics of multiple authorship: power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 42, n. 7, p. 1194-1210, 2017.) |
| Participants: multiple authors |
| Evaluation: White Bull effect (Kwok 2005KWOK, L. S. The white bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, [s.l.], v. 31, n. 9, p. 554-56, 2005.), Matthew effect (Merton 1973), legitimate authorship |
| LINGUISTICS |
Topic: co-author status criteria in collaborative research |
José; Berti (2017JOSÉ, B.; BERTI, M. The increasingly collaborative nature of linguistic scholarship. Journal of English Linguistics, Sage Journals, v. 45, n. 1, p. 88-94, 2017.) |
| Participants: co-authors (postdoc, supervising professor, junior professor, more senior colleague) |
| Evaluation: limited research experience, effective mentorship, work effectively with others, ethical (legal) responsibility |
| MEDICINE |
Topic: coauthorship roles, publication position |
Kwok (2005KWOK, L. S. The white bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, [s.l.], v. 31, n. 9, p. 554-56, 2005.) |
| Participants: young investigators, senior collaborators |
| Evaluation: White Bull effect, reward, greed, dishonesty, unscrupulous senior researchers, fraudulent behaviour, scientific misconduct, fraud, power asymmetry/intimidation, unfair arrangements, ambition, vanity, desire for fame, laziness, code of silence |
| Topic: authorship conflicts: ownership of data, gift authorship, academic competition, personality differences, intellectual passion |
Dhaliwal; Singh; Bhatia (2006DHALIWAL, U.; SINGH, N.; BHATIA, A. Awareness of authorship criteria and conflict: survey in a medical institution in India. Medscape General Medicine, v. 8, n. 4, p. 52, 2006.) |
| Participants: members of the University College of Medical Sciences |
| Evaluation: ability to correctly identify criteria for authorship, intuitive understanding of authorship, well-defined criteria, willful disregard of criteria, misappropriation of authorship, severe emotional stress, academic fatigue, inappropriate academic practices, inappropriate behavior, poor awareness of criteria for authorship |
| Topic: Gift authorship, Guest authorship, Ghost authorship |
Berquist (2009BERQUIST, T. H. Authorship: Did I really contribute? American Journal of Roentgeneology, American Roentgen Ray Society, v. 193, n. 4, p. 915-916, 2009. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3533
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3533...
) |
| Participants: authors, contributing authors, acknowledged contributors |
| Evaluation: substantive contributions, desire for credit and academic promotion, responsibility for content |
| Topic: Gift authorship |
Mitcheson; Collings; Siebers (2011MITCHESON, H.; COLLINGS, S.; SIEBERS, R. W. Authorship issues at a New Zealand academic institution. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Shiraz, v. 2, n. 3, p. 166-171, 2011.) |
| Participants: junior lecturer, professor |
| Evaluation: misappropriation of authorship, degree of awareness of authorship criteria for peer-reviewed publications, academic competition, co-author inappropriately included |
| NURSING |
Topic: inclusion, order in multiauthored publications |
Erlen et al. (1997ERLEN, J. A.; SIMINOFF, L. A.; SEREIKA, S. M.; SUTTON, L. B. Multiple authorship: issues and recommendations. Journal of Professional Nursing, Elsevier, v. 13, n. 4, p. 262-270, 1997. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80097-X
https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80...
) |
| Participants: principal investigator, co-principal investigator, team members, nurses, statistician |
| Evaluation: “honorary” credit, rewards of writing in collaboration (improved quality of writing, more available resources for research, increased productivity by team members), lack of adequate guidelines, pressure to publish, integrity, responsibility, accountability, recognition, fairness in publications, lack of agreement on assignment of publication credits, assigning authorship based on status or position |
| Topic: conflict of interest, disclosure concerns, protection of subjects, copyright, desire for authorship status |
Carlson; Ross (2010CARLSON, K.; ROSS, J. Publication ethics: conflicts, copyright, permission, and authorship. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, Elsevier, v. 25, n. 4, p. 263-271, 2010. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2010.05.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2010.05....
) |
| Participants: authors, editors, reviewers, publishers |
| Evaluation: intellectual property, promotion, to secure funding or grants, ego, status, tenure ambitions |
| PSYCHOLOGY |
Topic: Gift authorship (gifts of credit) |
Goodyear; Crego; Johnston (1992GOODYEAR, R. K.; CREGO, C. A.; JOHNSTON, M. W. Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: a study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, American Psychological Association, v. 23, n. 3, p. 203-210, 1992. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.203
https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.2...
) |
| Participants: faculty in doctoral programs (experienced researchers), professional psychologists, students |
| Evaluation: incompetent supervision, inadequate supervision (leave students for themselves), supervision abandonment, intrusion of the supervisor’s values, abusive and exploitive supervision, mutual attraction faculty x student |
