INTRODUCTION: Electrodiagnostic tests such as nervous conduction studies are mainly aimed at the general public, not at athletes. Therefore, information about motor nervous conduction velocity (MNCV) is scarce for trained subjects, especially when different sports are compared. OBJECTIVE: to measure the MNCV of the median and common fibular nerves in three groups of sport modalities. Methods: A group of middle distance runners (M RG, n=6), a group of sprinter runners (S RG, n=4) and a group of handball players (H G, n=5) were analyzed and compared to a control group (C G, n=9). Each volunteer was submitted to a single examination where data necessary to measure MNCV from the lower limbs of M RG and of S RG; upper limbs of H G and both upper and lower limbs of C G were collected. Data analysis presented normal distribution and homogeneous variances in all cases; therefore, a Student's t test for independent samples was used to compare means of MNCV of the athlete groups and the C G, as well as in the mean comparison of S RG and M RG (intergroup comparison). The paired Student's t test was used to compare MNCV means of the dominant limb (DL) and non-dominant limb (NDL) (intragroup comparison). RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the comparison between S RG and CG and between M RG and CG, but only in the DL comparison in the last case. On the other hand, in the intragroup comparison, there was significant difference only in the comparison between D L and N DL of the H G. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that MNCV benefits from physical exercise, especially in those sports where lower limbs are predominantly used. It also suggests that greater use of one upper limb over the other could lead to significant differences in MNCV values of D L and N DL.
sports; neural conduction; motor evoked potential; motor neurons
