Characterization of subclinical ectasia with integrated corneal tomography and biomechanics assessments

ABSTRACT

The article aims to prospectively describe different cases of highly asymmetric ectasia (very asymmetric ectasia, VAE) to differentiate subclinical or "frustrated" forms of keratoconus (forme fruste keratoconus - FFKC) from cases of unilateral ectatic disease. Case 1 is a 39-year-old patient with unilateral ectasia treated with an intrastromal ring implant. The contralateral eye was normal due to multimodal propaedeutics, stable for more than 3 years, with a TBI of 0.02. The patient admitted to having intensely scratched only his right eye in his youth. In Case 2, a 15-year-old patient with clinical ectasia in the right eye, had a left eye with normal topography and tomographic and biomechanical changes characterizing FFKC. Case 3 is the mother of the case 2 patient, aged 46, who presented with presbyopia, without any relevant ophthalmological history. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 in each eye, Placido topography with slight lower curving, but without definitive signs of ectasia. The biomechanical and tomographic evaluation revealed signs of keratoconus in both eyes. These three cases are in accordance with the definition of the global consensus: keratoconus is a bilateral disease, but ectasia can occur because of strictly mechanical unilateral (in any eye). The relevance of multimodal refractive imaging is highlighted, with a focus on integrating biomechanical and tomographic assessments with Scheimpflug images.

Keywords:
Ectasia; Dilatation, pathologic; keratoconus/diagnosis; Corneal Topography; Tomography; Biomechanics