Contaminantes emergentes em rios de abastecimento e sua relação com macroinvertebrados bentônicos

Authors contributions

Steffany Katherine Baudisch: Analysis of environmental parameters and emerging contaminants; identification of benthic macrofauna; statistical analysis; main text.

Franciane de Almeida Brehm Goulart: Analysis of environmental parameters and emerging contaminants.

Jhonatas Antonelli: Analysis of environmental parameters and emerging contaminants.

Julio César Azevedo: Master project supervisor analysis of emerging contaminants; text revision.

Kalina Manabe Brauko: Master project supervisor, identification of benthic macrofauna; revision of the text and translation.

Editor-in-Chief: Adilson Pinheiro

Associated Editor: Ibraim Fantin da Cruz

	Family	Subfamily	Genus	Species	Density (individuals.m^-2)
Hirudinea	Glossiphoniidae		Helobdella	sp1	16 166.7
				sp2	2 833.3
				sp3	1 833.3
				sp4	1 388.9
				sp5	5 500.0
				sp6	1 500.0
				Helobdella lineata	1 777.8
				spx	222.2
				spy	666.7
Oligochaeta	Naididae	Tubificinae		sp1	5 888.9
				sp2	3 166.7
				sp3	611.1
			Spirosperma		222.2
		Naidinae	Dero		388.9
			Dero (Dero)		333.3
			Dero (Aulophorus)		55.6
			Nais		3 111.1
			Pristina		555.6
			Paranais		166.7
				sp	166.7
				sp	500.0
	Narapidae		Narapa	Narapabonettoi	111.1

	Family	Subfamily	Genus	Species	Density (individuals.m^-2)
Diptera	Chironomidae	Chironominae	Chironomus		2 444.4
			Denopelopia		111.1
			Tanytarsus		500.0
			Goeldichironomus		111.1
			Caladomyia		1 944.4
			Polypedilum		2 000.0
			Fissimentum		222.2
			Riethia		55.6
		Tanypodinae	Paramerina		55.6
		Tanypodinae	Ablasbesmia		55.6
		Orthocladiinae			55.6
				sp1	166.7
	Ceratopogonidae				55.6
	Tabanidae				55.6
Hemiptera	Mesovellidae				55.6
	Belostomatidae		Belostoma		55.6
	Belostomatidae			sp	111.1
	Corixidae				55.6
Odonata	Libellulidae		Idiataphe		55.6
Tricoptera	Caenidae				55.6
Tricoptera	Odontoceridae				55.6

Sediment Matrix
Stations	IT1	IT2	IT3	IT4	PQ1	PQ2	CE
Coprostanol	3 451.8 ± 2 056.1	2 347.9 ± 2 394.8	2 544.7 ± 171.6	392.8 ± 254	294.2 ± 131.2	1 227.3 ± 728.5	13 222 ± 20 206.9
Epicoprostanol	6 670.7 ± 6 637.9	3 568.1 ± 2 583.7	14 226.9 ± 10 395.9	263.3 ± 46.1	3 103.4 ± 2 965.7	1 836.9 ± 989.2	14 213.5 ± 23 952.4
Cholesterol	1 734.4 ± 1 194.9	1 865.2 ± 1 266.8	2 595. 2 ± 988.6	284.8 ± 192.3	4 053.3 ± 5 654.5	668.3 ± 313.3	2 031.6 ± 3 310.5
Cholestanone	1 661.1 ± 2 163.5	1 012 ± 1 029.5	3 468.1 ± 1 623.2	9.3 ± 6.1	901.4 ± 1 051.8	437.3 ± 290.5	5 645.1 ± 9 664.5
Stigmasterol	1 070 ± 1 279.9	2 922.8 ± 3 415.1	8 235 ± 7 455.1	98.6 ± 46.6	3 303.7 ± 3 991.4	350.9 ± 196.8	3 073.6 ± 4 667.2
Sitosterol	18 965.3 ± 25 370.9	50 448.7 ± 77 658.9	35 154.6 ± 24 331	292.9 ± 211.5	21 847.8 ± 18 771.9	2 380.7 ± 1 621.2	13 300.9 ± 21 172.1
Cop/Epicop^*	0.79 ± 0.71	0.50 ± 0.29	0.27 ± 0.22	1.48 ± 0.87	0.12 ± 0.05	0.64 ± 0.06	2.85 ± 1.74
Epicop/Cop*	1.96 ± 1.16	2.78 ± 2.17	5.51 ± 3.7	0.82 ± 0.41	9.13 ± 4.79	1.56 ± 0.16	0.55 ± 0.51
Cop/Chol*	3.00 ± 2.34	1.04 ± 0.93	1.08 ± 0.45	2.08 ± 2.12	0.29 ± 0.34	1.93 ± 1.35	8.43 ± 6.69
Cop/(Cop+Chol)*	0.73 ± 0.17	0.66 ± 0.07	0.44 ± 0.12	0.97 ± 0.02	0.34 ± 0.14	0.74 ± 0.01	0.88 ± 0.17
TN (mg g-1)	1.859 ± 2.16	3.119 ± 3.09	4.815 ± 4.19	0.765 ± 0.76	3.214 ± 3.04	1.644 ± 1.58	2.094 ± 1.67
TP (mg g-1)	0.047 ± 0.01	0.053 ± 0.02	0.056 ± 0.01	0.014 ± 0.01	0.038 ± 0.006	0.028 ± 0.02	0.022 ± 0.01
%^#	36.4 ± 18	51.8 ± 28	14.9 ± 3	12.5 ± 8	53.7 ± 11	50.2 ± 5	74.9 ± 20
Diameter (µm)⁺	17.21 ± 7.1	10.46 ± 5.5	33.23 ± 3.9	43.11 ± 21.4	10.02 ± 2.6	9.03 ± 1.9	6.72 ± 2.6
Water Matrix
Stations	IT1	IT2	IT3	IT4	PQ1	PQ2	CE
N- Ammoniacal (mg L^-1)	0.136 ± 0.07	0.524 ± 0.34	0.451 ± 0.29	0.024 ± 0.04	0.001 ± 0.002	0.147 ± 0.04	0.047 ± 0.03
Nitrate (mg L^-1)	0.478 ± 0.57	0.731 ± 0.83	0.607 ± 0.64	2.602 ± 4.24	0.326 ± 0.44	0.392 ± 0.56	0.392 ± 0.50
Orthophosphate (mg L^-1)	0.004 ± 0.004	0.037 ± 0.02	0.042 ± 0.03	0.027 ± 0.02	0.0006 ± 0.001	0.011 ± 0.001	0.014 ± 0.01

^*
Ratio: Cop/Epicop:> 1.5 fecal pollution indicative (Zhang et al.,2008Zhang, C., Wang, Y., & Qi, S. (2008). Identification and significance of sterols in MSW landfill leachate. Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 874, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.08.014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008... ; Bujagić et al., 2016Bujagić, I. M., Grujić, S., Jauković, Z., & Lausević, M. (2016). Sterol ratios as a tool for sewage pollution assessment of river sediments in Serbia. Environmental Pollution, 213, 76-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.036.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.... ); Epicop/Cop: <0.2 indicative of fecal pollution and >0.8 without pollution (Mudge & Seguel, 1999Mudge, S. M., & Seguel, C. G. (1999). Organic contamination of San Vicente Bay, Chile. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38(11), 1011-1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00132-0.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)... ; Frena et al., 2016Frena, M., Bataglion, G. A., Tonietto, A. E., Eberlim, M. N., Alexandre, M. R., & Madureira, L. A. S. (2016). Assessment of anthropogenic contamination with sterol markers in surface sediments of a tropical estuary (Itajaí-Açu, Brazil). The Science of the Total Environment, 544, 432-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.20... ); Coprostanol/Cholesterol: >1.0 indicative of fecal pollution (Takada et al., 1994Takada, H., Farrlngton, J. W., Bothner, M. H., Johnson, C. G., & Tripp, B. W. (1994). Transport of sludge-derived organic pollutants to deep-sea sediments at Deep Water Dump Site 106. Environmental Science & Technology, 28(6), 1062-1072. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00055a015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00055a015... ; Frena et al., 2016Frena, M., Bataglion, G. A., Tonietto, A. E., Eberlim, M. N., Alexandre, M. R., & Madureira, L. A. S. (2016). Assessment of anthropogenic contamination with sterol markers in surface sediments of a tropical estuary (Itajaí-Açu, Brazil). The Science of the Total Environment, 544, 432-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.20... ); Coprostanol/Coprostanol+Cholesterol: >0.7 pollution indicative (Grimalt et al., 1990Grimalt, J., Fernández, P., Bayona, J. M., & Albaigés, J. (1990). Assessment of fecal sterols and ketones as indicators of urban sewage inputs to coastal waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 24(3), 357-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00073a011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00073a011... ; Bujagić et al., 2016Bujagić, I. M., Grujić, S., Jauković, Z., & Lausević, M. (2016). Sterol ratios as a tool for sewage pollution assessment of river sediments in Serbia. Environmental Pollution, 213, 76-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.036.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.... ). In which: Epicop- Epicoprostanol, Cop- Coprostanol, Chol- Cholesterol. # (%) percentage of fine sediments and ⁺ mean grain diameter

[1] E-mail: steffany.bau@gmail.com, fran_brehm90@hotmail.com, jonatas-a@hotmail.com, jcrazevedo.utfpr@gmail.com, kalinabio@gmail.com

Brasil

Brasil

Contaminantes emergentes em rios de abastecimento e sua relação com macroinvertebrados bentônicos

RESUMO