rca
Revista Ciência Agronômica
Rev. Ciênc. Agron.
0045-6888
1806-6690
Universidade Federal do Ceará
RESUMO
O estudo de cultivares de moderada tolerância ao alagamento é primordial para sua utilização na irrigação de pastagens com águas salinas. Objetivou-se avaliar a composição química do capim Panicum maximum cv. BRS Zuri sob o efeito de diferentes lâminas de água e níveis de salinidade. Utilizou-se delineamento em blocos casualizados com parcelas subdivididas com cinco repetições por tratamento. Os tratamentos foram resultantes da combinação de três níveis de salinidade na água (S1 = 0,6; S2 = 1,8; S3 = 3,0 dS m-1) e quatro intensidades de irrigação (I1 = 60; I2 = 80; I3 = 100; I4 = 120% da evapotranspiração). Avaliou-sea composição química do capim Panicum maximum cv. BRS Zuri, cortado aos 28 dias, durante dois ciclos.Houve interação entre os fatores (salinidade x lâmina x ciclo) para os teores de matéria seca (MS). Com o aumento das lâminas de irrigação, houve redução linear nos teores de proteína bruta (PB) nos dois ciclos. O teor de fibra em detergente neutro (FDN) ecelulose (CEL) aumentaram linearmenteem função das lâminas de irrigação, já os teores de lignina (LIG) reduziram linearmente com as lâminas de irrigação. Concluiu-se que os níveis elevados de salinidade causam reduções nos teores de matéria seca, em resposta ao aumentona disponibilidade hídrica e no prolongamento dos ciclos da cultivar. A redução dos níveis salinos sob baixa disponibilidade hídrica proporciona maiores teores de PB. A salinidade afeta negativamente os teores de FDN, FDA, HEM, CEL e LIG com o aumento das lâminas de irrigação.
INTRODUCTION
The use of pasture as the main source of feed for cattle bred in tropical regions around the world is due to the low cost of production, and is the most economical and practical way of feeding the herd, serving as the basis for cattle farming worldwide (ROJAS-DOWNING; HARRIGAN; NEJADHASHEMI, 2017). The Brazilian semi-arid region includes various microclimates, mainly due to the difference in precipitation that exists between the states. In semi-arid regions, pasture production is most often linked to irrigation systems or water sources that help to reduce losses in production due to drought. However, most of the water sources used for this purpose originate in rivers, dams, and even artesian wells, and have a moderate salt concentration. Compared to other crops, a forage grass cultivar that is tolerant to salinity has the adaptive capacity to withstand conditions unfavourable to plant development. As such, their high efficiency in absorbing water in saline environments stimulates their photosynthetic capacity to accumulate a larger amount of dry matter, an important characteristic of tolerant cultivars (SCHOSSLER et al., 2012).
Among forage grasses, the species, Panicum maximum, stands out for having productive cultivars of excellent quality, adapted to the different regions and continents of the planet. In February 2014, Embrapa Gado de Corte launched the BRS Zuri cultivar, selected for its productivity, vigour, carrying capacity and animal performance, as well as its moderate tolerance to flooding (SILVEIRA; WANDER, 2015). However, there is little information in the literature about this new cultivar, or data on its use in areas that have water sources with a particular salt concentration.
Within this context, the present work was carried out to evaluate the chemical composition of the forage grass, Panicum maximum ‘BRS Zuri’, under the effect of different levels of salinity and irrigation depths.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, in the Agrometeorology Sector of the Department of Agricultural Engineering at the Federal University of Ceará/UFC, in Fortaleza, Ceará, from March to August 2015. The facility is located at 3°44’44.8” S and 38°34’56.1” W, at an altitude of 30 metres. According to the Köppen classification (1948), the climate is type Aw’ (tropical rainy).
The experimental design was of randomised blocks in an arrangement of split plots, with five replications per treatment. Three levels of water salinity (S1 = 0.6, S2 = 1.8 and S3 = 3.0 dSm-1) and four irrigation depths (I1 = 60%, I2 = 80%, I3 = 100% and I4 = 120%, based on the evapotranspiration measured in the reference treatment, 0.5 dS m-1 x 100%), were evaluated, where the levels of salinity corresponded to the main plots and the irrigation depth to the subplots. The grass used was Panicum maximum ‘BRS Zuri’.
The soil was a Red-Yellow Argisol, classified as a sandy loam, taken from a homogeneous area at the Federal University of Ceará. A composite soil sample was collected at a depth of 0.20m for characterisation of its physical-chemical attributes (Table 1).
Table 1
Physical and chemical characteristics of the soil collected at a depth of 0.20 m
P
K+
Na+
Ca2+
Mg2+
Al3+
SB
CECt
PH
MO
--------mg dm-3--------
-------------------cmolc dm-3--------------------
H2O
g kg1
11.64
54.74
20.7
0.96
0.82
0.05
2.01
2.06
4.8
17.9
Coarse Sand
Fine Sand
Silt
Clay
EC
Overall Particle Density
-------------------------g kg-1------------------------------
dS m-1
-------------g cm-3-------------
94
465
298
147
0.59
0.59
1.36
2.66
Phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sodium (Na+), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), aluminium (Al3+), sum of bases (SB), effective cation exchange capacity (CECt), hydrogen potential (pH), organic matter (OM) and electrical conductivity (EC).
Source: Soil Laboratory/UFC
Polyethylene pots with a volume of 11 dm3 and holes drilled in the base were used. Plates were placed under each pot to collect the irrigation water drained through the holes in the base. The pots were placed in the greenhouse at a height of 20 cm from the ground. Each pot was considered one experimental unit and was properly identified with its respective treatment. The distance between each pot was established at 20 cm in the subplots and 50 cm in the plots. The soil was passed through 4 mm sieve and dried, after which a 2-cm layer of gravel was placed on the bottom of each pot, which was then filled with 10 dm3 of soil.
From the results of the soil analysis, fertilisation was carried out as recommended by the soil fertility commission of the state of Minas Gerais (ALVAREZ V.; RIBEIRO, 1999). The pH was corrected, together with the supply of macro- and micronutrients. Dolomitic limestone (380 mg dm-3) was applied 30 days before planting. At planting, phosphate fertiliser was applied using 75 mg dm-3 simple superphosphate, potassium fertiliser using 230 mg dm-3 potassium chloride and nitrogen fertiliser using 400 mg dm-3 urea; the micronutrients were applied using 40 mg dm-3 FTE BR-12. The fertilisers were applied when setting up the plants and during the period of standardisation, the same amount being repeated in each cycle.
Inside the greenhouse, daily measurements were taken by means of a data logger (HOBO U12-012), with the data for temperature (T, ºC) and relative humidity (RH, %) recorded throughout each evaluation cycle. (Table 2).
Table 2
Maximum, mean and minimum temperature and relative humidity
Cycle
1
2
Temperature (ºC)
Maximum
37.5
37.5
Minimum
24.2
24.2
Mean
29.0
29.2
Relative humidity (%)
Maximum
90.8
86.0
Minimum
41.9
40.1
Mean
72.0
67.3
Source: data logger, model HOBO U12-012
Approximately 50 seeds per pot were sown at a depth of 1.0 cm. Fifteen days after emergence, the plants were thinned, leaving five plants per pot. Before applying the treatments, the plants were irrigated with well-water (ECa = 1.0 dSm-1), to maintain the soil at field capacity.
Forty-five days after planting, the plants were uniformly cut, and the treatments applied to the experimental units. The grass was evaluated every 28 days in each of the two cycles. The cuts were made with pruning shears at a height of 10 cm from the ground. It is worth noting that one experiment had already been carried out with the same plants using four levels of salinity (S1 = 0.5, S2 = 2.0, S3 = 4.0 and S4 = 6.0 dS m-1) at the same irrigation depths. However, after the first cut, plant mortality was seen when applying salinity level S4 (6.0 dS m-1). The irrigation depth was determined from the evapotranspiration (ET), by means of the difference in the weight of five pots irrigated with water at an ECa of 0.5 dS m-1 before and after each irrigation, and the difference between the weight of the volume of replacement water, considering 60%, 80%, 100% and 120% of the obtained value. On the first day of each cycle, immediately after cutting, the pots were irrigated by hand as per the treatments, using a graduated beaker. A two-day irrigation frequency was adopted; when the pots were drained, the water was collected in containers and the volume measured with a beaker.
The saline solutions for irrigation were prepared weekly in tanks with a capacity of 100 L using well-water, distilled water, sodium chloride (NaCl), calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2.2H2O) and magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2.6H2O) in the ratio 7:2:1. The salt concentration was calculated from the equation: CsmmolcL−1=ECx10, where: Cs = salt concentration; ECa = pre-established electrical conductivity (RHOADES; KANDIAH; MASHALI, 2000).
The chemical composition of the forage was analysed at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Department of Animal Science at the Federal University of Ceará. The forage was harvested on one specific day at the end of each cycle. A representative sample from each plot was placed in paper bags and identified, dried in a forced ventilation oven at temperatures of from 55 to 60ºC for 48 hours (within the usual drying period of from 24h to 72h). After drying, the samples were ground in a Willey-type mill using a 1 mm sieve, then placed in an oven at 105ºC for 24 hours for later chemical analysis.
The dry matter content (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), mineral residue (MR), hemicellulose (HEM) and cellulose (CEL), were analysed as per the methodology described by Silva and Queiroz (2002). To determine the fibre content, neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF), the method proposed by Van Soest, Robertson and Lewis (1991) and reported by Silva and Queiroz (2002) was used. The Klason method (VAN SOEST, 1994) was used to determine the lignin content. The mathematical model adopted for the arrangement of subdivided plots in the randomised block design used in the present work was:
Y
ijkl
=
μ
+
α
i
+
β
j
+
γ
k
+
α
β
ij
+
α
γ
ik
+
β
γ
jk
+
α
β
γ
ijk
+
ε
ijkl
where: yijkl = observation of the i-th level of salinity, the j-th irrigation depth, and the k-th cycle in the l-th repetition; µ = overall mean value; αi = effect due to the the i-th level of salinity; βj = effect due to the j-th irrigation depth; γk= effect of the k-th cycle; (αβ)j = effect of the double interaction (salinity and irrigation); (αγ)i = effect of the double interaction (salinity and cycle); (βγ)j = effect of the double interaction (irrigation and cycle); (αβγ)k= effect of the triple interaction (salinity, irrigation and cycle); εijkl = mean error associated with the interaction (salinity, irrigation and cycle).
The data were submitted to analysis of variance, the mean-value comparison test, multiple regression models and descriptive analysis. The interaction between factors was tested at 5% probability by F-test. The quantitative factors were studied using multiple-regression models; the qualitative factors were compared by Tukey’s test at 5% probability. The choice of models was based on the significance of the coefficients up to 10% probability and on the coefficient of determination. The Statistical and Genetic Analysis software (SAEG, 2007) was used as an aid in analysing the data.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
There was an interaction between the factors (salinity x irrigation depth x cycle) for dry matter content (DM). The second cycle was superior to the first for the irrigation depth of 60% ET at the salinity levels of 1.8 and 3.0 dS m-1, and for the irrigation depths of 80% and 100% ET at the salinity level of 3.0 dS m-1 (Table 3).
Table 3
Dry matter (DM) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dS m-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Dry matter (DM, g kg-1)
0.6
1
199.85Y
199.21
209.64
211.94
205.16
DM
=
1840
.
151
+
0
.
233425
*
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
24
2
200.07M
204.40
207.27L
248.90
215.16
DM
=
325
.
162
−
3
.
45027
Δ
LAM
+
0
.
0233165
Δ
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
50
Mean
199.96
201.80
208.45
230.42
-
1.8
1
214.20BX
219.01
220.43
252.12
226.44
DM
=
174
.
610
+
0
.
575886
*
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
19
2
228.01AL
222.82
229.96K
231.23
228.01
DM
=
228
.
57
g
kg
−
1
Mean
221.10
220.91
225.19
241.67
-
3.0
1
188.30BY
188.19B
209.95B
224.01
202.61
DM
=
144
.
611
+
0
.
64445
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
61
2
245.29AK
255.23A
236.22AK
233.46
242.55
DM
=
267
.
090
−
0
.
272645
*
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
22
Mean
216.79
221.71
223.08
228.73
-
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
For the irrigation depth of 60% ET during the first cycle, the greatest DM content was seen at the salinity level of 1.8 dS m-1 compared to the other levels. For the irrigation depth of 100% ET during the second cycle, the greatest DM content was seen at the salinity levels of 1.8 and 3.0 dS m-1 in relation to the level of 0.6 dS m-1. The DM content increased linearly with the irrigation depth during the first cycle at all levels of salinity, with increases of 0.23, 0.57 and 0.64 g kg-1 DM for each 1% irrigation depth above 60% ET.
Consolmagno Neto, Monteiro and Dechen (2007), evaluating the productivity characteristics of Tanzania grass, found a greater DM content during cycle 2 in relation to cycle 1, similar to the results of this study. This occurred in response to the plants producing a higher amount of energy during the first evaluation cycle in order to promote root growth and establishment, whereas during the second cycle, the grasses directed their energy to shoot growth.
There was an interaction between the factors (salinity x irrigation depth x cycle) for crude protein (CP) content (Table 4).
Table 4
Crude protein (CP) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dS m-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Crude protein (CP, g kg-1)
0,6
1
154.31AX
112.04X
91.02X
37.98B
98.84
CP
=
265
.
344
−
1
.
85010
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
96
2
140.08BL
118.64K
90.83L
69.90AK
104.86
CP
=
212
.
121
−
1
.
19176
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
97
Mean
147.20
115.34
90.92
53.94
-
-
1.8
1
97.37BY
83.41Y
57.41BY
38.16
69.09
CP
=
160
.
717
−
1
.
0181
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
96
2
151.17AK
87.86L
74.56AM
35.82L
87.35
CP
=
249
.
062
−
1
.
79677
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
92
Mean
124.27
85.63
65.99
36.99
-
-
3.0
1
72.62BZ
109.88BX
64.82BY
39.25A
71.64
CP
=
−
161
.
520
+
6
.
3435
***
LAM
−
0
.
039274
***
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
76
2
156.23AK
118.48AK
109.05AK
20.84BM
101.15
CP
=
288
.
169
−
20
.
78
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
87
Mean
114.42
114.18
86.94
30.04
-
-
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
At the irrigation depth of 60% ET, the CP content decreased with the increasing levels of salinity during the first cycle, while during the second cycle, the CP content was greater at the salinity levels of 1.8 and 3.0 dS m-1. At the irrigation depth of 120% ET, the CP content decreased with the increase in salinity during the second cycle. As the irrigation depth increased, there was a linear reduction in CP content during both cycles and for each level of salinity, except during the first cycle at the salinity level of 3.0 dS m-1, which showed a quadratic response, with a maximum value of 94.63 g kg-1 DM for the irrigation depth of 80.76% ET.
A reduction in CP content was also found by Vale and Azevedo (2013) when evaluating the productivity and quality of elephant grass and sorghum irrigated with desalinated water, showing that in both crops, there was a reduction in CP content as the salinity of the irrigation water increased, with a decrease in the nutritional value of the grass as the age increased. Rodrigues et al. (2010) also saw a reduction in CP content when evaluating the effect of different levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on the CP content of the forage grass Panicum maximum Jacq. ‘Tanzania’, so that an increase in the level of irrigation gave a linear decrease in the CP content of the forage, with similar results being seen in the present work. This is related to high growth rates under the irrigation conditions, resulting in dilution of the levels of nitrogen produced by the cultivar.
Silva et al. (2014) evaluated the use of saline water in maize and sorghum as an alternative for the irrigation and production of forage in the semi-arid region, and found that the CP content was not affected by the salinity of the irrigation water; however, they obtained a mean CP content of 146.2 g kg-1 for the maize and 138.2 g kg-1 for the sorghum, higher values than those found in this work. The authors noted that the plants were also grown in a Red-Yellow Argisol, in which the higher values are due to the greater facility this type of soil shows for leaching, resulting in a reduction of salts accumulated in the roots.
There was an interaction between the factors under analysis (salinity x irrigation depth x cycle) for the levels of ether extract (EE). A smaller EE content was seen during the second cycle compared to the first cycle for the salinity of 1.8 dS m-1 at irrigation depths of 80% and 120% ET, and for the salinity of 3.0 dS m-1 at the irrigation depth of 60% ET (Table 5).
Table 5
Levels of ether extract (EE) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Ether extract (EE, g kg-1)
0.6
1
29.98X
26.10
21.82
20.90
24.70
EE
=
38
.
8868
−
0
.
157647
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
63
2
25.24
22.32
20.64
23.18
22.85
EE
=
52
.
3511
−
0
.
654327
*
LAM
+
0
.
0034690
*
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
29
Mean
27.61
24.21
21.23
22.04
-
--
1.8
1
20.98Y
22.68A
21.42
24.57A
22.41
EE
=
22
.
41
2
24.96
16.54B
18.28
18.51B
19.57
EE
=
27
.
5006
−
0
.
0880965
*
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
21
Mean
22.97
19.61
19.85
21.54
-
--
3.0
1
28.10AX
25.36
21.27
19.51
23.56
EE
=
36
.
9922
−
0
.
149252
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
68
2
22.57B
22.66
21.62
21.65
22.13
EE
=
22
.
13
Mean
25.33
24.01
21.44
20.58
-
--
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
For the irrigation depth of 60% ET during the first cycle, the EE content was greater at salinity levels of 0.6 and 3.0 dS m-1 compared to the level of 1.8 dS m-1. The EE content reduced linearly with irrigation depth at the salinity level of 0.6 dS m-1 during both cycles, in the second cycle, at the salinity level of 1.8 dS m-1 and in the first cycle, at the salinity level of 3.0 dS m-1, with a reduction of 0.16, 0.65, 0.09 and 0.15 g kg-1 DM respectively.
Authors such as Al-Soqeer and Al-Ghumaiz (2012), evaluating the productivity and quality of perennial forage grasses under different levels of irrigation and cutting period, found an increase in EE content as the irrigation interval increased, however, for the second cut, they found a reduction in EE value, a fact also seen in this study.
There was an interaction between the factors under analysis (salinity levels x irrigation depth x cycle) for the levels of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) (Table 6).
Table 6
Levels of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Neutral detergente fibre (NDF, g kg-1)
0.6
1
632.43
635.31
657.47
680.33
651.39
NDF
=
576
.
76
+
0
.
829176
**
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
37
2
585.02
603.52K
619.98
622.22
607.68
NDF
=
550
.
056
+
0
.
640317
**
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
39
Média
608.72
619.41
638.57
651.27
-
--
1.8
1
644.14
634.26
644.55
684.00
651.74
NDF
=
593
.
301
+
0
.
649274
Δ
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
16
2
566.92
628.87K
632.03
614.65
610.62
NDF
=
544
.
772
+
0
.
731644
Δ
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
13
Média
605.53
631.56
638.29
649.32
-
-
3.0
1
650.89A
657.89A
662.66A
667.45
659.72
NDF
=
659
.
72
2
531.89B
549.93BL
604.31B
656.70
585.71
NDF
=
392
.
729
+
2
.
14420
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
75
Média
591.39
603.91
633.48
662.07
-
--
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
At a salinity level of 3.0 dS m-1, there was a reduction in the NDF content for the irrigation depths of 60, 80 and 100% ET during the second cycle compared to the first. The NDF content increased linearly with irrigation depth during both cycles at the salinity levels of 0.6 and 1.8 dS m-1, and during the second cycle at the salinity level of 3.0 dS m-1, with an increase of 0.83, 0.64, 0.65, 0.73 and 2.14 g kg-1 DM respectively for each 1% irrigation depth above 60% ET.
According to Daur (2016), who evaluated the chemical composition of blue panicum grass (Panicum antidotale Retz.) at different growth stages and for changes in the level of humic acid under saline conditions, found that the NDF content of the grass was better when analysed before flowering, obtaining a content of from 540.0 to 588.1 g kg-1, compared to the levels analysed after flowering, which reached levels of from 588.0 to 722.4 g kg-1 under saline conditions.
There was no interaction between the factors (salinity x irrigation depth x cycle) for acid detergent fibre (ADF) (Table 7).
Table 7
Levels of acid detergent fibre (FDA) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Acid detergente fibre (ADF, g kg-1)
0.6
1
388.17AX
425.22AX
445.44AX
444.71AX
425.88
2
219.59B
249.13B
263.86B
320.27B
263.21
Mean
303.88
337.17
354.65
382.49
-
1.8
1
316.82AX
373.35AY
406.88AY
351.22Y
362.07
2
208.34B
289.72B
289.15B
329.85
279.26
Mean
262.58
331.53
348.01
681.07
-
3.0
1
231.03Y
243.39Z
270.35Z
278.65Y
255.85
2
235.82
260.64
281.65
291.40
267.38
Mean
233.42
252.01
276.00
285.02
-
Overall mean
266.63
306.90
326.22
449.53
-
ADF
=
206
.
580
+
1
.
13737
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
68
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
However, there was interaction of cycle x salinity, with the greatest FDA content seen during the first cycle at the salinity level of 0.6 dS m-1 and the lowest FDA content at the salinity level of 3.0 dS m-1. Mochel Filho et al. (2016) studied the productivity and chemical composition of Panicum maximum ‘Mombasa’ under irrigation and nitrogen fertilisation and found that the ADF content varies with the age and stress of the plant as a function of such parameters as soil moisture and precipitation.
A linear increase in ADF content was seen for irrigation depth, with an increase of 1,134 g kg-1 DM for each 1% irrigation depth above 60% ET.
There was an interaction between the factors under analysis (salinity levels x irrigation depth x cycle) for the levels of hemicellulose (HEM). During the first cycle it was found that the highest HEM content occurred in response to a salinity of 3.0 dS m-1 at the irrigation depth of 60% ET. Whereas, in the second cycle, an increase in HEM content was seen at all irrigation depths for a saline concentration of 0.6 dS m-1, and at 80% and 100% ET, when submitted to a saline concentration of 1.8 dS m-1 (Table 8).
Table 8
Levels of hemicellulose (HEM) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Hemicellulose (HEM, g kg-1)
0.6
1
244.27BX
210.09BY
212.02BY
235.62B
225.50
HEM
=
510
.
729
−
6
.
61955
*
LAM
+
3
.
61084
*
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
26
2
365.43AK
354.39A
356.12A
301.95A
344.47
HEM
=
429
.
398
−
0
.
943621
**
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
48
Mean
304.85
282.24
568.14
268.78
-
-
1.8
1
327.32Y
260.91BY
237.67BY
332.77
289.67
HEM
=
1059
.
96
−
18
.
2050
*
LAM
+
0
.
100948
*
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
22
2
358.58L
339.16A
342.88A
284.80
331.36
HEM
=
429
.
281
−
1
.
08806
*
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
28
Mean
342.95
300.03
290.27
308.78
-
-
3.0
1
419.86AY
414.50AX
392.30AX
388.80
403.87
HEM
=
455
.
785
−
0
.
576858
Δ
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
15
2
296.06BL
289.29B
322.66B
365.31
318.33
HEM
=
209
.
828
+
1
.
20558
*
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
28
Mean
357.96
351.89
357.48
377.05
-
-
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
Authors, such as Makarana et al. (2017), evaluated growth, yield and grain quality in genotypes of millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) affected by the salinity of the irrigation water in the northwest of India, and found that the hemicellulose content was affected by the different levels of salinity of the irrigation water, the content increasing with the increase in salinity, as was seen in the present study. However, the application of a salinity of 3.0 dS m-1 caused a reduction in HEM content during the second cycle compared to the first cycle, at irrigation depths of 60, 80 and 100% ET. It was found that the HEM content decreased linearly with irrigation depth during the second cycle at the salinity levels of 0.6 and 1.8 dS m-1, with a reduction of 0.94 and 1.09 g kg-1 in DM.
There was an interaction between the factors (salinity x irrigation depth x cycle) for cellulose content (CEL). The first cycle was superior to the second cycle at all irrigation depths and levels of salinity (Table 9).
Table 9
Cellulose (CEL) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Cellulose (CEL, g kg-1)
0.6
1
374.00AX
432.13AX
379.72A
361.49X
386.83
CEL
=
64
.
5753
+
8
.
14125
**
LAM
−
0
.
0477271
**
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
56
2
162.51BL
170.84BL
219.60B
333.28K
221.56
CEL
=
−
30
.
9210
+
2
.
80531
**
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
38
Mean
268.25
301.48
299.66
347.38
-
-
1.8
1
373.63AX
405.64AX
349.00A
381.07AX
377.34
CEL
=
377
.
34
2
197.52BK
232.23BK
261.21B
119.68BL
202.66
CEL
=
294
.
698
−
1
.
02266
Δ
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
17
Mean
285.57
318.93
305.10
250.37
-
-
3.0
1
162.68AY
196.31AY
237.53A
256.83AY
213.34
CEL
=
67
.
6798
+
1
.
61842
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
85
2
35.21BM
48.21BM
57.27B
73.29BL
53.50
CEL
=
−
1
.
98290
+
0
.
616438
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
82
Mean
98.94
122.26
147.40
165.06
-
-
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
The CEL content was similar at the salinity levels of 0.6 and 1.8 dS m-1 for the irrigation depths of 60, 80 and 120% ET. On the other hand, a reduction in CEL content was seen at the salinity of 3.0 dS m-1. A quadratic response to irrigation depth for the CEL content was seen during the first cycle at the salinity of 0.6 dS m-1, with a maximum value of 411.76 g kg-1 DM at 85.29% ET. A linear increase in CEL content was seen as a function of irrigation depth at the salinity levels of 1.8 and 3.0 dS m-1 during the second cycle, and at the salinity level of 3.0 dS m-1 during the first cycle.
Campi et al. (2016) evaluated the energy in the biomass of Sorghum irrigated with recovered wastewater and found a Sorghum cellulose content of 325.0 g kg-1. The results showed a higher cellulose content compared to those reported by Zhao et al. (2009), but lower than the initial levels seen in this study.
There was interaction between the factors (salinity x irrigation depth x cycle) for the lignin (LIG) content. The first cycle was superior to the second cycle for the irrigation depths of 60% and 120% ET and at the salinity level of 0.6 dS m-1. At the salinity level of 1.8 dS m-1, an increase was seen for the irrigation depth of 60% ET only (Table 10).
Table 10
Lignin (LIG) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Lignin (LIG, g kg-1)
0.6
1
89.67AY
104.01X
136.56
153.90AX
121.03
LIG
=
19
.
6777
+
1
.
12618
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
85
2
75.70BL
124.99L
116.32
79.74BL
99.19
LIG
=
−
310
.
323
+
9
.
67943
Δ
LAM
−
0
.
0536789
Δ
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
16
Mean
82.68
114.50
126.44
116.82
-
1.8
1
108.63AX
135.50X
140.24
122.05BY
126.60
LIG
=
−
107
.
684
+
5
.
29422
**
LAM
−
0
.
0281617
**
LAM
2
;
R
2
=
0
.
41
2
43.59BM
121.70L
139.94
249.37AK
138.65
LIG
=
−
147
.
349
+
3
.
17779
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
91
Mean
76.11
128.60
140.09
185.71
-
3.0
1
105.17BX
82.29BY
66.61B
69.76Z
80.96
LIG
=
135
.
809
−
0
.
609473
***
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
68
2
299.48AK
274.01AK
213.61A
54.44M
192.89
LIG
=
456
.
365
−
2
.
92755
**
LAM
;
R
2
=
0
.
42
Mean
202.32
178.15
140.11
62.10
-
-
A and B: compare the mean values between cycles 1 and 2, within each irrigation depth, for each level of salinity; X, Y and Z: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 1; K, L and M: compare the mean values between levels of salinity at each irrigation depth in cycle 2; Mean values followed by the same letter in a column do not differ by Tukey's test (P<0.05). *** - significant at 0.1%; ** - significant at 1%; * - significant at 5% and Δ- significant at 10% by F-test
During the second cycle, an increase in LIG content was seen at the irrigation depth of 120% ET for the salinity of 1.8 dS m-1, and at an irrigation depth of 60% and 80% ET for the salinity of 3.0 dS m-1. During the first cycle, it was found that the LIG content increased linearly with the irrigation depth at the salinity of 0.6 dS m-1. There was a quadratic response to irrigation depth during the second cycle at the salinity of 0.6 dS m-1. At a salinity of 1.8 dS m-1, the LIG content increased linearly with irrigation depth. On the other hand, with the increase in salinity to 3.0 dS m-1, the LIG content decreased linearly with irrigation depth, showing a reduction of 0.61 and 2.93 g kg-1 DM in the LIG content during the first and second cycle respectively.
Mannet al. (2009) found a strong relationship between lignin levels in a rapid evaluation of lignin content and structure in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) grown under different environmental conditions. Plants grown in the field had greater levels of lignin in the stem and smaller levels in the leaf biomass, while plants cultivated in growth chambers had a lower lignin content in the stem and a higher content in the leaf biomass (560 and 440 g kg-1 respectively). The levels of lignin were greater those found in this study.
CONCLUSIONS
The chemical composition of Panicum maximum ‘BRS Zuri’ is affected by increases in salinity level and irrigation depth, with an increase in the dry matter and fibre content, and a reduction in the levels of crude protein, thereby not preventing its use in animal nutrition due to the changes caused by stress.
1
Parte da Dissertação de Mestrado do primeiro autor apresentada na Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC
REFERENCES
AL-SOQEER, A.; AL-GHUMAIZ, N. S. Studies on forage yield and feeding value for some grass species under different irrigation treatment in AL-Qassim region.Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, v. 5, n. 1, p. 3-16, 2012.
AL-SOQEER
A.
AL-GHUMAIZ
N. S.
Studies on forage yield and feeding value for some grass species under different irrigation treatment in AL-Qassim region
Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
5
1
3
16
2012
ALVAREZ V., V.H.; RIBEIRO, A.C. Calagem. In: RIBEIRO, A.C.; GUIMARÃES, P.T.G.; ALVAREZ V., V.H.(ed.).Recomendação para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais: 5ª aproximação. Viçosa, MG: CFSEMG, 1999. 359p.
ALVAREZ V.
V.H.
RIBEIRO
A.C.
Calagem
RIBEIRO
A.C.
GUIMARÃES
P.T.G.
ALVAREZ V.
V.H.
Recomendação para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais: 5ª aproximação
Viçosa, MG
CFSEMG
1999
359p
CAMPI, P.et al. Energy of biomass sorghum irrigated with reclaimed wastewaters. European Journal of Agronomy, v. 76, p. 176-185, 2016.
CAMPI
P
Energy of biomass sorghum irrigated with reclaimed wastewaters
European Journal of Agronomy
76
176
185
2016
CONSOLMAGNO NETO, D.; MONTEIRO, F.; DECHEN, A. Características produtivas do capim-Tanzânia cultivado com combinações de potássio e de magnésio. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, v. 29, n. 4, p. 459-467, 2007.
CONSOLMAGNO
D.
NETO
MONTEIRO
F.
DECHEN
A.
Características produtivas do capim-Tanzânia cultivado com combinações de potássio e de magnésio
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
29
4
459
467
2007
DAUR, I. Feed value of blue panic (panicum antidotale Retz.) Grass at different growth stages and under varying levels of humic acid in saline conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, v. 21, n.2, p. 210-217, 2016.
DAUR
I.
Feed value of blue panic (panicum antidotale Retz.) Grass at different growth stages and under varying levels of humic acid in saline conditions
Turkish Journal of Field Crops
21
2
210
217
2016
MAKARANA, G. et al. Growth, yield and grain quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) genotypes as influenced by salinity of irrigation water in north western regions of India. International Journalof Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences,v. 6, n. 6, p. 2858-2874, 2017.
MAKARANA
G.
Growth, yield and grain quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) genotypes as influenced by salinity of irrigation water in north western regions of India
International Journalof Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences
6
6
2858
2874
2017
MANN, D. G. J.et al. Rapid assessment of lignin content and structure in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatumL.) grown under different environmental conditions.BioEnergy Research ,v. 2, n. 4, p. 246-256, 2009.
MANN
D. G. J
Rapid assessment of lignin content and structure in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatumL.) grown under different environmental conditions
BioEnergy Research
2
4
246
256
2009
MOCHEL FILHO, W. J. E. et al. Produtividade e composição bromatológica de Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça sob irrigação e adubação azotada.Revista de Ciências Agrárias, v. 39, n. 1, p. 81-88, 2016.
MOCHEL
W. J. E.
FILHO
Produtividade e composição bromatológica de Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça sob irrigação e adubação azotada
Revista de Ciências Agrárias
39
1
81
88
2016
RHOADES, J. D.; KANDIAH, A.; MASHALI, A. M. Uso de águas salinas para produção agrícola. Campina Grande: UFPB,2000.117p. (Estudos da FAO, Irrigação e Drenagem).
RHOADES
J. D.
KANDIAH
A.
MASHALI
A. M.
Uso de águas salinas para produção agrícola
Campina Grande
UFPB
2000
117p
(Estudos da FAO, Irrigação e Drenagem)
RODRIGUES, B. H. N.et al. Determinação do teor de proteína bruta de Panicum maximum cv. Tanzânia, sob diferentes níveis de irrigação e adubação nitrogenada. Pubvet, v. 4, p. 888-892, 2010.
RODRIGUES
B. H. N
Determinação do teor de proteína bruta de Panicum maximum cv. Tanzânia, sob diferentes níveis de irrigação e adubação nitrogenada
Pubvet
4
888
892
2010
ROJAS-DOWNING, M. M.; HARRIGAN, T.; NEJADHASHEMI, A. P. Resource use and economic impacts in the transition from small confinement to pasture-based dairies.Agricultural Systems,v. 153, p. 157-171, 2017.
ROJAS-DOWNING
M. M.
HARRIGAN
T.
NEJADHASHEMI
A. P.
Resource use and economic impacts in the transition from small confinement to pasture-based dairies
Agricultural Systems
153
157
171
2017
SAEG:sistema para análises estatísticas.Versão 9.1.Viçosa, MG: Fundação Arthur Bernardes : UFV, 2007. CD ROM.
SAEG
sistema para análises estatísticas
Versão 9.1
Viçosa, MG
Fundação Arthur Bernardes : UFV
2007
CD ROM
SCHOSSLER, T. R.et al. Salinidade: efeitos na fisiologia e na nutrição mineral de plantas.Enciclopédia Biosfera, v. 8, n. 15, p. 1563-1578, 2012.
SCHOSSLER
T. R
Salinidade: efeitos na fisiologia e na nutrição mineral de plantas
Enciclopédia Biosfera
8
15
1563
1578
2012
SILVA, D. J.; QUEIROZ, A. C. Análises de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. Viçosa, MG: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2002. 235p.
SILVA
D. J.
QUEIROZ
A. C.
Análises de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos
Viçosa, MG
Universidade Federal de Viçosa
2002
235p
SILVA, J. L. A. et al. Uso de águas salinas como alternativa na irrigação e produção de forragem no semiárido nordestino. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, v. 18, p. 66-72, 2014.
SILVA
J. L. A.
Uso de águas salinas como alternativa na irrigação e produção de forragem no semiárido nordestino
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental
18
66
72
2014
SILVEIRA, M. A.; WANDER, A. E. Os mecanismos de coordenação da cadeia produtiva das sementes de gramíneas forrageiras em goiás: um estudo de caso à luz da economia dos custos de transação. Latin American Journal of Business Management, v. 6, n. 2,p. 127-148, 2015.
SILVEIRA
M. A.
WANDER
A. E.
Os mecanismos de coordenação da cadeia produtiva das sementes de gramíneas forrageiras em goiás: um estudo de caso à luz da economia dos custos de transação
Latin American Journal of Business Management
6
2
127
148
2015
VALE, M. B.; AZEVEDO, P. V. Avaliação da produtividade e qualidade do capim elefante e do sorgo irrigados com água do lençol freático e do rejeito do dessalinizador. Holos,v. 3, p. 181-195, 2013.
VALE
M. B.
AZEVEDO
P. V.
Avaliação da produtividade e qualidade do capim elefante e do sorgo irrigados com água do lençol freático e do rejeito do dessalinizador
Holos
3
181
195
2013
VAN SOEST, P. J. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2. ed. New York: Cornell University Press, 1994. 476 p.
VAN SOEST
P. J.
Nutritional ecology of the ruminant
2. ed.
New York
Cornell University Press
1994
476 p
VAN SOEST, P.J.; ROBERTSON, J.B.; LEWIS, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. In: Symposium Carbohydrate Methodology, Metabolism, and Nutritional Implications in Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, v.74, n.10, p.3583-3597, 1991.
VAN SOEST
P.J.
ROBERTSON
J.B.
LEWIS
B.A.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. In: Symposium Carbohydrate Methodology, Metabolism, and Nutritional Implications in Dairy Cattle
Journal of Dairy Science
74
10
3583
3597
1991
ZHAO, Y.L. et al. Biomass yield changes in chemical composition of sweet sorghum cultivars grown for biofuel. Field Crops Research. v. 111, n. 1,p. 55-64.2009.
ZHAO
Y.L.
Biomass yield changes in chemical composition of sweet sorghum cultivars grown for biofuel
Field Crops Research
111
1
55
64
2009
Autoria
Eranildo Brasil da Silva **Author for correspondence
Departamento de Zootecnia/Forragicultura, Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, Brasil, eranildobrasil@gmail.com, msocorro@ufc.brUniversidade Federal do Ceará/UFCBrasilFortaleza, CE, BrasilDepartamento de Zootecnia/Forragicultura, Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, Brasil, eranildobrasil@gmail.com, msocorro@ufc.br
Departamento de Zootecnia/Forragicultura, Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, Brasil, eranildobrasil@gmail.com, msocorro@ufc.brUniversidade Federal do Ceará/UFCBrasilFortaleza, CE, BrasilDepartamento de Zootecnia/Forragicultura, Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, Brasil, eranildobrasil@gmail.com, msocorro@ufc.br
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Paulistana, Paulistana-PI, Brasil, rafael.furtado@ifpi.edu.brInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPIBrasilPaulistana, PI, BrasilInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Paulistana, Paulistana-PI, Brasil, rafael.furtado@ifpi.edu.br
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Valença do Piauí, Valença do Piauí-PI, Brasil, marcos.neves@ifpi.edu.brInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPIBrasilValença do Piauí, PI, BrasilInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Valença do Piauí, Valença do Piauí-PI, Brasil, marcos.neves@ifpi.edu.br
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Maranhão/IFMA, Campus São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, São Raimundo das Mangabeiras-MA, Brasil, marilena.braga@ifma.edu.brInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Maranhão/IFMABrasilSão Raimundo das Mangabeiras, MA, BrasilInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Maranhão/IFMA, Campus São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, São Raimundo das Mangabeiras-MA, Brasil, marilena.braga@ifma.edu.br
Departamento de Zootecnia/Forragicultura, Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, Brasil, eranildobrasil@gmail.com, msocorro@ufc.brUniversidade Federal do Ceará/UFCBrasilFortaleza, CE, BrasilDepartamento de Zootecnia/Forragicultura, Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, Brasil, eranildobrasil@gmail.com, msocorro@ufc.br
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Paulistana, Paulistana-PI, Brasil, rafael.furtado@ifpi.edu.brInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPIBrasilPaulistana, PI, BrasilInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Paulistana, Paulistana-PI, Brasil, rafael.furtado@ifpi.edu.br
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Valença do Piauí, Valença do Piauí-PI, Brasil, marcos.neves@ifpi.edu.brInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPIBrasilValença do Piauí, PI, BrasilInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí/IFPI, Campus Valença do Piauí, Valença do Piauí-PI, Brasil, marcos.neves@ifpi.edu.br
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Maranhão/IFMA, Campus São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, São Raimundo das Mangabeiras-MA, Brasil, marilena.braga@ifma.edu.brInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Maranhão/IFMABrasilSão Raimundo das Mangabeiras, MA, BrasilInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Maranhão/IFMA, Campus São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, São Raimundo das Mangabeiras-MA, Brasil, marilena.braga@ifma.edu.br
table_chartTable 2
Maximum, mean and minimum temperature and relative humidity
Cycle
1
2
Temperature (ºC)
Maximum
37.5
37.5
Minimum
24.2
24.2
Mean
29.0
29.2
Relative humidity (%)
Maximum
90.8
86.0
Minimum
41.9
40.1
Mean
72.0
67.3
table_chartTable 3
Dry matter (DM) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dS m-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Dry matter (DM, g kg-1)
0.6
1
199.85Y
199.21
209.64
211.94
205.16
DM=1840.151+0.233425*LAM;R2=0.24
2
200.07M
204.40
207.27L
248.90
215.16
DM=325.162−3.45027Δ
Mean
199.96
201.80
208.45
230.42
-
1.8
1
214.20BX
219.01
220.43
252.12
226.44
2
228.01AL
222.82
229.96K
231.23
228.01
Mean
221.10
220.91
225.19
241.67
-
3.0
1
188.30BY
188.19B
209.95B
224.01
202.61
2
245.29AK
255.23A
236.22AK
233.46
242.55
Mean
216.79
221.71
223.08
228.73
-
table_chartTable 4
Crude protein (CP) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dS m-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Crude protein (CP, g kg-1)
0,6
1
154.31AX
112.04X
91.02X
37.98B
98.84
2
140.08BL
118.64K
90.83L
69.90AK
104.86
Mean
147.20
115.34
90.92
53.94
-
-
1.8
1
97.37BY
83.41Y
57.41BY
38.16
69.09
2
151.17AK
87.86L
74.56AM
35.82L
87.35
Mean
124.27
85.63
65.99
36.99
-
-
3.0
1
72.62BZ
109.88BX
64.82BY
39.25A
71.64
2
156.23AK
118.48AK
109.05AK
20.84BM
101.15
Mean
114.42
114.18
86.94
30.04
-
-
table_chartTable 5
Levels of ether extract (EE) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Ether extract (EE, g kg-1)
0.6
1
29.98X
26.10
21.82
20.90
24.70
2
25.24
22.32
20.64
23.18
22.85
Mean
27.61
24.21
21.23
22.04
-
--
1.8
1
20.98Y
22.68A
21.42
24.57A
22.41
2
24.96
16.54B
18.28
18.51B
19.57
Mean
22.97
19.61
19.85
21.54
-
--
3.0
1
28.10AX
25.36
21.27
19.51
23.56
2
22.57B
22.66
21.62
21.65
22.13
Mean
25.33
24.01
21.44
20.58
-
--
table_chartTable 6
Levels of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Neutral detergente fibre (NDF, g kg-1)
0.6
1
632.43
635.31
657.47
680.33
651.39
2
585.02
603.52K
619.98
622.22
607.68
Média
608.72
619.41
638.57
651.27
-
--
1.8
1
644.14
634.26
644.55
684.00
651.74
2
566.92
628.87K
632.03
614.65
610.62
Média
605.53
631.56
638.29
649.32
-
-
3.0
1
650.89A
657.89A
662.66A
667.45
659.72
2
531.89B
549.93BL
604.31B
656.70
585.71
Média
591.39
603.91
633.48
662.07
-
--
table_chartTable 7
Levels of acid detergent fibre (FDA) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Acid detergente fibre (ADF, g kg-1)
0.6
1
388.17AX
425.22AX
445.44AX
444.71AX
425.88
2
219.59B
249.13B
263.86B
320.27B
263.21
Mean
303.88
337.17
354.65
382.49
-
1.8
1
316.82AX
373.35AY
406.88AY
351.22Y
362.07
2
208.34B
289.72B
289.15B
329.85
279.26
Mean
262.58
331.53
348.01
681.07
-
3.0
1
231.03Y
243.39Z
270.35Z
278.65Y
255.85
2
235.82
260.64
281.65
291.40
267.38
Mean
233.42
252.01
276.00
285.02
-
Overall mean
266.63
306.90
326.22
449.53
-
table_chartTable 8
Levels of hemicellulose (HEM) in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Hemicellulose (HEM, g kg-1)
0.6
1
244.27BX
210.09BY
212.02BY
235.62B
225.50
2
365.43AK
354.39A
356.12A
301.95A
344.47
Mean
304.85
282.24
568.14
268.78
-
-
1.8
1
327.32Y
260.91BY
237.67BY
332.77
289.67
2
358.58L
339.16A
342.88A
284.80
331.36
Mean
342.95
300.03
290.27
308.78
-
-
3.0
1
419.86AY
414.50AX
392.30AX
388.80
403.87
2
296.06BL
289.29B
322.66B
365.31
318.33
Mean
357.96
351.89
357.48
377.05
-
-
table_chartTable 9
Cellulose (CEL) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Cellulose (CEL, g kg-1)
0.6
1
374.00AX
432.13AX
379.72A
361.49X
386.83
2
162.51BL
170.84BL
219.60B
333.28K
221.56
Mean
268.25
301.48
299.66
347.38
-
-
1.8
1
373.63AX
405.64AX
349.00A
381.07AX
377.34
2
197.52BK
232.23BK
261.21B
119.68BL
202.66
Mean
285.57
318.93
305.10
250.37
-
-
3.0
1
162.68AY
196.31AY
237.53A
256.83AY
213.34
2
35.21BM
48.21BM
57.27B
73.29BL
53.50
Mean
98.94
122.26
147.40
165.06
-
-
table_chartTable 10
Lignin (LIG) content in g kg-1 of Panicum maximum 'BRS Zuri' under different salinity levels and irrigation depths
Salinity (dSm-1)
Cycle
Irrigation depth (%ET)
Mean
Equation
60
80
100
120
(Effect of irrigation depth)
Lignin (LIG, g kg-1)
0.6
1
89.67AY
104.01X
136.56
153.90AX
121.03
2
75.70BL
124.99L
116.32
79.74BL
99.19
Mean
82.68
114.50
126.44
116.82
-
1.8
1
108.63AX
135.50X
140.24
122.05BY
126.60
2
43.59BM
121.70L
139.94
249.37AK
138.65
Mean
76.11
128.60
140.09
185.71
-
3.0
1
105.17BX
82.29BY
66.61B
69.76Z
80.96
2
299.48AK
274.01AK
213.61A
54.44M
192.89
Mean
202.32
178.15
140.11
62.10
-
-
Como citar
Silva, Eranildo Brasil da et al. Composição química do capim BRS Zuri submetido a níveis de salinidade e lâminas de irrigação. Revista Ciência Agronômica [online]. 2020, v. 51, n. 1 [Acessado 17 Abril 2025], e20175997. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20200016>. Epub 16 Mar 2020. ISSN 1806-6690. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20200016.
Universidade Federal do CearáAv. Mister Hull, 2977 - Bloco 487, Campus do Pici, 60356-000 - Fortaleza - CE - Brasil, Tel.: (55 85) 3366-9702 / 3366-9732, Fax: (55 85) 3366-9417 -
Fortaleza -
CE -
Brazil E-mail: ccarev@ufc.br
rss_feed
Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.